Patron Drivers, Patron Impacts: Investigating Potential Patron Impacts of Moving to a Patron Driven Acquisition Model for Print Books

References

• Albanese, Andrew. 2020. “ALA Midwinter 2020: Macmillan CEO John Sargent, Librarians Spar Over E-Book Embargo.” Publishers Weekly, January 26. https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/libraries/article/82261-ala-midwinter-2020-macmillan-ceo-john-sargent-librarians-spar-over-e-book-embargo.html
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Rick. 2011. “Collections 2021: The Future of the Library Collection is Not a Collection.” Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community24 (3): 211–5. doi: 10.1629/24211.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Kristine J., Robert S.Freeman, Jean-Pierre V. M.Herubel, Lawrence J.Mykytiuk, Judith M.Nixon, and Suzanne M.Ward. 2002. “Buy, Don’t Borrow.” Collection Management27 (3–4): 1–11. doi: 10.1300/J105v27n03_01.
   Google Scholar
• Arougheti, Steven. 2014. “Keeping Up With … Patron Driven Acquisitions.” American Library Association, June 17. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/keeping_up_with/pda
   Google Scholar
• Back, Andi, and Sara E.Morris. 2021. “Patrons, Vendors, and Delivery: Print Demand Driven Acquisitions at the University of Kansas.” Technical Services Quarterly38 (2): 109–22. doi: 10.1080/07317131.2021.1892342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitbach, William, and Joy E.Lambert. 2011. “Patron-Driven Ebook Acquisition.” Computers in Libraries31 (6): 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bulick, Stephen, William N.Sabor, and RogerFlynn. 1979. “Circulation and in-House Use of Books.” In Use of Library Materials: The University of Pittsburgh Study, edited by AllenKent, JacobCohen, K. LeonMontgomery, James G.Williams, StephenBulick, Roger R.Flynn, William N.Sabor, and UnaMansfield, 9–55. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Chrzastowski, Tina E., and Lynn N.Wiley. 2015. “E-Book Use and Value in the Humanities.” Library Resources & Technical Services59 (4): 172–86. doi: 10.5860/lrts.59n4.172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, Laura. 2017. “Comparison of E-Book Acquisitions Strategies across Disciplines Finds Differences in Cost and Usage.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice12 (1): 109. doi: 10.18438/B8ZP70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, Lea, and KathyGraves. 2012. “A New Model for Demand-Driven Acquisition.” Kansas Library Association College and University Libraries Section Proceedings2 (1): 12–6. doi: 10.4148/culs.v2i0.1611.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, Kay, and YinZhang. 2020. “A Cross-Institutional Study of EBook Demand-Driven Acquisition (DDA) Use and Efficacy of Eight Large Academic Libraries.” College & Research Libraries81 (1): 27–42. doi: 10.5860/crl.81.1.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, Mark M., and RickAnderson. 2019. “Demand-Driven Acquisition of Print Books: Applying 21st-Century Procurement Strategies to a 5th-Century Format.” Collection Management44 (2–4): 95–104. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2018.1564715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enis, Matt. 2019. “Macmillan Announces Ebook Embargo.” Library Journal144 (8): 12–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, Karin. 2014. “The Rise of Patron-Driven Acquisitions: A Literature Review.” Georgia Library Quarterly51 (3): 1–9. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/glq/vol51/iss3/10.
   Google Scholar
• Hardesty, Larry. 1988. “Use of Library Materials at a Small Liberal Arts College: A Replication.” Collection Management10 (3–4): 61–80. doi: 10.1300/J105v10n03_05.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, Gail. 2012. “Deliver the eBooks Your Patrons and Selectors Both Want! PDA Program at the University of Mississippi.” The Serials Librarian63 (2): 178–86. doi: 10.1080/0361526X.2012.700780.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, Gail. 2015. “Testing the Patron-Driven Model: Availability Analysis of First-Time Use Books.” Collection Management40 (1): 3–16. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2014.965863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, Robert P., and KalyaniAnkem. 2005. “The Effect of the Internet on the Out-of-Print Book Market: Implications for Libraries.” Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services29 (2): 118–39. doi: 10.1080/14649055.2005.10766046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamothe, Alain R. 2010. “Electronic Book Usage Patterns as Observed at an Academic Library: Searches and Viewings.” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research5 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.21083/partnership.v5i1.1071.
   Google Scholar
• Levine-Clark, Michael. 2010. “Developing a Multiformat Demand-Driven Acquisition Model.” Collection Management35 (3): 201–7. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2010.486965.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Ziming. 2006. “Print vs. Electronic Resources: A Study of User Perceptions, Preferences, and Use.” Information Processing & Management42 (2): 583–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2004.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley, Laura, and Robert P.Holley. 2012. “History of the Ebook: The Changing Face of Books.” Technical Services Quarterly29 (4): 292–311. doi: 10.1080/07317131.2012.705731.
   Google Scholar
• Newton Miller, Laura. 2015. “Demand-Driven Acquisition E-Books Have Equal Cost per Use as Print, but DDA Has Much More Active Use Overall.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice10 (1): 89–91. doi: 10.1080/07317131.2014.875379.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, Judith M., and E. StewartSaunders. 2010. “A Study of Circulation Statistics of Books on Demand: A Decade of Patron-Driven Collection Development.” Collection Management35 (3): 151–61. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2010.486963.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Edward T., and Julia A.Gammon. 2009. “Building Collections Cooperatively: Analysis of Collection Use in the OhioLINK Library Consortium.” In Pushing the Edge: Explore, Engage, Extend: Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries March 12–15, 2009, Seattle, Washington, pp. 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Perdue, Jennifer, and James A.Van Fleet. 1999. “Borrow or Buy? Cost-Effective Delivery of Monographs.” Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply9 (4): 19–28. doi: 10.1300/J110v09n04_04.
   Google Scholar
• ProQuest . 2018. “Why DDA is Here to Stay: An Analysis of the Demand-Driven Acquisition Model for Libraries.” ProQuest. https://pq-static-content.proquest.com/collateral/media2/documents/wp-why-dda-is-here-to-stay.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Leslie J., CarmelitaPickett, WyomavanDuinkerken, JaneSmith, JeanneHarrell, and SandraTucker. 2010. “User-Driven Acquisitions: Allowing Patron Requests to Drive Collection Development in an Academic Library.” Collection Management35 (3): 244–54. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2010.486992.
   Google Scholar
• Rockinson-Szapkiw, Amanda J., JenniferCourduff, KimberlyCarter, and DavidBennett. 2013. “Electronic versus Traditional Print Textbooks: A Comparison Study on the Influence of University Students’ Learning.” Computers & Education63: 259–66. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose-Wiles, Lisa M. 2013. “Are Print Books Dead? An Investigation of Book Circulation at a Mid-Sized Academic Library.” Technical Services Quarterly30 (2): 129–52. doi: 10.1080/07317131.2013.759496.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Rebecca, and RebeccaBoughan. 2018. “Doing More with Less: Adoption of a Comprehensive E-Book Acquisition Strategy to Increase Return on Investment While Containing Costs.” Library Resources & Technical Services62 (1): 28–36. doi: 10.5860/lrts.62n1.28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Nackil, and Jan S.Sung. 2020. “Expanding Demand Driven Acquisition: Complete Just-In-Time Approval Plan.” Collection Management45 (3): 195–207. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2019.1679312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tench, Rob. 2019. “Implementation of a Print DDA Program at Old Dominion University Libraries.” Technical Services Quarterly36 (4): 363–78. doi: 10.1080/07317131.2019.1664091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, Richard W. 1969. “Some Behavior Patterns of Library Users: The 80/20 Rule.” Wilson Library Bulletin43 (5): 458–61.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, David C., ChristinaFalci, Joyce C.Melvin, MaryLouEpp, and Anita M.Kreps. 2013. “Patron-Driven Acquisition and Circulation at an Academic Library: Interaction Effects and Circulation Performance of Print Books Acquired via Librarians’ Orders, Approval Plans, and Patrons’ Interlibrary Loan Requests.” Collection Management38 (1): 3–32. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2012.730494.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Kevin W., and Michael A.Arthur. 2018. “Judging the Need for and Value of DDA in an Academic Research Library Setting.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship44 (5): 650–62. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, William H. 2013. “E-Books in Academic Libraries: Challenges for Acquisition and Collection Management.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy13 (2): 187–211. doi: 10.1353/pla.2013.0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, Rebecca, and JenicaBunderson. 2021. “Measuring the Past to Guide the Future: Takeaways from a Retrospective Disciplinary Analysis on Print Books and Ebooks.” Collection Management46 (2): 80–90. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2020.1841701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Suzanne M. 2014. Rightsizing the Academic Library Collection. Chicago: American Library Association. ProQuest Ebook Central.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Helmer. 1950. “The Optimum Size of the College Library.” College and Research Libraries11 (2): 143–7. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/10526/11972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, Lynn, and ElizabethClarage. 2012. “Building on Success: Evolving Local and Consortium Purchase-on-Demand Programs.” Interlending & Document Supply40 (2): 105–10. doi: 10.1108/02641611211239588.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Kelly Marie, R.Hooper, J.Simpson, and J.Slay. 2021. “Comparing Print and eBook Usage to Meet Patron Needs.” Collection Management46 (2): 91–106. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2020.1833802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar