1,744
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Housing Problems and Social Work Advocacy in a Home-Owning Society

ORCID Icon &

References

  • AWARE (2016). Single parents’ access to public housing: Findings from AWARE’s research project. Singapore: AWARE. Retrieved from http://www.aware.org.sg/2017/02/single-parents-need-more-inclusive-policies-on-public-housing
  • Armstrong, E. M. (2014). Shared subjects, divergent epistemologies: Sociology, social work, and social problems scholarship. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 13(6), 757–765. doi: 10.1177/1473325014542959
  • Bliss, D. L. (2015). Using the social work advocacy practice model to find our voices in service of advocacy. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), 57–68. doi: 10.1080/23303131.2014.978060
  • Briscoe, C. (2005). A study of the community work approaches of Family Service Centres in Singapore (Doctoral dissertation). National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Brydon, K. (2009). A changing face for social work: Globalisation, internationalisation and the Monash BSW in Singapore 2004-2006 (Doctoral dissertation). Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Brydon, K. (2010). Social work advocacy in Singapore: Some reflections on the constraints and opportunities. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 4(3), 119–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-1411.2010.00041.x
  • Chua, B. H. (2014). Navigating between limits: The future of public housing in Singapore. Housing Studies, 29(4), 520–533. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2013.874548
  • Curry-Stevens, A. (2012). Persuasion: Infusing advocacy practice with insights from anti-oppression practice. Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 345–363. doi: 10.1177/1468017310387252
  • Department of Statistics. (2018a). Resident households by tenancy, annual. Retrieved from https://www.tablebuilder.singstat.gov.sg/publicfacing/createDataTable.action?refId=12309
  • Department of Statistics. (2018b). Key household income trends, 2017. Singapore: DOS.
  • Donaldson, L. P. (2008). Developing a progressive adovocacy program within a human services agency. Administration in Social Work, 32(2), 25–48. doi: 10.1300/J147v32n02_03
  • Eurostat. (2016). EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/income-and-living-conditions/data/database
  • Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. The British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch106
  • Ezell, M. (2001). Advocacy in the human services. California, CA: Thomson.
  • Finch, H., Lewis, J., & Turley, C. (2014). Focus groups. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 211–242). London, UK: SAGE.
  • Flint, J. (2002). Social housing agencies and the governance of anti-social behaviour. Housing Studies, 17(4), 619–637. doi: 10.1080/02673030220144376
  • Gilligan, P. (2005). Well motivated reformists or nascent radicals: How do applicants to the degree in social work see social problems, their origins and solutions? British Journal of Social Work, 37(4), 735–760. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl030
  • Giullari, S., & Shaw, M. (2005). Supporting or controlling? New labour’s housing strategy for teenage parents. Critical Social Policy, 25(3), 402–417. doi: 10.1177/0261018305054078
  • Hansard. (1985). Parliament 6 session 1 vol 45 col 14 (25 February 1985).
  • Hansard. (2016). Parliament 13 session 1 vol 94 (24 March 2016).
  • Housing and Development Board (HDB). (2018a). Annual report 2017/2018. Singapore: HDB.
  • Housing and Development Board (HDB). (2018b). Public rental scheme: Eligibility. Retrieved from https://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/residential/renting-a-flat/renting-from-hdb/public-rental-scheme/eligibility
  • Howe, D. (1991). Knowledge, power and the shape of social work practice. In M. Davies (Ed.), The sociology of social work (pp. 202–220). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Jessen, J. T., & Tufte, P. A. (2014). Discretionary decision-making in a changing context of activation policies and welfare reforms. Journal of Social Policy, 43(2), 269–288. doi: 10.1017/S0047279413000998
  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of individuals in public service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Litzelfelner, P., & Petr, C. G. (1997). Case advocacy in child welfare. Social Work, 42(4), 392–402.
  • McCarty, D. (2008). The impact of public housing policy on family social work theory and practice. Journal of Family Social Work, 11(1), 74–88. doi: 10.1080/10522150802007329
  • Ministry of National Development. (2016). Fresh start housing scheme. Retrieved from http://www.mnd.gov.sg/BudgetDebate2016/fresh-start-housing-scheme-what-coming-up.htm
  • Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF). (2013). Social service offices to be set up in HDB towns to strengthen delivery of social services to needy Singaporeans. Retrieved from https://www.msf.gov.sg/media-room/Pages/Social-Service-Offices-to-be-set-up-in-HDB-towns-to-strengthen-delivery-of-social-services-to-needy-Singaporean.aspx
  • Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF). (2016). Family service centres. Retrieved from https://app.msf.gov.sg/Policies/Strong-and-Stable-Families/Supporting-Families/Family-Service-Centres
  • Mosley, J. (2010). Organizational resources and environmental incentives: Understanding the policy advocacy involvement of human service nonprofits. Social Service Review, 84(1), 57–76. doi: 10.1086/652681
  • Mosley, J. (2013a). The beliefs of homeless service managers about policy advocacy: Definitions, legal understanding, and motivations to participate. Administration in Social Work, 37(1), 73–89. doi: 10.1080/03643107.2012.656221
  • Mosley, J. (2013b). Recognizing new opportunities: Reconceptualizing policy advocacy in everyday organizational practice. Social Work, 58(3), 231–239. doi: 10.1093/sw/swt020
  • Nguyen, M. T., Basolo, V., & Tiwari, A. (2013). Opposition to affordable housing in the USA: Debate framing and the responses of local actors. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(2), 107–130. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2012.667833
  • Nissen, M. A. (2015). Social workers and the sociological sense of social problems: Balancing objectivism, subjectivism, and social construction. Qualitative Sociology Review, 11(2), 216–231.
  • Pittini, A., Ghekière, L., Dijol, J., & Kiss, I. (2015). The state of housing in the EU 2015. Brussels, Belgium: Housing Europe.
  • Rosenfeld, O. (2015). Social housing in the UNECE region: Models, trends and challenges. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
  • Sahlin, I. (1995). Strategies for exclusion from social housing. Housing Studies, 10(3), 381–401. doi: 10.1080/02673039508720827
  • Saldaña, J. (2014). Coding and analysis strategies. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347. doi: 10.2307/2939044
  • Sherraden, M. S., Slosar, B., & Sherraden, M. (2002). Innovation in social policy: Collaborative policy advocacy. Social Work, 47(3), 209–221.
  • Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., O’Connor, W., Morrell, G., & Ormston, R. (2014). Analysis in practice. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 295–345). London, UK: SAGE.
  • Thompson, S. J., McManus, H., Lantry, J., Windsor, L., & Flynn, P. (2006). Insights from the street: Perceptions of services and providers by homeless young adults. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(1), 34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.09.001
  • Yuen, B. (2007). Squatters no more: Singapore social housing. Global Urban Development, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.globalurban.org/GUDMag07Vol3Iss1/Yuen.htm
  • Zufferey, C. (2008). Responses to homelessness in Australian cities: Social worker perspectives. Australian Social Work, 61(4), 357–371. doi: 10.1080/03124070802428175

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.