What Does It Mean to Deliberate? An Interpretative Account of Jurors’ Expressed Deliberative Rules and Premises

References

• Abu-Lughod , L. , & Lutz , C. ( 1990 ). Introduction: Emotion, discourse, and the politics of everyday life . In C. Lutz & L. Abu-Lughod (Eds.), Language and politics of emotions (pp. 1 – 23 ). New York , NY : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Barabas , J. ( 2004 ). How deliberation affects policy opinions . American Political Science Review , 98 , 687 – 701 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber , B. R. ( 1984 ). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age . Berkeley , CA : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bell , R. ( 1987 ). Social involvement . In J. McCroskey & J. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 195 – 242 ). Newbery Park , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Bormann , E. G. ( 1996 ). Symbolic convergence theory and communication in group decision making . In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making ( , 2nd ed. , pp. 81 – 113 ). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Burkhalter , S. , Gastil , J. , & Kelshaw , T. ( 2002 ). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups . Communication Theory , 12 , 398 – 422 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett , A. , & Badzinski , D. M. (2000). An exploratory study of argument in the jury decision-making process. Communication Quarterly , 48, 380–396.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers , S. ( 2003 ). Deliberative democratic theory . Annual Review of Political Science , 6 , 307 – 326 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra , S. R. ( 2004 ). Juror stress sources, severity, and solutions . Ottawa , Canada : National Library of Canada .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , J. ( 1997 ). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy . In J. F. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 67 – 91 ). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Conover , P. J. , Crewe , I. M. , & Searing , D. D. ( 1991 ). The nature of citizenship in the United States and Great Britain: Empirical comments on theoretical themes . Journal of Politics , 53 , 800 – 832 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby , N. , & Nethercutt , D. ( 2005 ). Citizens juries: Creating a trustworthy voice of the people . In J. Gastil & P. Levine (Eds.), The deliberative democracy handbook (pp. 111 – 119 ). San Francisco , CA : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg , L. ( 2005 ). The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously . Theory and Society , 34 , 111 – 136 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , J. H. , Stasser , G. , Spitzer , C. E. , & Holt , R. W. ( 1976 ). Changes in group members’ decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 34 , 1177 – 1187 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini , M. X. , Cook , F. L. , & Jacobs , L. R. ( 2004 ). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature . Annual Review of Political Science , 7 , 315 – 344 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine , D. J. , Clayton , L. D. , Dunford , B. B. , Seying , R. , & Pryce , J. ( 2001 ). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 7 , 622 – 727 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond , S. S. ( 1997 ). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations . Law and Human Behavior , 21 , 561 – 571 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond , S. S. , & Casper , J. D. ( 1992 ). Blindfolding the jury to verdict consequences: Damages, experts, and the civil jury . Law & Society Review , 26 , 513 – 564 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond , S. S. , & Levi , J. N. ( 1996 ). Improving decisions on death by revising and testing jury instructions . Judicature , 79 , 224 – 232 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek , J. S. ( 1990 ). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science . New York , NY : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dutwin , D. ( 2003 ). The character of deliberation: Equality, argument, and the formation of public opinion . International Journal of Public Opinion Research , 15 , 239 – 264 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwork , A. , Alfini , J. J. , & Sales , B. ( 1982 ). Towards understandable jury instructions . Judicature , 65 , 432 – 443 .
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin , J. S. ( 1991 ). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform . New Haven , CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Freeman , S. ( 2000 ). Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment . Philosophy of Public Affairs , 29 , 370 – 418 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil , J. ( 1993 ). Democracy in small groups: Participation, decision-making, and communication . Philadelphia , PA : New Society Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Gastil , J. ( 2000 ). By popular demand: Revitalizing representative democracy through deliberative elections . Berkeley , CA : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gastil , J. , Burkhalter , S. , & Black , L. W. ( 2007 ). Do juries deliberate? A study of deliberation, individual difference, and group member satisfaction at a municipal courthouse . Small Group Research , 38 , 337 – 359 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil , J. , Deess , E. P. , Weiser , P. , & Simmons , C. ( 2010 ). The jury and democracy: How jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation . New York , NY : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gastil , J. , & Dillard , J. P. ( 1999 ). Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation . Political Communication , 16 , 3 – 23 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil , J. , & Keith , W. M. (2005). A nation that (sometimes) likes to talk: A brief history of public deliberation in the United States. In J. Gastil & P. Levine (Eds.), The deliberative democracy handbook (pp. 3–19). San Francisco , CA : Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (Eds.) . ( 2005 ). The deliberative democracy handbook . San Francisco , CA : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Giddens , A. ( 1984 ). The constitution of society . Berkeley , CA : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Goodin , R. E. ( 2000 ). Democratic deliberation within . Philosophy & Public Affairs , 29 , 81 – 109 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin , R. E. ( 2003 ). Reflective democracy . Oxford , England : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Goodin , R. E. , & Niemeyer , S. J. ( 2003 ). When does deliberation begin? Internal reflection versus public discussion in deliberative democracy . Political Studies , 51 , 627 – 649 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann , A. , & Thompson , D. F. ( 2004 ). Why deliberative democracy? . Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Habermas , J. ( 1979 ). Communication and the evolution of society . Boston , MA : Beacon .
   Google Scholar
• Hastie , R. , Penrod , S. D. , & Pennington , N. ( 1983 ). Inside the jury . Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hymes , D. ( 1972 ). Models of the interaction of language and social life . In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35 – 71 ). New York , NY : Holt, Rinehart, & Winston .
   Google Scholar
• Jonakit , R. N. ( 2003 ). The American jury . New Haven , CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kalven , H. , & Zeisel , H. ( 1966 ). The American jury . Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kerr , N. L. ( 1981 ). Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 41 , 684 – 702 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konieczka , S. ( 2006 ). Impaneled: The “jury analogy” and deliberative democracy in theory and practice. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Leighninger , M. ( 2006 ). The next form of democracy: How expert rule is giving way to shared governance … and why politics will never be the same . Nashville , TN : Vanderbilt University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lukensmeyer , C. J. , Goldman , J. , & Brigham , S. ( 2005 ). A town meeting for the twenty-first century . In J. Gastil & P. Levine (Eds.), The deliberative democracy handbook (pp. 154 – 163 ). San Francisco , CA : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Luskin , R. C. , Fishkin , J. S. , & Jowell , R. ( 2002 ). Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain . British Journal of Political Science , 32 , 455 – 487 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoun , R. J. , & Kerr , N. L. ( 1988 ). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors’ bias for leniency . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54 , 21 – 33 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge , J. ( 1983 ). Beyond adversary democracy . Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge , J. ( 1999 ). Everyday talk in the deliberative system . In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics (pp. 211 – 239 ). New York , NY : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge , J. , Hartz-Karp , J. , Amengual , M. , & Gastil , J. ( 2006 ). Norms of public deliberation: An inductive study . Journal of Public Deliberation , 2 .
   Google Scholar
• Manzo , J. F. ( 1996 ). Taking turns and taking sides: Opening scenes from two jury deliberations . Social Psychology Quarterly , 59 , 107 – 125 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marder , N. S. ( 1997 ). Deliberations and disclosures: A study of post-verdict interviews of jurors . Iowa Law Review , 82 , 465 – 546 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod , J. M. , Scheufele , D. A. , Moy , P. , Horowitz , E. M. , Holbert , R. L. , Zhang , W. , … Zubric , J. ( 1999 ). Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum . Communication Research , 26 , 743 – 774 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier , P. ( 2002 , April 28 ). Many are called, but few are chose . Minneapolis Star Tribune , 1E .
   Google Scholar
• Mendelberg , T. ( 2002 ). The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence . Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation , 6 , 151 – 193 .
   Google Scholar
• Muhlberger , P. ( 2005 ). The virtual agora project: A research design for studying democratic deliberation . Journal of Public Deliberation , 1 , 1 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Mutz , D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy . New York , NY : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn , M. , & Osborn , S. ( 1991 ). Alliance for a better public voice . Dayton , OH : NIF Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Page , B. I. ( 1996 ). Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy . Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pearce , W. B. , & Littlejohn , S. W. ( 1997 ). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Pennington , N. , & Hastie , R. ( 1986 ). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 , 242 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettus , A. B. ( 1990 ). The verdict is in: A study of jury decision making factors, moment of personal decision, and jury deliberations—From the juror's point of view . Communication Quarterly , 38 , 83 – 97 .
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen , G. ( 1997 ). A theory of speech codes . In G. Philipsen & T. Albrecht (Eds.), Developing theories of communication (pp. 119 – 156 ). Albany , NY : State University of New York Press .
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen , G. , & Coutu , L. M. ( 2005 ). The ethnography of speaking . In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 355 – 379 ). Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen , G. , Coutu , L. M. , & Covarrubias , P. ( 2005 ). Speech codes theory: Restatement, revisions, and response to criticism . In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 55 – 68 ). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Renz , M. A. ( 2006 ). Paving consensus: Enacting, challenging, and revising the consensus process in a cohousing community . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 34 , 163 – 190 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg , S. W. , Ward , D. , & Chilton , S. ( 1988 ). Political reasoning and cognition: A Piagetian view . Durham , NC : Duke University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ryfe , D. M. ( 2002 ). The practice of deliberative democracy: A study of 16 deliberative organizations . Political Communication , 19 , 359 – 377 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryfe , D. M. ( 2006 ). Narrative and deliberation in small group forums . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 34 , 72 – 93 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryfe , D. M. ( 2007 ). Toward a sociology of deliberation . Journal of Public Deliberation , 3 . Retrieved from http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol3/iss1/art3
   Google Scholar
• Sanders , L. M. ( 1997 ). Against deliberation . Political Theory , 25 , 347 – 376 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandys , M. , & Dillehay , R. C. ( 1995 ). First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials . Law and Human Behavior , 19 , 175 – 195 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen , M. R. , Bachtiger , A. , Sporndli , M. , & Steiner , J. ( 2004 ). Toward a political psychology of deliberation. Paper presented at Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics conference, European University Institute, Firenze, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley , J. ( 2007 ). Measuring deliberation's content: A coding scheme . Journal of Public Deliberation , 3 ( 1 ). Retrieved from http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol3/iss1/art12
   Google Scholar
• Sunwolf , & Seibold , D. R. ( 1998 ). Jurors’ intuitive rules for deliberation: A structurational approach to communication in jury decision making . Communication Monographs , 65 , 287 – 307 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theiss-Morse , E. , Marcus , G. , & Sullivan , J. ( 1993 ). Passion and reason in political life: The organization of affect and cognition and political tolerance . In G. Marcus & R. Handon (Eds.), Reconsidering the democratic public (pp. 249 – 272 ). University Park , PA : Pennsylvania State University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Thompson , S. , & Hoggett , P. ( 2000 ). The emotional dynamics of deliberative democracy . Policy & Politics , 29 , 351 – 364 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy , K. , & Ashcraft , C. ( 2001 ). Crafting policies about controversial values: How wording disputes manage a group dilemma . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 29 , 297 – 316 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco , P. D. P. ( 1995 ). The influence of size and decision rule in jury decision-making . In G. Davies , S. Lloyd-Bostock , M. McMurran & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law, and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (pp. 344 – 348 ). Berlin , Germany : de Gruyter .
   Google Scholar
• Vidmar , N. , & Hans , V. P. ( 2007 ). American juries: The verdict . Amherst , NY : Prometheus .
   Google Scholar
• Weithman , P. J. ( 2005 ). Deliberative character . Journal of Political Philosophy , 13 , 263 – 283 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar