Consistent, Holistic, and Objective: Using a Scorecard for Electronic Resource Evaluation and Renewal Decision-Making

References

• Baveye, Philippe C. 2010. “Sticker Shock and Looming Tsunami.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 41 (2):191–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, Ronadin, Stephen Elfstrand, and Renee Hijleh. 2006. “An Evidence-Based Approach for Gaining Faculty Acceptance in a Serials Cancellation Project.” Collection Management 30 (2):59–72. doi:10.1300/J105v30n02_05.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, Amy, and Barbara M. Pope. 2009. “The ‘Big Deal:’ A Survey of How Libraries Are Responding and What the Alternatives Are.” The Serials Librarian 57 (4):380–98. doi:10.1080/03615260903206861.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Hilary M., and Gregory K. Raschke. 2017. “Data Informed and Community Driven: Using Data and Feedback Loops to Manage a Journal Review and Cancellation Project.” Against the Grain 29 (2):12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, Jill, Graham Stone, and Peter McCracken. 2017. “TERMS 2.0” Last modified March 24, 2017. http://6terms.tumblr.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, Todd, and Karen R. Harker. 2015. “Planning for the Budget-ocalypse: The Evolution of a Serials/ER Cancellation Methodology.” The Serials Librarian, 68 (1–4):282–89. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2015.1025657.
   Google Scholar
• Enssle, Halcyon R., and Michelle L. Wilde. 2002. “So You Have to Cancel Journals? Statistics That Help.” Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 26 (3):259–82. doi:10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00254-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foudy, Gerri, and Alesia McManus. 2005. “Using a Decision Grid Process to Build Consensus in Electronic Resources Cancellation Decisions.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 31 (6):533–38. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2005.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, Stephanie. 2017. “Journal Publishers’ Big Deals: Are They Worth It?” Against the Grain 29 (2):22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Garza, Lanette. 2017. “The E-Resources Playbook: A Guide for Establishing Routine Assessment of E-Resources.” Technical Services Quarterly 34 (3):243–56. doi:10.1080/07317131.2017.1321373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohn, Katie, and Charlie Remy. 2017. “Proactive and Prudent: A Report of a Holistic Cyclical Electronic Resources Review Pilot at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.” The Serials Librarian 73 (1):44–52. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2017.1309335.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, Beatriz Betancourt, Martha C. Zimmerman, and Laura A. Hanscom. 2016. “Cutting without Cursing: A Successful Cancellation Project.” The Serials Librarian 71 (2):112–20. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2016.1196635.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, Karen R., Laurel Crawford, and Todd Enoch. 2014. “Keeping it Real: A Comprehensive and Transparent Evaluation of Electronic Resources.” Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. doi:10.5703/1288284315563.
   Google Scholar
• Hollister, Christopher V. 2001. “Price Inflation and Discrimination Extends to Non-STM Disciplines: A Study of Library and Information Service Journals.” Current Studies in Librarianship 25(1-2):49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Killian, David, Debbie Bezanson, and Robin Kinder. 2017. “Divide and Cancel: GW's Approach to Serials Cancellation.” Against the Grain 29 (2):24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, Judith M. 2010. “A Reprise, Or Round Three: Using a Database Management Program as a Decision-Support System for the Cancellation of Serials.” The Serials Librarian 59(3-4):302–12. doi:10.1080/03615261003619086.
   Google Scholar
• Robertshaw, M. Brooke, Michaela Willi Hooper, and Kerri Goergen-Doll. 2017. “Finding the Silver Lining…in the Serials Budget Crisis.” Against the Grain 29 (2):16–18.
   Google Scholar
• University of Vermont. 2018. “UVM Facts: Enrollment and Size.” Accessed January 12, 2018. https://www.uvm.edu/uvm_facts.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Mark R. 2017. “Taking New Aim at an Old Problem: Serials Management at the University of Oregon Libraries.” Against the Grain 29 (2):19–20.
   Google Scholar