Shear Strength and Wind Erosion Potential of Biologically Improved Sand

References

• Achal V, Mukerjee A, Sudhakara Reddy M. 2013. Biogenic treatment improves the durability and remediates the cracks of concrete structures. Constr Build Mater 48:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rawas AA, Hago AW, Al-Sarmi, H 2005. Effect of lime, cement and Sarooj (artificial pozzolan) on the swelling potential of an expansive soil from Oman. Build Environ 40(5):681–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsanad A, Kavazanjian E. 2011. Novel biopolymer treatment for wind induced soil erosion. Dissertation, Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Asgari MR, Baghebanzadeh Dezfuli A, Bayat M. 2015. Experimental study on stabilization of a low plasticity clayey soil with cement/lime. Arab J Geosci 8(3):1439–1452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwell BJ. 1993. Response of roots to mechanical impedance. Environ Exp Bot 33(1):27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbank MB, Weaver TJ, Green TL, Williams B, Crawford RL. 2011. Precipitation of calcite by indigenous microorganisms to strengthen liquefiable soils. Geomicrobiol J 28(4):301–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Cord-Ruwisch R 2014. Upscaling effects of soil improvement by microbially induced calcite precipitation by surface percolation. Geomicrobiol J 31(5):396–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshomi A, Mansouri S. 2020. Study the grain size and infiltration method effects for sand soil improvement using the microbial method. Geomicrobiol J 37(4):355–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rooij GH. 2004. Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods. Vadose Zone J 3(2), 722–723.
   Google Scholar
• DeJong JT, Fritzges MB, Nüsslein K. 2006. Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1381–1392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC. 2010. Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng 36(2):197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etemadi-Khah A, Pourbabaee AA, Alikhani HA, Noroozi M, Bruno L. 2017. Biodiversity of isolated cyanobacteria from desert soils in Iran. Geomicrobiol J 34(9):784–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory JM. 1984. Prediction of soil erosion by water and wind for various fractions of cover. Trans ASAE 27(5):1345–1350.
   Google Scholar
• Gu J, Suleiman MT, Bastola H, Brown DG, Zouari N. 2018. Treatment of sand using Microbial-Induced Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) for wind erosion application. Paper presented at: Geotechnical Special Publication 2018 March (GSP 296), IFCEE, March 5–10, Orlando, Florida, 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Gurbuz A, Sari YD, Yuksekdag ZN. 2015. Bacteria-Induced Cementation in Sandy Soils. Geomicrobiol J 32(9):853–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkes MP, van Paassen LA, Booster JL, Whiffin VS, van Loosdrecht MCM. 2010. Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecol Eng 36(2):112–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hataf N, Jamali R. 2018. Effect of fine-grain percent on soil strength properties improved by biological method. Geomicrobiol J 35(8):695–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong C, Chenchen L, Xueyong Z, Huiru L, Liqiang K, Bo L, Jifeng L. 2020. Wind erosion rate for vegetated soil cover: a prediction model based on surface shear strength. Catena 187:104398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubovskis R, Jankutė A, Urbonavičius J, Gribniak V. 2020. Analysis of mechanical performance and durability of self-healing biological concrete. Constr Build Mater 260:119822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi S, Goyal S, Sudhakara Reddy M. 2020. Influence of biogenic treatment in improving the durability properties of waste amended concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 263:120170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karuma A, Mtakwa P, Amuri N, Gachene CK, Gicheru P. 2014. Tillage effects on selected soil physical properties in a maize-bean intercropping system in Mwala District, Kenya. Int Sch Res Notices 2014:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr B. 2014. Enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation for the mitigation of fugitive dust. Arizona State University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/79572684.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maleki M, Ebrahimi S, Asadzadeh F, Emami Tabrizi M. 2016. Performance of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation on wind erosion control of sandy soil. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13(3):937–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadizadeh M, Ajalloeian R, Nadi B, Soltani Nezhad S. 2019. Investigating the shear strength of biologically improved soil using two types of bacteria. Geomicrobiol J 36(7):581–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RJ, Schaefer VR, Sharma RS. 2005. Determination and evaluation of alternative methods for managing and controlling highway-related dust phase II — demonstration project. Environmental Engineering. Iowa State University. Accessed July 31, 2020. Available at www.ccee.iastate.edu
   Google Scholar
• Movahedan M, Abbasi N, Keramat M. 2012. Wind erosion control of soils using polymeric materials. Eurasian J Soil Sci 1(2):81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Pakbaz MS, Behzadipour H, Ghezelbash GR. 2018. Evaluation of shear strength parameters of sandy soils upon microbial treatment. Geomicrobiol J 35(8):721–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phanikumar BR, Ramanjaneya Raju E 2020. Compaction and strength characteristics of an expansive clay stabilised with lime sludge and cement. Soils Found 60(1):129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian C, Wang R, Cheng L, Wang J. 2010. Theory of microbial carbonate precipitation and its application in restoration of cement-based materials defects. Chin J Chem 28(5):847–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadat M, Bayat M. In press. Prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of stabilised soil by Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Non-Linear Regression (NLR). Geomech Geoengin..
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan C, Montoya BM. 2014. Strengthening coastal sand dunes using microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Paper presented at: Geotechnical Special Publication (234 GSP), Geo-Congress, February 23-26, Atlanta, Georgia, 1683–1692..
   Google Scholar
• Taylor HM, Gardner HR. 1963. Penetration of cotton seedling taproots as influenced by bulk density, moisture content, and strength of soil. Soil Sci 96, 153–156.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zhang N, Ding J, Lu C, Jin Y. 2018. Experimental study on wind erosion resistance and strength of sands treated with microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiffin VS, van Paassen LA, Harkes MP. 2007. Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24(5):417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Li L, Li C, Li M, Amini F, Zhang H. 2014. Factors affecting improvement of engineering properties of MICP-treated soil catalyzed by bacteria and urease. J Mater Civ Eng 26(12):04014094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zomorodian SMA, Ghaffari H, O'Kelly BC. 2019. Stabilisation of crustal sand layer using biocementation technique for wind erosion control. Aeolian Res 40:34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar