Speech assignments and plagiarism in first year public speaking classes: an investigation of students’ moral attributes in relation to their behavioral intention

References

• Ackerman, E., & Kremer, J. A. (2016). Putting assessment into action: Selected projects from the first cohort of the assessment in action grant (pp. 10). DiMenna-Nyselius Library Book Gallery. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/library-books/10
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, T. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision making: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(5), 1038–1057. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02661.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buerkle, C. W., Gearhart, C. C., & Oliveira, C. M. (2017). According to student motivations … : A theory of planned behavior investigation of students’ intention to orally cite sources. Communication Reports, 30(3), 157–169. doi:10.1080/08934215.1280737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M., & Groshek, J. (2009). Forgive me now, fire me later: Mass communication students’ ethics gap concerning school and journalism. Communication Education, 58(4), 461–482. doi:10.1080/03634520903095839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engleberg, I. N. (2016). The case for core competencies in introductory communication courses. Review of Communication, 16(203), 151–161. doi:10.1080/15358593.2016.1187448
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M., Andrews, P. H., Andrews, J. R., & Williams, G. (2016). Public speaking and civic engagement (6th ed.). New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, T. T. (2002). Public speaking students’ perception of cheating. Communication Research Reports, 19(1), 66–76. doi:10.1080/08824090209384833
   Google Scholar
• Ivancic, S. R., & Hosek, A. M. (2017). Visual representations of academic misconduct: Enhancing information literacy skills. Communication Teacher, 31(2), 116–124. doi:10.1080/17404622.2017.1285419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4278958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnick, K. N., & Holler, E. (2012). Conflicting advice on oral citations in top public speaking texts. Basic Communication Course Annual, 24, 189–223.
   Google Scholar
• May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation, and intention. Business & Society, 41(1), 84–117. doi:10.1177/0007650302041001006
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. A., & McDonald, R. A. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgment: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 715–726. doi:10.1007/BF00872325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natcom.org. (2019). The basic course. Retrieved from https://www.natcom.org/search/content/basic%20course
   Google Scholar
• Neff, B. J. (2013). Preachers, politicians and people of character: A rationale for the centrality of a public-speaking course in the core curriculum. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 32(1), 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Nill, A., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2005). The impact of corporate culture, the reward system, and perceived moral intensity on marking students’ ethical decision making. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1), 68–80. doi:10.1177/0273475304273458
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K., & Lenhart, A. (2011). The digital revolution and higher education. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2011/08/28/overview/
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. C., Child, J. T., Mattern, J. L., & Kahl, D. H. (2006). What are students being taught about ethics in public speaking textbooks? Communication Quarterly, 54(4), 507–521. doi:10.1080/01463370601036689
   Google Scholar
• Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). (2020). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 27(1), 19–36. doi:10.1177/0092070399271002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 245–255. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00155-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, B., & Costello, F. (2009). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making: An empirical examination of undergraduate accounting and business students. Accounting Education, 18(1), 75–97. doi:10.1080/09639280802009454
   Google Scholar
• Wickelgren, B. F., & Holm, T. T. (2008). The role of the coach and the organization in addressing plagiarism. The Forensic of Pi Kappa Delta, 93, 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H. L., & Wu, W. P. (2009). The effect of moral intensity on ethical decision making in accounting. Journal of Moral Education, 38(3), 335–351. doi:10.1080/03057240903101606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar