The Role of Expertise and Expressiveness in Decision-Making Groups

References

• Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons R. F. Bales & E. A. Shills (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 116–161). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1949). An analysis of leaderless group discussion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bonito, J. A. (2001). An information-processing approach to participation in small groups. Communication Research, 28, 275–303. doi:10.1177/009365001028003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, B. L. (2000). The effects of extroversion on influence in ambiguous group tasks. Small Group Research, 31, 225–244. doi:10.1177/104649640003100205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, B. L., Sillito, S. D., & Baumann, M. R. (2007). Collective estimation: Accuracy, expertise, and extraversion as sources of intra-group influence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 121–133. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Hunter, J. E., & Hale, J. L. (1991). An information-processing model of jury decision making. Communication Research, 18, 524–547. doi:10.1177/009365091018004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Fryrear, J. E., Mongeau, P. A., & Hunter, J. E. (1982). An unequal speaking linear discrepancy model: Implications for polarity shift. Communication Yearbook, 6, 395–418.
   Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., & Mayer, M. (1984). Choice shifts: Argument qualities or social comparisons. Communication Yearbook, 8, 393–410.
   Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Mayer, M. E., Hunter, J. E., & Hale, J. L. (1980). Expanding the persuasive arguments explanation of the polarity shift: A linear discrepancy model. Communication Yearbook, 4, 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Mayer, J. E., Hunter, J. F., & Hale, J. L. (1984). Expanding the persuasive arguments explanation of the polarity shift: A linear discrepancy model. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 4, (pp. 165–176). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bottger, P. C. (1984). Expertise and air time as bases of actual and perceived influence in problem-solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 214–221. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.69.2.214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, M. G., Boster, F. J., & Rodriguez, J. I. (1997). The impact of group size and proportion of shared information on the exchange and integration of information in groups. Communication Research, 24, 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley, J. A., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1977). Relationship between vocal activity and perception of communicators in small group interaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 41, 175–187. doi:10.1080/10570317709389610
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (1990). Group Dynamics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Garlick, R., & Mongeau, P. A. (1992). Majority and minority size and the evaluations of persuasive arguments. Communication Research Reports, 56, 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Garlick, R., & Mongeau, P. A. (1993). Argument quality and group member status as determinants of attitudinal minority influence. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 289–308. doi:10.1080/10570319309374455
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Black, L., & Moscovitz, K. (2008). Ideology, attitude change, and deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Political Communication, 25, 23–46. doi:10.1080/10584600701807836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gintner, G., & Lindskold, S. (1975). Rate of participation and expertise as factors influencing leader choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1085–1089. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.32.6.1085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. P., & Meltzer, L. (1972). Interpersonal judgments based on talkativeness: I fact or artifact? Sociometry, 35, 538–561. doi:10.2307/2786532
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2003). Examining social influence in information-sharing contexts. Small Group Research, 34, 391–412. doi:10.1177/1046496403251933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2008). The effect of individual difference variables on information sharing in decision-making groups. Human Communication Research, 30, 540–555. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00744.x
   Google Scholar
• Jaffee, C. L., & Lucas, R. L. (1969). Effects of rates of talking and correctness of decisions on leader choice in small groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 247–254. doi:10.1080/00224545.1969.9922414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2007). Contributions to a group discussion and perceptions of leadership: Does quantity always count more than quality? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 15–30. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.11.1.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, J. C., & Pond, A. W. (1974). Desert survival situation. Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Hullett, C. R., Turner, M. M., & Lapinksi, M. K. (2006). The desirability of using confirmatory factor analysis on published scales. Communication Research Reports, 23, 309–314. doi:10.1080/08824090600962698
   Google Scholar
• Littlepage, G. E., Schmidt, G. W., Whisler, E. W., & Frost, A. G. (1995). An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877–889. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlepage, G. E., & Silbiger, H. (1992). Recognition of expertise in decision-making groups: Effects of group size and participation patterns. Small Group Research, 23, 344–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Heisel, A. D., & Richmond, V. (2001). Eysenk’s big three and communication traits: Three correlational studies. Communication Monographs, 68, 360–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1976). The effects of communication apprehension on the perception of peers. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 40, 14–21. doi:10.1080/10570317609373881
   Google Scholar
• Regula, C. R., & Julian, J. W. (1973). The impact of quality and frequency of task contributions on perceived ability. The Journal of Social Psychology, 89, 115–122. doi:10.1080/00224545.1973.9922575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicken, H. W. (1958). The effect of talkativeness on ability of influence group solutions of problems. Sociometry, 21, 309–321. doi:10.2307/2785795
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, T., Mata, R., & Stoeklin, M. (2004). The use of heuristics in persuasion: Deriving cues on source expertise from argument quality. Current Research in Social Psychology, 10, 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, T., Reimer, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2010). Decision-making groups attenuate the discussion bias in favor of shared information: A meta-analysis. Communication Monographs, 77, 121–142. doi:10.1080/03637750903514318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, R. M., & Bouttilier, R. G. (1975). The effect of quantity and quality of verbal interaction on ratings of leadership ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 403–411. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(75)90044-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81–93. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Swol, L. M. (2009). Extreme members and group polarization. Social Influence, 4, 185–199. doi:10.1080/15534510802584368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum, G. W., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967–978. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar