References
- Alghafli, Z., Marks, L. D., Hatch, T. G., & Rose, A. H. (2017). Veiling in fear or in faith? Meanings of the Hijab to practicing Muslim wives and husbands in USA. Marriage & Family Review, 53(7), 696–716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2017.1297757
- Arousell, J., & Carlbom, A. (2016). Culture and religious beliefs in relation to reproductive health. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 32, 77–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.08.011
- Bai, C., Cui, N., Xu, X., Mi, G., Sun, J., Shao, D., Li, J., Jiang, Y., Yang, Q., Zhang, X., & Cao, F. (2019). Effectiveness of two guided self-administered interventions for psychological distress among women with infertility: A three-armed, randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 34(7), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez066
- Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2015). Jewish law, scarcity of sperm donors and the consequent private import of sperm of non-Jews by Israeli women. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 81(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000435880
- Bokek-Cohen, Y., & Ben-Asher, S. (2018a). How does it feel to be an anti-martyr's widow? The interplay of religious capital and negative symbolic capital of war widows. Social Compass, 65(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768618772967
- Bokek-Cohen, Y., & Ben-Asher, S. (2018b). The Israeli selective myopia and the missing culturally sensitive support for Bedouin IDF war widows. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 3(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-017-0045-0
- Bokek-Cohen, Y., & Tarabeih, M. (2020). Forbidden medically assisted sex selection in Sunni Muslim patients. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 41(3), 534–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.05.018
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1643–1647). Pergamon Press/Elsevier Science.
- Bronfenbrenner, U, (2005). The bioecological theory of human development. In U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development (pp. 3–15). SAGE.
- Bulcroft, R., & Teachman, J. (2004). Ambiguous constructions: Development of childless or child-free life course. In M. Coleman & L.H. Ganong, (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future (p. 116–135). Sage Publications.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
- Dollahite, D. C., Marks, L. D., & Dalton, H. (2018). Why religion helps and harms families: A conceptual model of a system of dualities at the nexus of faith and family life. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 219–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12242
- Essig, L. W., Lott, M. L., Abo-Zena, M. M., Alghalfi, Z., Marks, L. D., & Dollahite, D. C. (2018). Answering to Allah: Relational unity among American Muslim families. Marriage & Family Review, 54(7), 749–761. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2018.1469577
- Fauser, B. C., Boivin, J., Barri, P. N., Tarlatzis, B. C., Schmidt, L., & Levy-Toledano, R. (2019). Beliefs, attitudes and funding of assisted reproductive technology: Public perception of over 6,000 respondents from 6 European countries. PLoS One, 14(1), e0211150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211150
- Ferraretti, A. P., Pennings, G., Gianaroli, L., Natali, F., & Magli, M. C. (2010). Cross-border reproductive care: A phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive technologies. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20(2), 261–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.009
- Fortin, C., & Abele, S. (2016). Increased length of awareness of assisted reproductive technologies fosters positive attitudes and acceptance among women. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, 9(4), 452–464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2015.4603
- Gameiro, S., El Refaie, E., Bliesemann de Guevara, B., & Payson, A. (2019). Women from diverse minority ethnic or religious backgrounds desire more infertility education and more culturally and personally sensitive fertility care. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 34(9), 1735–1745. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez156
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2000). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
- Goldman, K. N., Blakemore, J., Kramer, Y., McCulloh, D. H., Lawson, A., & Grifo, J. A. (2019). Beyond the biopsy: Predictors of decision regret and anxiety following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Human Reproduction, 34(7), 1260–1269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez080
- Greil, A., McQuillan, J., Benjamins, M., Johnson, D. R., Johnson, K. M., & Heinz, C. R. (2010). Specifying the effects of religion on medical helpseeking: The case of infertility. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 71(4), 734–742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.033
- Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 31)(3), 498–501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334
- Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces; a Scientific Medium of Social Study and Interpretation, 86(3), 1163–1188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0000
- Homburg, R., Husain, F., Gudi, A., Brincat, M., & Shah, A. (2018). Religious attitudes to gamete donation. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 231, 204–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.051
- Husain, F. A. (2000). Reproductive issues from the Islamic perspective. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England), 3(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1464727002000198831
- Inhorn, M. C. (1996). Infertility and patriarchy: The cultural politics of gender and family life in Egypt. University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Inhorn, M. C. (2004). Middle Eastern masculinities in the age of new reproductive technologies: Male infertility and stigma in Egypt and Lebanon. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 18(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2004.18.2.162
- Inhorn, M. C. (2006a). "He won't be my son": Middle Eastern Muslim men's discourses of adoption and gamete donation”. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20(1), 94–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2006.20.1.94
- Inhorn, M. C. (2006b). Fatwas and ARTs: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni v. Shi’a Islam. Journal of Gender Race & Justice, 9, 291–317. https://marciainhorn.com/wp-content/uploads/docs/inhorn-article-gender-race-justice.pdf
- Inhorn, M. C. (2011). Globalization and gametes: Reproductive 'tourism,' Islamic bioethics, and Middle Eastern modernity. Anthropology & Medicine, 18(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2010.525876
- Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (2016). Islam, assisted Reproduction, and the Bioethical Aftermath. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(2), 422–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0151-1
- Khan, M. A., & Konje, J. C. (2019). Ethical and religious dilemmas of modern reproductive choices and the Islamic perspective. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 232, 5–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.052
- Koropeckyj-Cox, T., & Pendell, G. (2007). Attitudes about childlessness in the United States: Correlates of positive, neutral, and negative responses. Journal of Family Issues, 28(8), 1054–1082. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07301940
- Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
- Larijani, B., & Zahedi, F. (2007). Ethical and religious aspects of gamete and embryo donation and legislation in Iran. Journal of Religion and Health, 46(3), 399–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-007-9108-3
- Larson, D. G., & Chastain, R. L. (1990). Self-concealment: Conceptualization, measurement and health implications. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.4.439
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1991). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
- Marey-Sarwan, I., Otto, H., Roer-Strier, D., & Keller, H. (2015). Parenting among the Arab Bedouins in the Naqab desert in Israel: Children are a gift from God. In G. Nicolas, A. Bejarano, & D. L. Lee (Eds.), Contemporary parenting: A global perspective (pp. 105–123). Routledge.
- Marks, L. (2005). How does religion influence marriage? Christian, Jewish, Mormon and Muslim perspectives. Marriage & Family Review, 38(1), 85–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v38n01_07
- Milewski, N., & Haug, S. (2020). Religious diversity and women’s attitudes toward using assisted reproductive technologies—Insights from a pilot study in Germany. Journal of Religion and Demography, 7(1), 150–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/2589742X-12347104
- Pew Research Center. (2021). Why Muslims are the world’s fastest-growing religious group? Retrieved May 21, 2021, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/06/why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group/
- Roberts, R. E. (2020). Qualitative interview questions: Guidance for novice researchers. Qualitative Report, 25(9), 3185–3203.
- Roer-Strier, D., & Nadan, Y. (2020). Context-informed perspectives of child risk and protection in Israel. Springer.
- Serour, G. I. (2005). Religious perspectives of ethical issues in ART 1. Islamic perspectives of ethical issues in ART. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 10(3), 185–190.
- Serour, G. I., & Dickens, B. M. (2001). Assisted reproduction developments in the Islamic world. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 74(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00425-8
- Serour, G. I., Aboulghar, M. A., & Mansour, R. T. (1995). Bioethics in medically assisted conception in the Muslim world. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 12(9), 559–565. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212574
- Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N., & Roer-Strier, D. (2016). Context-informed, counter-hegemonic qualitative research: Insights from an Israeli/Palestinian research team studying loss. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 15(4), 552–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015595545
- Simpson, B., Hampshire, K., & Blell, M. (2014). British Pakistani Muslims, infertility and the new reproductive technologies: Summary of findings. Durham University.
- Tsui, E. Y. L., & Cheng, J. O. Y. (2019). The living experience of losing genetic continuity: Concealment tendency in Chinese recipients of donor-assisted conception. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(4), 525–542.
- Van Hoof, W., & Pennings, G. (2011). Extraterritoriality for cross-border reproductive care: Should states act against citizens travelling abroad for illegal infertility treatment? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23(5), 546–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.015
- West, B. T., & Blom, A. G. (2017). Explaining interviewer effects: A research synthesis. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 5(2), 175–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smw024