A Novel Sponge‐Submerged Membrane Bioreactor (SSMBR) for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse

References

• DiGiano , F. A. 2004 . Membrane bioreactor technology and sustainable water . Water Environment Research , 76 (3) : 195
   Google Scholar
• Lee , W. , Kang , S. and Shin , H. 2003 . Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors . Journal of Membrane Science , 216 : 217 – 227 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang , W. , Cicek , N. and Ilg , J. 2006 . State‐of‐the‐art of membrane bioreactor: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America . Journal of Membrane Science , 270 : 201 – 211 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto , K. , Hiasa , M. , Mahmood , T. and Matsuo , T. 1989 . Direct solid‐liquid separation using hollow fiber membrane in an activated sludge aeration tank . Water Science and Technology , 21 ( 4–5 ) : 43 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee , J. C. , Kim , J. S. , Kang , I. J. , Cho , M. H. , Park , P. K. and Lee , C. H. 2001 . Potential and limitations of alum or zeolite addition to improve the performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor . Water Science and Technology , 43 ( 11 ) : 59 – 66 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim , H. S. , Katayama , H. , Takizawa , S. and Ohgaki , S. Removal of coliphage Qβ and organic matter from synthetic secondary effluent by powdered activated carbon‐microfiltration (PAC‐MF) process . Proceedings of IWA Specialized Conference on Membrane Technology . Israel. pp. 211 – 219 .
   Google Scholar
• Tsai , H. H. , Ravindran , V. and Pirbazari , M. 2005 . Model for predicting the performance of membrane bioadsorber reactor process in water treatment applications . Chemical Engineering Science , 60 : 5620 – 5636 .
   Google Scholar
• Yoon , S. H. and Collins , J. H. 2006 . A novel flux enhancing method for membrane bioreactor (MBR) process using polymer . Desalination , 191 : 52 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee , W. N. , Kang , I. J. and Lee , C. H. 2006 . Factors affecting filtration characteristics in membrane‐coupled moving bed biofilm reactor . Water Research , 40 : 1827 – 1835 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang , Q. , Chen , J. and Zhang , F. 2006 . Membrane fouling control in a submerged membrane bioreactor with porous, flexible suspended carriers . Desalination , 189 : 292 – 302 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field , R. W. , Wu , D. , Howell , J. A. and Gupta , B. B. 1995 . Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling . Journal of Membrane Science , 100 : 259 – 272 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fane , T. and Leslie , G. Membrane technology—The key to water reuse . Proceedings of IWA Specialty Conference, Water Environment‐Membrane Technology (WEMT2004) . June 7–10 , Seoul, Korea. pp. 875 – 883 .
   Google Scholar
• Gander , M. , Jefferson , B. and Judd , S. 2000 . Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations . Separation and Purification Technology , 18 : 119 – 130 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon , T. I. , Lee , H. S. and Kim , C. G. 2004 . Comparison of pilot scale performances between membrane bioreactor and hybrid conventional wastewater treatment systems . Journal of Membrane Science , 242 : 5 – 12 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genz , A. , Kornmüller , A. and Jekel , M. 2004 . Advanced phosphorus removal from membrane filtrates by adsorption on activated aluminium oxide and granulated ferric hydroxide . Water Research , 38 : 3523 – 3530 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn , K. H. , Song , K. G. , Cho , E. , Cho , J. , Yun , H. , Lee , S. and Kim , J. 2003 . Enhanced biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal using a sequencing anoxic/anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAM) process . Desalination , 157 : 345 – 352 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibiya , K. , Terada , A. , Tsuneda , S. and Hirata , A. 2003 . Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by controlling vertical and horizontal microenvironment in a membrane‐aerated biofilm reactor . Journal of Biotechnology , 100 : 23 – 32 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang , H. M. , Xiao , J. N. , Cheng , Y. J. , Liu , L. F. , Zhang , X. W. and Yang , F. L. 2006 . Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor . Process Biochemistry , 41 : 87 – 95 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo , H. H. , Nguyen , M. C. , Sangvikar , N. G. , Hoang , T. T.L. and Guo , W. S. 2006 . Simple approaches towards a design of an attached‐growth sponge bioreactor (AGSB) for wastewater treatment and reuse . Water Science and Technology , 54 ( 11–12 ) : 191 – 197 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Psoch , C. and Schiewer , S. 2006 . Direct filtration of natural and simulated river water with air sparging and sponge ball application for fouling control . Desalination , 197 : 190 – 204 .
   Google Scholar
• Chae , K. J. , Yim , S. K. and Choi , K. H. 2004 . Application of a sponge media (BioCube) process for upgrading and expansion of existing caprolactam wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal . Water Science and Technology , 50 ( 6 ) : 163 – 171 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pascik , I. 1990 . Modified polyurethane carrier of biochemical wastewater treatment . Water Science and Technology , 22 ( 1–2 ) : 32 – 42 .
   Google Scholar
• Clesceri , L. S. , Greenberg , A. E. and Eaton , A. D. 1998 . Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater , 20th edn. Washington, DC, USA : American Public Health Association .
   Google Scholar
• Merzouki , M. , Bernet , N. , Delgenes , J. P. , Moletta , R. and Benlemlih , M. 2001 . Biological denitrifying phosphorus removal in SBR: effect of added nitrate concentration and sludge retention time . Water Science and Technology , 43 ( 3 ) : 191 – 194 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar