622
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Prenatal Genetic Technologies and the Social Control of Pregnant Women: A Review of the Key Issues

Pages 448-468 | Published online: 23 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • Aalfs , C. M. , Smets , E. M. A. , Hanneke , C. J. M. , & Leschot , N. J. ( 2003 ). Referral for genetic counselling during pregnancy: Limited alertness and awareness about genetic risk factors among GPs . Family Practice , 20 ( 2 ), 135 – 141 .
  • Abberley , P. ( 1996 ). Work, utopia and impairment . In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging Issues and Insights . Harlow, Essex , UK : Longman .
  • Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing . ( 2000 ). Prenatal genetic testing . London : Department of Health .
  • Alderson , P. , Aro , A. , Dragonas , T. , Ettorre , E. , Hemminki , E. , Jallinoja , P. , Santalahti , P. , & Tymstra , T. ( 2001 ). Prenatal screening and genetics . European Journal of Public Health , 11 , 231 – 233 .
  • American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology . ( 2007 ). ACOG practice bulletin no. 77: Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities . Obstetrics & Gynecology , 109 , 217 – 228 .
  • Annandale , E. , & Clark , J. ( 1996 ). What is gender? Feminist theory and the sociology of human reproduction . Sociology of Health and Illness , 18 ( 1 ), 17 – 44 .
  • Atkin , K. , & Ahmad , W. ( 1998 ). Genetic screening and hemoglobinopathies: Ethics, politics and practice . Social Science and Medicine , 46 ( 3 ), 445 – 458 .
  • Badagliacco , J. , & Ruiz , C. ( 2006 ). Impoverished Appalachia and Kentucky genomes: What is at stake? New Genetics and Society , 25 ( 2 ), 133 – 143 .
  • Barnes , C. ( 1992 ). Institutional discrimination against disabled people and the campaign for anti-discrimination legislation . Critical Social Policy , 12 ( 1 ), 5 – 22 .
  • Barnes , C. , & Mercer , G. (Eds.). ( 1996 ). Exploring the divide, illness and disability . Leeds , UK : The Disability Press .
  • Bartky , S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination . New York : Routledge.
  • Barton , L. (Eds.). ( 1996 ). Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights . London : Longman .
  • Birke , L. , Himmelweit , S. , & Vines , G. ( 1992 ). Detecting genetic diseases: Prenatal screening and its problems . In G. Kirup & L. Smith Keller (Eds.), Inventing women: Science technology and gender . Cambridge , UK : Polity Press in association with Open University Press .
  • Bordo , S. ( 1993 ). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture and the body . Berkeley , CA : University of California Press .
  • Bricher , G. ( 1999 ). A voice for people with disabilities in the prenatal screening debate . Nursing Inquiry , 6 , 65 – 67 .
  • Brouwer-DudokdeWit , A. C. , Savenije , A. , Maat-Kievet , A. , & Tibben , A. ( 2002 ). A hereditary disorder in the family and the family life cycle: Huntington disease as a paradigm . Family Process , 41 ( 4 ), 677 – 692 .
  • Browner , C. H. ( 2001 ). Situating women's reproductive activities . American Anthropologist , 102 ( 4 ), 773 – 788 .
  • Browner , C. H. , & Preloran , H. M. ( 2000a ). Para Sacarse la Espina (To get rid of the doubt): Mexican immigrant women's amniocentesis decisions . In A. R. Saetnan , N. Oudshoorn , & M. Kirejczyk (Eds.), Bodies of technology: Women's involvement with reproductive medicine (pp. 368 – 383 ). Columbus , OH : Ohio State University .
  • Browner , C. H. , & Preloran , H. M. ( 2000b ). Latinas, amniocentesis and the discourse of choice . Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry , 24 , 353 – 375 .
  • Browner , C. H. , & Preloran , H. M. ( 2000c ). Interpreting low-income Latinas amniocentesis refusals . Hispanic Journal of Behavioural Sciences , 22 ( 3 ), 346 – 368 .
  • Browner , C. H. , Preloran , H. M. , & Cox , S. ( 1999 ). Ethnicity, bioethics and prenatal diagnosis: The amniocentesis decisions of Mexican-origin women and their partners . American Journal of Public Health , 89 ( 11 ), 1658 – 1666 .
  • Bunton , R. , & Petersen , A. ( 2005 ). Genetics and governance: An introduction . In R. Bunton & A. Petersen (Eds.), Genetic governance: health, risk and ethics in a biotech era (pp. 1 – 27 ). London , Routledge .
  • Bush , J. ( 2000 ). Its just part of being a woman. Cervical screening, the body and femininity . Social Science and Medicine , 50 , 429 – 444 .
  • Carroll , J. C. , Brown , J. B. , Reid , A. J. , & Pugh , P. ( 2000 ). Women's experience of maternal serum screening . Canadian Family Physician , 46 , 614 – 620 .
  • Chandler , M. , & Smith , A. ( 1998 ). Prenatal screening and women's perception of infant disability: A Sophies Choice for every mother . Nursing Inquiry , 5 , 71 – 76 .
  • Chapman , E. ( 2002 ). Difficult decisions: Social and ethical implications of changing medical technology . Community Genetics , 5 ( 2 ), 110 – 119 .
  • Chappell , A. L. ( 1994 ). Disability, discrimination and the criminal justice system . Critical Social Policy , 14 ( 3 ), 19 – 33 .
  • Chard , T. ( 1996 ). Screening for Down's syndrome . Clinical Endocrinology , 44 ( 15 ), 15 .
  • Committee on Obstetric Practice . ( 1994 ). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee opinion: Down syndrome screening . International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics , 47 , 186 – 190 .
  • Conrad , P. ( 1999 ). A mirage of genes . Sociology of Health and Illness , 21 ( 2 ), 228 – 241 .
  • Conrad , P. , & Gabe , J. (Eds.). (1999). Sociological perspectives on the new genetics . Oxford : Blackwell.
  • Corker , M. , & French , S. ( 1999 ). Disability discourse . Buckingham, UK : Open University Press .
  • Corker , M. , & Shakespeare , T. ( 2002 ). Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory . London : Continuum .
  • Cowan , R. S. ( 1994 ). Women's roles in the history of amniocentesis and chorionic villi sampling . In K. Rothenberg & E. J. Thomson (Eds.), Women and prenatal testing: Facing the challenges of genetic testing , Columbus , OH : Ohio State University Press .
  • d'Agincourt-Canning , L. , & Baird , P. ( 2006 ). Genetic testing for hereditary cancers: The impact of gender on interest, uptake and ethical considerations . Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology , 58 , 114 – 123 .
  • David , J. , & Watson , N. ( 2002 ). Countering stereotypes of disability: Disabled children and resistance . In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 159 – 174 ). London : Continuum .
  • Dragonas , T. ( 2001 ). Whose fault is it? Shame and guilt for the genetic defect . In E. Ettorre (Ed.), Before birth . London : Ashgate .
  • Drake , R. F. ( 1996 ). A critique of the role of traditional charities . In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights . Harlow, Essex , UK : Longman .
  • Durand , V. M. ( 2001 ). Future directions for children and adolescents with mental retardation . Behavior Therapy , 32 , 633 – 650 .
  • Duster , T. ( 2003 ) Backdoor to eugenics . London : Routledge .
  • Emery , J. , Watson , E. , Rose , P. , & Andermann , A. ( 1999 ). A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services . Family Practice , 16 ( 4 ), 426 – 445 .
  • Ettorre , E. ( 1999 ). Experts as genetic story tellers: Exploring key issues . Sociology of Health and Illness , 21 ( 5 ), 539 – 559 .
  • Ettorre , E. ( 2000 ). Reproductive genetics, gender and the body: Please doctor, may I have a normal baby? Sociology , 34 ( 3 ), 403 – 420 .
  • Ettorre , E. ( 2002 ). Reproductive genetics, gender and the body . London : Routledge .
  • Ettorre , E. ( 2007 ). Prenatal screening: Impact on normal pregnancies . Encyclopedia of Life Sciences .
  • Ettorre , E. , Steinberg , D. L. , & Rothman , B. K. ( 2006 ). Feminism confronts the genome: Introduction . New Genetics and Society , 25 ( 2 ), 133 – 142 .
  • Exley , C. , & Letherby , G. ( 2001 ). Managing a disrupted lifecourse: Issues of identity and emotion work . Health , 5 ( 1 ), 112 – 132 .
  • Farrant , W. ( 1985 ). Who's for amniocenteisis? In H. Homans (Ed.), The sexual politics of reproduction . Aldershot : Gower Publishing .
  • Featherstone , M. ( 1991 ). Consumer culture and postmodernism . London : Sage .
  • Finger , A. ( 1990 ). Past due: A story of disability, pregnancy and birth . London : The Women's Press .
  • Fletcher , R. ( 2006 ). Reproductive consumption . Feminist Theory , 7 ( 1 ), 27 – 47 .
  • Franklin , S. , & McKinnon , S. (Eds.). ( 2001 ). Relative values: Reconfiguring kinship studies . Durham , NC : Duke University Press .
  • Gillam , L. ( 1999 ). Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled . Journal of Medical Ethics , 25 , 163 – 171 .
  • Gimenez , M. (1991). The mode of reproduction in transition: A Marxist-feminist analysis of the effects of reproductive technologies. Gender and Society , 5(3), 334–350.
  • Glasier , A. , Gulmezoglu , A. M. , Schmid , G. P. , Moreno , C.G. , & Van Look , P. F. A. ( 2006 ). Sexual and reproductive health: A matter of life and death . Lancet , 368 , 1595 – 1607 .
  • Green , J. M. ( 1990 ). Prenatal screening and diagnosis: Some psychological and social issues . British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , 97 , 1074 – 1076 .
  • Hales , G. (Ed.). ( 1996 ). Beyond disability . London : Sage .
  • Henn , W. ( 2000 ). Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: A challenge for ethical guidelines . Journal of Medical Ethics , 26 , 444 – 446 .
  • Heyman , B. , & Henriksen , M. ( 2001 ). Risk, age and pregnancy: A case study of prenatal genetic screening and testing . Basingstoke, Palgrave, UK : Macmillan .
  • Hindmarsh , R. ( 2005 ). Genetics engineering regulation in Australia: An archeaology of expertise and power . Science as Culture , 14 ( 4 ), 373 – 392 .
  • Ho , K. M. , & Keiley , M. K. ( 2003 ). Dealing with denial: A systems approach for family professionals working with parents of individuals with multiple disabilities . Family Journal: Counselling and Therapy for Couples and Families , 11 ( 3 ), 239 – 247 .
  • Hockey , J. , & James , A. ( 2003 ). Social identities across the life course . Basingstoke, Palgrave, UK : Macmillan .
  • Howson , A. ( 1998 ). Embodied obligation: the female body and health surveillance . In S. Nettleton & J. Watson (Eds.), The body in everyday life . London : Routledge .
  • Hughes , G. ( 1998 ). A suitable case for treatment? Constructions of disability . In E. Saraga (Ed.), Embodying the social: Constructions of difference . London : Routledge .
  • Hughes , A. , & Witz , A. ( 1997 ). Feminism and the matter of bodies: From de Beauvoir to Butler . Body and Society , 3 ( 1 ), 47 – 60 .
  • James , A. , & Hockey , J. ( 2007 ). Embodying healthy identities . Basingstoke, Palgrave, UK : Macmillan .
  • Jonsen , A. R. ( 1996 ). The impact of mapping the human genome on the patient-physician relationship . In T. Murray , M. A. Rothstein , & R. F. Murray (Eds.), The Human Genome Project and the future of health care . Bloomington , IN : Indiana University Press .
  • Kallianes , V. , & Rubenfeld , P. ( 1997 ). Disabled women and reproductive rights . Disability & Society , 12 ( 2 ), 203 – 220 .
  • Keith , L. , & Morris , J. ( 1995 ). Easy targets: A disability rights perspective on the children as carers . Critical Social Policy , 15 ( 2/3 ), 36 – 57 .
  • Kerr , A. , & Cunningham-Burley , S. ( 2000 ). On ambivalence and risk: Reflexive modernity and the new human genetics . Sociology , 34 ( 2 ), 283 – 304 .
  • Kerr , A. , Cunningham-Burley , S. , & Amos , A. ( 1998 ). Eugenics and the new genetics in Britain: Examining contemporary professionals accounts . Science Technology and Human Values , 23 , 175 – 198 .
  • Kerr , A. , & Franklin , S. ( 2006 ). Genetic ambivalence: Expertise, uncertainty and communication in the context of new genetic technologies . In A. Webster (Ed.), New technologies in health care: Challenge, change and innovation (pp. 40 – 56 ). Houndsmill, Basingstoke, Palgrave, UK : Macmillan .
  • Kotarski , B. R. ( 2000 ). Reexamining preventive health standards for women in a new century: Successful screening strategies of one community-based health center . Women's Health Issues , 10 ( 6 ), 294 – 299 .
  • Landsman , G. H. (1998). Reconstructing motherhood in the age of perfect babies: Mothers of infants and toddlers with disabilities. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society , 24(1), 69–98.
  • Lebner , A. ( 2000 ). Genetic “mysteries” and international adoption: the cultural impact of biomedical technologies on the adoptive family experience . Family Relations , 49 , 371 – 377 .
  • Le Breton , D. ( 2004 ). Genetic fundamentalism or the cult of the gene . Body and Society , 10 ( 4 ), 1 – 20 .
  • Lee , E. ( 2000 ). Young peoples attitudes to abortion and abnormality . Feminism & Psychology , 10 ( 3 ), 396 – 399 .
  • Lee , R. , & Morgan , D. ( 1989 ). A lesser sacrifice? Sterilization and mentally handicapped . In R. Lee & D. Morgan (Eds.), Birthrights, law and ethics at the beginnings of life . New York and London : Routledge .
  • Lilford , R. J. , Vanderkerckhove , P. , & Thornton , J. G. ( 1994 ). Decision analysis in clinical genetics . Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology , 8 ( 3 ), 625 – 642 .
  • Lippman , A. ( 1992 ). Led astray by genetic maps: The cartography of the human genome and health care . Social Science and Medicine , 35 , 1469 – 1476 .
  • Litton-Fox , G. , Bruce , C. , & Combs-Orme , T. ( 2000 ). Parenting expectations and concerns of fathers and mothers of newborn infants . Family Relations , 49 ( 2 ), 123 – 131 .
  • Markens , S. , Browner , C. H. , & Press , N. ( 1999 ). Because of the risks: How US women account for refusing prenatal screening . Social Science and Medicine , 49 ( 3 ), 359 – 369 .
  • Marteau , T. , Shaw , R. , & Slack , J. ( 1994 ). Routine prenatal testing for fetal abnormalities . London : Medical Research Council .
  • Morris , J. ( 1991 ). Pride against prejudice: Transforming attitudes to disability . London : The Women's Press .
  • Nelkin , D. , & Lindee , M. S. ( 1995 ). The mediated gene: Stories of gender and race . In J. Terry & J. Urla (Eds.), Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular cultures . Bloomington , IN : Indiana University Press .
  • Nicholas , B. ( 2001 ). Exploring a moral landscape: Genetic science and ethics . Hypatia , 16 ( 1 ), 45 – 63 .
  • Oakley , A. ( 1984 ). The captured womb: A history of the medical care of pregnant woman . Oxford, UK : Basil Blackwell .
  • Oliver , M. ( 1996 ). Understanding disability: From theory to practice . London : Macmillan .
  • Oliver , M. , & Barnes , C. ( 1998 ). Disabled people and social policy: From exclusion to inclusion . London and New York : Longman .
  • Ormond , K. E. , Gill , C. J. , Semik , P. , & Kirschner , K. L. ( 2003 ). Attitudes of health care trainees about genetics and disability: Issues of access, health care communication and decisions making . Journal of Genetic Counselling , 12 ( 4 ), 333 – 349 .
  • Overall , C. ( 1987 ). Ethics and human reproduction . Boston : Allen and Unwin .
  • Overboe , J. ( 1999 ). Difference in itself: Validating disabled peoples lived experiences . Body and Society , 5 ( 4 ), 17 – 29 .
  • Parker , M. ( 2000 ). Public deliberation and private choice in genetics and reproduction . Journal of Medical Ethics , 26 , 160 – 165 .
  • Parker , M. , & Hope , T. ( 2000 ). Medical ethics in the 21st century . Journal of Internal Medicine , 248 ( 1 ), 1 – 6 .
  • Parsons , E. , & Atkinson , P. (1993). Genetic risk and reproduction. Sociological Review , 41, 679–706.
  • Pinder , R. ( 1995 ). Bringing back the body without the blame? The experience of ill and disabled people at work . Sociology of Health and Illness , 17 ( 5 ), 605 – 631 .
  • Press , N. , & Browner , C. H. ( 1997 ). Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis . Social Science and Medicine , 45 ( 7 ), 979 – 989 .
  • Press , N. , & Browner , C. H. ( 1998 ). Characteristics of women who refuse an offer of prenatal diagnosis: Data from the California Maternal Serum Alpha Fetoprotein Blood Test Experience . American Journal of Medical Genetics , 78 , 433 – 445 .
  • Press , N. , Browner , C. H. , Tran , D. , Morton , C. , & LeMaster , B. ( 1998 ). Provisional normalcy and “perfect babies”: Pregnant women's attitudes towards disability in the context of prenatal testing . In S. Franklin & H. Ragone (Eds.), Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power & technological innovation (pp. 46 – 65 ). Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press .
  • Qureshi , N. , & Raeburn , J. A. ( 1993 ). Clinical genetics meets primary care . British Medical Journal , 307 , 816 – 817 .
  • Qureshi , N. , Armstrong , S. , & Modell , B. ( 2005 ). GPs opinions of their role in prenatal genetic services: A cross-sectional survey . Family Practice , 23 , 106 – 110 .
  • Rapp , R. ( 1999 ). Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis . New York and London : Routledge .
  • Rapp , R. , Heath , D. , & Taussig , K. S. ( 2001 ). Genealogical disease: Where hereditary abnormality, biomedical explanation, and family responsibility meet . In S. Franklin & S. McKinnon (Eds.), Relative values: Reconfiguring kinship studies (pp. 384 – 409 ). Durham , NC : Duke University Press .
  • Reid , M. ( 1991 ). The diffusion of four prenatal screening tests across Europe . London : Kings Fund Centre for Health Services Development .
  • Reynolds , T. M. ( 2003 ). Down's syndrome screening is unethical: Views of today's research ethics committees . Journal of Clinical Pathology , 56 , 268 – 270 .
  • Richards , M. ( 1997 ). It runs in the family: Lay knowledge about inheritance . In A. Clarke & E. Parsons (Eds.), Culture, kinship and genes: Towards cross-cultural genetics . Houndsmills , UK : Macmillan .
  • Richards , M. P. M. ( 1993 ). The new genetics: Some issues for social scientists . Sociology of Health and Illness , 15 ( 5 ), 567 – 586 .
  • Rolland , J. S. ( 2006 ). Genetics, family systems and multicultural influences . Families, Systems & Health , 24 ( 4 ), 425 – 441 .
  • Rolland , J. S. , & Williams , J. ( 2005 ). Toward a biopsychosocial model for the 21st century . Family Process , 44 ( 1 ), 3 – 24 .
  • Root , R. , & Browner , C. H. ( 2001 ). Practices of the pregnant self: Compliance with and resistance to prenatal norms . Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry , 25 , 195 – 223 .
  • Rothenberg , K. , & Thomson , E. J. ( 1994 ). Women and prenatal testing . In K. Rothenberg & E. J. Thomson (Eds.), Women and prenatal testing: Facing the challenges of genetic testing . Columbus , OH : Ohio State University Press .
  • Rothman , B. K. ( 1998a ). Genetic maps and human imaginations . New York : W. W. Norton .
  • Rothman , B. K. ( 1998b ). A sociological skeptic in the brave new world . Gender and Society , 12 , 501 – 504 .
  • Rothman , B. K. (1994). The tentative pregnancy: Amniocentesis and the sexual politics of motherhood . London : Pandora.
  • Ruhl , P. L. ( 2002 ). Disarticulating liberal subjectivities: Abortion and fetal protection . Feminist Studies , 28 ( 1 ), 37 – 60 .
  • Saharso , S. ( 2003 ). Feminist ethics: Autonomy and the politics of multiculturalism . Feminist Theory , 4 ( 2 ), 199 – 215 .
  • Scully , J. L. ( 2002 ). A postmodern disorder: Moral encounters with molecular models of disability . In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 48 – 61 ). London : Continuum .
  • Shakespeare , T. ( 1998 ). Choices and rights: Eugenics, genetics and disability equality . Disability & Society , 13 ( 5 ), 665 – 681 .
  • Shakespeare , T. ( 1995 ). Back to the future? New genetics and disabled people . Critical Social Policy , 15 , 22 – 35 .
  • Shildrick , M. ( 1997 ). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics . London and New York : Routledge .
  • Shildrick , M. ( 2004 ). Genetics, normativity and ethics: Some bioethical concerns . Feminist Theory , 5 ( 2 ), 149 – 165 .
  • Shore , C. ( 1992 ). Virgin births and sterile debates . Current Anthropology , 33 ( 3 ), 295 – 314 .
  • Strathern , M. ( 1997 ). The work of culture: An anthropological perspective . In A. Clarke & E. Parsons (Eds.), Culture, kinship and genes . Houndsmill, UK : Macmillan .
  • Strathern , M. ( 1999 ). Postscript: A relational view . In J. Edwards , S. Franklin , E. Hirsch , F. Price , & M. Strathern (Eds.), Technologies of procreation: Kinship in the age of assisted reproduction () , 2nd ed. . London : Routledge .
  • Strobino , D. M. , Grason , H. , & Minkovitz , C. ( 2002 ). Charting a course for the future of women's health in the United States: Concepts, findings and recommendations . Social Science & Medicine , 54 , 839 – 848 .
  • Thomas , C. ( 1997 ). The baby and the bath water: Disabled women and motherhood in a social context . Sociology of Health and Illness , 19 ( 5 ), 622 – 643 .
  • Wendell , S. ( 1992 ). Toward a feminist theory of disability . In H. B. Holmes & L. Purdy (Eds.), Feminist perspectives in medical ethics . Bloomington , IN : Indiana University Press .
  • Wendell , S. ( 1996 ). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability . New York : Routledge .
  • Wertz , D. C. , & Fletcher , J. C. ( 1993 ). Prenatal diagnosis and sex selection in 19 nations . Social Science and Medicine , 37 ( 11 ), 1359 – 1366 .
  • Wetherall , D. J. ( 1991 ). The new genetics and clinical practice . Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press .
  • Wetherell , M. ( 1997 ). Social structure, ideology and family dynamics: The case of parenting . In J. Muncie , M. Wetherell , M. Langan , R. Dallos , & A. Cochrane (Eds.), Understanding the family ( , 2nd ed. , pp. 214 – 256 ). London : Sage .
  • Williams , S. ( 1998 ). Capitalising on emotions? Rethinking the inequalities in Health Debate. Sociology , 32 , 121 – 139 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.