References
- International Coffee Organization. ICO Annual Review 2017/18. 2017.
- Clarke, R. J.; Macrae, R. Coffee; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1987.
- Vitzthum, O.; Koch, K. D. Process for the preparation of soluble coffee. United States Patent No 5225223, 1999.
- Corso, M. P.; Vignoli, J. A.; De Toledo Benassi, M. Development of an Instant Coffee Enriched with Chlorogenic Acids. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53(3), 380–1388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2163-y.
- Zapata, J.; Londoño, V.; Naranjo, M.; Osorio, J.; Lopez, C.; Quintero, M. Characterization of Aroma Compounds Present in an Industrial Recovery Concentrate of Coffee Flavor. CyTA - J. Food. 2018, 16(1), 367–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2017.1406995.
- Weschenfelder, T. A.; Lantin, P.; Viegas, M. C.; De Castilhos, F.; Scheer, A. D. P. Concentration of Aroma Compounds from an Industrial Solution of Soluble Coffee by Pervaporation Process. J. Food Eng. 2015, 159, 57–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.03.018.
- Okada, M.; Rao, M. A.; Lima, J. E.; Torloni, M. Energy Consumption and the Potential for Conservation in a Spray-dried Coffee Plant. J. Food Sci. 1980, 45(3), 685–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1980.tb04132.x.
- Wang, L.;. Energy Efficiency Technologies for Sustainable Food Processing. Energy Effic. 2014, 7(5), 791–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-014-9256-8.
- Cassano, A.; Drioli, E. Integrated Membrane Operations in the Food Production; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2014.
- Madaeni, S. S.; Zereshki, S. Energy Consumption for Sugar Manufacturing. Part I: Evaporation versus Reverse Osmosis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51(6), 1270–1276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.002.
- Akoum, O. A.; Jaffrin, M. Y.; Ding, L.; Paullier, P.; Vanhoutte, C. An Hydrodynamic Investigation of Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration in a Vibrating Membrane Module. J. Memb. Sci. 2002, 197(1), 37–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00602-0.
- Fillaudeau, L.; Boissier, B.; Moreau, A.; Blanpain-avet, P.; Ermolaev, S.; Jitariouk, N.; Gourdon, A. Investigation of Rotating and Vibrating Filtration for Clarification of Rough Beer. J. Food Eng. 2007, 80(1), 206–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.05.022.
- Akoum, O.; Mercier-Bonin, M.; Ding, L.; Fonade, C.; Aptel, P.; Jaffrin, M. Comparison of Three Different Systems Used for Flux Enhancement: Application to Crossflow Filtration of Yeast Suspensions. Desalination. 2002, 147(1–3), 31–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00567-2.
- Cassano, A.; Rastogi, N. K.; Basile, A. Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse in the Food and Beverage Industries. In Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment: Materials, Processes and Applications; Basile, A., Cassano, A., Rastogi, N. K., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2015; pp 551–580.
- Beier, S. P.; Jonsson, G. Separation of Enzymes and Yeast Cells with a Vibrating Hollow Fiber Membrane Module. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 53(1), 111–118.
- Brazinha, C.; Cadima, M.; Crespo, J. G. Valorisation of Spent Coffee through Membrane Processing. J. Food Eng. 2015, 149, 123–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.07.016.
- Frappart, M.; Jaffrin, M.; Ding, L. Reverse Osmosis of Diluted Skim Milk: Comparison of Results Obtained from Vibratory and Rotating Disk Modules. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 60(3), 321–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.09.007.
- Suárez, A.; Fernández, P.; Ramón Iglesias, J.; Iglesias, E.; Riera, F. A. Cost Assessment of Membrane Processes: A Practical Example in the Dairy Wastewater Reclamation by Reverse Osmosis. J. Memb. Sci. 2015, 493, 389–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.065.
- Firman, L. R.; Ochoa, N. A.; Marchese, J.; Pagliero, C. L. Deacidification and Solvent Recovery of Soybean Oil by Nanofiltration Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 431, 187–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.040.
- Cai, W.; Sun, Y.; Piao, X.; Li, J.; Zhu, S. Solvent Recovery from Soybean Oil/hexane Miscella by PDMS Composite Membrane. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 19(4), 575–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60024-4.
- Firman, L.; Ochoa, N. A.; Marchese, J.; Pagliero, C. Simultaneous Improvement in Solvent Permeability and Deacidification of Soybean Oil by Nanofiltration. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54(2), 398–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2476-5.
- Vincze, I.; Bányai-Stefanovits, É.; Vatai, G. Concentration of Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae Rhamnoides L.) Juice with Membrane Separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 57(3), 455–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.06.020.
- Bhattacharjee, C.; Saxena, V. K.; Dutta, S. Fruit Juice Processing Using Membrane Technology: A Review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 43, 136–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.08.002.
- Banvolgyi, S.; Kiss, I.; Bekassy-Molnar, E.; Vatai, G. Concentration of Red Wine by Nanofiltration. Desalination. 2006, 198(1–3), 8–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.09.003.
- Luo, J.; Ding, L.; Wan, Y.; Jaffrin, M. Y. Threshold Flux for Shear-enhanced Nanofiltration: Experimental Observation in Dairy Wastewater Treatment. J. Memb. Sci. 2012, 409–410, 276–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.065.
- Bédas, M.; Tanguy, G.; Dolivet, A.; Mejean, S.; Gaucheron, F.; Garric, G.; Senard, G.; Jeantet, R.; Schuck, P. Nanofiltration of Lactic Acid Whey Prior to Spray Drying: Scaling up to a Semi-industrial Scale. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 79, 355–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.01.061.
- Moulik, S.; Vadthya, P.; Kalipatnapu, Y. R.; Chenna, S.; Sundergopal, S. Production of Fructose Sugar from Aqueous Solutions: Nanofiltration Performance and Hydrodynamic Analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 92, 44–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.092.
- Malmali, M.; Wickramasinghe, S. R.; Tang, J.; Cong, H. Sugar Fractionation Using Surface-modified Nanofiltration Membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 166, 187–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.025.
- Shon, H. K.; Phuntsho, S.; Chaudhary, D. S.; Vigneswaran, S.; Cho, J. Nanofiltration for Water and Wastewater Treatment - A Mini Review. Drink. Water Eng. Sci. 2013, 6(1), 47–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/dwes-6-47-2013.
- Giacobbo, A.; Moura Bernardes, A.; Filipe Rosa, M.; de Pinho, M. Concentration Polarization in Ultrafiltration/nanofiltration for the Recovery of Polyphenols from Winery Wastewaters. Membranes. 2018, 8(3), 46–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030046.
- Cartier, S.; Theoleyre, M. A.; Decloux, M. Treatment of Sugar Decolorizing Resin Regeneration Waste Using Nanofiltration. Desalination. 1997, 113(1), 7–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(97)00110-0.
- Ong, Y. K.; Ng, H. T.; Chung, T. S. A Conceptual Demonstration of Decaffeination via Nanofiltration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54(31), 7737–7742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01737.
- Pan, B.; Yan, P.; Zhu, L.; Li, X. Concentration of Coffee Extract Using Nanofiltration Membranes. Desalination. 2013, 317, 127–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.03.004.
- Vincze, I.; Vatai, G. Application of Nanofiltration for Coffee Extract Concentration. Desalination. 2004, 162(1–3), 287–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00053-0.
- Van der Bruggen, B.; Mänttäri, M.; Nyström, M. Drawbacks of Applying Nanofiltration and How to Avoid Them: A Review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63(2), 251–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.05.010.
- Jaffrin, M. Y.;. Hydrodynamic Techniques to Enhance Membrane Filtration. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2012, 44(1), 77–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101112.
- Zhang, W.; Luo, J.; Ding, L.; Jaffrin, M. Y. A Review on Flux Decline Control Strategies in Pressure-driven Membrane Processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54(11), 2843–2861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie504848m.
- Shirazi, S.; Lin, C. J.; Chen, D. Inorganic Fouling of Pressure-driven Membrane Processes - A Critical Review. Desalination. 2010, 250(1), 236–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.056.
- Sablani, S.; Goosen, M.; Al-Belushi, R.; Wilf, M. Concentration Polarization in Ultrafiltration and Reverse Osmosis: A Critical Review. Desalination. 2001, 141(3), 269–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)85005-0.
- Jaffrin, M. Y.;. Dynamic Filtration with Rotating Disks, and Rotating and Vibrating Membranes: An Update. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2012, 1(2), 171–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2012.01.002.
- Jaffrin, M. Y.; Ding, L. H.; Akoum, O.; Brou, A. A Hydrodynamic Comparison between Rotating Disk and Vibratory Dynamic Filtration Systems. J. Memb. Sci. 2004, 242(1–2), 155–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.07.029.
- New Logic Research Inc. VSEP Products: Series LP. In https://www.vsep.com/product/series-lp (accessed Jun. 20, 2020).
- Akoum, O.; Jaffrin, M. Y.; Ding, L. Concentration of Total Milk Proteins by High Shear Ultrafiltration in a Vibrating Membrane Module. J. Memb. Sci. 2005, 247(1–2), 211–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.09.021.
- Kertész, S.; László, Z.; Forgács, E.; Szabó, G.; Hodúr, C. Dairy Wastewater Purification by Vibratory Shear Enhanced Processing. Desalin. Water Treat. 2011, 35(1–3), 195–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2011.2485.
- Subramani, A.; De Carolis, J.; Pearce, W.; Jacangelo, J. G. Vibratory Shear Enhanced Process (VSEP) for Treating Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis Concentrate with High Silica Content. Desalination. 2012, 291, 15–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.01.020.
- Petala, M. D.; Zouboulis, A. I. Vibratory Shear Enhanced Processing Membrane Filtration Applied for the Removal of Natural Organic Matter from Surface Waters. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 269(1–2), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.013.
- Su, X.; Li, W.; Palazzolo, A.; Ahmed, S. Concentration Polarization and Permeate Flux Variation in a Vibration Enhanced Reverse Osmosis Membrane Module. Desalination. 2017, 433, 75–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.001.
- Shi, W.; Benjamin, M. M. Fouling of RO Membranes in a Vibratory Shear Enhanced Filtration Process (VSEP) System. J. Memb. Sci. 2009, 331(1–2), 11–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.027.
- Wisniewski, C.; Savelski, M.; Slater, C. S. Eye-opening Reuse: Membrane-based Water Recovery in Coffee Manufacture. Water Environ Technol. 2018, 30, 56–58.
- Wisniewski, C.; Laurio, M. V.; Slater, C. S.; Savelski, M. Environmental and Process Assessment of a Vibratory Nanofiltration System for the Recovery of Water from Soluble Coffee Manufacturing Waste. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy. 2020, 39(5), e13425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13425.
- Wisniewski, C.; Slater, C. S.; Savelski, M. Dynamic Vibratory Membrane Processing for Use in Water Recovery from Soluble Coffee Product Manufacturing Wastewater. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 2018, 20(8), 1791–1803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1569-4.
- Slater, C. S.; Savelski, M. J.; Wisniewski, C. M. Integration of Membrane Technology into Coffee Manufacturing Operations for Water Recovery. 7th International Congress on Sustainability Science and Engineering, 2018, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1–23.
- Zhang, W.; Grimi, N.; Jaffrin, M.; Ding, L.; Tang, B.; Zhang, Z. Optimization of RDM-UF for Alfalfa Wastewater Treatment Using RSM. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25(2), 1439–1447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0588-8.
- AbuKhadra, M.; Shaban, M.; Saad, I. Statistical Modeling and Optimization in Separation and Purification; Lambert Academic Publishing: Germany, 2018.
- Dasgupta, J.; Mondal, D.; Chakraborty, S.; Sikder, J.; Curcio, S.; Arafat, H. A. Nanofiltration Based Water Reclamation from Tannery Effluent following Coagulation Pretreatment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 121, 22–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.07.006.
- Farhadian, M.; Askari, N.; Razmjou, A. Decolorization of Ionic Dyes from Synthesized Textile Wastewater by Nanofiltration Using Response Surface Methodology. Adv. Environ. Technol. 2015, 1(2), 85–92.
- Ho, K. C.; Teow, Y. H.; Mohammad, A. H. Optimization of Nanocomposite Conductive Membrane Formulation and Operating Parameters for Electrically-enhanced Palm Oil Mill Effluent Filtration Using Response Surface Methodology Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 126, 297–308.
- Ghaemi, N.; Madaeni, S. S.; Daraei, P.; Rajabi, H.; Shojaeimehr, T.; Rahimpour, F.; Shirvani, B. PES Mixed Matrix Nanofiltration Membrane Embedded with Polymer Wrapped MWCNT: Fabrication and Performance Optimization in Dye Removal by RSM. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 298, 111–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.018.
- Said, S.; Abdullah, R. S.; Mohammad, A. W. Palm Oil Mill Effluent Treatment through Combined Process Adsorption and Membrane Filtration. Sriwij. J. Environ. 2016, 1(2), 36–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22135/sje.2016.1.2.36-41.
- Cathie Lee, W. P.; Mah, S. K.; Leo, C. P.; Wu, T. Y.; Chai, S. P. Phosphorus Removal by NF90 Membrane: Optimisation Using Central Composite Design. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2014, 45(4), 1260–1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2014.02.011.
- Akarsu, C.; Ozay, Y.; Dizge, N.; Gulsen, H. E.; Ates, H.; Gozmen, B.; Turabik, M. Electrocoagulation and Nanofiltration Integrated Process Application in Purification of Bilge Water Using Response Surface Methodology. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 74(3), 564–579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.168.
- Yuliwati, E.; Ismail, A. F.; Lau, W. J.; Ng, B. C.; Mataram, A.; Kassim, M. A. Effects of Process Conditions in Submerged Ultrafiltration for Refinery Wastewater Treatment: Optimization of Operating Process by Response Surface Methodology. Desalination. 2012, 287, 350–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.051.
- Gasemloo, S.; Khosravi, M.; Reza, M.; Dastmalchi, S.; Gharbani, P. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Modeling to Improve Removal of Cr (VI) Ions from Tannery Wastewater Using Sulfated Carboxymethyl Cellulose Nanofilter. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 736–742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.177.
- Madaeni, S. S.; Arast, N.; Rahimpour, F.; Arast, Y. Fabrication Optimization of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (Abs)/polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) Nanofiltration Membrane Using Response Surface Methodology. Desalination. 2011, 280(1–3), 305–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.020.
- Khayet, M.; Seman, M. N. A.; Hilal, N. Response Surface Modeling and Optimization of Composite Nanofiltration Modified Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2010, 349(1–2), 113–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.031.
- Mah, K. H.; Yussof, H. W.; Abu Seman, M. N.; Mohammad, A. W. Optimisation of Interfacial Polymerization Factors in Thin-film Composite (TFC) Polyester Nanofiltration (NF) Membrane for Separation of Xylose from Glucose. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 209, 211–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.041.
- Yoo, S. S.; Chu, K. H.; Choi, I. H.; Mang, J. S.; Ko, K. B. Operating Cost Reduction of UF Membrane Filtration Process for Drinking Water Treatment Attributed to Chemical Cleaning Optimization. J. Environ. Manage. 2018, 206, 1126–1134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.072.
- Aşçı, Y. S.; Dramur, U.; Bilgin, M. Investigation of the Separation of Carboxylic Acids from Aqueous Solutions Using a Pilot Scale Membrane Unit. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 248, 391–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.10.076.
- Garg, M. C.; Joshi, H. Optimization and Economic Analysis for a Small Scale Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Water Desalination System. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply. 2015, 15(5), 1027–1033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2015.059.
- Negrão Murakami, A. N.; de Mello Castanho Amboni, R. D.; Prudencio, E. S.; Amante, E. R.; de Moraes Zanotta, L.; Maraschin, M.; Petrus, J. C. C.; Teofilo, R. F. Concentration of Phenolic Compounds in Aqueous Mate (Ilex Paraguariensis A. St. Hil) Extract through Nanofiltration. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44(10), 2211–2216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.06.002.
- Ochando-Pulido, J. M.; Corpas-Martínez, J. R.; Vellido-Perez, J. A.; Martinez-Ferez, A. Optimization of Polymeric Nanofiltration Performance for Olive-oil-washing Wastewater Phenols Recovery and Reclamation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 236, 1–12.
- Nourbakhsh, H.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Omid, M.; Mirsaeedghazi, H.; Moini, S. Prediction of Red Plum Juice Permeate Flux during Membrane Processing with ANN Optimized Using RSM. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2014, 102, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.12.017.
- Zhang, Q.; Yuan, Q. Modeling of Nanofiltration Process for Solvent Recovery from Aqueous Ethanol Solution of Soybean Isoflavones. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2009, 44(13), 3239–3257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390903183105.
- Cai, M.; Wang, S.; Liang, H. H. Optimization of Ultrasound-assisted Ultrafiltration of Radix Astragalus Extracts with Hollow Fiber Membrane Using Response Surface Methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 100, 74–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.002.
- Ruby Figueroa, R. A.; Cassano, A.; Drioli, E. Ultrafiltration of Orange Press Liquor: Optimization for Permeate Flux and Fouling Index by Response Surface Methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 80(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.030.
- Zhu, Z.; Ladeg, S.; Ding, L.; Bals, O.; Moulai-Mostefa, N.; Jaffrin, M. Y.; Vorobiev, E. Study of Rotating Disk Assisted Dead-end Filtration of Chicory Juice and Its Performance Optimization. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 53, 154–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.12.030.
- Telis-Romero, J.; Cabral, R. A. F.; Gabas, A. L.; Telis, V. R. N. Rheological Properties and Fluid Dynamics of Coffee Extract. J. Food Process Eng. 2001, 24(4), 217–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2001.tb00541.x.
- Telis‐Romero, J.; Gabas, A. L.; Polizelli, M. A.; Telis, V. R. N. Temperature and Water Content Influence on Thermophysical Properties of Coffee Extract. Int. J. Food Prop. 2000, 3(3), 375–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910009524642.
- Rice, E. W.; Barid, R. B.; Eaton, A. D.; Cleceri, L. S. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation: Washington, USA, 2012.
- Lazić, Ž. R.;. Design of Experiments in Chemical Engineering: A Practical Guide; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.: Weinheim, Germany, 2004.
- Novita, E.;. Biodegradability Simulation of Coffee Wastewater Using Instant Coffee. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia. 2016, 9, 217–229.
- Clifford, M. N.; Wilson, K. C. Coffee: Botany, Biochemistry and Production of Beans and Beverage; The AVI Publishing Company, Inc.: Connecticut, USA, 1985.
- Schäfer, A. I.; Fane, A. G.; Waite, T. D. Nanofiltration - Principles and Applications; Elsevier Ltd.: Oxford, United Kingdom, 2005.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Water Reuse. EPA/600/R-12/618. USA, 2012.
- Laurio, M. V. O.; Slater, C. S. Process Scale-up, Economic, Environmental Assessment of Vibratory Nanofiltration of Coffee Extracts for Soluble Coffee Production Process Intensification. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 2020, 22(9), 1891–1908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01931-x.
- Bacchin, P.; Aimar, P.; Field, R. W. Critical and Sustainable Fluxes: Theory, Experiments and Applications. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 281(1–2), 42–69.
- Ferrarini, R.; Versari, A.; Galassi, L. A Preliminary Comparison between Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Grape Juice Treatment. J. Food Eng. 2001, 50(2), 113–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00199-0.
- Li, W.; Su, X.; Palazzolo, A.; Ahmed, S.; Thomas, E. Reverse Osmosis Membrane, Seawater Desalination with Vibration Assisted Reduced Inorganic Fouling. Desalination. 2017, 417, 102–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.05.016.
- Geraldes, V.; Semião, V.; De Pinho, M. N. Flow and Mass Transfer Modelling of Nanofiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 2001, 191(1–2), 109–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00458-6.