Effect of low-frequency pulsatile crossflow microfiltration on flux and protein transmission in milk protein fractionation

References

• Hilal, N.; Ogunbiyi, O. O.; Miles, N. J.; Nigmatullin, R. Methods Employed for Control of Fouling in MF and UF Membranes: A Comprehensive Review. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40(10), 1957–2005. DOI: 10.1081/SS-200068409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffrin, M. Y.;. Hydrodynamic Techniques to Enhance Membrane Filtration. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.. 2012, 44(1), 77–96. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, C. D.; Hoogland, M. R.; Li, H.; Odell, R. A.; Fane, A. G. Flux Enhancement in Crossflow Microfiltration Using a Collapsible-tube Pulsation Generator. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 84(3), 279–292. DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(93)80023-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, B. B.; Blanpain, P.; Jaffrin, M. Y. Permeate Flux Enhancement by Pressure and Flow Pulsations in Microfiltration with Mineral Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1992, 70(2), 257–266. DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(92)80111-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. A.; Field, R. W.; Wu, D. Yeast Cell Microfiltration: Flux Enhancement in Baffled and Pulsatile Flow Systems. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80(1), 59–71. DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(93)85132-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadzismajlovic, D. E.; Bertram, C. D. Flux Enhancement in Laminar Crossflow Microfiltration Using a Collapsible-tube Pulsation Generator. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 142(2), 173–189. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00319-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadzismajlovic, D. E.; Bertram, C. D. Flux Enhancement in Turbulent Crossflow Microfiltration of Yeast Using a Collapsible-tube Pulsation Generator. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 163(1), 123–134. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00161-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maranges, C.; Fonade, C. Flux Enhancement in Crossflow Filtration Using an Unsteady Jet. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 123(1), 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00175-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamel, M. M.; Sulaiman, N. M.; Sulaiman, M. Z. Cross Flow Ultrafiltration Studies on Solutions of Pectin with Pulsatile Flow Insitu Cleaning. Artif. Cells, Blood Substitues Biotechnol. 1999, 27(5–6), 447–453. DOI: 10.3109/10731199909117718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, B. B.; Zaboubi, B.; Jaffrin, M. Y. Scaling up Pulsatile Filtration Flow Methods to a Pilot Apparatus Equipped with Mineral Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80(1), 13–20. DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(93)85128-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olayiwola, B.; Walzel, P. Effects of In-phase Oscillation of Retentate and Filtrate in Crossflow Filtration at Low Reynolds Number. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345(1–2), 36–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffrin, M. Y.; Ding, L. H.; Gupta, B. B. Rationale of Filtration Enhancement in Membrane Plasmapheresis by Pulsatile Blood Flow. Life Support Syst. 1987, 5(3), 267–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaffrin, M. Y.; Ding, L. H.; Laurent, M. J. Kinetics of Concentration-polarization Formation in Crossflow Filtration of Plasma from Blood: Experimental Results. J. Membr. Sci. 1992, 72(3), 267–275. DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(92)85054-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffrin, M. Y.; Gupta, B. B.; Paullier, P. Energy Saving Pulsatile Mode Cross Flow Filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 86(3), 281–290. DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0151-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, T. J.; Merson, R. L.; McCoy, B. J. Improving Permeation Flux by Pulsed Reverse Osmosis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1974, 29(9), 1927–1931. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(74)85010-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. H.; Leighton, D. T. Shear-induced Transport of a Particle Layer along a Porous Wall. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1987, 42(2), 275–281. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(87)85057-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D.; Howell, J. A.; Field, R. W. Pulsatile Flow Filtration of Yeast Cell Debris: Influence of Preincubation on Performance. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 41(10), 998–1002. DOI: 10.1002/bit.260411011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilias, S.; Govind, R. Potential Applications of Pulsed Flow for Minimizing Concentration Polarization in Ultrafiltration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1990, 25(13–15), 1307–1324. DOI: 10.1080/01496399008050393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curcio, S.; Calabrò, V.; Iorio, G. Monitoring and Control of TMP and Feed Flow Rate Pulsatile Operations during Ultrafiltration in a Membrane Module. Desalination. 2002, 145(1), 217–222. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00415-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P.; Sharma, N.; Ranjan, R.; Kumar, S.; Bhat, Z. F.; Jeong, D. K. Perspective of Membrane Technology in Dairy Industry: A Review. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 26(9), 1347–1358. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, G.; Schroën, C. G. P. H.; van der Sman, R. G. M.; Boom, R. M. Membrane Fractionation of Milk: State of the Art and Challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243(1–2), 263–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchoux, A.; Gésan-Guiziou, G.; Pérez, J.; Cabane, B. How to Squeeze a Sponge: Casein Micelles under Osmotic Stress, a SAXS Study. Biophys. J. 2010, 99(11), 3754–3762. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchoux, A.; Debbou, B.; Gésan-Guiziou, G.; Famelart, M.-H.; Doublier, J.-L.; Cabane, B. Rheology and Phase Behavior of Dense Casein Micelle Dispersions. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131(16), 165106. DOI: 10.1063/1.3245956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Q.; Li, W.; Trinh, T. A.; Fane, A. G.; Chew, J. W. Effect of the Surface Charge of Monodisperse Particulate Foulants on Cake Formation. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 548, 108–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schork, N.; Schuhmann, S.; Arndt, F.; Schütz, S.; Guthausen, G.; Nirschl, H. MRI Investigations of Filtration: Fouling and Cleaning Processes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 269, 60–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.05.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuhmann, S.; Simkins, J. W.; Schork, N.; Codd, S. L.; Seymour, J. D.; Heijnen, M.; Saravia, F.; Horn, H.; Nirschl, H.; Guthausen, G. Characterization and Quantification of Structure and Flow in Multichannel Polymer Membranes by MRI. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 570–571, 472–480. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çulfaz, P. Z.; Buetehorn, S.; Utiu, L.; Kueppers, M.; Bluemich, B.; Melin, T.; Wessling, M.; Lammertink, R. G. H. Fouling Behavior of Microstructured Hollow Fiber Membranes in Dead-End Filtrations: Critical Flux Determination and NMR Imaging of Particle Deposition. Langmuir. 2011, 27(5), 1643–1652. DOI: 10.1021/la1037734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, Y.; Hengl, N.; Baup, S.; Pignon, F.; Gondrexon, N.; Magnin, A.; Sztucki, M.; Narayanan, T.; Michot, L.; Cabane, B. Effects of Ultrasound on Colloidal Organization at Nanometer Length Scale during Cross-flow Ultrafiltration Probed by In-situ SAXS. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 453, 624–635. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijl, E.; van Valenberg, H. J. F.; Huppertz, T.; van Hooijdonk, A. C. M. Protein, Casein, and Micellar Salts in Milk: Current Content and Historical Perspectives. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96(9), 5455–5464. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walstra, P.;. On the Stability of Casein Micelles. J. Dairy Sci. 1990, 73(8), 1965–1979. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78875-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumpler, J.; Wohlschläger, H.; Kulozik, U. Dissociation and Coagulation of Caseins and Whey Proteins in Concentrated Skim Milk Heated by Direct Steam Injection. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2017, 96(6), 807–826. DOI: 10.1007/s13594-016-0304-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartinger, M.; Heidebrecht, H.-J.; Schiffer, S.; Dumpler, J.; Kulozik, U. Milk Protein Fractionation by Means of Spiral-Wound Microfiltration Membranes: Effect of the Pressure Adjustment Mode and Temperature on Flux and Protein Permeation. Foods. 2019, 8(6), 180. DOI: 10.3390/foods8060180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunkumar, A.; Etzel, M. R. Fractionation of α-lactalbumin from β-lactoglobulin Using Positively Charged Tangential Flow Ultrafiltration Membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 105, 121–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piry, A.; Kühnl, W.; Grein, T.; Tolkach, A.; Ripperger, S.; Kulozik, U. Length Dependency of Flux and Protein Permeation in Crossflow Microfiltration of Skimmed Milk. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325(2), 887–894. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Berre, O.; Daufin, G. Skimmilk Crossflow Microfiltration Performance versus Permeation Flux to Wall Shear Stress Ratio. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 117(1), 261–270. DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(96)00076-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchoux, A.; Qu, P.; Bacchin, P.; Gésan-Guiziou, G. A General Approach for Predicting the Filtration of Soft and Permeable Colloids: The Milk Example. Langmuir. 2014, 30(1), 22–34. DOI: 10.1021/la402865p.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Militello, V.; Navarra, G.; Foderá, V.; Librizzi, F.; Vetri, V.; Leone, M. Thermal Aggregation of Proteins in Presence of Metal Ions. In Biophysical Inquiry into Protein Aggregation and Amyloid Diseases; Biagio, P. L. S., Bulone, D., Eds. 181–232; Trivandrum, India: Transworld Research Network, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. A. M.; van Mil, P. J. J. M. Heat-Induced Aggregation of β-Lactoglobulin as a Function of pH. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47(5), 1898–1905. DOI: 10.1021/jf980886e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontopidis, G.; Holt, C.; Sawyer, L. Invited Review: β-Lactoglobulin: Binding Properties, Structure, and Function. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87(4), 785–796. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73222-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhid de Aguiar, I.; Schroën, K.; Meireles, M.; Bouchoux, A. Compressive Resistance of Granular-scale Microgels: From Loose to Dense Packing. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2018, 553, 406–416. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.05.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piry, A.; Heino, A.; Kühnl, W.; Grein, T.; Ripperger, S.; Kulozik, U. Effect of Membrane Length, Membrane Resistance, and Filtration Conditions on the Fractionation of Milk Proteins by Microfiltration. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95(4), 1590–1602. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, P.; Gésan-Guiziou, G.; Bouchoux, A. Dead-end Filtration of Sponge-like Colloids: The Case of Casein Micelle. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 417–418, 10–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, R.; Steinhauer, T.; Meyer, P.; Sterr, J.; Perlich, J.; Kulozik, U. Structural Changes of Deposited Casein Micelles Induced by Membrane Filtration. Faraday Discuss. 2012, 158, 77–88. DOI: 10.1039/c2fd20022h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, M. C.; Barbano, D. M. Serum Protein Removal from Skim Milk with a 3-stage, 3× Ceramic Isoflux Membrane Process at 50°C1. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96(4), 2020–2034. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidebrecht, H.-J.; Kulozik, U. Fractionation of Casein Micelles and Minor Proteins by Microfiltration in Diafiltration Mode. Study of the Transmission and Yield of the Immunoglobulins IgG, IgA and IgM. Int. Dairy J. 2019, 93, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2019.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trejo, R.; Dokland, T.; Jurat-Fuentes, J.; Harte, F. Cryo-transmission Electron Tomography of Native Casein Micelles from Bovine Milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94(12), 5770–5775. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühnl, W.; Piry, A.; Kaufmann, V.; Grein, T.; Ripperger, S.; Kulozik, U. Impact of Colloidal Interactions on the Flux in Cross-flow Microfiltration of Milk at Different pH Values: A Surface Energy Approach. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 352(1–2), 107–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, T.; Kühnl, W.; Kulozik, U. Impact of Protein Interactions and Transmembrane Pressure on Physical Properties of Filter Cakes Formed during Filtrations of Skim Milk. Procedia Food Sci. 2011, 1, 886–892. DOI: 10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.134.
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, J.; Dechau, J.; Kulozik, U. Multiscale Approach to Characterize Bulk, Surface and Foaming Behavior of Casein Micelles as a Function of Alkalinisation. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016, 57, 92–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar