Questions for Postqualitative Inquiry: Conversations to Come

References

• Arai, S. (2011). What will you assume about my difference? A poem. In K. Paisley & D. Dustin (Eds.), Speaking up and speaking out (pp. 21–30). Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berbary, L. A. (2017). Thinking through poststructuralism in leisure studies: A detour around “proper” humanist knowledges. In K. Spracklen, L. Lashua, E. Sharpe, & S. Swain (Eds.), Handbook of leisure theory (pp. 719–742). London, England: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Berbary, L. A. (2015). Creative analytic practices: Onto-epistemological and theoretical attachments, uses, and constructions within humanist qualitative leisure research. International Leisure Review, 2(4), 27–55.
   Google Scholar
• Berbary, L. A. (2012). Don't be a whore, that's not ladylike: Discursive discipline and sorority women's gendered subjectivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(7), 535–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbary, L. A., & Boles, J. C. (2014). Eight reflection points: Re-visiting scaffolding for improvisational humanist qualitative inquiry. Leisure Sciences, 36(5), 401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2010). Cruel optimism. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 93–117). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2010). The politics of “life itself” and new ways of dying. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 201–218). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T. (2010). The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia, and bodies. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 206–225). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T. (2009). The new empiricism, affect, and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Introduction: Deleuze and research methodologies. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialism. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control, October, 59(Winter), 3–7. ( Original work published 1990)
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1997). Negotiations (M. Joughin Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1990 by Les Editions de Minuit)
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2011). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. ( Original work published 1980 by Les Editions de Minuit, Paris)
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1974). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press. ( Original work published 1967)
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, J. D. (2010). Performative, non-representational, and affect-based research: Seven injunctions. In D. DeLyser, S. Herbert, S. Aitken, M. Crang, & L. McDowell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative geography (pp. 321–334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flax, J. (1990). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 39–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, M. F. (2014). Social justice as an integrating force for leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 36(4), 379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (A. M. S. Smith Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? (C. Porter, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. Ne York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fullagar, S. (2017). Post-qualitative inquiry and the new materialist turn: Implications for sport, health and physical culture research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(2), 247–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J., Roudolph, S., & Sriprakash, A. (2017). The politics of post-qualitative inquiry: History and power. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 384–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, T. D. (2007). Ugly on the diamonds: An examination of white privilege in youth baseball. Leisure Sciences, 29(2), 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. (2011). Postpositivism and the pragmatics of leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 33(4), 341–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y. (2013). Data-as-machine: A Deleuzian becoming. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 111–124). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 741–748.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kivel, B. D. (2011). What does society need done and how can we do it? In K. Paisley & D. Dustin (Eds.), Speaking up and speaking out (pp. 9–14). Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
   Google Scholar
• Kumm, B. E., & Johnson, C. W. (2017). Subversive imagination: Smoothing space for leisure, identity, and politics. In K. Spracklen, L. Lashua, E. Sharpe, & S. Swain (Eds.), Handbook of leisure theory (pp. 891–910). London, England: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kumm, B. E. (2015). Modest experiments in living: Intensities of life (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Lashua, B. (2017). “Let's murder the moonlight!” Futurism, anti-humanism, and leisure. In K. Spracklen, L. Lashua, E. Sharpe, & S. Swain (Eds.), Handbook of leisure theory (pp. 487–506). London, England: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lashua, B., & Fox, K. (2007). Defining the grove: From remix to research in the Beat of Boyle Street. Leisure Sciences, 29(2), 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1996). Troubling clarity: The politics of accessible language. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 525–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 26(6), 629–633.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess is social science research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Johnson, C. W. (2011). But it's not that easy: Negotiating trans leisure space. Leisure/Loisir, 35(2), 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, H. (2011). What about the “rest of the story?” Recreation on the backs of others. In K. Paisley & D. Dustin (Eds.), Speaking up and speaking out (pp. 117–124). Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
   Google Scholar
• Malick, M. (2017). Postmodernism and leisure. In K. Spracklen, B. Lashua, E. Sharpe, & S. Swain (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of leisure theory (pp. 689–704). London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. (2009). Notes toward an ethnographic memoir of supervising graduate research through anthropology's decades of transformation. In J. Faubion & G. Marcus (Eds.), Fieldwork is not what it used to be: Learning anthropology's method in a time of transition (pp. 1–34). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (1987). Translator's foreword: Pleasures of philosophy. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari (Eds.), A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (pp. ix–xv). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (1992). A user's guide to capitalism and schizophrenia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mowatt, R. A. (2012). Lynching as leisure: Broadening notions of a field. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(10), 1361–1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville, R. D. (2013). The pragmatics of leisure revisited. Leisure Sciences, 35(4), 399–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, D. C. (2007). There is life after breast cancer: Nine vignettes exploring dragon boat racing for breast cancer survivors. Leisure Sciences, 29(1), 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, D. C., & Johnson, C. W. (2007). Contextualizing leisure research to encompass complexity in lived leisure experience: The need for creative analytic practice. Leisure Sciences, 29(2), 119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, D., Johnson, C., & Stewart, W. (2013). Leisure research for social justice: A response to Henderson. Leisure Sciences, 35(1), 81–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., & Coleman, R. (2013). Looking and desiring machines: A feminist Deleuzian mapping of bodies and affects. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 125–144). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samdahl, D. (2011).What can “American beach” teach us? In K. Paisley & D. Dustin (Eds.), Speaking up and speaking out (pp. 83–94). Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
   Google Scholar
• Seigworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, E. (2017). Against limits: A post-structural theorizing of resistance in leisure. In K. Spracklen, B. Lashua, E. Sharpe, & S. Swain (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of leisure theory (pp. 911–926). London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. M. (2001). Conceptualizing resistance: Women's leisure as political practice. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(2), 186–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.) (pp. 611–635). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Post-structural feminism in education: An overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A., Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2016). New empiricism and new materialism: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies←→ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, G. (2005). The epistemological unconsciousness of U.S. sociology and the transition to post-Fordism: The case of historical sociology. In J. Adams, E. S. Clemens, & A. S. Orloff (Eds.), Remaking modernity: Politics, history, and sociology (pp. 109–159). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, W. (2014). Leisure research to enhance social justice. Leisure Sciences, 36(4), 325–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography, 86(1), 57–78.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & Yang, W. K. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar