Publication Cover
Leisure Sciences
An Interdisciplinary Journal
Volume 44, 2022 - Issue 4
954
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Good Place for What? Placing “Value” in Youth Centers

, &
Pages 497-513 | Received 11 Aug 2018, Accepted 30 Jan 2019, Published online: 02 Jul 2019

References

  • Addams, J. (1899). A function of the social settlement. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 13(3), 33–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629901300302
  • Addams, J. (1909). The spirit of youth in the street. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Aston, M. (2016). Teaching feminist poststructuralism: Founding scholars still relevant today. Creative Education, 7(15), 22–51.
  • Baldridge, B. J. (2014). Relocating the deficit: Reimagining Black youth in neoliberal times. American Educational Research Journal, 51(3), 440–472.
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, UK: Sage.
  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bocarro, J., Greenwood, P. B., & Henderson, K. A. (2008). An integrative review of youth development research in selected United States recreation journals. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 26(2), 4–27.
  • Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, Task Force on Youth Development and Community Programs. (1992). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours. New York, NY: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.
  • Carpenter, S. (2017). ‘Modeling’ youth work: Logic models, neoliberalism, and community praxis. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 26(2), 105–120.
  • Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and the rockers. Oxford, UK: Martin Robertson.
  • Dieser, R. B. (2013). Leisure education: A person-centered, system-directed, social policy perspective. Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
  • de St Croix, T. (2018). Youth work, performativity and the new youth impact agenda: Getting paid for numbers? Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 414–438.
  • Duffy, D. N. (2017). Scientism, governance and evaluation: Challenging the ‘good science’ of the UK evaluation agenda for youth work. Youth and Policy, 116, 45–61.
  • Foucault, M., & Pearson, J. (2001). Fearless speech. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext (e).
  • Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models, Vol. 31. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Gordon, E. (2013). Under-served and un-deserving: Youth empowerment programs, poverty discourses and subject formation. Geoforum, 50, 107–116.
  • Hayhurst, L. M. (2013). Girls as the ‘new’ agents of social change? Exploring the ‘girl effect’ through sport, gender and development programs in Uganda. Sociological Research Online, 18(2), 1–12.
  • Hall, S. (2011). The neo-liberal revolution. Cultural Studies, 25(6), 705–728. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.619886
  • Halpern, R. (2002). A different kind of child development institution: The history of after-school programs for low-income children. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 178–211.
  • Harvey, D. (2005). Neoliberalism: A brief history. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism as creative destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 21–44.
  • Jeffs, T., & Smith, M. K. (1999). The problem of ‘youth’ for youth work. Youth and Policy, 62, 45–66.
  • Kelly, L. (2012). Representing and preventing youth crime and disorder: Intended and unintended consequences of targeted youth programmes in England. Youth Justice, 12(2), 101–117.
  • King, S. (2006). Pink Ribbons, Inc.: Breast cancer and the politics of philanthropy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Kwon, S. A. (2013). Uncivil youth: Race, activism, and affirmative governmentality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Lashua, B. D. (2016). Recreation, development and youth. In E. K. Sharpe, H. Mair, & F. Yuen (Eds.), Community development: Applications for leisure (pp. 151–163). State College, PA: Venture.
  • Leslie, D., & Hunt, M. (2013). Securing the neoliberal city: Discourses of creativity and priority neighborhoods in Toronto, Canada. Urban Geography, 34(8), 1171–1192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.823729
  • McDonald, M. G. (2009). Dialogues on whiteness, leisure and (anti) racism. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(1), 5–21.
  • Moeller, K. (2013). Proving “the girl effect”: Corporate knowledge production and educational intervention. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(6), 612–621.
  • Niagara Prosperity Initiative. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.niagaraprosperityinitiative.ca/.
  • Nolas, S. M. (2014). Exploring young people’s and youth workers’ experiences of spaces for ‘youth development’: Creating cultures of participation. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(1), 26–41.
  • Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(1), 49–66.
  • Raby, R. (2005). What is resistance? Journal of Youth Studies, 8(2), 151–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260500149246
  • Simmons, T. Y. (2016). Youth development: The role of third sector neoliberal organizational logics and institutional isomorphism in perpetuating social inequality (Order No. 10194631). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1878238686). Retrieved from http://proxy.library.brocku.ca/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1878238686?accountid=9744.
  • Spracklen, K. (2013). Whiteness and leisure. London, UK: Springer.
  • Statistics Canada. (2013). Canada (Code 01) (table). National Household Survey (NHS) Profile. 2011 National Household Survey. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 99-004-XWE. Ottawa. Released September 11, 2013. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E (accessed April 14, 2015).
  • Teitle, J. R. (2012). Theorizing hang out: Unstructured youth programs and the politics of representation. The University of Iowa. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.86h7gczg
  • United Way Niagara (2018). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of urban marginality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of urban marginality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Webb, A., & Richelieu, A. (2016). Sport for development and peace in action: Building facts for funding. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 40(5), 432–456.
  • Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.
  • Witt, P. A., & Crompton, J. L. (Eds.). (1996). Recreation programs that work for at-risk youth: The challenge of shaping the future. State College, PA: Venture.
  • Whyte, W. F. (1943/1993). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian Slum (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.