Methods of visualizing hydrodynamics and fouling in membrane filtration systems: recent trends

References

• Lay, W. C. L.; Liu, Y.; Fane, A. G. Impacts of salinity on the performance of high retention membrane bioreactors for water reclamation: A review. Water. Res. Elsevier Ltd. 2010, 44, 21–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, S.; Lin, C. J.; Chen, D. Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes - A critical review. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2010, 250, 236–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, T. H.; Wong, F. S.; Fane, A. G. Implications of critical flux and cake enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP) on colloidal fouling in reverse osmosis: Experimental observations. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 314, 101–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoek, E. M. V.; Elimelech, M. Cake-Enhanced Concentration Polarization: A New Fouling Mechanism for Salt-Rejecting Membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5581–5588. DOI: 10.1021/es0262636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, T. H.; Wong, F. S.; Fane, A. G. Enhanced concentration polarization by unstirred fouling layers in reverse osmosis: Detection by sodium chloride tracer response technique. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287, 198–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C. Y.; Chong, T. H.; Fane, A. G. Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., Elsevier B.V. 2011, 164, 126–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2010.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutariya, B.; Karan, S. A realistic approach for determining the pore size distribution of nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 293, 121096. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa, A. R.; Fane, A. G.; Wiley, D. E. Ultrafiltration of whey protein solutions in spacer-filled flat channels. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 76, 245–254. DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(93)85221-H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, K.; Park, M.; Oh, S.; Kim, J. H. Impacts of flow channel geometry, hydrodynamic and membrane properties on osmotic backwash of RO membranes—CFD modeling and simulation. Desalination. 2020, 476, 114229. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.114229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karode, S. K.; Kumar, A. Flow visualization through spacer filled channels by computational fluid dynamics I. Pressure drop and shear rate calculations for flat sheet geometry. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 193, 69–84. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00494-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; van Paassen, J. A. M.; Wessels, L. P.; van Dam, A. F.; Bakker, S. M. The Membrane Fouling Simulator: A practical tool for fouling prediction and control. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281, 316–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidari, A.; Heijman, S.; Van Der Meer, W. Optimal design of spacers in reverse osmosis. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 192, 441–456. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.10.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M.; Zhizhong, L.; Febrina, E.; Van Hoof, S.; Shippers, J. Effects of coagulation on filtration mechanisms in dead-end ultrafiltration. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 3, 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Xin, T.; Yong, C.; Yun-Hong, W.; Yuan, B.; Tong, Y.; Xue-Hao, Z.; Nozomu, I.; Hui-jia, L.; Hong-Ying, H.; Yin-Hu, W. Fouling properties of reverse osmosis membranes along the feed channel in an industrial-scale system for wastewater reclamation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136673. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhaoyang, S.; Ting, L.; Xing, L.; Nigel, J. D. G.; Wenzheng, Y. Tracking metal ion-induced organic membrane fouling in nanofiltration by adopting spectroscopic methods: Observations and predictions. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 708, 135051. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, R. Y. Reverse osmosis process chemistry relevant to the Gulf. Desalination. 1999, 123, 157–164. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(99)00069-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alejandro, L.; Rosana, M.; Rocío, L.-R.; Rocío, P.-R.; Juan, J. B. Identification, resistance to antibiotics and biofilm formation of bacterial strains isolated from a reverse osmosis system of a drinking water treatment plant. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145718. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watnick, P.; Kolter, R. Biofilm, city of microbes. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 2675–2679. DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.10.2675-2679.2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, B.; Ding, Y.; Wang, B.; Qi, Z.; Bai, Y.; Liu, R.; Liu, H.; Qu, J. Influence of sedimentation with pre-coagulation on ultrafiltration membrane fouling performance. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 708, 134671. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, Y. A.; Mohammad, A. A.-G.; Dana, A. D. N.; Hazim, Q.; Nabil, Z. Investigating the effect of temperature on calcium sulfate scaling of reverse osmosis membranes using FTIR, SEM-EDX and multivariate analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 134726. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. D.; Probstein, R. F. Colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis membranes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1986, 114, 194–207. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(86)90252-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q.; Elimelech, M. Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: Measurements and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 4683–4693. DOI: 10.1021/es0354162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoof, S. C. J. M.; Minnery, J. G.; Mack, B. Performing a membrane autopsy. Desalin. Water Reuse. 2002, 11, 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, R. R.; Gohil, J. M.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S. K. Antifouling, fouling release and antimicrobial materials for surface modification of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A, RoyalSoc. Chem. 2018, 6, 313–333. DOI: 10.1039/C7TA08627J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, S.; Wan, Y.; Li, N.; Zhao, Y. Investigation of combined fouling behavior in nano-filtration process under various feed conditions. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2016, 51(4), 681–691. DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2015.1117104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, Y.; Cheng, C.; Wang, R.; Nie, C.; Deng, J.; Zhao, C. Ag-nanogel blended polymeric membranes with antifouling, hemocompatible and bactericidal capabilities. J. Mater Chem. B. 2015, 3(48), 9295–9304. DOI: 10.1039/C5TB01523E.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F.; Zhang, W.; Yu, Y.; Deng, B.; Li, J.; Jin, J. Sol–gel preparation of PAA-g-PVDF/TiO2 nanocomposite hollow fiber membranes with extremely high water flux and improved antifouling property. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 432, 25–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, S. Antifouling ultrafiltration membrane fabricated from poly (arylene ether ketone) bearing hydrophilic hydroxyl groups. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133(1). DOI: 10.1002/app.42809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraldes, V.; Semião, V.; De Pinho, M. N. Flow management in nanofiltration spiral wound modules with ladder-type spacers. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 203, 87–102. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00753-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu, A. I.; van Steen, M. S. H.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Picioreanu, C. Spacer geometry and particle deposition in spiral wound membrane feed channels. Water. Res. Elsevier Ltd. 2014, 64, 160–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.06.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charfi, A.; Harmand, J.; Ben Amar, N.; Grasmick, A.; Héran, M. Deposit membrane fouling: influence of specific cake layer resistance and tangential shear stresses. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 70(1), 40–46. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2014.186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C.; Bérubé, P.; Hall, E. Relationship between types of surface shear stress profiles and membrane fouling. Water Res. 2011, 45(19), 6403–6416. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.09.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X.; Wang, Y.; Leslie, G.; Li, G.; Liang, H. Shear stress in a pressure‐driven membrane system and its impact on membrane fouling from a hydrodynamic condition perspective: a review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2017, 92(3), 463–478. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, B. Z.; Lu, T. D.; Wu, H. L.; Fan, Y. Q.; Xing, W.; Sun, S. P. Designing High-Performance Nanofiltration Membranes for High-Salinity Separation of Sulfate and Chloride in the Chlor-Alkali Process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 12280–12290. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S.; Ahmed, S. M. Membrane technology in food processing. In Food Processing: Strategies for Quality Assessment; Malik, A., Erginkaya, Z., Ahmad, S., Erten, H., Eds.; Springer: New york, 2014; pp 379–394. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1378-7_15.
   Google Scholar
• Farooque, A. M.; Jamaluddin, A. T. M.; Al-Reweli, A. R.; Jalaluddin, P. A. M.; Al-Marwani, S. M.; Al-Mobayed, A. S. A.; Qasim, A. H. Comparative study of various energy recovery devices used in SWRO process, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z.; Deshmukh, A.; Du, Y.; Elimelech, M. Minimal and zero liquid discharge with reverse osmosis using low-salt-rejection membranes. Water. Res. Elsevier Ltd. 2020, 170, 115317. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutariya, B.; Raval, H. Analytical study of optimum operating conditions in a semi-batch closed-circuit reverse osmosis (CCRO) process. Sep. Purif. Technol., Elsevier B.V. 2021, 264, 118421. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek, A.; Hawlader, M. N. A.; Ho, J. C. Design and economics of RO seawater desalination. Desalination. 1996, 105, 245–261. DOI: 10.1016/0011-9164(96)00081-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutariya, B.; Raval, H. Energy and resource‐efficient reverse osmosis system with tunable recovery for brackish water desalination and heavy metal removal. Water Environ. J. 2022. DOI: 10.1111/wej.12788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beluci, N. D. C. L.; Mateus, G. A. P.; Miyashiro, C. S.; Homem, N. C.; Gomes, R. G.; Fagundes-Klen, M. R.; Bergamasco, R.; Vieira, A. M. S. Hybrid treatment of coagulation/flocculation process followed by ultrafiltration in TIO2-modified membranes to improve the removal of reactive black 5 dye. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 222–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoslett, J.; Massara, T. M.; Malamis, S.; Ahmad, D.; van den Boogaert, I.; Katsou, E.; Ahmad, B.; Ghazal, H.; Simons, S.; Wrobel, L. Surface water filtration using granular media and membranes: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 1268–1282. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, W.; Changjun, M.; Kang, X.; Xianzheng, Z.; Xia, H. Surface charge regulation of reverse osmosis membrane for anti-silica and organic fouling. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715, 137013. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun-Cheng, H.; Yi-Kang, Z.; Long-Fei, W.; Yang, M.; Guo-Guang, F.; Kun-Qiao, L.; Cai-Huan, T.; Zhen-Xun, Y. Modification of regenerated cellulose ultrafiltration membranes with multi-walled carbon nanotubes for enhanced antifouling ability: Field test and mechanism study. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 780, 146657. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youbing, Z.; Shuili, Y.; Bing, Z.; Jianfeng, L.; Dongsheng, Z.; Zhengyang, G.; Chao, G.; Guicai, L. Antifouling performance of polytetrafluoroethylene and polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes during alkali/surfactant/polymer flooding wastewater treatment: Distinctions and mechanisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 988–998. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, A.; Hruza, J.; Yalcinkaya, F. Fouling and Chemical Cleaning of Microfiltration Membranes: A Mini-Review. Polymers. 2021, 13(6), 846. DOI: 10.3390/polym13060846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebron, Y. A. R.; Moreira, V. R.; da Costa, P. R.; Alkmin, A. R.; de França Neta, L. S.; Cerqueira, A. C.; Amaral, M. C. S. Chemical cleaning procedures on permeability recovery and lifespan of MBR membranes treating petroleum refinery wastewater: From bench-to pilot-scale applications. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2021, 44, 102411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rooij, F.; Scarf, P.; Do, P. Planning the restoration of membranes in RO desalination using a digital twin. Desalination. 2022, 519, 115214. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, S.; Xiao, K.; Huang, X. Enzymatic Cleaning Mitigates Polysaccharide-Induced Refouling of RO Membrane: Evidence from Foulant Layer Structure and Microbial Dynamics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55(8), 5453–5462. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, S.; Shao, Y.; Gao, N.; Li, L.; Deng, J.; Tan, C.; Zhu, M. Influence of hydrophobic/hydrophilic fractions of extracellular organic matters of Microcystis aeruginosa on ultrafiltration membrane fouling. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 470, 201–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X.; Khan, M. T.; Cao, X.; Croue, J.-P. Importance of origin and characteristics of biopolymers in reversible and irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 784, 147157. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesters, S. P.; Pena, N.; Gallego, S.; Fazel, M.; Armstrong, M. W.; Del Vigo, F. Results from 99 seawater RO membrane autopsies. IDA J. Desalin. Water Reuse. 2013, 5(1), 40–47. DOI: 10.1179/2051645213Y.0000000006.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. A.; Pihlajamäki, A.; Bird, M. The role of synthetic membrane pre-treatment in influencing filtration performance over multiple operational cycles. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2012, 47(8), 1119–1128. DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2011.648471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chon, K.; Cho, J. Fouling behavior of dissolved organic matter in nanofiltration membranes from a pilot-scale drinking water treatment plant: an autopsy study. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 295, 268–277. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Serrano, F.; Marín, E.; Pérez, J. I.; Gómez, M. Á. Autopsy of ultrafiltration membranes for drinking-water production with in-line coagulation and ozonation pre-treatments. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57(42), 19619–19631. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1106986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y.; Galili, N.; Gelman, Y.; Herzberg, M.; Gilron, J. Evaluating the impact of pretreatment processes on fouling of reverse osmosis membrane by secondary wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 623, 119054. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-García, A.; Melián-Martel, N.; Mena, V. Fouling characterization of RO membranes after 11 years of operation in a brackish water desalination plant. Desalin., Elsevier. 2018, 430, 180–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2017.12.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Triñanes, P.; Chairopoulou, M. A.; Campos, L. C. Investigating reverse osmosis membrane fouling and scaling by membrane autopsy of a bench scale device. Environmental Technology. 2021, 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2021.1918262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Manolarakis, S. A.; van der Hoek, J. P.; van Paassen, J. A. M.; van der Meer, W. G. J.; van Agtmaal, J. M. C.; Prummel, H. D. M.; Kruithof, J. C.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Quantitative biofouling diagnosis in full scale nanofiltration and reverse osmosis installations. Water Res. 2008, 42, 4856–4868. Elsevier Ltd DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, L. H.; Nava-Ocampo, M.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kruithof, J. C.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. The membrane fouling simulator: Development, application, and early-warning of biofouling in RO treatment. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 126, 1–23. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2018.23081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, R.; Qin, W.; Zhang, B.; Wang, X.; Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, X. Nanofiltration in pilot scale for wastewater reclamation: Long-term performance and membrane biofouling characteristics. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125087. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. J.; Oh, B. S.; Yu, H. W.; Kim, L. H.; Kim, C. M.; Yang, E. T.; Shin, M. S.; Jang, A.; Hwang, M. H.; Kim, I. S. Foulant characterization and distribution in spiral wound reverse osmosis membranes from different pressure vessels. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2015, 370, 44–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, S.; Naidu, G.; Vollprecht, R.; Leiknes, T. O.; Vigneswaran, S. In-depth analyses of organic matters in a full-scale seawater desalination plant and an autopsy of reverse osmosis membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 162, 171–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, F.; Hu, H. Y.; Sun, L. J.; Sun, Y. X.; Shi, N.; Crittenden, J. C. Fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membranes at different positions of a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation. Water. Res. Elsevier Ltd. 2016, 90, 329–336. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Song, P. Analyzing and verifying the association of spiral-wound reverse osmosis membrane fouling with different secondary effluents: full-scale experiments. Sci. Total Environ., Elsevier B.V. 2020, 711, 135150. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhat, S.; Bali, M.; Kamel, F. Membrane autopsy to provide solutions to operational problems of Jerba brackish water desalination plant. Desalin., Elsevier. 2018, 445, 225–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2018.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Manolarakis, S. A.; Veenendaal, H. R.; Van Der Kooij, D. Biofouling potential of chemicals used for scale control in RO and NF membranes. Desalination. 2000, 132, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00129-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashfaq, M. Y.; Al-Ghouti, M. A.; Al Disi, Z. A.; Zouari, N. Interaction of seawater microorganisms with scalants and antiscalants in reverse osmosis systems. Desalination. 2020, 487, 114480. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweity, A.; Oren, Y.; Ronen, Z.; Herzberg, M. The influence of antiscalants on biofouling of RO membranes in seawater desalination. Water. Res. Elsevier Ltd. 2013, 47, 3389–3398. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanuwidjajaa, D.; Jina, X.; Huanga, X.; Marambio-Jonesa, C.; Jawora, A.; Zhangb, M.; Jiangb, S.; Chengc, R.; Hoeka, E. M. Comparison of membrane fouling and cleaning in one-pass reverse osmosis and two-pass nanofiltration approaches to seawater desalination. Desalin. Water Treat. 2020, 193, 235–250. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2020.25832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, D.; Su, C.; Liu, G.; Zhu, Y.; Gu, Z. Performance and autopsy of nanofiltration membranes at an oil-field wastewater desalination plant. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26(3), 2681–2690. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3797-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-G.; Kim, S.; Shin, J.; Rho, H.; Kim, Y. M.; Cho, K. H.; Eom, H.; Oh, S.-E.; Cho, J.; Chon, K. Sequential effects of cleaning protocols on desorption of reverse osmosis membrane foulants: Autopsy results from a full-scale desalination plant. Desalination. 2021, 500, 114830. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanawar, H.; Bucs, S. S.; Pot, M. A.; Zlopasa, J.; Farhat, N. M.; Witkamp, G.-J.; Kruithof, J. C.; van Loosdrecht, M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Pilot-scale assessment of urea as a chemical cleaning agent for biofouling control in spiral-wound reverse osmosis membrane elements. Membranes. 2019, 9(9), 117. DOI: 10.3390/membranes9090117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongsheng, Z.; Liping, Q.; Jiyu, S.; Junxia, L.; Zonghua, W.; Youbing, Z.; Guicai, L. Efficiencies and mechanisms of chemical cleaning agents for nanofiltration membranes used in produced wastewater desalination. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 256–266. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J.; Luo, J.; Chen, X.; Feng, S.; Wan, Y. New insights into effect of alkaline cleaning on fouling behavior of polyamide nanofiltration membrane for wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 780, 146632. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucs, S. S.; Valladares Linares, R.; Marston, J. O.; Radu, A. I.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Picioreanu, C. Experimental and numerical characterization of the water flow in spacer-filled channels of spiral-wound membranes. Water Res. 2015, 87, 299–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreszer, C.; Wexler, A. D.; Drusová, S.; Overdijk, T.; Zwijnenburg, A.; Flemming, H. C.; Kruithof, J. C.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: Formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change. Water. Res. Elsevier Ltd. 2014, 67, 243–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow, N. W.; Vogt, S. J.; O’Neill, K. T.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Johns, M. L.; Fridjonsson, E. O. Flow field in fouling spiral wound reverse osmosis membrane modules using MRI velocimetry. Desalin., Elsevier. 2020, 491, 114508. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C.; Garcia-Algado, P.; Semião, V.; de Pinho, M. N.; Geraldes, V. Concentration boundary layer visualization in nanofiltration by holographic interferometry with light deflection correction. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier. 2013, 447, 306–314. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, T.; Reinikainen, S. P.; Lahti, J.; Mänttäri, M.; Kallioinen, M. Visual tool for real-time monitoring of membrane fouling via Raman spectroscopy and process model based on principal component analysis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–8. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29268-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakaib, M.; Hasani, S. M. F.; Mahmood, M. Study on the effects of spacer geometry in membrane feed channels using three-dimensional computational flow modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 297, 74–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J. L. C.; Geraldes, V.; Velizarov, S.; Crespo, J. G. Investigation of flow patterns and mass transfer in membrane module channels filled with flow-aligned spacers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 305, 103–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.07.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. L.; Tung, K. L. The effect of curvature of a spacer-filled channel on fluid flow in spiral-wound membrane modules. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 319, 286–297. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostoglou, M.; Karabelas, A. J. Comprehensive simulation of flat-sheet membrane element performance in steady state desalination. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2013, 316, 91–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu, A. I.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Picioreanu, C. Modeling the effect of biofilm formation on reverse osmosis performance: Flux, feed channel pressure drop and solute passage. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier B.V. 2010, 365, 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Z.; Wiley, D. E.; Fane, A. G. CFD simulations of net-type turbulence promoters in a narrow channel. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 185, 157–176. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00643-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. L.; Tung, K. L.; Chen, Y. S.; Hwang, K. J. CFD analysis of the initial stages of particle deposition in spiral-wound membrane modules. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2012, 287, 200–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anqi, A. E.; Alkhamis, N.; Oztekin, A. Numerical simulation of brackish water desalination by a reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination. 2015, 369, 156–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amokrane, M.; Sadaoui, D.; Koutsou, C. P.; Karabelas, A. J.; Dudeck, M. A study of flow field and concentration polarization evolution in membrane channels with two-dimensional spacers during water desalination. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier. 2015, 477, 139–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chieh, T. H.; Onn, L. S.; Min, L. K.; Chung, C. K. Study of the effect of spacer on the performance of spiral wound membrane for water treatment using CFD modelling. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019, 2157(1), 020023. DOI: 10.1063/1.5126558.
   Google Scholar
• Schwinge, J.; Wiley, D. E.; Fletcher, D. F. Simulation of the flow around spacer filaments between channel walls. 2. Mass-transfer enhancement. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 4879–4888. DOI: 10.1021/ie011015o.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwinge, J.; Wiley, D. E.; Fletcher, D. F. Simulation of the flow around spacer filaments between narrow channel walls. 1. Hydrodynamics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 2977–2987. DOI: 10.1021/ie010588y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraldes, V.; Semiao, V.; Pinho, M. N. Hydrodynamics and concentration polarization in NF/RO spiral-wound modules with ladder-type spacers. Desalination. 2003, 157, 395–402. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00422-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraldes, V.; Semiao, V.; De Pinho, M. N. Concentration polarisation and flow structure within nanofiltration spiral-wound modules with ladder-type spacers. Comput. Struct. 2004, 82, 1561–1568. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwinge, J.; Wiley, D. E.; Fletcher, D. F. A CFD study of unsteady flow in narrow spacer-filled channels for spiral-wound membrane modules. Desalination. 2002, 146, 195–201. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00470-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimbres-Weihs, G. A.; Wiley, D. E.; Fletcher, D. F. Unsteady flows with mass transfer in narrow zigzag spacer-filled channels: A numerical study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 6594–6603. DOI: 10.1021/ie060243l.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimbres-Weihs, G. A.; Wiley, D. E. Numerical study of mass transfer in three-dimensional spacer-filled narrow channels with steady flow. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 306, 228–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y. Y.; Fimbres Weihs, G. A.; Wiley, D. E. CFD modelling of electro-osmotic permeate flux enhancement in spacer-filled membrane channels. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 507, 107–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraldes, V.; Semião, V.; De Pinho, M. N. The effect of the ladder-type spacers configuration in NF spiral-wound modules on the concentration boundary layers disruption. Desalination. 2002, 146, 187–194. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00467-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salcedo-Díaz, R.; García-Algado, P.; García-Rodríguez, M.; Fernández-Sempere, J.; Ruiz-Beviá, F. Visualization and modeling of the polarization layer in crossflow reverse osmosis in a slit-type channel. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 456, 21–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Picioreanu, C.; Kruithof, J. C.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Biofouling in spiral wound membrane systems: Three-dimensional CFD model based evaluation of experimental data. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 346, 71–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranade, V. V.; Kumar, A. Comparison of flow structures in spacer-filled flat and annular channels. Desalination. 2006, 191, 236–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F.; Meindersma, G. W.; De Haan, A. B.; Reith, T. Optimization of non-woven spacers by CFD and validation by experiments. Desalination. 2002, 146, 209–212. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00472-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F.; Meindersma, W.; De Haan, A. B.; Reith, T. Optimization of commercial net spacers in spiral wound membrane modules. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208, 289–302. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00307-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsou, C. P.; Yiantsios, S. G.; Karabelas, A. J. Direct numerical simulation of flow in spacer-filled channels: Effect of spacer geometrical characteristics. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 291, 53–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. K.; Abu Bakar, M. Z.; Ahmad, A. L.; Murugesan, T. Feed spacer mesh angle: 3D modeling, simulation and optimization based on unsteady hydrodynamic in spiral wound membrane channel. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 343, 16–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsou, C. P.; Yiantsios, S. G.; Karabelas, A. J. A numerical and experimental study of mass transfer in spacer-filled channels: Effects of spacer geometrical characteristics and Schmidt number. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326, 234–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. L.; Tung, K. L.; Lu, M. Y.; Huang, S. H. Mitigating the curvature effect of the spacer-filled channel in a spiral-wound membrane module. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 329, 106–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. L.; Tung, K. L. CFD simulation of fluid flow through spacer-filled membrane module: selecting suitable cell types for periodic boundary conditions. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2008, 233, 351–358. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsou, C. P.; Karabelas, A. J. Towards optimization of spacer geometrical characteristics for spiral wound membrane modules. Desalin. Water Treat. 2010, 18, 139–150. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2010.1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F.; Meindersma, W.; De Haan, A. B.; Reith, T. Novel spacers for mass transfer enhancement in membrane separations. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 253, 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranade, V. V.; Kumar, A. Fluid dynamics of spacer filled rectangular and curvilinear channels. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 271, 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsou, C. P.; Karabelas, A. J. A novel retentate spacer geometry for improved spiral wound membrane (SWM) module performance. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier. 2015, 488, 129–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, B.; Adjiman, C. S.; Xu, X. Y. The effect of feed spacer geometry on membrane performance and concentration polarisation based on 3D CFD simulations. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier. 2017, 527, 78–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, L. M. G.; Lechuga, F. T. Three-Dimensional Modeling and Simulation of Multilayer Spacers for Spiral Wound Membrane Modules. In Membranes: Materials, Simulations, and Applications; Maciel-Cerda, A., Ed.; Switzerland: Springer, Cham, 2017; pp 87–95. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45315-6_10.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Z.; Terashima, M.; Liu, B.; Yasui, H. Impact of modified spacer on flow pattern in narrow spacer-filled channels for spiral-wound membrane modules. Environ. - MDPI. 2018, 5, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutariya, B.; Sargaonkar, A.; Markam, B. K.; Raval, H. 3D CFD study and optimisation of static mixer type feed spacer for reverse osmosis. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2022, 11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceja.2022.100335.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, A.; Vuthaluru, R.; Yang, Y.; Vuthaluru, H. B. Effect of feed spacer arrangement on flow dynamics through spacer filled membranes. Desalination. 2012, 285, 163–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojab, S. M.; Pollard, A.; Pharoah, J. G.; Beale, S. B.; Hanff, E. S. Unsteady laminar to turbulent flow in a spacer-filled channel. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2014, 92, 563–577. DOI: 10.1007/s10494-013-9514-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qamar, A.; Bucs, S.; Picioreanu, C.; Vrouwenvelder, J.; Ghaffour, N. Hydrodynamic flow transition dynamics in a spacer filled filtration channel using direct numerical simulation. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 590. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y. Y.; Chapman, M. B.; Fimbres Weihs, G. A.; Wiley, D. E. CFD modelling of electro-osmotic permeate flux enhancement on the feed side of a membrane module. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 470, 378–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y. Y.; Toh, K. Y.; Fimbres Weihs, G. A. 3D CFD study of the effect of multi-layer spacers on membrane performance under steady flow. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier B.V. 2019, 580, 256–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toh, K. Y.; Liang, Y. Y.; Lau, W. J.; Fimbres Weihs, G. A. 3D CFD study on hydrodynamics and mass transfer phenomena for SWM feed spacer with different floating characteristics. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2020, 159, 36–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2020.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraldes, V. M.; Semiao, V. A.; De Pinho, M. N. Nanofiltration mass transfer at the entrance region of a slit laminar flow. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 4792–4800. DOI: 10.1021/ie980198k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, D. E.; Fletcher, D. F. Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow in membrane channels. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 211, 127–137. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00412-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Bakker, S. M.; Cauchard, M.; Le Grand, R.; Apacandié, M.; Idrissi, M.; Lagrave, S.; Wessels, L. P.; van Paassen, J. A. M.; Kruithof, J. C., et al. The membrane fouling simulator: A suitable tool for prediction and characterisation of membrane fouling. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55, 197–205. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanawar, H.; Pinel, I.; Farhat, N. M.; Bucs, S. S.; Zlopasa, J.; Kruithof, J. C.; Witkamp, G. J.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Enhanced biofilm solubilization by urea in reverse osmosis membrane systems. Water Res. X, Elsevier Ltd. 2018, 1, 100004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staal, M.; Farhat, N.; Van Loosdrecht, M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. Biofouling patterns in spacer-filled channels: High-resolution imaging for characterization of heterogeneous biofilms. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 80, 1–10. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2017.20863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf von der Schulenburg, D. A.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Creber, S. A.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Johns, M. L. Nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy studies of membrane biofouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 323, 37–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Graf von der Schulenburg, D. A.; Kruithof, J. C.; Johns, M. L.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: A feed spacer problem. Water Res. 2009, 43, 583–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kruithof, J. C. Early warning of biofouling in spiral wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2011, 265, 206–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyton, B. M. Effects of shear stress and substrate loading rate on PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA biofilm thickness and density. Water Res. 1996, 30, 29–36. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00110-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picioreanu, C.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Heijnen, J. J. Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 72, 205–218. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0290(20000120)72:2<205::AID-BIT9>3.0.CO;2-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanawar, H.; Siddiqui, A.; Bucs, S. S.; Farhat, N. M.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kruithof, J. C.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Applicability of short-term accelerated biofouling studies to predict long-term biofouling in reverse osmosis membrane systems. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 97, 72–78. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2017.21625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimmelshtein, M. M.; Semiat, R. Investigation of flow next to membrane walls. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264(1–2), 137–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, P.; Deen, N.; Kemperman, A. J.; Lammertink, R. G.; Wessling, M.; van Sint Annaland, M.; Kuipers, J.; van der Meer, W. G. J. Use of Particle Imaging Velocimetry to measure liquid velocity profiles in liquid and liquid/gas flows through spacer filled channels. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 362(1–2), 143–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J.; Liu, Z.; Xu, X.; Liu, F. Saw-tooth spacer for membrane filtration: Hydrodynamic investigation by PIV and filtration experiment validation. Chem. Eng. Process. 2015, 91, 23–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, C.; Marks, D. L.; Schlachter, S.; Luo, W.; Boppart, S. A. High-resolution three-dimensional imaging of biofilm development using optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2006, 11(3), 034001. DOI: 10.1117/1.2209962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derlon, N.; Koch, N.; Eugster, B.; Posch, T.; Pernthaler, J.; Pronk, W.; Morgenroth, E. Activity of metazoa governs biofilm structure formation and enhances permeate flux during Gravity-Driven Membrane (GDM) filtration. Water Res. 2013, 47(6), 2085–2095. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derlon, N.; Peter-Varbanets, M.; Scheidegger, A.; Pronk, W.; Morgenroth, E. Predation influences the structure of biofilm developed on ultrafiltration membranes. Water Res. 2012, 46(10), 3323–3333. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janjaroen, D.; Ling, F.; Monroy, G.; Derlon, N.; Mogenroth, E.; Boppart, S. A.; Liu, W.-T.; Nguyen, T. H. Roles of ionic strength and biofilm roughness on adhesion kinetics of Escherichia coli onto groundwater biofilm grown on PVC surfaces. Water Res. 2013, 47(7), 2531–2542. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M.; Taherzadeh, D.; Haisch, C.; Horn, H. Investigation of the mesoscale structure and volumetric features of biofilms using optical coherence tomography. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 107(5), 844–853. DOI: 10.1002/bit.22864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangrle, B.; Walsh, E.; Moore, S.; DiBiasio, D. Investigation of fluid flow patterns in a hollow fiber module using magnetic resonance velocity imaging. Biotechnol. Tech. 1989, 3(1), 67–72. DOI: 10.1007/BF01876224.
   Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, J.; Von Der Schulenburg, D. G.; Kruithof, J.; Johns, M.; Van Loosdrecht, M. Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: a feed spacer problem. Water Res. 2009, 43(3), 583–594. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zargar, M.; Ujihara, R.; Vogt, S. J.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Fridjonsson, E. O.; Johns, M. L. Imaging of membrane concentration polarization by NaCl using 23Na nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier B.V. 2020, 600, 117868. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sempere, J.; Ruiz-Beviá, F.; García-Algado, P.; Salcedo-Díaz, R. Experimental study of concentration polarization in a crossflow reverse osmosis system using Digital Holographic Interferometry. Desalination. 2010, 257(1–3), 36–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sempere, J.; Ruiz-Beviá, F.; Salcedo-Díaz, R.; García-Algado, P. Diffusion studies in polarized reverse osmosis processes by holographic interferometry. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2008, 46(12), 877–887. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, T.; Reinikainen, S.-P.; Kögler, M.; Mänttäri, M.; Viitala, T.; Kallioinen, M. Real-time fouling monitoring with Raman spectroscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 525, 312–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. J.; Araújo, P. A.; Correia, P. B.; Ramsey, M. M.; Kruithof, J. C.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Freeman, B. D.; Paul, D. R.; Whiteley, M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Short-term adhesion and long-term biofouling testing of polydopamine and poly(ethylene glycol) surface modifications of membranes and feed spacers for biofouling control. Water Res. 2012, 46, 3737–3753. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucs, S. S.; Linares, R. V.; Farhat, N.; Matin, A.; Khan, Z.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Yang, R.; Wang, M.; Gleason, K. K.; Kruithof, J. C., et al. Coating of reverse osmosis membranes with amphiphilic copolymers for biofouling control. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 68, 1–11. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2017.20369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, P. A.; Miller, D. J.; Correia, P. B.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kruithof, J. C.; Freeman, B. D.; Paul, D. R.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Impact of feed spacer and membrane modification by hydrophilic, bactericidal and biocidal coating on biofouling control. Desalination. 2012, 295, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adout, A.; Kang, S.; Asatekin, A.; Mayes, A. M.; Elimelech, M. Ultrafiltration membranes incorporating amphiphilic comb copolymer additives prevent irreversible adhesion of bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 2406–2411. DOI: 10.1021/es902908g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C.; Such, G. K.; Widjaya, A.; Lomas, H.; Stevens, G.; Caruso, F.; Kentish, S. E. Click poly(ethylene glycol) multilayers on RO membranes: Fouling reduction and membrane characterization. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier B.V. 2012, 409-410, 9–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeva, L. G.; Gibbins, E.; Luthra, S. S.; White, L. S.; Stateva, R. P.; Livingston, A. G. Effect of concentration polarisation and osmotic pressure on flux in organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 236(1–2), 121–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asatekin, A.; Olivetti, E. A.; Mayes, A. M. Fouling resistant, high flux nanofiltration membranes from polyacrylonitrile-graft-poly(ethylene oxide). J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 332, 6–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Z.; Zhu, L. P.; Xu, Y. Y.; Zhao, Y. F.; Ma, X. T.; Zhu, B. K. Polysulfone-based amphiphilic polymer for hydrophilicity and fouling-resistant modification of polyethersulfone membranes. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier B.V. 2010, 365, 25–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. F.; Zhu, L. P.; Yi, Z.; Zhu, B. K.; Xu, Y. Y. Improving the hydrophilicity and fouling-resistance of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes via surface zwitterionicalization mediated by polysulfone-based triblock copolymer additive. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier. 2013, 440, 40–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo, T. H. A.; Nguyen, D. T.; Do, K. D.; Minh Nguyen, T. T.; Mori, S.; Tran, D. T. Surface modification of polyamide thin film composite membrane by coating of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J. Sci.: Adv. Mater. Devices, Elsevier Ltd. 2016, 1, 468–475.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, B.; Wu, G.; Li, W.; Miao, R.; Li, X.; Wang, P. Roles of membrane–foulant and inter/intrafoulant species interaction forces in combined fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 19–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulsalam Ebrahim, M.; Karan, S.; Livingston, A. G. On the influence of salt concentration on the transport properties of reverse osmosis membranes in high pressure and high recovery desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 594. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y.; Qi, S.; Tian, M.; Widjajanti, W.; Wang, R. Fabrication of aquaporin-based biomimetic membrane for seawater desalination. Desalination. 2019, 467, 103–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z.; Saeki, D.; Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, H. Improved anti-biofouling performance of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes modified with a polyampholyte with effective carboxyl anion and quaternary ammonium cation ratio. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier B.V. 2020, 595, 117529. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagle, A. C.; Van Wagner, E. M.; Ju, H.; McCloskey, B. D.; Freeman, B. D.; Sharma, M. M. PEG-coated reverse osmosis membranes: Desalination properties and fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 340, 92–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z.; Saeki, D.; Matsuyama, H. Zwitterionic polymer modification of polyamide reverse-osmosis membranes via surface amination and atom transfer radical polymerization for anti-biofouling. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier B.V. 2018, 550, 332–339. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeki, D.; Karkhanechi, H.; Matsuura, H.; Matsuyama, H. Effect of operating conditions on biofouling in reverse osmosis membrane processes: Bacterial adhesion, biofilm formation, and permeate flux decrease. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2016, 378, 74–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y.; Maruf, S.; Aghajani, M.; Greenberg, A. R. Surface patterning of polymeric membranes and its effect on antifouling characteristics. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52(2), 240–257. DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2016.1201115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xianhui, L.; Yinghiu, M.; Jianxin, L.; Wenshan, G.; Huu Hao, N. In-situ monitoring techniques for membrane fouling and local filtration characteristics in hollow fiber membrane processes: A critical review. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 528, 187–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairal, A. P.; Greenberg, A. R.; Krantz, W. B. Investigation of membrane fouling and cleaning using ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry. Desalination. 2000, 130(1), 45–60. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00073-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairal, A. P.; Greenberg, A. R.; Krantz, W. B.; Bond, L. J. Real-time measurement of inorganic fouling of RO desalination membranes using ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 159(1–2), 185–196. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00058-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, G.-Y.; Greenberg, A.; Krantz, W. Ultrasound, gravimetric, and SEM studies of inorganic fouling in spiral-wound membrane modules. Desalination. 2007, 208(1–3), 277–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, S.; Suwarno, S.; Chong, T.; Krantz, W.; Fane, A. Monitoring membrane biofouling via ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry enhanced by silica dosing. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428, 24–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.; Ren, H.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Ding, L.; Geng, J.; Xu, K.; Huang, H.; Hu, H. In situ monitoring of wastewater biofilm formation process via ultrasonic time domain reflectometry (UTDR). Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 2134–2141. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goosen, M.; Sablani, S.; Al‐Hinai, H.; Al‐Obeidani, S.; Al‐Belushi, R.; Jackson, A. Fouling of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membranes: a critical review. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39(10), 2261–2297. DOI: 10.1081/SS-120039343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J.; Luo, J.; Chen, X.; Feng, S.; Wan, Y. How do chemical cleaning agents act on polyamide nanofiltration membrane and fouling layer? Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59(40), 17653–17670. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c03365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cen, J.; Vukas, M.; Barton, G.; Kavanagh, J.; Coster, H. Real time fouling monitoring with Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 484, 133–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, P.; Lau, W.; Othman, M.; Ismail, A. Membrane fouling in desalination and its mitigation strategies. Desalination. 2018, 425, 130–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartman, A. R.; McFall, C. W.; Christofides, P. D.; Cohen, Y. Model-predictive control of feed flow reversal in a reverse osmosis desalination process. J. Process Control. 2009, 19(3), 433–442. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchymiak, M.; Rahardianto, A.; Lyster, E.; Glater, J.; Cohen, Y. A novel RO ex situ scale observation detector (EXSOD) for mineral scale characterization and early detection. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 291(1–2), 86–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, E. R.; Harmsen, D. J. H.; Blankert, B.; Wessels, L. P.; van der Meer, W. G. J. Effect of minimal pre-treatment on reverse osmosis using surface water as a source. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2021, 509, 115056. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melián-Martel, N.; Sadhwani, J. J.; Malamis, S.; Ochsenkühn-Petropoulou, M. Structural and chemical characterization of long-term reverse osmosis membrane fouling in a full scale desalination plant. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2012, 305, 44–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rho, H.; Chon, K.; Cho, J. An autopsy study of a fouled reverse osmosis membrane used for ultrapure water production. Water (Switzerland). 2019, 11(6), 1116. DOI: 10.3390/w11061116.
   Google Scholar
• Cran, M.; Gray, S.; Schmidt, J.; Gao, L. Root cause analysis for membrane system validation failure at a full-scale recycled water treatment plant. Desalination. 2022, 523, 115405. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, P.; Soares, A.; Monteiro, E.; Rouboa, A. A CFD study of the hydrodynamics in a desalination membrane filled with spacers. Desalination. 2014, 349, 22–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, P. A.; Kruithof, J. C.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. The potential of standard and modified feed spacers for biofouling control. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 403-404, 58–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucs, S. S.; Radu, A. I.; Lavric, V.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Picioreanu, C. Effect of different commercial feed spacers on biofouling of reverse osmosis membrane systems: A numerical study. Desalination. 2014, 343, 26–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, A.; Vuthaluru, R.; Vuthaluru, H. B. Investigations into the effects of mass transport and flow dynamics of spacer filled membrane modules using CFD. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 93, 79–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, P.; Murdoch, L. C.; Ladner, D. A. Hydrodynamics of sinusoidal spacers for improved reverse osmosis performance. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier. 2014, 453, 92–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anqi, A. E.; Alkhamis, N.; Oztekin, A. Computational study of desalination by reverse osmosis - Three-dimensional analyses. Desalin. Elsevier B.V. 2016, 388, 38–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, P.; Murdoch, L. C.; Ladner, D. A. Mitigating membrane fouling with sinusoidal spacers. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 168, 56–64. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2019.24406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haaksman, V. A.; Siddiqui, A.; Schellenberg, C.; Kidwell, J.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Picioreanu, C. Characterization of feed channel spacer performance using geometries obtained by X-ray computed tomography. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 522, 124–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelbaky, M. M. A.; El-Refaee, M. M. A 3D CFD comparative study between torsioned and non-torsioned net-type feed spacer in reverse osmosis. SN Applied Sciences. 2019, 1, 1059. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-1098-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, C. C.; Kottke, V. Effects of spacer geometry on pressure drop, mass transfer, mixing behavior, and residence time distribution. Desalination. 1996, 104, 129–134. DOI: 10.1016/0011-9164(96)00035-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, A.; Lehmann, S.; Haaksman, V.; Ogier, J.; Schellenberg, C.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kruithof, J. C.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Porosity of spacer-filled channels in spiral-wound membrane systems: Quantification methods and impact on hydraulic characterization. Water Res. 2017, 119, 304–311. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brian, P. L. T. Concentration polarization in reverse osmosis desalination with variable flux and incomplete salt rejection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1965, 4, 439–445. DOI: 10.1021/i160016a014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, D. E.; Fletcher, D. F. Computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow and permeation for pressure-driven membrane processes. Desalination. 2002, 145, 183–186. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00406-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi, M. R.; Dewan, K.; Gill, W. N. The effect of concentration dependent viscosity and diffusivity on concentration polarization in reverse osmosis flow systems. AIChE Symp. Ser. 1971, 68, 323.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsou, C. P.; Yiantsios, S. G.; Karabelas, A. J. Numerical simulation of the flow in a plane-channel containing a periodic array of cylindrical turbulence promoters. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231, 81–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2003.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, A.; Lehmann, S.; Bucs, S. S.; Fresquet, M.; Fel, L.; Prest, E. I. E. C.; Ogier, J.; Schellenberg, C.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kruithof, J. C., et al. Predicting the impact of feed spacer modification on biofouling by hydraulic characterization and biofouling studies in membrane fouling simulators. Water Res. 2017, 110, 281–287. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, A.; Farhat, N.; Bucs, S. S.; Linares, R. V.; Picioreanu, C.; Kruithof, J. C.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kidwell, J.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Development and characterization of 3D-printed feed spacers for spiral wound membrane systems. Water Res. 2016, 91, 55–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhat, N. M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Bucs, S. S.; Staal, M. Effect of water temperature on biofouling development in reverse osmosis membrane systems. Water. Res. Elsevier Ltd. 2016, 103, 149–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridjonsson, E. O.; Vogt, S. J.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Johns, M. L. Early non-destructive biofouling detection in spiral wound RO membranes using a mobile earth’s field NMR. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 489, 227–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhat, N. M.; Staal, M.; Bucs, S. S.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Spatial heterogeneity of biofouling under different cross-flow velocities in reverse osmosis membrane systems. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier. 2016, 520, 964–971. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreszer, C.; Flemming, H. C.; Wexler, A. D.; Zwijnenburg, A.; Kruithof, J. C.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Development and testing of a transparent membrane biofouling monitor. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52, 1807–1819. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2013.874708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreszer, C.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Paulitsch-Fuchs, A. H.; Zwijnenburg, A.; Kruithof, J. C.; Flemming, H. C. Hydraulic resistance of biofilms. J. Membr. Sci., Elsevier. 2013, 429, 436–447. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutariya, B.; Patel, K.; Karan, S. Effects of manual interventions in the winding process on the performance of spiral wound membrane module. Desalin. Water Treat. 2022, 251, 1–6. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2021.27858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oss, C. J. Interfacial forces in aqueous media; CRC press: Boca Raton, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Naumov, V. A. Influence of Saffman’s lift force on the motion of a particle in a Couette layer. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 1995, 68, 683–686. DOI: 10.1007/BF00858072.
   Google Scholar
• Fangchao, Z.; Huaqiang, C.; Yiming, S.; Xiaobo, T.; Yalei, Z.; Libin, Y.; Xuefei, Z. Microalgae harvesting by an axial vibration membrane: The mechanism of mitigating membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 508, 127–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E.; Qadir, M.; van Vliet, M. T. H.; Smakhtin, V.; Kang, S. M. The state of desalination and brine production: A global outlook. Sci. Total Environ., Elsevier B.V. 2019, 657, 1343–1356. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, S.; Li, Y.; Ladewig, B. P. A review of reverse osmosis membrane fouling and control strategies. Sci. Total Environ., Elsevier B.V. 2017, 595, 567–583. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picioreanu, C.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Three-dimensional modeling of biofouling and fluid dynamics in feed spacer channels of membrane devices. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345, 340–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, X.-T.; Xu, C.-X.; Geng, H.-Z.; Ji, Q.; Wang, L.; He, B.; Jiang, Y.; Kong, J.; Li, J. Multifunctional PVDF/CNT/GO mixed matrix membranes for ultrafiltration and fouling detection. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 120978. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar