Dialogic courage and “interpreting otherwise” in Camus’ existential phenomenology of absurdity: Sudanese/African women’s constructive engagement with totalitarian discourse structures

References

• Abdelaziz, K. (2019). Sudan’s Bashir names VP, prime minister as protests continue. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sudan-protests/day-into-emergency-rule-sudans-bashir-names-vp-and-prime-minister-idUSKCN1QC0I1
   Google Scholar
• Acreman, S. (2018). Political theory and the enlarged mentality. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aidoo, A. A. (1997). The girl who can: And other stories. Oxford, UK: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Ajooba, M. (2008). Sudanese woman: Dark and bright sides of the past. Khartoum, Sudan: Azza Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Alamin, M. (2019). Sudan’s leader issues decrees to curb protests, black market. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-26/sudan-s-al-bashir-issues-decrees-to-curb-protests-black-market
   Google Scholar
• Al-Haj, O. (2007). Sudanese woman: Development and speciality. Khartoum, Sudan: Azza Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., Baxter, L. A., & Cissna, K. N. (2004). Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (1984). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (Vol. 2, pp. 1729–1867). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, P. (2003). A Gebserian perspective on organizational “Change management”. Integrative Explorations, 7/8, 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, P. (2014a). Communicative engagement and social liberation: Justice will be made. Madison/Teaneck: Fairfield Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, P. (2014b). Tymieniecka’s benevolent sentiment as ground for communication ethics. In R. Arnett & P. Arneson (Eds.), Philosophy of communication ethics: Alterity and the other (pp. 103–128). Madison/Teaneck,NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. (1986). Communication and community: Implications of Martin Buber’s dialogue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. (2003). The responsive “I”: Levinas’s derivative argument. Argumentation & Advocacy, 40(1), 39–50. doi:10.1080/00028533.2003.11821596
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. (2004). A dialogic ethic “between” Buber and Levinas: A repsonsive ethical “I”. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Ca (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 75–90). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. (2005). Dialogic confession: Bonhoeffer’s rhetoric of responsibility. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. (2008). The rhetoric of communication ethics. International encyclopedia of communication. Retrieved from http://www.communicationencyclopedia.com/public/tocnode?queryDarnett&widenD1&result_numberD1&fromDsearch&fuzzyD0&idDg9781405131995_chunk_g978140513199523_ss49-1&typeDstd&slopD1
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. (2012). Communication ethics in dark times: Hannah Arendt’s rhetoric of warning and hope. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. (2016). Camus and existential dialogue. In B. Sleasman (Ed.), Creating Albert Camus: Foundations and explorations of his philosophy of communication (pp. 3–28). Madison/Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. (2018). Communication ethics research: Evolution and thoughtful response. In P. L. Plaisance (Ed.), Communication and Media Ethics (Vol. 26, pp. 391–406). Boston, MA/Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R., & Arneson, P. (1999). Dialogic civility in cynical age: Community, hope, and interpersonal relationships. Albaby: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R., Fritz, J. H., & Holba, A. M. (2007). The rhetorical turn to otherness: Otherwise than humanism. Cosmos and History: the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 3(1), 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2019a). Sudan protests: No amount of beating could make us stop [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-africa-47823367/sudan-protests-no-amount-of-beating-could-make-us-stop
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2019b). Sudan protests: The women driving change [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-africa-48027451/sudan-protests-the-women-driving-change
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary Ethics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (2000). The reluctant modernism of Hannah Arendt. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergoffen, D. B. (2001). Between the ethical and the political: The difference of ambiguity. In W. O’Brien & L. Embree (Eds.), The existential phenomenology of Simone de Beauvoir (pp. 187–203). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academics Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, H. (2007). Creative evolution (A. Mitchell, K. A. Pearson, M. Kolkman, & M. Vaughan, Trans.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. F. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (W. Kaufman, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, A., Mattern, J. L., Herakova, L. L., Kahl, D. H., Jr, Tobola, C., & Bornsen, S. E. (2009). Communicating/muting date rape: A co-cultural theoretical analysis of communication factors related to rape culture on a college campus. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(4), 465–485. doi:10.1080/00909880903233150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M. (2010). Resilience: Talking, resisting, and imagining new normalcies into being. Journal of Communication, 60, 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01469.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus, and other essays (J. O’Brien, Trans.). New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Camus, A. (1964). The human crisis (L. Abel, Trans.). In W. Wasserstrom (Ed.), Civil liberties and the arts: Selections from twice a year, 1938-48 (pp. 240–255). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camus, A. (1965). Notebooks:1942-1951. Chicago, IL: Ivan R Dee.
   Google Scholar
• Camus, A. (1968). Lyrical and critical essays (C. Kennedy, Trans. P. Thody Ed.). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Camus, A. (1991). The rebel: An essay on man in revolt (A. Bower, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Camus, A. (2012). Resistance, rebellion, and death: Essays (J. O’Brien, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Christians, C. (1988). Dialogic communication theory and cultural studies. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 9, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cissna, K. K., & Anderson, R. (2002). Moments of meeting: Buber, Rogers, and the potential for public dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czubaroff, J., & Friedman, M. (2000). A conversation with Maurice Friedman. Southern Communication Journal, 65(2 & 3), 243–254.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M. (1985). Beyond God the father: Toward a philosophy of women’s liberation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. (2013). Camus, Albert. In C. J. Murray (Ed.), Encyclopedia of modern French thought (pp. 11–118). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Beauvoir, S. (1989). The second sex (H. H. Parshley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, J. (1997). Toward a Christian theology of religious pluralism. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, M., & Pal, M. (2010). Dialog theory in marginalized settings: A subaltern studies approach. Communication Theory, 20(4), 363–386. doi:10.1111/comt.2010.20.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, C. (1997). The first hundred years of Mikhail Bakhtin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fadlalla, A. H. (2011). State of vulnerability and humanitarian visibility on the Verge of Sudan’s secession: Lubna’s pants and the transnational politics of rights and dissent. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 37(1), 159–184. doi:10.1086/660179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, I. (2012). Of dogs and men: Empathy and emotion in Camus’s the stranger. Journal of Camus Studies, 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• France24. (2019). Women lead the charge, and chants, in Sudan protests. Retrieved from https://www.france24.com/en/20190411-sudan-women-take-lead-protests-rights-overthrow-islamist-bashir
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. S. (1960). Martin Buber: The life of dialogue. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fuit, I. S. (2009). Albert Camus: Phenomenology and postmodern thought. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Phenomenology and existentialism in the twentieth century (pp. 341–354). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. (1975/1989). Truth and method (2nd J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall.). New York, NY:Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gebser, J. (1985). The ever-present origin (A. Mickunas & N. Barstard, Trans.). Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, C. (1997). Rhetoric retold: Regendering the tradition from antiquity through the renaissance. Carbondale: Southern Illinios University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. D. (2000). Karl Jaspers: Existential philosopher of dialogical communication. Southern Journal of Communication, 65(2–3), 105–118. doi:10.1080/10417940009373161
   Google Scholar
• Gunkel, D. J. (2009). Camus: The rebellious spirit. In C. G. Christians & J. C. Merrill (Eds.), Ethical communication: Moral stances in human dialogue (pp. 74–80). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagenah, I. (2019). Women are leading the push to topple Sudan’s Omar Hassan al-Bashir, and suffering for it. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sudan-women-lead-uprising-vs-omar-hassan-al-bashir-and-suffer-for-it/
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S. (2018). Gender politics in Sudan: Islamism, socialism, and the state. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Handerek, J. (2009). The problem of authenticity and everydayness in existential philosophy. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Phenomenology and existentialism in the twentieth century (pp. 191–200). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hawes, L. C. (2004). Double binds as structures in dominance and of feelings: Problematics of dialogue. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Ca (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 175–190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, P. (2013). Albert Camus and rebellious cosmopolitanism in a divided world. Journal of International Political Theory, 9(2), 194–219. doi:10.3366/jipt.2013.0055
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, P. (2016). Camus and the challenge of political thought: Between despair and hope. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henrici, P. (1983). Toward an anthropological philosophy of communication. Communication Resource, 1, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Holba, A. (2008). Revisiting Martin Buber’s I-It: A rhetorical strategy. Human Communication, 11(4), 495–510.
   Google Scholar
• Holba, A. (2015). Philosophical lineage: Situating voices of self and other. In B. Sleasman (Ed.), Creating Albert Camus: Foundations and explorations of his philosophy of communication (pp. 69–84). Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, M. J. (2004). The ontological workings of dialogue and acknowledgment. In R. Anderson, L. Baxter, & K. K. Ca (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 57–74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Infinito, J. (2004). Theorizing courage as requisite for moral education. Philosophy of Education. Retrieved from https://educationjournal.web.illinois.edu/archive/index.php/pes/article/view/1661.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, J. C. (1992). Arendt, Camus, and modern rebellion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacinto, L. (2019). Women lead the charge, and chants, in Sudan protests. Retrieved from https://www.france24.com/en/20190411-sudan-women-take-lead-protests-rights-overthrow-islamist-bashir
   Google Scholar
• Jaspers, K. (1986). Basic philosophical writings (E. Ehrlich, Trans.). Athens: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johannesen, R. L. (2000). Nel Noddings’s uses of Marrin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 151–160. doi:10.1080/10417940009373164
   Google Scholar
• Lehan, R. (1959). Existentialism in recent American fiction: The demonic quest. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 1(2), 181–202.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. A. (2006). Psychotic entelechy: The dangers of spiritual gifts theology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, R. (2018). Dozens have been killed by the regime. But Sudan’s protesters march on. Online. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/30/dozens-have-died-but-sudan-protesters-march-on
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. J. S. (1993). Interpreting otherwise than Heidegger: Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics as first philosophy. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manoussakis, J. P., & DeRoo, N. (2016). Introduction. In J. P. Manoussakis & N. DeRoo (Eds.), Phenomenology and eschatology: Not yet in the now (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marková, I. (2016). The dialogical mind: Common sense and ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, T. (1981). The literary essays of Thomas Merton. (P. Hart, Ed.). New York, NY: New Directions Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mohiedeen, N. (2019). Sudanese graffiti artist honors anti-government protest victims. Retrieved from https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/sudanese-graffiti-artist-honors-anti-government-protest-victims/4860760.html
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. W. (2000). Bakhtinian answerability and Levinasian responsibility: Forging a fuller dialogical communicative ethics. Southern Journal of Communication, 65(2–3), 133–150. doi:10.1080/10417940009373163
   Google Scholar
• Novello, S. (2008). Tragedy and “Aesthetic politics”: Re-thinking the political beyond Nihilism in the work of Albert Camus. In C. Margerrison, M. Orme, & L. Lincoln (Eds.), Albert Camus in the 21st century: A reassessment of his thinking at the dawn of the new millennium (pp. 259–276). Amsterdam, NY: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Øyen, S. A. (2011). The paradoxes of moral in Jean-Paul Sartre’s philosophy. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Transcendentalism overturned: From absolute power of consciousness until the forces of cosmic architectonics (pp. 169–181). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peach, F. (2008). Death,’deathlessness’ and existenz in Karl Jaspers’ philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, W. B., & Pearce, K. A. (2000). Combining passions and abilities: Toward dialogic virtuosity. Southern Journal of Communication, 65(2–3), 161–175. doi:10.1080/10417940009373165
   Google Scholar
• Poulos, C. N. (2008). Accidental dialogue. Communication Theory, 18, 117–138. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, E., & Sturgess, J. N. (2016). Speaking freely: Thinking with Camus and Beauvoir toward a philosophy of communication. In B. Sleasman (Ed.), Creating Albert Camus: Foundations and explorations of his philosophy of communication (pp. 121–138). Madison/Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2002). The transformative power of dialogue. London, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sagi, A., & Sagi, A. (2002). Albert Camus and the philosophy of the absurd (B. Stein, Trans.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/New York: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. (1953). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). New York, NY: Washington Square Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, C. O. (1986). Communicative praxis and the space of subjectivity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, C. O. (1992). The resources of rationality: A response to the postmodern challenge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, M. (2015). Camus, philosophe: To return to our beginnings. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Sleasman, B. (2016). Introduction. In B. Sleasman (Ed.), Creating Albert Camus: Foundations and explorations of his philosophy of communication (pp. vii–xvii). Madison/Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. R. (2008). Dialogue in agony: The problem of communication in authoritarian regimes. Communication Theory, 18, 160–185. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (1996). The symbol model vs. language as constitutive articulate contact. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Beyond the symbol model: Reflections in the representational nature of language (pp. 9–68). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., & Zediker, K. (2000). Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 224–242. doi:10.1080/10417940009373169
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, K. (2005). Eschatology and Ethics. In G. Meilaender & W. Werpehowski (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of theological ethics (pp. 41–56). New York, NY: Oxforf University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tchir, T. (2017). Hannah Arendt’s theory of political action: Daimonic disclosure of the ‘who’. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, O. (1998). Albert Camus: A life (B. Ivry, Trans.). New York, NY: Alfred A Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. M. (1953). The ethics of rhetoric. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery.
   Google Scholar