Assessing a Consortium for a Multidisciplinary Subject

References

• Adams, Maurianne. 2013. Readings for Diversity and Social Justice, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, Melissa. 2016. “The Case for Taxonomic Reparations.” Knowledge Organization 43 (8):630–40. doi: 10.5771/0943-7444-2016-8-630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, Melissa. 2017. “Classification along the Color Line: Excavating Racism in the Stacks.” Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 1 (1):1–32. doi: 10.24242/jclis.v1i1.17.
   Google Scholar
• American Library Association (ALA). “Diversity Standards: Cultural Competency for Academic Libraries.” Accessed May 4, 2012. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/diversity.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, Conusella, and Sandra Phoenix. 2011. The State of Libraries at Historically Black Colleges and Universities: A Comparative Analysis Using Data Collected through the Academic Libraries Survey. Atlanta: LYRASIS. http://www.hbculibraries.org/docs/State_of_HBCU_Libraries_2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Beals, Jennifer Benedetto. 2006. “Assessing Library Collections Using Brief Test Methodology.” Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship 7 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sanford. 1971. Prejudices and Antipathies: A Tract on the LC Subject Headings concerning People. Metuchen, N.J.:The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, Paromita. 2018. “Rooted in the past: Use of “East Indians” in Library of Congress Subject Headings.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 56 (1):1–18. doi: 10.1080/01639374.2017.1386253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clack, Doris Hargrett. 1995. “Subject Access to African American Studies Resources in Online Catalogs: Issues and Answers.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 19 (2):49–66. doi: 10.1300/J104v19n02_04.
   Google Scholar
• Clouston, John S. 1995. “How Much is Enough? Establishing a Corridor of Adequacy in Library Acquisitions.” Collection Management 19 (3–4):57–75. doi: 10.1300/J105v19n03_07.
   Google Scholar
• Conner-Gaten, V., Kristyn Caragher, 2017. and, and Tracy Drake. “Collections Decoded: Reflections and Strategies for anti-Racist Collection Development.” In Brick & Click Libraries Conference Proceedings, edited by Frank Baudino, Kathy Hart, and Carolyn Johnson, 151–8. Northwest Maryville, MO: Missouri State University.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, Lea, and Amalia Monroe-Gulick. 2013. “What Do Our Faculty Use? An Interdisciplinary Citation Analysis Study.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 39 (6):471–80. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, Cynthia, Jeffery Kushkowski, and Kristin H. Gerhard. 1996. “Collection Evaluation for Interdisciplinary Fields: A Comprehensive Approach.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 22 (4):279–84. doi: 10.1016/S0099-1333(96)90118-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edozie, RitaKiki. 2013. “African American Studies Research Guide: AAAS830: African American Studies Readings, 2013-2015,” MSU Libraries Research Guides. Michigan State University. Accessed August 1, 2018. https://libguides.lib.msu.edu/c.php?g=95622&p=624431
   Google Scholar
• Embrick, David G., David L. Brunsma, and James M. Thomas. 2016.“Campuses as Racial Utopias?” Inside Higher Ed. Accessed August 1, 2018. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/08/25/college-leaders-often-deny-racial-tensions-their-own-institutions-essay
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Anthony W. 1992. “The Conspectus and Cooperative Collection Development: What It Can and Cannot Do.” The Acquisitions Librarian 4 (7):105–14. doi: 10.1300/J101v04n07_08.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, Vince. 2016. “LGBTQ Collection Assessment: Library Ownership of Resources Cited by Master’s Students.” College & Research Libraries 77 (1):114–27. doi: 10.5860/crl.77.1.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen, Dan. 1996. “Brief Tests of Collection Strength: A Methodology for All Types of Libraries Book Review.” College & Research Libraries 57 (3):305–7. doi: 10.5860/crl_57_03_305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Allison L., James W. Jawitz, Christopher McCarty, Alex Goldman, and Nandita B. Basu. 2013. “Disparities in Publication Patterns by Gender.” Scientometrics 96 (2):515–34. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0893-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Sara A., and Steven A. Knowlton. 2018. “Browsing through Bias: The Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies.” Library Trends 67 (1):74–88. doi: 10.1353/lib.2018.0026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Peggy. 2018. Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management, 4th ed. Chicago: ALA Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Madeline. 2014. “Applying the Tiers of Assessment: A Holistic and Systematic Approach to Assessing Library Collections.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 40 (6):585–91. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowlton, Steven A. 2005. “Three Decades since Prejudices and Antipathies: A Study of Changes in the Library of Congress Subject Headings.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 40 (2):123–45. doi: 10.1300/J104v40n02_08.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Karen C. 2015. Collection Evaluation in Academic Libraries: A Practical Guide for Librarians. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kolowich, Steve. 2015. “Diversity Training is in Demand. Does It Work?” Chronicle of Higher Education 62 (3):A6.
   Google Scholar
• Law, Ian. 2017. “Building the Anti-Racist University, Action and New Agendas.” Race Ethnicity and Education 20 (3):332–43. doi: 10.1080/13613324.2016.1260232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee & Low Books. 2016. “Where Is the Diversity In Publishing? The 2015 Diversity Baseline Survey Results.” Accessed August 1, 2018. https://blog.leeandlow.com/2016/01/26/where-is-the-diversity-in-publishing-the-2015-diversity-baseline-survey-results/
   Google Scholar
• Leiding, Reba. 2005. “Using Citation Checking of Undergraduate Honors Thesis Biliographies to Evaluate Library Collections.” College & Research Libraries 66 (5):417–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesniaski, David. 2004. “Evaluating Collections: A Discussion and Extension of Brief Tests of Collection Strength.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 11 (1):11–24. doi: 10.1300/J106v11n01_02.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, Helen N. 2015. “Michigan Shared Print Initiative and Green Glass for Groups Fir Data Analysis in Developing a Collaborative Collection.” Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve 25 (3–5):89–105. 10.1080/1072303X.2016.1254701.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, Lucy E. 2009. “Collection Evaluation: Selecting the Right Tools and Methods for Your Library.” In Library Data: Empowering Practice and Persuasion, edited by Darby Orcutt, 37–51. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Machovec, George. 2017. “Trends in Higher Education and Library Consortia.” Journal of Library Administration 57 (5):577–84. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2017.1326266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, Joan K. 1977. On Equal Terms: A Thesaurus for Nonsexist Indexing and Cataloging. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics. 2017. “Fast Facts.” Accessed August 1, 2018. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61
   Google Scholar
• Norlin, Elaina, and Patricia Morris. 2001. “Historically Black College and University Libraries in the 21st Century.” Journal of Library Administration 33 (3–4):183–97. doi: 10.1300/J111v33n03_02.
   Google Scholar
• Nosakhere, Akilah, M. Elaine Hughes, and Anne Page Mosby. 2004. African-American Studies Core List of Resources: An Annotated List of Selected Resources Used by Teachers of African-American Studies at Colleges and Universities in the United States during the 1998-99 Academic Year. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oak, Graeme, and Brian Tyrrell. 1998. “Cumulative Approach to Collection Evaluation.” Accessed April 2019. http://vuir.vu.edu.au/46/1/alia98.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ostos, Manuel. 2017. “What Do They Use? Where Do They Get It? An Interdisciplinary Citation Analysis of Latin American Studies Faculty Monographs, 2004–2013.” College & Research Libraries 78 (5):567–75. doi: 10.5860/crl.78.5.567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, Irene. 2000. “Stories Told but yet Unfinished: Challenges Facing African-American Libraries and Special Collections, in Historically Black Colleges and Universities.” In Diversity Now: People, Collections, and Services in Academic Libraries, edited by Teresa Y. Neely and Kuang-Hweu Lee-Smeltzer, 165–82. New York: Haworth Information Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, Max, Angeli R. Rasbury, and Carol Taylor. 1999. Sacred Fire: The QBR 100 Essential Black Books. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Twiss, Thomas M. 2001. “A Validation of Brief Tests of Collection Strength.” Collection Management 25 (3):23–37. doi: 10.1300/J105v25n03_03.
   Google Scholar
• White, Howard D. 1995. Brief Tests of Collection Strength: A Methodology for All Types of Libraries. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, Howard D. 2008. “Better than Brief Tests: Coverage Power Tests of Collection Strength.” College & Research Libraries 69 (2):155–74. doi: 10.5860/crl.69.2.155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar