The Rationale Behind Texting, Videoconferencing, and Mobile Phones in Couple Relationships

References

• Abbasi, I. S., & Alghamdi, N. G. (2017). When flirting turns into infidelity: The Facebook dilemma. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 45(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/01926187.2016.1277804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Etgar, S. (2016). Intimacy and smartphone multitasking—A new oxymoron? Psychological Reports, 119(3), 826–838. doi:10.1177/0033294116662658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Emmers-Sommer, T. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 57(2), 153–172. doi:10.1080/10510970600666834
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2013). Beyond viral: Interpersonal communication in the internet age. Psychological Inquiry, 24(4), 293–296. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2013.842203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, N., & Peña, J. (2015). Equity, relational maintenance, and linguistic features of text messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 499–506. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, I., & Tseng, F. (2016). The relevance of communication media in conflict contexts and their effectiveness: A negotiation experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 134–141. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2011). “I luv u”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150–162. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191–233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Patterns of communication channel use in the maintenance of long‐distance relationships. Communication Research Reports, 19(2), 118–129. doi:10.1080/08824090209384839
   Google Scholar
• David, M., Roberts, J., & Christenson, B. (2018). Too much of a good thing: Investigating the association between actual smartphone use and individual well-being. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(3), 265–275. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1349250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 444–449. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy vs. connection. Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.541336
   Google Scholar
• Farci, M., Rossi, L., Boccia Artieri, G., & Giglietto, F. (2017). Networked intimacy: Intimacy and friendship among Italian Facebook users. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 784–801. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleuriet, C., Cole, M., & Guerrero, L. (2014). Exploring Facebook: Attachment style and nonverbal message characteristics as predictors of anticipated emotional reactions to facebook postings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(4), 429–450. doi:10.1007/s10919-014-0189-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Rivera, J. A., Segura-Abreu, L. M., & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Phubbing in romantic relationships: Cell phone use, couple satisfaction, psychological well-being and mental health. Interacciones Revista de Avances en Psicología, 4(2), 81–91. doi:10.24016/2018.v4n2.117
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J., & Baym, N. (2012). Calling and texting (too much): Mobile maintenance expectations, (over)dependence, entrapment, and friendship satisfaction. New Media & Society, 14(2), 316–331. doi:10.1177/1461444811415047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting’s consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, A. J., Rawlings, J., Treger, S., & Sprecher, S. (2018). Channels of computer-mediated communication and satisfaction in long-distance relationships. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 11(2), 171–187. doi:10.5964/ijpr.v11i2.273
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., & Whitty, M. T. (2010). Netiquette within married couples: Agreement about acceptable online behavior and surveillance between partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 916–926. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? *Qual. Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. doi:10.1177/1049732316665344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61(3), 374–387. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Ancheta, K. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of technology in relationships: Findings from an open-ended survey. The Qualitative Report, 19(11), 1–11. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss11/2.
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. C. (2013). The couple and family technology framework. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Stevenson, A. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems: A literature review. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), 1. Retrieved November 10, 2012, from http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2010050202&article=3.
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Twist, M. L. C. (2019). The Internet family. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L., & Kurzenberger, M. (2008). Premodern, modern, and postmodern ways of interpreting the miraculous and mental illness from religious and psychological perspectives. In H. Ellens (Ed.), Miracles: God, science, and psychology in the paranormal (Vol. 3, pp. 65–93). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, R. (2017). Two-thirds of the world’s population are now connected by mobile devices. Business Insider. Retrieved from: https://www.businessinsider.de/world-population-mobile-devices-2017-9?r=US&IR=T
   Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information & Management, 45(7), 499–506. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H. S., & Lombard, M. (2006). Understanding instant messaging: Gratifications and social presence. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. doi:10.1177/0270467610380009
   Google Scholar
• Internet World Stats (2019). World Internet usage and population statistics. Retrieved September 1, 2019, from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jin, B., & Peña, J. (2010). Mobile communication in romantic relationships: Mobile phone use, relational uncertainty, love, commitment, and attachment styles. Communication Reports, 23(1), 39–51. doi:10.1080/08934211003598742
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A., & Bradford, K. (2016). Mobile phone use in romantic relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 52(8), 707–721. doi:10.1080/01494929.2016.1157123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konok, V., Gigler, D., Bereczky, B., & Miklósi, A. (2016). Humans’ attachment to their mobile phones and its relationship with interpersonal attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 61(C), 537–547. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. (2014). Online communication attitude similarity in romantic dyads: Predicting couples’ frequency of e-mail, instant messaging, and social networking site communication. Communication Quarterly, 62(2), 233–252. doi:10.1080/01463373.2014.890120
   Google Scholar
• Len-Ríos, M., Streit, C., Killoren, S., Deutsch, A., Cooper, M., & Carlo, G. (2016). US Latino adolescents’ use of mass media and mediated communication in romantic relationships. Journal of Children and Media, 10(4), 395–410. doi:10.1080/17482798.2016.1144214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesitaokana, W. (2018). Mobile phone use in intimate relationships: The case of youth in Botswana. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(4), 393–404. doi:10.1177/1367877917694094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S. (2014). Effects of texting on satisfaction in romantic relationships: The role of attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 145–152. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S., & Tuney, S. (2015). Can texting be used to improve romantic relationships? The effects of sending positive text messages on relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 670–678. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. C., Bejanyan, K., Di Castro, G., & Lee, R. A. (2013). Attachment styles as predictors of facebook‐related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 20(1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). ‘Technoference’: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98. doi:10.1037/ppm0000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Baptist, J., & Hogan, B. (2018). Computer-mediated communication in intimate relationships: Associations of boundary crossing, intrusion, relationship satisfaction, and partner responsiveness. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(1), 165–182. doi:10.1111/jmft.12246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum, G. J. (1999). Asynchronous computer-mediated communication versus face-to-face collaboration: Results on student learning, quality and satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(5), 427–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohadi, J., Brown, B., Trub, L., & Rosenthal, L. (2018). I just text to say I love you: Partner similarity in texting and relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 126–132. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, M., Shin, J., & Ju, Y. (2015). A taxonomy of social networking site users: Social surveillance and self‐surveillance perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 32(6), 601–610. doi:10.1002/mar.20803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, T. S., Blackburn, K. M., Perry, M. S., & Hawks, J. M. (2013). Sexting as an intervention: Relationship satisfaction and motivation considerations. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/01926187.2011.635134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. S., & Werner-Wilson, R. J. (2011). Couples and computer‐mediated communication: A closer look at the affordances and use of the channel. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(2), 120–134. doi:10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02099.x
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, J. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close interpersonal relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6–8), 697–716. doi:10.1080/01494920903224269
   Google Scholar
• PEW. (2018). Mobile fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.
   Google Scholar
• Rabby, M., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication impacts on relationship formation and maintenance. In D. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 141–162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, H., Lindsay, M., & Williams, L. (2015). “She Posted It on Facebook”: Mexican American adolescents’ experiences with technology and romantic relationship conflict. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30(4), 419–445. doi:10.1177/0743558414565236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E., Gross, C., Stoll, A., Peck, B., Allen, M., & Kim, S. (2017). Reflecting on connecting: Meta‐analysis of differences between computer‐mediated and face‐to‐face self‐disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 18–34. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rus, H. M., & Tiemensma, J. (2017). “It’s complicated.” A systematic review of associations between social network site use and romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 684–703. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., … Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schade, L., Sandberg, J., Bean, R., Busby, D., & Coyne, S. (2013). Using technology to connect in romantic relationships: Effects on attachment, relationship satisfaction, and stability in emerging adults. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(4), 314–338. doi:10.1080/15332691.2013.836051
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1993). Visual communication and social interaction. Readings in groupware and computer-supported cooperative work: Assisting human-human collaboration (pp. 153–164). Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Saslow, L., Muise, A., Impett, E., & Dubin, M. (2013). Can you see how happy we are? Facebook images and relationship satisfaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(4), 411–418. doi:10.1177/1948550612460059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2019). Number of mobile phone users. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/274774/forecast-of-mobile-phone-users-worldwide/
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M., Dainton, M., & Goodboy, A. (2014). Maintaining relationships on Facebook: Associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 27(1), 13–26. doi:10.1080/08934215.2013.845675
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, B., Faires, A., Robbins, M., & Rollins, E. (2014). The mere presence of a cell phone may be distracting implications for attention and task performance. Social Psychology, 45(6), 479–488. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokunaga, R. S. (2016). Interpersonal surveillance over social network sites: Applying a theory of negative relational maintenance and the investment model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(2), 171–190. doi:10.1177/0265407514568749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardecker, B. M., Chopik, W. J., Boyer, M. P., & Edelstein, R. S. (2016). Individual differences in attachment are associated with usage and perceived intimacy of different communication media. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Zhou, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Can insecurely attached dating couples get compensated on social network sites? The effect of surveillance. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 303–310. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23–32. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9117-8
   Google Scholar
• Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 605. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweck, C. V., Paterson, M., & Pentland, W. (2008). The use of hermeneutics in a mixed methods design. The Qualitative Report, 13(1), 116–134. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss1/9
   Google Scholar