Defining the Limits of Acceptable Parenthood: Reproductive Governance in Brazil

References

• Alvarez, B., and D. Marre 2022 Motherhood in Spain: From the “baby boom” to “structural infertility”. Medical Anthropology 41(6–7):718–31. doi:10.1080/01459740.2021.1961246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, A. P., coord. 2011 [Infant learning: An Approach from Neuroscience, Economy, and Cognitive Psychology] Aprendizagem Infantil : Uma Abordagem da Neurociência, Economia e Psicologia Cognitiva. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciências.
   Google Scholar
• Backer, K., K. Chivers, C. Mason, J. Sandall, and A. Easter 2022 Removal at birth and its challenges for midwifery care. European Journal of Midwifery 6(April):1–4. doi:10.18332/ejm/146647.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, R. L., N. H. Goodno, R. F. Cochran, and J. A. Milbrandt, eds. 2015 The Intercountry Adoption Debate: Dialogues Across Disciplines. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., and M. C. Inhorn, eds. 2009 Assisting Reproduction, Testing Genes: Global Encounters with New Biotechnologies. London: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brandão, E.R. and C.S. Cabral 2021 Vidas precárias: tecnologias de governo e modos de gestão da fecundidade de mulheres “vulneráveis”. Horizontes antropológicos 27(61):47–84. doi:10.1590/s0104-71832021000300002.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, L. 2012 Somebody´s Children: The Politics of Transracial and Transnational Adoption. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, L. 2021 Taking Children: History of American Terror. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K. 2018 Born into Care: Newborns in Care Proceedings in England. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. 1999 The Myth of the First Three Years. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardarello, A. 2012 The right to have a family: ‘legal trafficking of children’, adoption and birth control in Brazil. Anthropology and Medicine 19(2):225–40. doi:10.1080/13648470.2012.675047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catie, T. 2023 Caso das mães de Blumenau chega às mãos do ministro de Direitos Humanos [Case of the Blumenau mothers reaches the Minister of Human Rights]. NSC Total. https://www.nsctotal.com.br/noticias/caso-das-maes-de-blumenau-chega-as-maos-do-ministro-de-direitos-humanos, consulted March 1, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• CNJ – Conselho Nacional de Justiça 2022 Destituição do Poder Familiar e Adoção de Crianças: Sumário Executivo [Severance of Family Authority: Executive Summary]. Brasília: CNJ.
   Google Scholar
• Colen, S. 1995 Like a mother to them’: Stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction F. D. Ginsburg and R. Rapp, eds., Pp. 78–102. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, D., K. Murphy, and M. Quartly 2009 Adoption and feminism. Australian Feminist Studies 24(62):395–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz, D., M. Medeiros, and A. Madeiro 2023 National Abortion Survey – Brazil 2021. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 28(6):1601–06. doi:10.1590/1413-81232023286.01892023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumit, J. 2004 Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faircloth, C., and Z. Gürtin 2017 Fertile connections: Thinking across assisted reproductive technologies and parenting culture studies. Sociology 52(5):983–1000. doi:10.1177/0038038517696219.
   Google Scholar
• Felizardo, N. de março 15, 2021 “Esqueça a sua Filha”. Casais ricos do Amapá driblam Lei da Adoção e tiram crianças de famílias pobres com apoio do judiciário [“Forget your daughter”: Rich couples from Amapá sidestep the Adoption Law and remove children from poor families with support from judicial officials]. The Intercept.
   Google Scholar
• Finamori, S. 2018 Who has the right to motherhood? A view on compulsory sheltering of babies in Belo Horizonte - MG (Brazil). Paper presented at the 18th IUAES World Congress, Conference Proceedings 4. Pp.5607–18. Florianópolis: Tribo da Ilha.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C. 2011 The de-kinning of birthmothers – reflections on maternity and being human. Vibrant 8(2):307–39. doi:10.1590/S1809-43412011000200014.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C. 2021 Conceiving parents, consolidating the state: Emphasis and Erasure in the governance of marginal parenthoods in Brazil. PoLar: Political & Legal Anthropology Review 44(2):178–91. doi:10.1111/plar.12444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C. 2022 Knowledge forms and gendered moralities in policies of infant care in Brazil. Families, relationships and societies. Families, Relationships and Societies 1–17. (published online ahead of print 2022). doi:10.1332/204674321X16533933612496, accessed Apr 5, 2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C., and S. Fleischer 2021 Vulnerabilities within and beyond the pandemic: Disability in COVID-19 Brazil. In Viral Loads: Anthropologies of Urgency in the Time of COVID-19 L. Manderson, N. J. Burke, and A. Wahlberg, eds., Pp. 243–59. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, D. A., M. Augustyn, W. G. Knight, T. Pell, and B. Zuckerman 2001 Growth, development, and behavior in early childhood following prenatal cocaine exposure: A systematic review. JAMA 285(12):1613–25. doi:10.1001/jama.285.12.1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesteira, S., I. S. Agoglia, K. A. Monsalve, and C. Villalta 2021 Child appropriations and irregular adoptions: Activism for the “right to identity,” justice, and reparation in Argentina and Chile. Childhood 28(4):585–99. doi:10.1177/09075682211028648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, V., R. Edwards, and N. Horsley 2017 Challenging the Politics of Early Intervention: Who´s ´Saving´ Children and Why. Bristol and Chicago: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, F., and R. Rapp, eds. 1995 Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, J., coord. 2017 Primeira Infância e Maternidade nas Ruas de São Paulo. 1st ed. São Paulo: Lampião Conteúdo e Conhecimento.
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, J. 2015 Entre la pediatría, el psicoanálisis y el derecho: apuntes sobre la recepción, reelaboración y difusión del “maltrato infantil” en Argentina. Revista de Estudios Sociales 53(53):77–89. doi:10.7440/res53.2015.06.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, S. 1996 The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. D. 2009 White Mothers to a Dark Race. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Junge, B., S. T. Mitchell, A. Jarrín, and L. Cantero 2021 Precarious Democracy: Ethnographies of Hope, Despair, and Resistance in Brazil. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, M., S. Beck, and M. Klotz, eds. 2012 Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., J. Bristow, C. Faircloth, and J. Macvarish, eds. 2014 Parenting Culture Studies. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leinaweaver, J., and L. Seligmann 2009 Introduction: Cultural and political economies of adoption in Latin America. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 14(1):1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1935-4940.2009.01036.x.
   Google Scholar
• Macvarish, J., E. Lee, and P. Lowe 2014 The “first three years” movement and the infant brain: A review of critiques. Sociology Compass 8(6):792–804. doi:10.1111/soc4.12183.
   Google Scholar
• Marre, D., and L. Briggs 2009 International Adoption: Global Inequalities and the Circulation of Children. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marre, D., and H. Gaggiotti 2021 Irregular adoptions and infrastructures of memory in Spain: Remnant practices from the franco regime. Childhood 28(4):570–84. doi:10.1177/09075682211061448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinero, A. G., and C. K. Clemente-Martínez 2021 Irregularities in transnational adoptions and child appropriations: Challenges for reparation practices. Childhood 28(4):467–76. doi:10.1177/09075682211066379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M. 2019 Reproductive governance, redux. Medical Anthropology 38(2):113–17. doi:10.1080/01459740.2018.1555829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M., and E. F. S. Roberts 2012 Reproductive governance in Latin America. Anthropology & Medicine 19(2):241–54. doi:10.1080/13648470.2012.675046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento, P. 2020 Desejo de filhos: Uma etnografia sobre reprodução, desigualdade e políticas de saúde [Desire for children: An ethnography on reproduction, inequality, and health policies]. João Pessoa: Editora UFPB.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, J., N. Hofmeister, and S. Lisboa 2021 “Quero poder cuidar do meu filho”: a luta de uma família afastada do bebê na maternidade [“I want to care for my child”: The fight of a family separated from its baby]. 7 de julho, Matinal (Porto Alegre).
   Google Scholar
• Pontes, M., L. S. Braga, and A. Jorge 2022 The dynamics of violence in the compulsory separation of mothers from children in situations of vulnerability. Interface (Botucatu) 26:e210511. doi:10.1590/interface.210511.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes-Kipp, A. C. 2015 New lives for children: Adoption documents and the law in Central Mexico. In An Anthropology of Living and Dying in the Contemporary World C. Han and V. Das, eds. Pp. 100–113. Berkeley e Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. 2002 Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare. New York: Basic Civitas Books.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. 2022 Torn Apart : How the Child Welfare System Destroys Black Families—And How Abolition Can Build a Safer World. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2013 Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L., and R. Solinger 2017 Reproductive Justice: An Introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schweikert, P., G. Molinari, E. T. Fávero, and C. R. Nakamura 2018 Infância e Juventude: A proteção integral de crianças e adolescentes na atualidade: reconexões e práticas garantistas no contexto de retração de direitos [Childhood and Youth: The integral protection of children and adolescents in today´s world: Reconnections and Progressive Practices in a Context of Diminishing Rights] (eds). Cadernos da Defensoria Pública do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo) 3(19): 110–23.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, R. 2010 The Road to Evergreen: Adoption, Attachment Therapy, and the Promise of Family. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Villalta, C., and S. Gesteira 2019 coords La Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño en la Argentina: Trayectorias, Experiencias y Activismo [Convention on the Rights of the Child in Argentina: Trajectories, Experiences, Activisms]. Buenos Aires: UNICEF.
   Google Scholar
• Wichelen, S. 2014 Medicine as moral technology: Somatic economies and the making up of adoptees. Medical Anthropology: Cross-Cultural Studies in Health and Illness 33 van 2: 109–27. doi:10.1080/01459740.2013.776046.
   Google Scholar
• Wichelen, S. 2019 Moving children through private international law: Institutions and the enactment of ethics. Law and Society Review 53 van 3: 671–705. doi:10.1111/lasr.12412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar