Making Sense of Hurtful Mother-in-law Messages: Applying Attribution Theory to the In-Law Triad

References

• Acitelli, L. K., Douvan, E., & Veroff, J. (1993). Perceptions of conflict in the first year of marriage: How important are similarity and understanding? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 5–19. doi:10.1177/0265407593101001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acitelli, L. K., Kenny, D. A., & Weiner, D. (2001). The importance of similarity and understanding of partners’ marital ideals to relationshp satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 8, 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, L. L., Davis, W. M., Ahmed, R., Mrinal, N. R., Mukherji, B. R., & Morgan, N. (1989). The perception of mother-in-law and father-in-law in cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Group Tensions, 19, 245–254.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, L. L., Denmark, F. L., & Ahmed, R. A. (1989). Attitudes toward mother-in-law and stepmother: A cross-cultural study. Psychological Reports, 65, 1194. doi:10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3f.1194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054–1068. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baucom, D. H. (1987). Attributions in distress relations: How can we explain them? In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deteroriation (pp.177–206). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Daiuto, A. D., Carels, R. A., Rankin, L. A., & Burnett, C. K. (1996). Cognitions in marriage: The relationship between standards and attributions. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 209–222. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.10.2.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.107.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 613–628. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.63.4.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Nelson, G. M. (1996). Attributions and behavior in functional and dysfunctional marriages. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 569–576. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.64.3.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, C. M., Conger, R. D., & Meehan, J. M. (2001). The influence of in-laws on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 614–626. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M. (1979). Concepts in the analysis of qualitative data. The Sociological Review, 27, 651–677. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, S., Rutt, D. J., Hurst, M. H., & Strejc, H. (1991). Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships: All communications are not created equal. Human Communication Research, 18, 228–267. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, J. A. (2004). Hurt feelings in couple relationships: Towards integrative models of the negative effects of hurtful events. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 487–506. doi:10.1177/0265407504044844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The impact of attributons in marriage: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 510–517. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The relationshp attribution measure. Journal of Personality and Social Pschology, 62, 457–468. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, L. R. (1983). Mothers and mothers-in-law. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 187–193. doi:10.2307/351307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzaga, G. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 34–48. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Seleno, K. K. (1985). Interpersonal communication satisfaction: Relationship to satisfaction with self and other. Communication Research Reports, 2, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., Sereno, K., & Spitzberg, B. (1984). Communication satisfaction and satisfaction with selfand other: The relevance of relationship level and topic level. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 376–384. doi:10.1177/0146167284103005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1985). Causal attributions of married couples: When do they search for causes? What do they conclude when they do? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1398–1412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, C.-H. (2005). Women’s postpartum stress, social support, and health status. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 27, 148–159. doi:10.1177/0193945904270913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston, T. L., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1986). When the honeymoon's over: Changes in the marital relationship over the first year. In R. GIlmour & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 109–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ickes, W., Marangoni, C., & Garcia, S. (1997). Studying empathic accuracy in a clinically relevant context. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 282–307). New York, New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig Kellas, J. (2010). Transmitting relational worldview: The relationship between mother-daughter memorable messages and adult daughters’ romantic relational schemata. Communication Quarterly, 58, 458–479. doi:10.1080/01463373.2010.525700
   Google Scholar
• Koenig Kellas, J., Trees, A. R., Schrodt, P., LeClair-Underberg, C., & Willer, E. K. (2010). Exploring links between well-being and interactional sense-making in married couples’ jointly told stories of stress. Journal of Family Communication, 10, 174–193. doi:10.1080/15267431.2010.489217
   Google Scholar
• Koenig Kellas, J., Willer, E. K., & Trees, A. R. (2013). Communicated perspective-taking: Spouses’ perceptions of each others’ behaviors during stories of marital stress. Southern Communication Journal, 78, 326–351. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2013.815264
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R., Springer, C., Negel, L., Ansell, E., & Evans, K. (1998). The causes, phenomenology, and consequences of hurt feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1225–1237. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manusov, V. (1990). An application of attribution principles to nonverbal behavior in romantic dyads. Communication Monographs, 57, 104–118. doi:10.1080/03637759009376189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manusov, V., Floyd, K., & Kerssen-Griep, J. (1997). Yours, mine, and ours: Mutual attributions for nonverbal behaviors in couples’ interactions. Communication Research, 24, 234–260. doi:10.1177/009365097024003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manusov, V., & Koenig, J. (2001). The content of attributions in couples’ communication. In J.Manusov & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Attribution, communication behavior, and close relationships (pp. 353–371). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manusov, V., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2008). Attribution theory: Finding good cause in the search fortheory. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpesonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 37–49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, D. M. (2007). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: Understanding the relationship and what makes them friends or foe. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Mikucki-Enyart, S. L. (2011). Parent-in-law privacy management: An examination fo the links among relational uncertainty, topic avoidance, in-group status, and in-law satisfaction. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 237–265. doi:10.1080/15267431.2010.544633
   Google Scholar
• Mills, R. S. L., Naser, J., & Farrell, H. M. (2005). Child and parent perceptions of hurtful messages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 731–754. doi:10.1177/0265407502196001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morr Serewicz, M. C., & Canary, D. J. (2008). Assessments of disclosure from the in-laws: Links among disclosure topics, family-privacy orientations, and relational quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 333–357. doi:10.1177/0265407507087962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morr Serewicz, M. C., Hosmer, R., Ballard, R. L., & Griffin, R. A. (2008). Disclosure from in-laws and the quality of in-law and marital relationships. Communication Quarterly, 56, 427–444. doi:10.1080/01463370802453642
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Bryant, L. E. (2008). Emerging adult siblings’ use of verbally aggressive messages as hurtful messages. Communication Quarterly, 56, 268–283. doi:10.1080/01463370802240981
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Schrodt, P., & Rittenour, C. E. (2006). The impact of parents’ use of hurtful messages on adult children’s self-esteem and educational motivation. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 425–445). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nuner, J. E. (2004). A qualitative study of mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationships. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Denton, TX: Texas Woman’s University,
   Google Scholar
• Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, C. M. (2008). The assimiliation of in-laws: The impact of newcomers on the communication routines of families. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 74–97. doi:10.1080/00909880701799311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittenour, C. E., & Soliz, J. (2009). Communicative and relational dimensions of shared family identity and relational intentions in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationships: Developing a conceptual model for mother-in-law/daughter-in-law research. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 67–90. doi:10.1080/10570310802636334
   Google Scholar
• Serewicz, M. C. M. (2006). The difficulties of in-law relationships. In D. C. Kirkpatrick, S. Duck, & M. K. Foley (Eds.), Relating Difficulty: The processes of constructing and managing difficult interaction. (pp. 101–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Serewicz, M. C. M. (2007). Toward a triangular theory of in-law relationships: Theoretical proposal and social relations analysis of relational satisfaction and private disclosure in in-law triads. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Sillars, A. Roberts, L., Dun, T., & Leonard, K. (2001). Stepping into the stream of thought: Cognition during marital conflict. In V. Manusov & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Attribution, communication behavior, and close relationships (pp. 193–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Zhang, Y. B. (2012). Husbands’ conflict styles in chinese mother/daughter-in-law conflicts: Daughters-in-law’s perspectives. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 57–74. doi:10.1080/15267431.2011.629968
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L. (1994). Messages that hurt. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 53–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L. (2007). Communicating hurt. In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 121–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L., Corbin, S. D., Lucchetti, A. E., & Sprague, R. J. (1999). Couples' concurrent cognitions: The influence of relational satifaction on the thoughts couples have as they converse. Human Communication Research, 25, 370–398. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00450.x
   Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L., & Crumley, L. P. (1998). Reactions to messages that hurt: The influence of relational contexts. Communication Monographs, 65, 173–196. doi:10.1080/03637759809376447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L., & Young, S. L. (2000). When words hurt: The effects of perceived intentionality on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 393–424. doi:10.1177/0265407500173005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamboldt, F. S., & Reiss, D. (1989). Defining a family heritage and a new relationship identity: Two central tasks in the making of a marriage. Family Process, 28, 317–335. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1989.00317.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, A. L., Harvey, J. H., & Stanley, M. (1987). The nature and motivations of acounts for failed relationships. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Account for relationships: Exploration, representation and knowledge (pp. 114–133). New York: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P. T. P., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–653. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.40.4.650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. L., & Bippus, A. M. (2001). Does it make a difference if they hurt you in a funny way?: Humorously and non-humorously phrased hurtful messages in personal relationships. Communication Quarterly, 49, 35–52. doi:10.1080/01463370109385613
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Ho, P. S. Y., & Yip, P. S. F. (2012). Does similarity breed marital and sexual satisfaction? Journal of Sex Research, 49, 583–593. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.574240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar