Uncertainty and inoculation: Instilling resistance to anti-vaccination conspiracy propaganda

References

• Afifi, A. A., Clark, V., & May, S. (2004). Computer-aided multivariate analysis. Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Anson, I. G. (2018). Partisanship, political knowledge, and the Dunning‐Kruger effect. Political Psychology, 39(5), 1173–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino, F., Donzelli, G., De Franco, E., Privitera, G., Lopalco, P. L., & Carducci, A. (2017). The web and public confidence in MMR vaccination in Italy. Vaccine, 35(35), 4494–4498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Bessarabova, E. (2023). Employing inoculation theory to mitigate conspiratorial beliefs. In M. Miller (Ed.), The social science of QAnon: Understanding a new social and political phenomenon (pp. 252–268). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., Bessarabova, E., Penkauskas, M., & Talbert, N. (2023). Inoculating against anti-vaccination conspiracies. Health Communication, 1–9. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2235733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Miller, G. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and meta-inoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 40, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Richards, A. (2017). Apprehension or motivation to defend attitudes? Exploring the underlying threat mechanism in inoculation-induced resistance to persuasion. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1307999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., Berriche, M., Uenal, F., McClanahan, W. P., & Linden, S. V. D. (2021). Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 205395172110138. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Good news about bad news: Gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bessarabova, E., & Banas, J. A. (2023). Emotions and the QAnon conspiracy theory. In M. Miller (Ed.), The social science of QAnon: Understanding a new social and political phenomenon (pp. 87–103). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bessarabova, E., Banas, J. A., Reinikainen, H., Talbert, N., Luoma-Aho, V., & Tsetsura, K. (2024, November). Assessing inoculation’s effectiveness in motivating resistance to conspiracy propaganda in Finnish and U.S. Samples. Paper submitted to the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Bessarabova, E., Piercy, C., King, S., Vincent, C., Dunbar, N. E., Burgoon, J. K., Miller, C. H., Jensen, M., Elkins, A., Wilson, D., Wilson, S. N., & Lee, Y.-H. (2016). Mitigating bias blind spot via a serious video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinson, N. H. (2022). Resistance to persuasion: Examining the influence of political ideology on COVID-19 vaccine uptake hesitancy. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.760847
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., Cohen, M., Miller, M. D., & Montgomery, C. L. (1978). An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00620.x
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2013). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. J. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd. ed. pp. 220–237). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2021). Threat and/in inoculation theory. International Journal of Communication, 15, 13. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17634/0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J., & Ivanov, B. (2012). Untangling threat during inoculation-conferred resistance to influence. Communication Reports, 25(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2012.661018
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J., van der Linden, S., Cook, J., & Basol, M. (2021). Inoculation theory in the post‐truth era: Extant findings and new frontiers for contested science, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(6), e12602. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., & Manalo, E. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. Public Library of Science ONE, 12(5), e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2018). Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 256–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabis, L. V., Attia, O. L., Goldman, M., Barak, N., Tefera, P., Shefer, S., Shaham, M., & Lerman-Sagie, T. (2022). The myth of vaccination and autism spectrum. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 36, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2021.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampson, S. E., Goldberg, L. R., & John, O. P. (1987). Category‐breadth and social‐desirability values for 573 personality terms. European Journal of Personality, 1(4), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010405
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Hester, E. B., Martin, J. C., Silberman, W., Slone, A. R., Goatley-Soan, S., Geegan, S., Parker, K. A., Herrington, T. F., Riker, S., & Anderson, A. (2020). Persistence of emotion in the process of inoculation: Experiencing post-attack threat, fear, anger, happiness, sadness, and surprise. Communication Quarterly, 68(5), 560–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2020.1850492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Parker, K. A., & Dillingham, L. L. (2018). Testing the limits of inoculation-generated resistance. Western Journal of Communication, 82(5), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2018.1454600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Pfau, M., & Parker, K. A. (2009). The attitude base as a moderator of the effectiveness of inoculation strategy. Communication Monographs, 76(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802682471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H., Dunbar, N., Miller, C. H., Bessarabova, E., Jensen, M., Wilson, S. N., Elizondo, J., Burgoon, J., & Valacich, J. (2021). Mitigating bias and improving professional decision making through digital game play. In J. Raessens, B. Schouten, J. Jansz, T. D. L. H. Conde Pumpido, M. Kors, & R. Jacobs (Eds.), Persuasive gaming in context (pp. 239–258). Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H., Dunbar, N., Miller, C., Lane, B., Jensen, M., Bessarabova, E., Burgoon, J., Adame, B., Valacich, J., Arterburn, E., Bostwick, E., Piercy, C., King, S., Elizondo, J., & Wilson, S. (2016). Training anchoring and representativeness bias mitigation through a digital game. Simulation & Gaming, 47(6), 751–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116662955
   Google Scholar
• Lees, J., Banas, J. A., Linvill, D., Meirick, P. C., Warren, P., Druckman, J., & Druckman, J. (2023). The spot the Troll Quiz game increases accuracy in discerning between real and in authentic social media accounts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nexus, 2(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad094
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., Basol, M., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1961). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786067
   Google Scholar
• Omer, S. B., Salmon, D. A., Orenstein, W. A., deHart, M. P., & Halsey, N. (2009). Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(19), 1981–1988. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0806477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K. A., Ivanov, B., Matig, J., Dillingham, L. L., & Peritore, N. (2022). Inoculation booster messages: Frequency, content, and timing. The Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18848/2470-9247/CGP/v07i01/1-19
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Banas, J. A., Semmler, S. M., Deatrick, L., Lane, L., Mason, A., Nisbett, G., Craig, E., & Underhill, J. (2010). Role and impact of involvement and enhanced threat in resistance. Communication Quarterly, 58(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370903520307
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Compton, J., Parker, K. A., Wittenberg, E. M., An, C., Ferguson, M., Horton, H., & Malyshev, Y. (2004). The traditional explanation for resistance based on the core elements of threat and counterarguing and an alternative rationale based on attitude accessibility: Do these mechanisms trigger distinct or overlapping processes of resistance? Human Communication Research, 30(3), 329–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2012.661018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Ivanov, B., Houston, B., Haigh, M., Sims, J., Gilchrist, E., Russell, J., Wigley, S., Eckstein, J., & Richert, R. (2005). Inoculation and mental processing: The instrumental role of associative networks in the process of resistance to counterattitudinal influence. Communication Monographs, 72(4), 414–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500322578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Wood, M., Yin, S., Cho, J., Lu, K.-H., & Shen, L. (2003). Attitude accessibility as an alternative explanation for how inoculation confers resistance. Communication Monographs, 70(1), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750302474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Semmler, S. M., Deatrick, L., Lane, L., Mason, A., Nisbett, G., Craig, E., Cornelius, J., & Banas, J. A. (2009). Nuances about the role and impact of affect in inoculation. Communication Monographs, 76(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802378807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Szabo, A., Anderson, J., Morrill, J., Zubric, J., & H-Wan, H.-H. (2001). The role and impact of affect in the process of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 27(2), 216–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00781.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. M. (2020). Mistrust and misinformation: A two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2), 617–641. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, C. L., Wicke, R., & Harvill, B. (2022). Communicating uncertainty to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review of the literature. Annals of the International Communication Association, 46(4), 260–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2085136
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A., & Banas, J. A. (2018). The opposing mediational effects of apprehensive threat and motivational threat when inoculating against reactance to health promotion. Southern Communication Journal, 83(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2018.1498909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). The fake news game: Actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. Journal of Risk Research, 22(5), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serlin, R. C., & Kaiser, H. F. (1976). A computer program for item selection based on maximum internal consistency. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36(3), 757–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447603600328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. E., Swerdfeger, A. L., & Eslick, G. D. (2014). Vaccines are not associated with autism: An evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine, 32(29), 3623–3629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2002). What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1298–1313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, N. C. (2016). “Vaccinations are safe and effective”: Inoculating positive HPV vaccine attitudes against antivaccination attack messages. Communication Reports, 29(3), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2015.1083599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2019). Ten Threats to global health in 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
   Google Scholar