Facing our Heuristic Limits: Expanding the Terminology for Types of Positive Face

References

• Baiocchi-Wagner, E. (2011). “Facing threats”: Understanding communication apprehensive instructors’ face loss and face restoration in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 59(2), 221–238. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.563442
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, L. L. (2012). Defacement: Indigenous patients’ experiences in Baja Verapaz, Guatamala. Howard Journal of Communications, 23, 119–135. doi:10.1080/10646175.2012.667723
   Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1994). Facework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dickel Dunn, C. (2013). Speaking politely, kindly, and beautifully: Ideologies of politeness in Japanese business etiquette training. Multilingua, 32(2), 225–245. doi:10.1515/multi-2013-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. (1999). Crafting society: Ethnicity, class, and communication theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Flustered and faithful: Embarrassment as a signal of prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 81–97. doi:10.1037/a0025403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, C. (2012). Complimenting professional achievement. Journal of Politeness Research, Language, Behavior, Culture, 8, 223–244. doi:10.1515/pr-2012-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1972). Relations in public. London, England: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, N., & Stratemeyer, M. (2016). Recent research on dehumanization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 25–29. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, H., & Hahn, J.-W. (2011). What Korean apologies require of politeness theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1303–1317. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, D. Y. F. (1994). Face dynamics: From conceptualization to measurement. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), The challenge of facework (pp. 269–305). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., Sabourin, T. C., Rudd, J. E., & Shannon, E. A. (1990). Verbal aggression in violent and nonviolent marital disputes. Communication Quarterly, 38(4), 361–371. doi:10.1080/01463379009369773
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., & Wigley, C. A. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53(1), 61–69. doi:10.1080/03637758609376126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, T. S., & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Facework: Solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17(3), 415–450. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, M., Jordens, C. F. C., Paul, K., Sayers, E., & Sriskandarajah, D. (2000). Face, honor and dignity in the context of colon cancer. Journal of Medical Humanities, 21, 229–243. doi:10.1023/A:1009077209274
   Google Scholar
• Macagno, F. (2013). Strategies of character attack. Argumentation, 27, 369–401. doi:10.1007/s10503-013-9291-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madlock, P. E., & Dillow, M. R. (2012). The consequences of verbal aggression in the workplace: An application of the investment model. Communication Studies, 63, 593–607. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.642456
   Google Scholar
• Mausehund, J., Dortch, R. N., Brown, P., & Bridges, C. (1995). Business etiquette: What your students don’t know. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(4), 34–38. doi:10.1177/108056999505800407
   Google Scholar
• Mensa International Website. (2017). About Mensa. Retrieved from https://www.mensa.org/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Nau, C., & Stewart, C. O. (2014). Effects of verbal aggression and party identification bias on perceptions of political speakers. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 33, 526–536. doi:10.1177/0261927X13512486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojwang, B. O., Matu, P. M., & Ogutu, E. A. (2010). Face attack and patients’ response strategies in a Kenyan hospital. Sociolinguistics, 14, 501–523. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00449.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penman, R. (1994). Facework in communication: Conceptual and moral challenges. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), The challenge of facework (pp. 15–45). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62. doi:10.2307/2092239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueda, K. (1995). Differences in the perception face: Chinese mien-tzu and Japanese mentsu. World Communication, 24(1), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Chory, R. M., Lachlan, K., Westerman, D., & Skalski, P. (2008). Talking smack: Verbal aggression in professional wrestling. Communication Studies, 59, 242–258. doi:10.1080/10510970802257689
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2008). “Reasonable hostility”: Situation-appropriate face attack. Journal of Politeness: Language, Behavior, Culture, 4, 169–171. doi:10.1515/JPLR.2008.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2011). A facework system of minimal politeness: Oral argument in appellate court. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 7(1), 123–145. doi:10.1515/jplr.2011.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, W., Myrick, C., Forrest, J., & Fox, M. J. (2016). The significance of linguistic variation in the speeches of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. American Speech, 91, 269–300. doi:10.1215/00031283-3701015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar