An exploratory study of argument in the jury decision‐making process

References

• Allen , M. , Mabry , E. and McKelton , D. 1998 . Impact of juror attitudes about the death penalty on juror evaluations of guilt and punishment: A meta‐analysis . Law and Human Behavior , 22 : 715 – 731 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badzinski , D.M. and Pettus , A.B. 1994 . Nonverbal involvement and sex: Effects on jury decision making . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 22 : 309 – 321 .
   Google Scholar
• Batiza , P. 1999 . One lawyer's inside look at the jury . Practical Litigator , 10 : 9 – 18 .
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B.H. 1999 . The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? . Law and Human Behavior , 23 : 75 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster , F.J. , Hunter , J.E. and Hale , J.L. 1991 . An information‐processing model of jury decision making . Communication Research , 18 : 524 – 547 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brashers , D. and Meyers , R.A. 1989 . Tag‐team argument and group decision‐making: A preliminary investigation . Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference of Argumentation . 1989 , Annandale, VA. Edited by: Gronbeck , B.E. pp. 542 – 550 . Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Bridgeman , D.L. and Marlowe , D. 1979 . Jury decision making: An empirical study based on actual felony trials . Journal of Applied Psychology , 64 : 91 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossmann , B.G. and Canary , D.J. 1990 . An observational analysis of argument structures: The case of Nightline . Argumentation , 4 : 199 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Burnett , A. 1999 . “ Jury decision‐making processes in the O.J. Simpson criminal and civil trials ” . In The O.J. Simpson trials: Media, rhetoric and the law , Edited by: Schuetz , J. and Lilley , L. 122 – 138 . Carbondale : Southern Illinois Press .
   Google Scholar
• Burnstein , E. and Vinokur , A. 1975 . What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive‐arguments explanation of choice shifts . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 11 : 412 – 426 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnstein , E. and Vinokur , A. 1977 . Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 13 : 315 – 332 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary , D.J. , Brossman , J.E. , Brossman , B.G. and Weger , H. Jr. 1995 . Toward a theory of minimally rational argument: Analyses of episode‐specific effects of argument structures . Communication Monographs , 62 : 183 – 212 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary , D.J. , Brossmann , B.G. and Seibold , D.R. 1987 . Argument structures in decision‐making groups . The Southern Speech Communication Journal , 53 : 18 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D.J. , Brossman , B.G. , Sillars , A.L. and LoVette , S. 1987 . Married couples’ argument structures and sequences: A comparison of satisfied and dissatisfied dyads . Argument and social criticism: Proceedings of the Fifth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation . 1987 , Annandale, VA. Edited by: Wenzel , J.W. pp. 475 – 484 . Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D.J. and Sillars , A.L. 1992 . “ Argument in satisfied and dissatisfied married couples. ” . In Readings in Argumentation , Edited by: Benoit , W.L. , Hample , D. and Benoit , P.J. 737 – 764 . New York : Foris .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D.J. , Tanita‐Ratledge , N. and Seibold , D.R. 1982 . Argument and group decision‐making: Development of a coding scheme. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention . November 1982 , Louisville, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D.J. , Weger , H. Jr. and Stafford , L. 1991 . Couples’ argument sequences and their associations with relational characteristics . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55 : 159 – 179 .
   Google Scholar
• Chambers , H.L. 1998 . Reasonable certainty and reasonable doubt . Marquette Law Review , 81 : 655 – 704 .
   Google Scholar
• Dace , K.L. and Hirokawa , R.Y. 1987 . The role of argumentation in group decision‐making efficacy: A functional perspective . Argument and critical practices: Proceedings of the Fifth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation . 1987 , Annandale, VA. Edited by: Wenzel , J.W. pp. 405 – 410 . Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Diamond , S.S. 1997 . Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations . Law and Human Behavior , 21 : 561 – 571 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth , P.C. and Mauro , R. 1998 . “ Psychology and law. ” . In The handbook of social psychology , 4th ed. , Edited by: Gilbert , D.T. and Fiske , S.T. Vol. 2 , 684 – 732 . Boston : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Garlick , R. and Mongeau , P.A. 1993 . Argument quality and group member status as determinants of attitudinal minority influence . Western Journal of Communication , 57 : 289 – 308 .
   Google Scholar
• Gouran , D.S. 1982 . Making decisions in groups: Choices and consequences. , Scott : Foresman .
   Google Scholar
• Gouran , D.S. 1985 . A critical summary of research on the role of argument in decision‐making groups . Argument and Social Practice: Proceedings of the Fourth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation . 1985 , Annandale, VA. Edited by: Cox , J.R. , Sillars , M.O. and Walker , G.B. pp. 723 – 736 . Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Gouran , D.S. 1986 . “ Inferential errors, interaction, and group decision‐making. ” . In Communication and group decision making , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 93 – 112 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Gouran , D.S. 1990 . “ Exploiting the predictive potential of structuration theory. ” . In Communication Yearbook , Edited by: Anderson , J. A. Vol. 13 , 313 – 322 . Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Gouran , D.S. , Brown , C. and Henry , D.R. 1978 . Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision‐making discussions . Communication Monographs , 45 : 51 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guetzkow , H. 1950 . Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data . Journal of Clinical Psychology , 6 : 47 – 58 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewes , D.C. 1985 . Systematic biases in coding social interaction data . Human Communication Research , 11 : 554 – 574 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa , R.Y. 1980 . A comparative analysis of communication patterns within effective and ineffective decision‐making groups . Communication Monographs , 47 : 312 – 321 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa , R.Y. 1982 . Group communication and problem‐solving effectiveness I: A critical review of inconsistent findings . Communication Quarterly , 30 : 134 – 141 .
   Google Scholar
• Hirokawa , R.Y. 1983 . Group communication and problem‐solving effectiveness II: An exploratory investigation of procedural functions . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 47 : 59 – 74 .
   Google Scholar
• Hirokawa , R.Y. 1985 . Discussion procedures and decision‐making performance: A test of a functional perspective . Human Communication Research , 12 : 203 – 224 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa , R.Y. 1988 . Group communication and decision‐making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective . Human Communication Research , 14 : 487 – 515 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa , R.Y. and Pace , R. 1983 . A descriptive investigation of the possible communication‐based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision‐making . Communication Monographs , 50 : 363 – 379 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa , R.Y. and Scheerhorn , D. R. 1985 . The functions of argumentation in group deliberation . Argument and Social Practice: Proceedings of the Fourth SCA/AFA Conference in Argumentation . 1985 , Annandale, VA. Edited by: Cox , J.R. , Sillars , M.O. and Walker , G.B. pp. 737 – 746 . Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Holstein , J. A. 1985 . Jurors interpretations and jury decision‐making . Law and Human Behavior , 9 : 83 – 100 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong , P.B. 1997 . A theory of final argument in civil trials . Hamline Law Review , 21 : 31 – 63 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , R.H. 2000 . Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. , New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Kalven , H. Jr. and Zeisel , H. 1966 . The American Jury. , Boston : Little, Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Landis , J.R. and Koch , G.G. 1977 . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data . Biometrics , 33 : 159 – 174 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh , L.J. 1984 . A theory of jury trial advocacy . Utah Law Review , : 763 – 806 .
   Google Scholar
• Mabry , E.A. , VanLear , C.A. , Jackson , J.J. and McPhee , R.D. 1991 . Constitutive dimensions of small group argument: Rethinking argument in persuasive arguments theory . Argument in Controversy: Proceedings of the Seventh SCA/AFA Conference in Argumentation . 1991 , Annandale, VA. Edited by: Parson , D.W. pp. 175 – 181 . Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun , R.J. 1990 . Experimental research on jury decision‐making . Jurimetrics Journal of Law, Science and Technology , 30 : 223 – 233 .
   Google Scholar
• Manzo , J.F. 1996 . Taking turns and taking sides: Opening scenes from two jury deliberations . Social Psychology Quarterly , 59 : 107 – 125 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marder , N.S. 1997 . Deliberations and disclosures: A study of post‐verdict interviews of jurors . Iowa Law Review , 82 : 465 – 546 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R.A. 1989a . Testing persuasive argument theory's predictor model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence . Communication Monographs , 56 : 112 – 132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R.A. 1989b . Persuasive arguments theory: A test of assumptions . Human Communication Research , 15 : 357 – 381 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R.A. 1991 . Argument and group decision making research: Implications and applications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association . 1991 , Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R.A. and Brashers , D.E. 1995 . Multi‐stage versus single‐stage coding of small group argument: A preliminary comparative assessment . Argumentation and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation . 1995 . Edited by: Jackson , S. pp. 93 – 100 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R.A. and Brashers , D.E. 1998 . Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument‐outcome link . Communication Monographs , 65 : 261 – 281 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R.A. , Brashers , D.E. and Jerzak , J. 1998 . Majority/minority influence: Identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument‐outcome links . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association . 1998 , New York.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R.A. and Seibold , D.R. 1989 . Assessing number of cognitive arguments as a predictor of group shifts: A test and alternative interactional explanation . Spheres of Argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation . 1989 . Edited by: Gronbeck , B.E. pp. 576 – 583 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R.A. and Seibold , D.R. 1990 . “ Perspectives on group argument: A critical review of persuasive arguments theory and an alternative structurational view. ” . In Communication Yearbook , Edited by: Anderson , J.A. Vol. 13 , 268 – 302 . Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R.A. , Seibold , D.R. and Brashers , D. 1991 . Argument in initial group decision‐making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55 : 47 – 68 .
   Google Scholar
• Miller , G.R. , Fontes , N.E. , Boster , F.J. and Sunnafrank , M.J. 1983 . Methodological issues in legal communication research: What can trial simulations tell us? . Communication Monographs , 50 : 33 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici , S. and Zalvalloni , M. 1969 . The group as a polarizer of attitudes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 12 : 125 – 135 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D.J. 1977 . Two concepts of argument . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 13 : 121 – 128 .
   Google Scholar
• Pace , R.C. 1985 . Patterns of argumentation in high and low consensus discussions . Argument and Social Practice: Proceedings of the Fourth SCA/ AFA Conference on Argumentation . 1985 . Edited by: Cox , J.R. , Sillars , M.O. and Walker , G.B. pp. 770 – 781 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Pennington , N. and Hastie , R. 1981 . Juror decision‐making models: The generalization gap . Psychological Bulletin , 89 : 246 – 287 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington , N. and Hastie , R. 1986 . Evidence evaluation in complex decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 : 242 – 258 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington , N. and Hastie , R. 1990 . Practical implications of psychological research on juror and jury decision‐making . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 16 : 90 – 105 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington , N. and Hastie , R. 1991 . A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The story model . Cardozo Law Review , 13 : 519 – 557 .
   Google Scholar
• Penrod , S. and Hastie , R. 1980 . A computer simulation of jury decision making . Psychology Review , 87 : 133 – 159 .
   Google Scholar
• Pettus , A.B. 1990 . The verdict is in: A study of jury decision making factors, moment of personal decision, and jury deliberations—from the jurors’ point of view . Communication Quarterly , 38 : 83 – 97 .
   Google Scholar
• Pryor , B. , Taylor , K.P. , Buchanan , R.W. and Strawn , D.U. 1980 . An affective‐cognitive consistency explanation for comprehension of standard jury instructions . Communication Monographs , 47 : 68 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratledge , N.E.T. 1986 . Theoretical and methodological integrity of a structurational scheme for coding argument in decision‐making groups. , Los Angeles, CA : University of Southern California . Unpublished doctoral doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Rieke , R.D. and Stutman , R.K. 1990 . Communication in legal advocacy. , Columbia, SC : University of South Carolina Press .
   Google Scholar
• Saks , M.J. 1997 . What do jury experiments tell us about how juries (should) make decisions? . Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal , 6 : 1 – 53 .
   Google Scholar
• Sandys , M. and Dillehay , R.C. 1995 . First ballot votes, pre‐deliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials . Law and Human Behavior , 19 : 175 – 195 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz , J.S. 1997 . The expert witness and jury comprehension: An expert's perspective . Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy , 7 : 107 – 119 .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D.R. , McPhee , R. D. , Poole , M.S. , Tanita , N.E. and Canary , D.J. 1981 . Argument, group influence, and decision outcomes . Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation . 1981 . Edited by: Ziegelmueller , G. and Rhodes , J. pp. 663 – 692 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D.R. and Meyers , R.A. 1986 . “ Communication and influence in decision‐making. ” . In Communication and group decision‐making , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 133 – 155 . Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Semic , B.A. and Canary , D.J. 1997 . Trait argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and minimally rational argument: An observational analysis of friendship discussions . Communication Quarterly , 45 : 355 – 378 .
   Google Scholar
• Simon , R.J. 1980 . “ The rationality of jury deliberations and verdicts. ” . In The jury: Its role in American society , Edited by: Simon , R.J. 49 – 71 . Lexington, MA : Lexington Books .
   Google Scholar
• Sobus , M.S. 1998 . Commensurability: Understanding jury research and juror information processing . Defense Counsel Journal , 65 : 408 – 413 .
   Google Scholar
• Sonaike , S.F. 1978 . The influence of jury deliberation on juror perception of trial, credibility, and damage awards . Brigham Young University Law Review , : 889 – 908 .
   Google Scholar
• Stafford , L. , Burggraf , C.S. and Sharkey , W.F. 1987 . Conversational memory: The effects of time, recall, mode, and memory expectancies on remembrances of natural conversations . Human Communication Research , 14 : 203 – 229 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser , G. , Kerr , N.L. and Davis , J.H. 1989 . “ Influence processes and consensus models in decision‐making groups. ” . In Psychology of group influence , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Paulus , P.B. 279 – 326 . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Sunwolf and Seibold , D.R. 1998 . Jurors’ intuitive rules for deliberation: A structurational approach to communication in jury decision making . Communication Monographs , 65 : 282 – 307 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanford , S. and Penrod , S. 1986 . Jury deliberations:Discussion content and influence processes in jury decision making . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 16 : 322 – 347 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin , S.E. 1958 . The uses of argument. , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• VanLear , C.A. and Mabry , E.A. 1999 . Testing contrasting interaction models for discriminating between consensual and dissentient decision‐making groups . Small Group Research , 30 : 29 – 58 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesper , T.J. 1998 . Seinfeld syndrome: The indifference of otherwise nice jurors . Trial , 34 : 39 – 43 .
   Google Scholar
• Vinokur , A. and Burnstein , E. 1978 . Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion . European Journal of Social Psychology , 8 : 335 – 348 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar