Powering reversible actuators using forward osmosis membranes: feasibility study and modeling

References

• Chekli, L. et al. (2012) A review of draw solutes in forward osmosis process and their use in modern applications. Desalination and Water Treatment, 43 (1–3): 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, R.L.; Elimelech, M. (2007) Energy requirements of ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination, 207(1): 370–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phuntsho, S. et al. (2012) Fertiliser drawn forward osmosis desalination: the concept, performance and limitations for fertigation. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/ Technology, 11 (2): 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore, M.H.;. (2015) Reverse Osmosis and Other Treatment Technologies, in Global Drinking Water Management and Conservation: Optimal Decision-Making, Springer International Publishing: Cham. 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Cath, T.Y.; Childress, A.E.; Elimelech, M. (2006) Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 281(1–2): 70–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achilli, A. et al. (2009) The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination, 239 (1): 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilal, N. et al. (2015) Water Desalination by Forward (Direct) Osmosis Phenomenon: A Comprehensive Review,
   Google Scholar
• Lutchmiah, K. et al. (2014) Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: a review. Water Research, 58: 179–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, T.-S. et al. (2015) What is next for forward osmosis (FO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO). Separation and Purification Technology, 156: 856–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, A.P.; Deshmukh, A.; Elimelech, M. (2016) Pressure-retarded osmosis for power generation from salinity gradients: is it viable? Energy & Environmental Science, 9(1): 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarp, S.; Li, Z.; Saththasivam, J. (2016) Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO): past experiences, current developments, and future prospects. Desalination,389: 2–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She, Q. et al. (2016) Membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes: A review. Journal of Membrane Science, 499: 201–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaee, A.; Sharif, A. (2015) Pressure retarded osmosis: advancement in the process applications for power generation and desalination. Desalination,356: 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. et al. (2015) Recent advances in osmotic energy generation via Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO): A review. Energies, 8 (10): 11821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, F.; Lemckert, C.; Anissimov, Y.G. (2014) Osmotic power with pressure retarded osmosis: theory, performance and trends – A review. Journal of Membrane Science,453: 337–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, G. et al. (2015) Progress in pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) membranes for osmotic power generation. Progress in Polymer Science, 51: 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsvik, I.; Hägg, M.-B. (2013) Pressure retarded osmosis and forward osmosis membranes: materials and methods. Polymers, 5(1): 303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achilli, A.; Childress, A.E. (2010) Pressure retarded osmosis: from the vision of Sidney Loeb to the first prototype installation - Review. Desalination, 261(3): 205–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y.-H.; Su, Y.-C. (2010) Miniature osmotic actuators for controlled maxillofacial distraction osteogenesis. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 20(6): 065013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. et al. (2012) Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Membrane Science, 396: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cath, T.Y.; Childress, A.E.; Elimelech, M. (2006) Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of membrane science, 281(1–2): 70–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, F.; Yum, S. (1976) Principles of the design and operation of generic osmotic pumps for the delivery of semisolid or liquid drug formulations. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 4(4): 343–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagakura, T.; Ishihara, K.; Furukawa, T.; Masuda, K.; Tsuda. T. (1995) Auto-regulated medical pump without energy supply. in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1995 and 14th Conference of the Biomedical Engineering Society of India. An International Meeting, Proceedings of the First Regional Conference., IEEE, 1995. IEEE: p. PS27-PS28.
   Google Scholar
• Su, Y.-C; Lin, L. (2004) A water-powered micro drug delivery system. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 13(1): 75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu-Chuan, S.; Liwei, L.; Pisano, A.P. (2002) A water-powered osmotic microactuator. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 11(6): 736–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinibaldi, E. et al. (2013) Osmotic actuation modelling for innovative biorobotic solutions inspired by the plant kingdom. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 8 (2): 025002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzolai, B. et al., Inspiration from plant roots: a robotic root apex for soil exploration. Proceedings of Biological Approaches for Engineering, University of Southampton. 2008. p. 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzolai, B. et al. (2014) Emerging Technologies Inspired by Plants, in Bioinspired Approaches for Human-Centric Technologies, Springer: 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, X.; Li, K.; Cai, S. (2015) Drying-induced deformation in fiber-embedded gels to mimic plant nastic movements. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 7(02): 1550016.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzolai, B.; Beccai, L.; Mattoli, V. (2014) Plants as model in biomimetics and biorobotics: new perspectives. Frontiers Bioengineering Biotechnology,2 (10.3389).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stahlberg, R. (2009) The phytomimetic potential of three types of hydration motors that drive nastic plant movements. Mechanics of Materials, 41(10): 1162–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, T. et al. (2008) Biomimetic transfer of plant roots for planetary anchoring. Proceedings 59th International Astronautics Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Dario, P. et al. (2008) Bio-inspiration from plants‟ roots. Final Report, Ariadna ID, 6: 6301.
   Google Scholar
• Sinibaldi, E. et al. (2014) Another lesson from plants: the forward osmosis-based actuator. PloS one, 9 (7): e102461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, N.Y.;, et al. (2010) High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environmental Science & Technology, 44 (10): 3812–3818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, D.P.; Crosby, A.J. (2007) Snapping surfaces. Advanced Materials, 19(21): 3589–3593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. et al. (2012) Lifting gate PDMS microvalves and pumps for microfluidic control. Analytical Chemistry, 84 (4): 2067–2071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santulli, C. et al. (2005) Development of smart variable stiffness actuators using polymer hydrogels. Smart Materials and Structures, 14 (2): 434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. et al. Resealable, ultra-low leak micro valve using liquid surface tension sealing for vacuum applications. in Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS), 2017 19th International Conference on. 2017. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Khorshidi, B. et al. (2016) Developing high throughput thin film composite polyamide membranes for forward osmosis treatment of SAGD produced water. Journal of Membrane Science, 511: 29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahebi, S. et al. (2016) Effect of sulphonated polyethersulfone substrate for thin film composite forward osmosis membrane. Desalination, 389: 129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L.; Xiong, S.; Wang, Y. (2016) Graphene oxide incorporated thin-film composite membranes for forward osmosis applications. Chemical Engineering Science,143: 194–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang, W. et al. (2016) Investigation of internal concentration polarization reduction in forward osmosis membrane using nano-CaCO3 particles as sacrificial component. Journal of Membrane Science, 497 (p): 485–493.
   Google Scholar
• Kuang, W. et al. (2016) Thin film composite forward osmosis membranes with poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) grafted nano-TiO2 as additive in substrate. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 133 (31): n/a-n/a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, P. et al. (2016) Thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes based on layered double hydroxide nanoparticles blended substrates. Journal of Membrane Science, 504: 196–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, P. et al. (2015) A sacrificial-layer approach to fabricate polysulfone support for forward osmosis thin-film composite membranes with reduced internal concentration polarisation. Journal of Membrane Science, 481: 106–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.P.N. et al. (2015) Comparison of integrally asymmetric and thin film composite structures for a desirable fashion of forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 495: 457–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L.; Arena, J.T.; McCutcheon, J.R. (2016) Surface modified PVDF nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science,499: 352–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiraferri, A. et al. (2013) A method for the simultaneous determination of transport and structural parameters of forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 444: 523–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, J.R.; Elimelech, M. (2007) Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: implications for improved membrane design. AIChE Journal, 53(7): 1736–1744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argon, A.S. (2013) The Physics of Deformation and Fracture of Polymers, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K.P.; Arnot, T.C.; Mattia, D. (2011) A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—development to date and future potential. Journal of Membrane Science, 370(1–2): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R. et al. (2010) Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 355 (1): 158–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenlo, F. et al. (2002) Viscosities of aqueous solutions of sucrose and sodium chloride of interest in osmotic dehydration processes. Journal of Food Engineering, 54 (4): 347–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C.; Xing, D.; Li, Y. (2007) Micropumps, microvalves, and micromixers within PCR microfluidic chips: advances and trends. Biotechnology Advances, 25(5): 483–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. et al. (2014) A critical review of transport through osmotic membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 454: 516–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, M.; Keten, S.; Lueptow, R.M. (2016) Dynamics of water and solute transport in polymeric reverse osmosis membranes via molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Membrane Science,506: 95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araki, T. et al. (2015) Molecular dynamics study of carbon nanotubes/polyamide reverse osmosis membranes: polymerization, structure, and hydration. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 7 (44): 24566–24575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, S.J. et al. (2015) Salt and water transport in reverse osmosis thin film composite seawater desalination membranes. Desalination, 368: 202–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. et al. (2017) Enhanced both water flux and salt rejection of reverse osmosis membrane through combining isophthaloyl dichloride with biphenyl tetraacyl chloride as organic phase monomer for seawater desalination. Journal of Membrane Science, 522: 175–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, X.; Liu, Z.; Sun, D.D. (2011) Nano gives the answer: breaking the bottleneck of internal concentration polarization with a nanofiber composite forward osmosis membrane for a high water production rate. Advanced Materials, 23(29): 3256–3260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werber, J.R.; Osuji, C.O.; Elimelech, M. (2016) Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nature Reviews Materials,1: 16018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar