“The Best I Could”: Future Orientations for Danish Women with Gestational Diabetes

References

• Adams, V., M. Murphy, and A. E. Clarke 2009 Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity: International Journal of Critical Psychology 28(1):246–265. doi:10.1057/sub.2009.18.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, J. 2012 The great future debate and the struggle for the world. The American Historical Review 117(5):1411–1430. doi:10.1093/ahr/117.5.1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabin, B., and A. A. Baschat 2017 Pregnancy: An Underutilized window of opportunity to improve long-Term maternal and infant health—an appeal for continuous family care and interdisciplinary communication. Frontiers in Pediatrics 5(April):69. doi:10.3389/fped.2017.00069.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloch, M., and M. Parascandola 2014 Tobacco use in pregnancy: A window of opportunity for prevention. The Lancet Global Health 2(9):e489–90. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70294-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browner, C. H., and N. Press 1995 The normalization of prenatal diagnostic screening. In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. D. Ginsburg Faye and Rayna Rapp, eds. Pp. 307–322. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browner, C. H., N. Press, and R. Rapp 1997 The production of authoritative knowledge in American prenatal care. In Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge. 1st edition. E. Davis-Floyd Robbie and F. Sargent Carolyn, eds. Pp. 113–131. Cross-Cultural Perspectives. University of California Press. doi:10.2307/jj.2711580.8.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, R., and D. M. Knight 2019 The Anthropology of the Future. New Departures in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108378277.
   Google Scholar
• The Capital Region of Denmark 2021 Triagering På Fødegangen. VIP Region H. https://vip.regionh.dk/VIP/Admin/GUI.nsf/Desktop.html?open&openlink=https://vip.regionh.dk/VIP/Slutbruger/Portal.nsf/Main.html?open&unid=X1F72D9DF68452645C1258696003ACEF7&dbpath=/VIP/Redaktoer/1301XJ.nsf/&windowwidth=1100&windowheight=600&windowtitle=S%F8g.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., and J. Shim 2011 Medicalization and biomedicalization revisited: Technoscience and transformations of health, illness and American medicine. In Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness, and Healing: A Blueprint for the 21st Century. Bernice A. Pescosolido, Jack K. Martin, Jane D. McLeod, and Anne Rogers, eds. Pp. 173–199. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7261-3_10.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. 1992 Birth as an American Rite of Passage. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003001393.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. 1997 Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft, T. 2013 Potentiality and human temporality: Haunting futures in Vietnamese pregnancy care. Current Anthropology 54(S7):S159–71. doi:10.1086/670389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft, T. 2014 Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, F. D., and R. Rapp 1995 Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, F., and R. Rapp 1991 The politics of reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology 20(1):311–343. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.001523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, R. P., and C. Burton-Jeangros 2013 Tensions around risks in pregnancy: A typology of women’s experiences of surveillance medicine. Social Science & Medicine 93(September):55–63. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedgecoe, A. 2004 The politics of personalised medicine: Pharmacogenetics in the clinic. In Cambridge Studies in Society and the Life Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489136.
   Google Scholar
• Heinsen, L. L. 2018 Moral adherers: Pregnant women undergoing routine prenatal screening in Denmark. In Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century. Ayo Wahlberg and M. Gammeltoft Tine, eds. Pp. 69–95. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58220-7_4.
   Google Scholar
• Heinsen, L. L., A. Wahlberg, and H. Vendel Petersen 2021 Surveillance life and the shaping of “genetically at risk” chronicities in Denmark. Anthropology & Medicine 1–16. doi:10.1080/13648470.2021.1893654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S. 2017 Reordering Life: Knowledge and Control in the Genomics Revolution. Inside Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeyer, K. 2019 Data as promise: Reconfiguring Danish public health through personalized medicine. Social Studies of Science 49(4):531–555. doi:10.1177/0306312719858697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. 1994 Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility and Egyptian Medical Traditions. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivry, T. 2009 Embodying Culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan 1997 Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Robbie E. Davis-Floyd and Carolyn Fishel Sargent, eds. Pp. 55–79. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, M. 2003 Predictive genetic testing and the making of the pre-symptomatic person: Prognostic moralities amongst Huntington’s-affected families. Anthropology & Medicine 10(1):23. doi:10.1080/13648470301269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lakoff, A., and F. Keck 2013 Preface: Sentinel devices. Limn 1(3): https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0xq1t67m.
   Google Scholar
• Lappé, M. D. 2014 Taking care: Anticipation, extraction and the politics of temporality in autism science. BioSocieties 9(3):304–328. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2014.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latimer, J. 2013 The Gene, the Clinic, and the Family: Diagnosing Dysmorphology, Reviving Medical Dominance. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203441459.
   Google Scholar
• Lauenborg, J., T. Hansen, D. Møller Jensen, H. Vestergaard, L. Mølsted-Pedersen, P. Hornnes, H. Locht, et al. 2004 Increasing incidence of diabetes after gestational diabetes: A long-Term follow-up in a Danish population. Diabetes Care 27(5):1194–1199. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.5.1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, L. L. 2003 Motherhood Lost: A Feminist Account of Pregnancy Loss in America. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203948040.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, M. M., and V. Nguyen 2018 An Anthropology of Biomedicine. 2nd edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2012 “Precious cargo”: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health 22(3):329–340. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.657612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E. 1987 The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, H. David, D. M. Jensen, R. C. Jensen, H. B. Kyhl, T. K. Jensen, D. Glintborg, and M. Andersen 2018 Gestational diabetes mellitus: Does one size fit all? A challenge to uniform worldwide diagnostic thresholds. Diabetes Care 41(7):1339–1342. doi:10.2337/dc17-2393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster 2024 ‘Definition of PRISM’. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prism. April 11, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M. 2009 Icons of Life: A Cultural History of Human Embryos. 1st edition. University of California Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ppxx8.
   Google Scholar
• Navne, L. E., and M. N. Svendsen 2018 Careography: Staff experiences of navigating decisions in neonatology in Denmark. Medical Anthropology 37(3):253–266. doi:10.1080/01459740.2017.1313841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nethery, E., M. R. Law, A. Kotaska, P. A. Janssen, and J. A. Hutcheon 2023 The effect of changing screening practices and demographics on the incidence of gestational diabetes in British Columbia, 2005–2019. Canadian Medical Association Journal 195(11):E396–403. doi:10.1503/cmaj.221404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Og Ældreministeriet, Sundheds-, and Danske Regioner 2016 ‘Personlig medicin til gavn for patienterne: klar diagnose, målrettet behandling, styrket forskning : national strategi for personlig medicin 2017–2020’. Sundheds- og Ældreministeriet. https://ngc.dk/media/6568/national-strategi-for-personlig-medicin.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, R. 1999 Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kbdk/detail.action?docID=214508.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, R. 2011 Chasing science: Children’s brains, scientific inquiries, and family labors. Science, Technology, & Human Values 36(5):662–684. doi:10.1177/0162243910392796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, J. 2017 The Postgenomic Condition: Ethics, Justice, and Knowledge After the Genome. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes-Foster, B. M. 2022 “No justice in birth”: Maternal vanishing, VBAC, and reconstitutive practice in central Florida. American Anthropologist 125(1):49–62. doi:10.1111/aman.13796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, B. K. 1982 In Labor: Women and Power in the Birthplace. London: Junction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, B. K. 1986 The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood. WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schwennesen, N., and T. Gammeltoft 2021 Prenatal screening and diagnosis. In The Routledge Handbook of Anthropology and Reproduction. Cecília Tomori and Sallie Han, eds. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003216452.
   Google Scholar
• Schwennesen, N., M. N. Svendsen, and L. Koch 2010 Beyond informed choice: Prenatal risk assessment, decision-making and trust. Clinical Ethics 5(4):207–216. doi:10.1258/ce.2010.010041.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Morris, C. 2015 Diagnostic Controversy: Cultural Perspectives on Competing Knowledge in Healthcare. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Morris, C. M. 2005 Diagnostic controversy: Gestational diabetes and the meaning of risk for pima Indian women. Medical Anthropology 24(2):145–177. doi:10.1080/01459740590933902.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sufrin, C. 2017 Jailcare: Finding the Safety Net for Women Behind Bars. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundhed, D. k. 2022 Gestational Diabetes (GDM) - Lægehåndbogen På Sundhed.Dk. https://www.sundhed.dk/sundhedsfaglig/laegehaandbogen/obstetrik/tilstande-og-sygdomme/risikofaktorer-i-svangerskabet/gestationel-diabetes-gdm/.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, M. N. 2011 Articulating potentiality: Notes on the delineation of the blank figure in human embryonic stem cell research. Cultural Anthropology 26(3):414–437. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01105.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen, M. N., and L. E. Navne 2022 Citizen-Person: The “me” in the “we” in Danish precision medicine. Science, Technology, & Human Values June, 01622439221108535. 48(5):1176–1198. doi:10.1177/01622439221108535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taussig, K., K. Hoeyer, and S. Helmreich 2013 The anthropology of potentiality in biomedicine: An introduction to supplement 7. Current Anthropology 54(S7):S3–14. doi:10.1086/671401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. S. 2008 The Public Life of the Fetal Sonogram: Technology, Consumption, and the Politics of Reproduction. Rutgers University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hjb89.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, J. 1989 The body invaded: Medical surveillance of women as reproducers. Socialist Review 89(3):13–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, G. M., J. Roberts, and F. E. Griffiths 2017 Ultrasound as a technology of reassurance? How pregnant women and health care professionals articulate ultrasound reassurance and its limitations. Sociology of Health & Illness 39(6):893–907. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. 2005 Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Ticktin, M. 2011 Casualties of Care. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and M. Buchbinder 2013 Saving Babies? The Consequences of Newborn Genetic Screening. Fieldwork Encounters and Discoveries. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. 1967 Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. In The Forest of Symbols. Pp. 93–111. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tutton, R. 2014 Genomics and the Reimagining of Personalized Medicine. 1st edition. Farnham: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315584317.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gennep, A. 1960 [1908]. The Rites of Passage. Translated by Monika B. Vizdom and Gabrielle L. Caffee. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. http://archive.org/details/theritesofpassage.
   Google Scholar
• Vigh, H. 2011 Vigilance: On conflict, social invisibility, and negative potentiality. Social Analysis 55(3):93–114. doi:10.3167/sa.2011.550306.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlberg, A. 2018 Good Quality: The Routinization of Sperm Banking in China. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlberg, A., and T. M. Gammeltoft 2017 Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan UK. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kbdk/detail.action?docID=4947292.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, L. 2006 Pregnancy, Risk and Biopolitics: On the Threshold of the Living Subject. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203966716.
   Google Scholar
• Wendland, C. L. 2007 The vanishing mother: Cesarean section and “evidence-based Obstetrics”. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 21(2):218–233. doi:10.1525/maq.2007.21.2.218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. 2013 Projecting potentiality: Understanding maternal serum screening in contemporary China. Current Anthropology 54(S7):S36–44. doi:10.1086/670969.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., and C. Zhang 2016 Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: A global perspective. Current Diabetes Reports 16(1):7. doi:10.1007/s11892-015-0699-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar