Examining First Date Goals across Different Types of Date Initiation

References

• Andersen, P. A. (1998). The cognitive valence theory of intimate communication. In M. T. Palmer & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Mutual influence in interpersonal communication: Theory and research in cognition, affect, and behaviors (pp. 39–72). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12(4), 469–493. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. L., Shaver, P. R., & Abrahams, M. F. (1999). Strategic behaviors in romantic relationship initiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6), 709–722. doi:10.1177/0146167299025006006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81–91. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D., Braz, M. E., & Davies, E. (2008). Why do we flirt? Flirting motivations and sex differences in working and social contexts. Journal of Business Communication, 45(4), 483–502. doi:10.1177/0021943608319390
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2010). Testing error management theory: Exploring the commitment skepticism bias and the sexual overperception bias. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 618–634. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D., Henningsen, M. L. M., McWorthy, E., McWorthy, C., & McWorthy, L. (2011). Exploring the effects of sex and mode of presentation in perceptions of dating goals in video-dating. Journal of Communication, 61, 641–658. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D., Henningsen, M. L. M., & Valde, K. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions of women’s sexual interest during cross-sex interactions: An application and extension of cognitive valence theory. Sex Roles, 54(11–12), 821–829. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9050-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. L. (1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• La France, B. H., Henningsen, D. D., Oates, A., & Shaw, C. (2009). Social-sexual interactions?: Meta-analyses of sex differences in perceptions of flirtatiousness, seductiveness, and promiscuousness. Communication Monographs, 76(3), 263–285. doi:10.1080/03637750903074701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21(4), 488–500. doi:10.1177/019251300021004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., & Carey, C. M. (1996). Who’s wooing whom II? An experimental investigation of date-initiation and expectancy violation. Western Journal of Communication, 60(3), 195–213. doi:10.1080/10570319609374543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. M., Carrey, C., & Williams, M. L. (1998). First date initiation and enactment: An expectancy violation approach. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction. (pp. 413–426). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. M., Jacobsen, J., & Donnerstein, C. (2007). Defining dates and first date goals: Generalizing from undergraduates to single adults. Communication Research, 34(5), 526–547. doi:10.1177/0093650207305235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. M., & Johnson, K. L. (1995). Predicting cross-sex first date sexual expectations and involvement: Contextual and individual difference factors. Personal Relationships, 2(4), 301–312. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00094.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., Serewicz, M. C. M., Henningsen, M. L. M., & Davis, K. L. (2006). Sex differences in the transition to a heterosexual romantic relationship. In K. Dindia & D. J. Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication. (2nd ed, pp. 337–358). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. M., Serewicz, M. C. M., & Therrien, L. F. (2004). Goals for cross-sex first dates: Identification, measurement, and the influence of contextual factors. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 121–144. doi:10.1080/0363775042331302514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. M., Shaw, C., & Bacue, A. (2000). Dating norms on one college campus. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association annual conference, Sacramento.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. M., Yeazell, M., & Hale, J. L. (1994). Sex differences in relational message interpretations on male- and female-initiated first dates: A research note. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 731–742.
   Google Scholar
• Morr, M. C., & Mongeau, P. M. (2004). First-date expectations: The impact of sex of the initiator, alcohol consumption, and relationship type. Communication Research, 31(1), 3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe, B., Diana, M. S., & Brooks, R. H. (1987). Early, middle, and late adolescents' views on dating and factors influencing partner selection. Adolescence, 22(85), 59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serewicz, M. C. M., & Gale, E. (2008). First-date scripts: Gender roles, context, and relationship. Sex Roles, 58, 149–164. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9283-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar