“It Puts Them in the Role of Zoo Animals”: Gatekeeping, Research Fatigue and Over-Researched Populations in Czech Social Work Research

References

• Aaltonen, S., & Kivijärvi, A. (2019). Disrupting professional practices with research-driven intervention. Researcher–gatekeeper negotiations in the context of targeted youth services. Qualitative Social Work, 18(4), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325018757080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andoh-Arthur, J., et al. (2019). Gatekeepers in qualitative research. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations (pp. 4377–4391). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• APA. (2016). Ethical principles for psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved January 31, 2024, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, F. (2021). Accounting for research fatigue in research ethics. Bioethics, 35(3), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesten, J., & Henry, M. (2018). Between fatigue and silence: The challenges of conducting research on sexual violence in conflict. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 25(4), 568–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxy027
   Google Scholar
• Broadhead, R. S., & Rist, R. C. (1976). Gatekeepers and the social control of social research. Social Problems, 23(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.2307/799778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broskevičová, Z., & Gřundělová, B. (2023). Negotiating relationships between researchers, gatekeepers, and hard-to-reach groups of population as a challenge for social work research. Czech & Slovak Social Work/Sociální Práce/Sociálna Práca, 23(1), 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. (2008). We’re over-researched here!’ exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology, 42(5), 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094573
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. (2011). Gaining and maintaining access: Exploring the mechanisms that support and challenge the relationship between gatekeepers and researchers. Qualitative Social Work, 10(4), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009358228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowhurst, I., & Kennedy-Macfoy, M. (2013). Troubling gatekeepers: Methodological considerations for social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(6), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.823281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čtvrtníčková, M., & Táborská, T. (2021). Sociální služby jako samozřejmá ženská práce? Alice se zasadí o její docenění! Feminismus.cz. [online]. Retrieved February 20, 2024, from https://www.feminismus.cz/cz/clanky/socialni-sluzby-jako-samozrejma-zenska-prace-alice-se-zasadi-o-jeji-doceneni
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K., & Gray, M. (2017). The place of service-user expertise in evidence-based practice. Journal of Social Work, 17(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316637222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Laine, M. (2000). Fieldwork, participation and practice: Ethics and dilemmas in qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denvall, V., & Skillmark, M. (2021). Bridge over troubled water—closing the research–practice gap in social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(7), 2722–2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessens, K., Saurama, E., & Fargion, S. (2011). Research with social workers to improve their social interventions. European Journal of Social Work, 14(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.516629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldridge, A. (2013). Gatekeeping and drinking cultures: How do we talk about drinking? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(6), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.823292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellard-Gray, A., Jeffrey, N. K., Choubak, M., & Crann, S. E. (2015). Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 160940691562142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmel, N., Hughes, K., Greenhalgh, J., & Sales, A. (2007). Accessing socially excluded people—Trust and the gatekeeper in the researcher-participant relationship. Sociological Research Online, 12(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerich, N. (2016). When is a REC not a REC? When it is a gatekeeper. Research Ethics, 12(4), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116651668
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, P., Balfour, B., & Moss, S. (2018). Advocating co-productive engagement with marginalised people: A specific perspective on and by survivors of childhood sexual abuse. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(7), 2096–2113. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovagnoniová, R., Hron, D., Mlejnková, K., Nekolová, M., Sluková, A., & Šnajdrová, Z. (2019). Analýza stávající situace v oblasti vzdělávání pracovníků v sociálních službách v ČR. MPSV.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hubíková, O., Havlíková, J., Musil, L., & Kubalčíková, K. (2015). Pracovní podmínky výkonu sociální práce v rámci agendy příspěvku na péči. Czech & Slovak Social Work/Sociální Práce/Sociálna Práca, 15(2), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Iarskaia-Smirnova, E. (2013). Social work in post-socialist countries: Divergence and common ground. In H. G. Homfeldt, Ch. Bähr, Ch. Schröder, W. Schröder, & C. Schweppe (Eds.), Weltatlas Soziale Arbeit (pp. 353–378). BELTZ Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• IFSW. (2018). Global statement of ethical principles for social work - international federation of social workers. Retrieved February 15, 2024, from ifsw.org
   Google Scholar
• Kay, L. (2019). Guardians of research: Negotiating the strata of gatekeepers in research with vulnerable participants. Practice, 1(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2019.1589988
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy-Macfoy, M. (2013). ‘It’s important for the students to meet someone like you.’ How perceptions of the researcher can affect gaining access, building rapport and securing cooperation in school-based research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(6), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.823294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koen, J., Wassenaar, D., & Mamotte, N. (2017). The ‘over-researched community’: An ethics analysis of stakeholder views at two South African HIV prevention research sites. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 194, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, J. L. (2003). Negotiating expectations in the field: Gatekeepers, research fatigue and cultural biases. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9493.00152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAreavey, R., & Das, C. (2013). A delicate balancing act: Negotiating with gatekeepers for ethical research when researching minority communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200102
   Google Scholar
• MoLSA [MPSV]. (2019). Analýza financování sociálních služeb. MoLSA.
   Google Scholar
• Nečasová, M., & Musil, L. (2006). Pracovní podmínky a dilemata pomáhajících pracovníků. Sociální práce| Sociálna práca, 3, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, L., Colyer, M., & Cooper, S. A. (2013). Recruitment to intellectual disability research: A qualitative study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, 57(7), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01573.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2002). The role and achievements of a professional association in the late twentieth century: The British Association of Social Workers 1970–2000. British Journal of Social Work, 32(8), 969–995. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/32.8.969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K., & Lamaro Haintz, G. (2021). Is anyone listening to us? ‘They’re given feedback and there’s no outcomes’ settlement for newly arrived Syrians in Regional Australia. Ethics and Social Welfare, 15(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2020.1802502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2016). The social work voice: How could unions strengthen practice? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 26(4), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol26iss4id21
   Google Scholar
• Sanghera, G. S., & Thapar-Björkert, S. (2008). Methodological dilemmas: Gatekeepers and positionality in Bradford. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701491952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scourfield, P. (2012). Defenders against threats or enablers of opportunities: The screening role played by gatekeepers in researching older people in care homes. The Qualitative Report, 17(14), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1788
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, S., Többe-Schukalla, M., Singh, S., & Martinss, K. H. (2018). Community work in Germany and Sweden in context of changing welfare models. International Social Work, 61(4), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872816666622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, S., & Turunen, P. (2022). Community work in Nordic welfare states in transformation: Directions, conditions and dilemmas. Nordic Social Work Research, 12(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2022.2056812
   Google Scholar
• Stanojević, M., & Broder, Ž. (2012). Trade unions in Slovenia: Historical development and the current situation. SEER, 15(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-2869-2012-3-303
   Google Scholar
• Steens, R., Van Regenmortel, T., & Hermans, K. (2018). Beyond the research–practice gap: The development of an academic collaborative centre for child and family social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(6), 1611–1626. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchanec, M., & Ďásek, K. (2019). Pracovní hodnoty, kvalita pracovního života a pracovní spokojenost sociálních pracovníků v ČR ve srovnání s dalšími sektory. Czech & Slovak Social Work/Sociální Práce/Sociálna Práca, 19(3), 100–116.
   Google Scholar
• Sukarieh, M., & Tannock, S. (2013). On the problem of over-researched communities: The case of the Shatila Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon. Sociology, 47(3), 494–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512448567
   Google Scholar
• Teater, B. (2017). Social work research and its relevance to practice:“The gap between research and practice continues to be wide”. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(5), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1340393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, S., Kirkham, S. R., & O’Flynn-Magee, K. (2004). The analytic challenge in interpretive description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300101
   Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A. (2015). Preparing current and future practitioners to integrate research in real practice settings. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(4), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514538105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor‐Shlevin, S. (2021). Contextualised resistance: The mediating power of paradigmatic frameworks. Social Policy & Administration, 55(5), 802–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadeboncoeur, C., Townsend, N., Foster, C., & Sheehan, M. (2016). Variation in university research ethics review: Reflections following an inter-university study in England. Research Ethics, 12(4), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116652650
   Google Scholar
• Wanat, C. L. (2008). Getting past the gatekeepers: Differences between access and cooperation in public school research. Field Methods, 20(2), 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (2020). ‘Hard to reach’ parents but not hard to research: A critical reflection of gatekeeper positionality using a community-based methodology. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(5), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1626819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar