Treatment Barriers to Social and Health Care Services from the Standpoint of Female Substance Users in Finland

References

• Brown, D. J. (2006). Working the system: Re-thinking the institutionally organized role of mothers and the reduction of “risk” in child protection work. Social Problems, 53(3), 352–370. doi:10.1525/sp.2006.53.3.352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. (2011). “Vulnerability”: Handle with care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(3), 313–321. doi:10.1080/17496535.2011.597165
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. G. (1984). Autobiographical accounts and research experience. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), The research process in educational settings: Ten case studies (pp. 251–270). Lewes: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. L. (1998). Institutional ethnography and experience as data. Qualitative Sociology, 21(1), 55–73. doi:10.1023/A:1022171325924
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, N. D. (2000). Using women. Gender, drug policy, and social justice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L., & McCoy, L. (2006). Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In D. E. Smith (Ed.), Institutional ethnography as practice (pp. 15–44). London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, B. (2009). Vulnerability questioning the certainties in social work and health. International Social Work, 52(4), 473–484. doi:10.1177/0020872809104251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grahame, P. R. (1998). Ethnography, institutions, and the problematic of the everyday world. Human Studies, 21(4), 347–360. doi:10.1023/A:1005469127008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hiilamo, H. (2015). Hyvinvoinnin vakuutusyhtiö – Mistä sote-uudistuksessa on kysymys? Helsinki: Into.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, L. (2013). The treatment views and recommendations of substance abusing women: A meta-synthesis. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 12(4), 473–489. doi:10.1177/1473325011432776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Chau, S., & Vokrri, L. (2015). Mothers’ narratives of their involvement with child welfare services. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 31(3), 344–358. doi:10.1177/0886109915574579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhila, K. (2004). Talking back to stigmatized identities: Negotitation of culturally dominant categorizations in interviews with sheltered resident. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 3(3), 259–275. doi:10.1177/1473325004045665
   Google Scholar
• Lavee, E. (2016). Low-income women’s encounters with social services: Negotiation over power, knowledge and respectability. British Journal of Social Work, 47, 1554–1571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppo, A., & Perälä, R. (2009). User involvement in Finland: The hybrid of control and emancipation. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 23(3), 359–371. doi:10.1108/14777260910966771
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Liuski, S. (2016). Poikkeavuuden kategorioita huumeita käyttävien naisten ryhmäkeskusteluissa. Pro Gradu –tutkielma, Jyväskylän yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: Asking, listening and interpreting. In T. May (Ed.) Qualitative research in action (pp. 226–241). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, L., Officer, S., & Robinson, L. (2003). Feeling poor: The felt experience of low-income lone mothers. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 18(3), 316–331. doi:10.1177/0886109903254581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Glassner, B. (2004). The “inside” and ”outside”. Finding realities in interviews. In D. Silverman (Ed.) Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 125–139). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mulia, N. (2002). Ironies in the pursuit of well-being: The perspectives of low-income, substance-using women on service institutions. Contemporary Drug Problems, 29(4), 711–748. doi:10.1177/009145090202900404
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. (2012). Social work with substance users. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nesvaag, S., & Lie, T. (2010). The Norwegian substance treatment reform. Between new public management and conditions for good practice. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 27(6), 655–666. doi:10.1177/145507251002700610
   Google Scholar
• Partanen, A., Kuussaari, K., Forsell, M., & Varis, T. (2014). Päihdepalvelut. In Kunnallistalouden ja -hallinnon neuvottelukunta. Peruspalvelujen tila -raportti 2014. II osa – liiteosa. Valtiovarainministeriön julkaisuja 9/2014, II osa, pp. 189–207.
   Google Scholar
• Paylor, I., Measham, F., & Asher, H. (2012). Social work and drug use. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill, Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rihter, L., & Kobal, B. (2007). “I look like a mess. Am I needed in the profit oriented society?” The labour market and employment situation of some vulnerable categories of unemployed and inactive people in Slovenia. Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku Journal of Social Policy, 14(3–4), 373–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic. A feminist sociology. Oxford: Open University Press/Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (2004). Writing the social. Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto: University Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, R. (2015). Pregnant women and substance use: Fear, stigma, and barriers to care. Health & Justice, 3(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tammi, T. (2007). Medicalising prohibition: Harm reduction in Finnish and international drug policy. Helsinki: Stakes Research Reports 151.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, O. D. (2010). Barriers to treatment for women with substance use disorders. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20(3), 393–409. doi:10.1080/10911351003673310
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman, E. (2010). Women and addiction: The importance of gender issues in substance abuse research. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 29(2), 127–138. doi:10.1080/10550881003684582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virokannas, E. (2017a). Eriarvoisuuden kokemuksia ja hallinnan suhteita hyvinvointipalvelujärjestelmässä – Huumeita käyttävien naisten “standpoint”. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 82(3), 274–283.
   Google Scholar
• Virokannas, E. (2017b). Rajoitettuja avun saannin kokemuksia ja hallinnan suhteita huumeita käyttävien naisten keskusteluissa hyvinvointipalvelujärjestelmästä. Janus, 25(2), 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Virokannas, E., Liuski, S., & Kuronen, M. (2018). The contested concept of vulnerability – a literature review. European Journal of Social Work. Published online 12 Aug 2018. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1508001
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Web pages http://alueuudistus.fi/en/frontpage, https://www.thl.fi/en/web/social-welfare-and-health-care-reform.
   Google Scholar