Comparison of Satellite Altimetric Gravity and Global Geopotential Models with Shipborne Gravity in the Red Sea

References

• Adam, D. 2002. Gravity measurement: Amazing GRACE. Nature 416 (6876):10–11. doi:10.1038/416010a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, N. M., A. M. Dmitriy, and N. L. Alexander. 2016. Gravity field models derived from the second-degree radial derivatives of the GOCE mission: A case study. Annals of Geophysics 59 (6):doi:10.4401/ag-7049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, O. B., P. Knudsen, P. Berry, N. Pavlis, and S. Kenyon. 2008. The DNSC07 A ocean-wide altimetry-derived gravity field. Vienna, Austria: EGU Proceedings, General Assembly, April 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, O., P. Knudsen, and L. Stenseng. 2014. The DTU13 MSS (Mean Sea Surface) and MDT (Mean Dynamic Topography) from 20 Years of Satellite Altimetry. In: IGFS 2014: Proceedings of the 3rd International Gravity Field Service (IGFS), ed. S. Jin, R. Barzaghi, S. Jin, and R. Barzaghi, vol. 144, 111–121. Shanghai, China: Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Arlot, S., and A. Celisse. 2010. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys 4:40–79. doi:10.1214/09-SS054.
   Google Scholar
• Bettadpur, S., J. Ries, R. Eanes, P. Nagel, N. Pie, S. Poole, T. Richter, and H. Save. 2015. Evaluation of the GGM05 Mean Earth Gravity models. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, J. M., N. Zehentner, E. Höck, R. Pail, I. Loth, T. Mayer-Gürr, and W.-D. Schuh. 2014. EGM_TIM_RL05: An independent geoid with centimeter accuracy purely based on the GOCE mission. GeoPhysical Research Letters 41 (22):8089–8099, doi:10.1002/2014GL061904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruinsma, S. L., C. Förste, O. Abrikosov, J.-C. Marty, M.-H. Rio, S. Mulet, and S. Bonvalot. 2013. The new ESA satellite-only gravity field model via the direct approach. Geophysical Research Letters 40 (14):1944–8007, doi:10.1002/grl.50716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capponi, M., A. H. Mansi, and D. Sampietro. 2017. Improving the computation of the gravitational terrain effect close to ground stations in the GTE software. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica. doi:10.1007/s11200-017-0814-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahle, C., F. Flechtner, C. Gruber, D. König, R. König, G. Michalak, and K.-H. Neumayer. 2013. GFZ GRACE Level-2 processing standards document for level-2 product release 0005: Revised edition. Potsdam: Potsdam: Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, doi:10.2312/GFZ.b103-1202-25.
   Google Scholar
• Denker, H., and M. Roland. 2005. Compilation and evaluation of a consistent marine gravity data set surrounding Europe. In: A window on the future of geodesy: Proceedings of the international association of geodesy IAG general assembly sapporo, Japan June 30–July 11, 2003, ed. F. Sansò, 248–253. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/3-540-27432-4_42.
   Google Scholar
• Drinkwater, M. R., R. Floberghagen, R. Haagmans, D. Muzi, and A. Popescu. 2003. GOCE: ESA's first Earth explorer core mission. In: Earth gravity field from space – from sensors to earth sciences: Proceedings of an ISSI Workshop 11–15 March: 2002, ed. G. Beutler, M. R. Drinkwater, R. Rummel, and R. Von Steiger, 419–432. Bern, Switzerland: Springer Netherlands, doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1333-7_36.
   Google Scholar
• European GOCE Gravity-Consortium. 2010. GOCE level 2 product data handbook. GO-MA-HPF-GS-0110, Issue 4.2. Noordwijk: European Space Agency. Retrieved from http://earth.esa.int/pub/ESA_DOC/GOCE/Product_Data_Handbook_4.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, W., and D. Sproule. 2006. Fitting AUSGeoid98 to the Australian Height Datum using GPS data and least squares collocation: Application of a cross-validation technique. Survey Review 38 (301):573–582, doi:10.1179/sre.2006.38.301.573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fecher, T., R. Pail, and T. Gruber. 2016. The combined gravity field model GOCO05 c. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 18, 7696. Vienna, Austria: EGU. Retrieved from http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016EGUGA..18.7696F.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, R. 1984. A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modelling. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA150788.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, R. 1985. Gravity field terrain effect computations by FFT. Bulletin Géodésique 59 (4):342–360, doi:10.1007/BF02521068. doi:10.1007/BF02521068.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, R., and C. C. Tscherning. 1981. The use of height data in gravity field approximation by collocation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 86 (B9):7843–7854, doi:10.1029/JB086iB09p07843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, R., and C. C. Tscherning. 2008. An overview manual for the GRAVSOFT geodetic gravity field modelling programs. DRAFT 1 ed. Copenhagen: Contract report for JUPEM.
   Google Scholar
• Förste, C., S. L. Bruinsma, O. Abrikosov, J-M. Lemoine, J. C. Marty, F. Flechtner, G. Balmino, F. Barthelmes, and R. Biancale. 2014. EIGEN-6C4 The latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse. presented at the 5th GOCE User Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Gatti, A., M. Reguzzoni, F. Migliaccio, and F. Sansò. 2014. Space-wise grids of gravity gradients from GOCE data at nominal satellite altitude. 5th International GOCE User Workshop (pp. 25–28). Paris, France: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardoni, M., M. Reguzzoni, and D. Sampietro. 2016. GECO: A global gravity model by locally combining GOCE data and EGM2008. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 60 (2):228–247, doi:10.1007/s11200-015-1114-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt, C., W. E. Featherstone, and U. Marti. 2010. Combining EGM2008 and SRTM/DTM2006.0 residual terrain model data to improve quasigeoid computations in mountainous areas devoid of gravity data. Journal of Geodesy 84 (9):557–567, doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0395-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt, C., T. Gruber, and W. E. Featherstone. 2011. Evaluation of the first GOCE static gravity field models using terrestrial gravity, vertical deflections and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights. Journal of Geodesy 85 (10):723–740, doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0482-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiamehr, R. 2007. Qualification and refinement of the gravity database based on cross-validation approach – A case study of Iran. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica 42 (3):285–295. doi:10.1556/AGeod.42.2007.3.3.
   Google Scholar
• Lequentrec-Lalancette, M., C. Salaűn, S. Bonvalot, D. Rouxel, and S. Bruinsma. 2016. Exploitation of Marine Gravity Measurements of the Mediterranean in the Validation of Global Gravity Field Models. In: International association of geodesy symposia, 1–5. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/1345_2016_258.
   Google Scholar
• Matheron, G. 1963. Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology 58 (8):1246–1266. doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246.
   Google Scholar
• Moritz, H. 1980. Advanced physical geodesy. Tunbridge, England: Karlsruhe: Wichmann.
   Google Scholar
• Pail, R., T. Fecher, D. Barnes, J. Factor, S. Holmes, T. Gruber, and P. Zingerle. 2016. The Experimental Gravity Field Model XGM2016. International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height System. Thessaloniki, Greece: Presentation at International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height System 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlis, N. K., S. A. Holmes, and S. C. Kenyon. 2008. An earth gravitational model to degree 2160: EGM2008, presented at the 2008 General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlis, N. K., S. A. Holmes, S. C. Kenyon, and J. K. Factor. 2012. The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 117 (B4):2156–2202, doi:10.1029/2011JB008916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlis, N., J. Factor, and S. Holmes. 2007. Terrain-related gravimetric quantities computed for the next EGM. The 1st international symposium of the international gravity field service. 18, pp. 318–323. Istanbul, Turkey: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium of the International Gravity Field Service. Retrieved from http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/new_egm/EGM08_papers/NPavlis&al_S8_Revised111606.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman, M. R., J. J. Degnan, and J. M. Bosworth. 2002. The international laser ranging service. Advances in Space Research 30 (2):135–143. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00277-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasul, N. M., C. I. Stewart, and Z. A. Nawab. 2015. Introduction to the red sea: Its origin, structure, and environment. In: The red sea: The formation, morphology, oceanography and environment of a young ocean basin, ed. N. M. Rasul, & I. C. Stewart, 1–28. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45201-1_1.
   Google Scholar
• Reigber, C., H. Lühr, and P. Schwintzer. 1999. The CHAMP geopotential mission. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 40 (3–4):285–289. Retrieved from http://www3.ogs.trieste.it/bgta/pdf/bgta40.3.4_REIGBER1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sampietro, D., M. Capponi, A. H. Mansi, A. Gatti, P. Marchetti, and F. Sansò. 2017. Space-Wise approach for airborne gravity data modelling. Journal of Geodesy 91 (5):535–545. doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0981-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampietro, D., M. Capponi, D. Triglione, A. H. Mansi, P. Marchetti, and F. Sansò. 2016. GTE: A new software for gravitational terrain effect computation. Theory and Performances. Pure and Applied Geophysics 173 (7):2435–2453. doi:10.1007/s00024-016-1265-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandwell, D., E. Garcia, K. Soofi, P. Wessel, M. Chandler, and W. Smith. 2013. Toward 1-mGal accuracy in global marine gravity from CryoSat-2, Envisat, and Jason-1. The Leading Edge 32 (8):892–899. doi:10.1190/tle32080892.1.
   Google Scholar
• Sandwell, D., R. Müller, W. Smith, E. Garcia, and R. Francis. 2014. New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science 346 (6205):65–67. doi:10.1126/science.1258213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strykowski, G., and R. Forsberg. 1998. Operational merging of satellite, airborne and surface gravity data by draping techniques. In: Geodesy on the move: Gravity, geoid, geodynamics and antarctica, ed. R. Forsberg, M. Feissel, and R. Dietrich, 243–248. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-72245-5_35.
   Google Scholar
• Tapley, B. D., B. E. Schutz, R. J. Eanes, J. C. Ries, and M. M. Watkins. 2013. Lageos laser ranging contributions to geodynamics, geodesy, and orbital dynamics. In: Contributions of space geodesy to geodynamics: Earth dynamics, ed, D. E. Smith, and D. L. Turcotte, 147–173. Washington, D. C.: American Geophysical Union. doi:10.1029/GD024p0147.
   Google Scholar
• Tscherning, C. C. 1991. A strategy for Gross-Error detection in satellite altimeter data applied in the Baltic-Sea area for enhanced geoid and gravity determination. In: Determination of the geoid: Present and future, R. H. Rapp, F. Sansò, R. H. Rapp, and F. Sansò, 95–107. New York, NY, USA: Springer New York, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3104-2_12.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2017. Shuttle Radar Topography mission, https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V., and O. Chapelle. 2000. Bounds on error expectation for support vector machines. Neural Computation 12 (9):2013–2036. doi:10.1162/089976600300015042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, H. 2013. Multivariable geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Berlin HeidelBerg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from https://books.google.it/books?id=vM3sCAAAQBAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel, P., and A. B. Watts. 1988. On the accuracy of marine gravity measurements. Journal of GeOphysical Research: Solid Earth 93 (B1):393–413. doi:10.1029/JB093iB01p00393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, C. F., J. G. Williams, J. O. Dickey, B. E. Schutz, R. J. Eanes, and B. D. Tapley. 1983. Secular variation of Earth's gravitational harmonic J2 coefficient from Lageos and nontidal acceleration of Earth rotation. Nature 303:757–762. doi:10.1038/303757a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., D. T. Sandwell, T. Jin, and D. Li. 2017. Inversion of marine gravity anomalies over southeastern China seas from multi-satellite altimeter vertical deflections. Journal of Applied Geophysics 137:128–137. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlotnicki, V. 1984. On the accuracy of gravimetric geoids and the recovery of oceanographic signals from altimetry. Marine Geodesy 8 (1–4):129–157. doi:10.1080/15210608409379500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar