Determinants of Unemployment and Economic Hardship of Welfare Leavers Who Have Reached Their Lifetime Limits

REFERENCES

• Albert , V. , Iaci , R. and Catlin , S. 2004 . Facing time limits and kinship placements . Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services , 85 ( 1 ) : 63 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom , D. , Farrel , M. and Fink , B. 2002 . Welfare time limits: State policies, implementation, and effects on families , New York : Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation .
   Google Scholar
• Cherlin , A. J. and Wilson , W. J. 2002 . Welfare reform and the current recession , National Center for Children in Poverty, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University . Retrieved January 10, 2004, from http://www.nccp.org
   Google Scholar
• Chernick , H. and Reschovsky , A. 2002 . Welfare reform and recession: Can the states handle both? . Focus , 22 ( 1 ) : 22 – 28 .
   Google Scholar
• Danziger , S. K. , Carlson , M. J. and Henly , J. R. 2001 . Post-welfare employment and psychological well-being . Women Health , 32 ( 1–2 ) : 47 – 78 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger , S. K. and Seefeldt , K. S. 2002 . Barriers to employment and the “Hard to Serve”: Implications for services, sanctions, and time limits . Focus , 22 ( 1 ) : 76 – 81 .
   Google Scholar
• DeWees , S. October 1998 . The drive to work: Transportation issues and welfare reform in rural areas , October , Mississippi State, MS : Southern Rural Development Center . Information Brief No.5
   Google Scholar
• Dilger , R. J. 2004 . “ Cash assistance and social welfare policy in the United States: The political and institutional context ” . In Welfare reform in West Virginia , Edited by: Dilger , R. 55 – 106 . Morgantown, WV : West Virginia University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Duncan , G. J. and Brooks-Gunn , J. 2000 . New directions for child development in the twenty-first century: family poverty, welfare reform, and child development . Child Development , 71 ( 1 ) : 188 – 196 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finegold , K. and Staveteig , S. 2002 . “ Race, ethnicity, and welfare reform ” . In Welfare reform: The next act , Edited by: Weil , A. and Finegoal , K. 203 – 223 . Washington, DC : Urban Institute Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fremstad , S. and Parrot , S. 2004 . The Senate Finance Committee's TANF reeditorization bill , Washington, DC : Center on Budget and Policy Priorities .
   Google Scholar
• Holzer , H. J. 2000 . Career advancement prospects and strategies for low-wage minority workers , Washington, DC : Urban Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Hunter-Manns , J. and Bloom , D. 1999 . Connecticut post-time limit tracking study: Six-months survey results , Working paper. New York : Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation .
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan , J. 2001 . What happens next?: Post-time-limit programs . Issue Notes , 5 ( 12 ) : 1 – 11 . Retrieved January 5, 2005, from http://www.financeproject.org/win/safteynetprograms.htmThe Welfare Information Network
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid , J. 1998 . The devolution tortoise and the centralization hare . New England Economic Review , May/June : 13 – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• Lee , K. H. 2005 . Effects of work incentive policies and determinants of the socioeconomic status of welfare leavers in an economically disadvantaged area . The Social Policy Journal , 4 ( 3/4 ) : 111 – 129 .
   Google Scholar
• Loprest , P. J. 2002 . Who returns to welfare? , Washington, DC : Urban Institute . Retrieved October 15, 2004, from http://www.urban.org
   Google Scholar
• Loprest , P. J. and Wissoker , D. 2002 . Employment and welfare reform in the National Survey of America's Families , Washington, DC : Urban Institute . The New Federalism Discussion Paper No. 02–04
   Google Scholar
• Marson , S. M. and Powell , R. M. 2000 . Churners: A focus group analysis of the return rate of former rural TANF recipients (Welfare recidivism in Robeson county, N.C.) . Policy and Practice of Public Human Services , 58 ( 4 ) : 44 – 49 .
   Google Scholar
• Martinson , S. M. and Strawn , J. 2003 . Built to last: Why skills matter for long-run success in welfare reform , Washington, DC : Center for Law and Social Policy .
   Google Scholar
• MAXIMUS . 2000 . Study of families leaving TANF in North Carolina due to time limits: Results of the second follow-up survey , Reston, VA : Author .
   Google Scholar
• Mettler , S. 2000 . States' rights, women's obligations: Contemporary welfare reform in historical perspective . Women & Politics , 21 ( 1 ) : 1 – 34 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavetti , L. and Bloom , D. 2001 . “ State sanctions and time limits ” . In The new world of welfare , Edited by: Blank , R. and Haskins , R. 245 – 269 . Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sandefur , G. D. and Cook , S. T. 1998 . Permanent exits from public assistance: The impact of duration, family, and work . Social Forces , 77 ( 2 ) : 763 – 787 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhill , I. and Haskins , R. March 2002 . Welfare reform and the work support system. Welfare reform and beyond , March , Washington, DC : Brookings Institution . Retrieved January 18, 2005, from http://www.brookings.org/wrb/publications.htmPolicy Brief No. 17
   Google Scholar
• Schott , L. 1998 . State choices on time limit policies in TANF-funded programs , Washington, DC : Center on Budget and Policy Priorities .
   Google Scholar
• Soss , J. , Schram , S. F. , Vartanian , T. P. and O'Brien , E. 2001 . Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution . American Journal of Political Science , 45 ( 2 ) : 378 – 395 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staveteig , S. and Wigton , A. 2000 . Key findings by race and ethnicity (Findings from the 1999 National Survey of America's Families) , Washington, DC : Urban Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , M. J. and Barusch , A. S. 2004 . Personal, family, and multiple barriers of long-term welfare recipients . Social Work , 49 ( 2 ) : 9 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• Tolman , R. M. and Raphael , J. 2000 . A review of research on welfare and domestic violence . Journal of Social Issues , 56 ( 4 ) : 655 – 681 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweedie , J. , Reichert , D. and O'Connor , M. 1999 . Tracking recipients after they leave welfare: Summaries of new state tracking studies , Denver : National Conference of State Legislatures . 1998
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) . 2002 . Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program (TANF): Fourth annual report to Congress , Washington, DC : Author .
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) . 2004 . Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program (TANF): Sixth annual report to Congress , Washington, DC : Author .
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) . 2006 . Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program (TANF): Seventh annual report to Congress , Washington, DC : Author .
   Google Scholar
• Vartanian , T. P. and McNamara , J. M. 2000 . Work and economic outcomes after welfare . Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare , 27 ( 2 ) : 41 – 77 .
   Google Scholar
• Zedlewski , S. R. and Loprest , P. 2001 . “ Will TANF work for the most disadvantaged families? ” . In The new world of welfare , Edited by: Blank , R. and Haskins , R. 311 – 334 . Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press .
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman , J. , DeWees , S. , Reinschmiedt , L. and Hirschl , T. 1999 . Rural America and welfare reform: An overview assessment , Columbia, MO : University of Missouri, Columbia, Rural Policy Research Institute .
   Google Scholar