The use of efficiency curve approach for predicting the classification performance of teetered bed separator

References

• Altun, O.; Benzer, H. Selection and Mathematical Modelling of High Efficiency Air Classifiers. Powder Technol. 2014, 264, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A.; Sarkar, B.; Mehrotra, S. P. Prediction of Separation Performance of Floatex Density Separator for Processing Fine Coal Particles. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2009, 91, 41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A.; Biswajit, S. Advanced Gravity Concentration of Fine Particles: A Review. Mineral Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2018, 39(6), 359–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doroodchi, E.; Fletcher, D. F.; Galvin, K. P. Influence of Inclined Plates on the Expansion Behaviour of Particulate Suspensions in a Liquid Fluidized Bed. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004, 59, 3559–3567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felice, D. R.;. Hydrodynamics of Liquid Fluidization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50, 1213–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J. A.;. Modelling a Fish-hook in Hydrocyclone Selectivity Curves. Powder Technol. 1983, 80(905), 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, B.; Hart, G. Some Aspects of Modeling Partition Curves for Size Classification. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2008, 28(3), 174–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. P.; Pratten, S. J.; Nguyen Tran, L. G. A Generalized Empirical Description for Particle Slip Velocities in Liquid Fluidized Beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999a, 54, 1045–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. P.; Pratten, S. J.; Nicol, S. K. Dense Medium Separation Using a Teetered Bed Separator. Miner. Eng. 1999b, 12(9), 1069–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. P.; Callen, A.; Zhou, J.; Doroodchi, E. Performance of the Reflux Classifier for Gravity Separation at Full Scale. Miner. Eng. 2005, 18, 19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A.; Yan, D. Mineral Processing Design and Operations;Second; Elsevier: UK, 2016; pp 704.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, K.;. Particle Classification, first ed.; Chapman & Hall: London, 1993; Vols. 59-60, 87. 264–272.
   Google Scholar
• Kapure, G.; Kari, C.; Rao, S. M.; Rao, N. D.; Rao, S. M. The Feasibility of a Slip Velocity Model for Predicting the Enrichment of Chromite in a Floatex Density Separator. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2007, 82, 86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B. H. 2003. Modeling of Hindered-Settling Column Separations. A Thesis in Mineral Processing for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The Pennsylvania State University, The Graduate School, Department of Energy and Geo-Environmental Engineering, p. 186.
   Google Scholar
• Kohmuench, J. N.;. Improving Efficiencies in Water-based Separators Using Mathematical Analysis Tools. Dissertation; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburgh: Virginia, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kohmuench, J. N.; Mankosa, M. J.; Honaker, R. Q.; Bratton, R. C. Applications of the CrossFlow Teeter-bed Separator in the US Coal Industry. Miner. Metall. Process. 2006, 23(4), 187–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohmuench, J. N.; Yan, E. S.; Mankosa, M. J. Design, Operation and Control of a Teeter-bed Hydroseparator for Classification. Miner. Metall. Process. 2010, 27, 166–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraipech, W.; Chen, W.; Parma, F. J.; Dyakowski, T. Modelling the Fish-Hook Effect of the Flow within Hydrocyclones. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2002, 66, 49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraipech, W.; Nowakowski, A.; Dyakowski, T.; Suksangpanomrung, A. An Investigation of the Effect of the Particle-Fluid and Particle-Particle Interactions on the Flow within a Hydrocyclone. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 111, 189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, C. R.; Tripathy, S. K.; Rao, D. S. Characterization and Pre-concentration of Chromite Values from Plant Tailings Using Floatex Density Separator. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 2009, 8, 367–378.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, C. R.; Tripathy, S. K.; Mohanan, S.; Venugopalan, T.; Suresh, N. (2010) Evaluation of Floatex Density Separator Performance Using Silica Sand. Proceedings of the XI International Seminar on Mineral Processing Technology (MPT-2010), Jamshedpur, India, 701–706.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, C. R.; Mohanan, S.; Tripathy, S. K.; Ramamurthy, Y.; Venugopalan, T.; Suresh, N. Prediction of Process Input Interactions of Floatex Density Separator Performance for Separating Medium Density Particles. Int J Miner Eng. 2011, 100, 136–141.
   Google Scholar
• Litter, A.;. Automatic Hindered-settling Classifier for Hydraulic Sizing and Mineral Beneficiation. Trans Inst Min Metall. 1986, 95, 133–138.
   Google Scholar
• Luttrell, G. H.; Westerfield, T. C.; Kohmuench, J. N.; Mankosa, M. J.; Mikkola, K. A.; Oswald, G. Development of High-efficiency Hydraulic Separators. Miner Metall Process. 2006, 23, 33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neesse, T.; Dueck, J.; Minkov, L. Separation of Finest Particles in Hydrocyclones. Miner. Eng. 2004, 17, 689–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan, O.; Ergun, L. (2015) Classification Performance Evaluation of a Teetered Bed Separator for Silica Sand. Proceedings of the 14th European Symposium on Comminution & Classification, Gothenburg, 240–244.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcan, O.; Celik, I. B. Beneficiation Routes for Upgrading Iron Ore Tailings with a Teetered Bed Separator. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2016, 51(17), 2844–2855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan, O.; Ergun, L. Performance of Teetered Bed Separator for Non-coal Applications. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 1486–1495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan, O.;. Performance Comparison of a Hydrocyclone and Crossflow Separator – A Plant Study. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2020a, 55(4), 799–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan, O.; (2020b) Investigation of Classification Alternatives for Grinding Circuits, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, doi: 10.1080/25726641.2020.1793048.
   Google Scholar
• Remes, A.; Tuikka, A.; Kovio, H. Simulation and Pilot Experiments on Pyrite Concentrate Separation in a Floatex Density Separator. Miner. Metall. Process. 2011, 28, 62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. F.; Zaki, W. N. Sedimentation and Fluidisation: Part I. Trans Inst Chem Eng. 1965, 43, 69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathy, S. K.; Mallick, M. K.; Singh, V.; Murthy, R. M. Preliminary Studies on Teeter Bed Separator for Separation of Manganese Fines. Powder Technol. 2013, 239, 284–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathy, S. K.; Bhoja, S. K.; Kumar, C. R.; Suresh, N. A Short Review on Hydraulic Classification and Its Development in Mineral Industry. Powder Technol. 2015, 270, 205–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiten, W. J.;. Lecture Notes for Winter School on Mineral Processing; Queensland, Australia: Dept. Min. and Met. Eng, university of Queensland, Aug (Lynch and Bull), 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmels, Y.;. Theory of Density Separation of Particulate System. Powder Technol. 1985, 43, 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar