186
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluating a Case of Parent Separation in Social Services Through a Text Analysis: Clinical and Health Implications

, &

References

  • Beecham, J., & Sinclair, I. (2007). Costs and outcomes in children's social care. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2006). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Busschers, I., van Vugt, E. S., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2016). Case management for child protection services: A multi-level evaluation study. Children and Youth Services Review, 68, 169–177.
  • Carlson, M. J., & Berger, L. M. (2013). What kids get from parents: Packages of parental involvement across complex family forms. Social Service Review, 87(2), 213–249.
  • Charmaz, K. (2003). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 249–291). New York: Sage.
  • Cho, S. M. (2007). Assessing organizational effectiveness in human service organizations: An empirical review of conceptualization and determinants. Journal of Social Service Research, 33(3), 31–45.
  • Colaianni, L., & Ciardiello, P. (2012). Cambiamo discorso. Diagnosi e counselling nell'intervento sociale secondo la scienza dialogica. Milano, Italy: F. Angeli.
  • Einbinder, S. D., Robertson, P. J., Garcia, A., Vuckovic, G., & Patti, R. J. (2000). Interorganizational collaboration in social service organizations: A study of the prerequisites to success. Journal of Children and Poverty, 6(2), 119–140.
  • Enano, S., Freisthler, B., Perez-Johnson, D., & Lovato-Hermann, K. (2017). Evaluating parents in partnership: A preliminary study of a child welfare intervention designed to increase reunification. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(2), 236–245.
  • Faccio, E, Belloni, E., Cipolletta, S., Iudici, A., Castiglioni, M., & Mannarini, S. (2016). The power of weight and the weight of power in adolescence: a comparison between young and adult women. Journal of Family Studies, 1–15.
  • Farmer, E., & Lutman, E. (2010). Case management and outcomes for neglected children returned to their parents: A five year follow-up study. London: Department of Children, Schools and Families.
  • Farmer, E., Sturgess, W., & O’Neill, T. (2008). The reunification of looked after children with their parents: Patterns interventions and outcomes. Report to the department for children, schools and families. School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol.
  • Grinnell, R. M., Jr., & Unrau, Y. (2005). Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  • Hardina, D. (2005). Ten characteristics of empowerment-oriented social service organizations. Administration in Social Work, 29(3), 23–42.
  • Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Hasenfeld, Y. (2009). Human services as complex organizations. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Hwang, J., & Lee, B. R. (2013). Response agreement rates between child welfare–involved youth and their caregivers. Journal of Social Service Research, 39(2), 218–232.
  • Iudici, A., Alborghetti, E. & Ferri, (2017). Mediation as a restorative justice tool: Applications in the Italian juvenile judicial context. In J. Evans (Ed.), Restorative and transitional justice: Perspectives, progress and considerations for the future. New York: Nova Science Publisher.
  • Iudici, A., & Gagliardo Corsi, A. (2017). Evaluation in the field of social services for minors: Measuring the efficacy of interventions in the Italian service for health protection and promotion. Evaluation and Program Planning, 61, 160–168.
  • Iudici, A., & Maiocchi, A. (2014). Community Justice and juvenile offender: The management of an individual case with criminal slope with community involvement. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 2015–2027. Doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p2015.
  • Iudici, A., & Renzi, C. (2015). The configuration of job placement for people with disabilities in the current economic contingencies in Italy: Social and clinical implications for health. Disability and Health Journal, 8(4), 586. Doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.06.004.
  • Lamothe, M., & Lamothe, S. (2009). Beyond the search for competition in social service contracting: Procurement, consolidation, and accountability. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 164–188.
  • Netting, F. E., Kettner, P. M., McMurtry, S. L., & Thomas, L. M. (2016). Social work macro practice (6th Edition) connecting core competencies series. New York: Pearson Longman.
  • Pilkauskas, N. V., Currie, J. M., & Garfinkel, I. (2012). The great recession, public transfers, and material hardship. Social Service Review, 86(3), 401–427.
  • Robinson, K., & Webber, M. (2013). Models and effectiveness of service user and carer involvement in social work education: A literature review. British Journal of Social Work, 43(5), 925–944.
  • Rose, W., & Barnes, J. (2008). Improving safeguarding practice: Study of serious case reviews 2001–2003, London, UK: Department for Children Schools and Families/Open University.
  • Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2003). Evaluation: A systematic approach. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2016). Empowerment series: Essential research methods for social work, empowerment series. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  • Salvini, A. (2004). Psicologia clinica. Padova: Domeneghini editore.
  • Shaw, I., & Lishman, J. (2002). Evaluation and social work practice. London: Sage Publications.
  • Sheppard, M. (2009). High thresholds and prevention in children’s services: The impact of mothers’ coping strategies on outcome of child and parenting problems—six month follow-up. British Journal of Social Work, 39(1), 46–63.
  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Turchi, G. P., & Gherardini, V. (2014). La mediazione dialogica(R). Fondazione scientifica, metodo e rassi in ambito penale, civile e commerciale, familiare e di comunità. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  • Turchi, G. P. (2002). “Tossicodipendenza”. Generare il cambiamento tra mutamento di paradigm ed effetti pragmatici. Padova: Domeneghini Editore.
  • Turchi, G. P. (2009). Dati senza numeri. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore.
  • Turchi, G. P., Celleghin, E., & Francato, S. (2012). Promozione della salute e politiche sociali. Il contributo di M.A.D.I.T. alla ricerca intervento. Padova: Domeneghini Editore.
  • Turchi, G., & Ciardiello, P. (2004). Reato e identità. Implicazioni epistemologiche ed operative–Il contributo del progetto Chirone. Padova: Upsel Domeneghini.
  • Turchi, G. P., Romanelli, M., Bonazza, F., & Girardi, A. (2014). Discursive Repertory. In Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 467–470). New York: Springer.
  • Webb, S. A. (2001). Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31(1), 57–79.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Ricerche filosofiche. Torino: Einaudi.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.