Does size matter? Non-market social and political engagement by accounting firms in the #Brexit discourse on Twitter

References

• Accountancy Age. (2016). Top 50 + 50 Firms 2016. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from https://www.accountancyage.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2016/09/AA-top50-workbook-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcouffe, S., Berland, N., & Levant, Y. (2008). Actor-networks and the diffusion of management accounting innovations: A comparative study. Management Accounting Research, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aral, S., Dellarocas, C., & Godes, D. (2013). Introduction to the special issue – Social media and business transformation: A framework for research. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, P. (2009). Global financial crisis: The challenge to accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and non-market components. California Management Review, 37(2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, J. A., & Brown, J. L. (2019). Tax-related corporate political activity research: A literature review. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 41(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-52026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baysinger, B. D. (1984). Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: An expanded typology. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankespoor, E., Miller, S. G., & White, H. D. (2014). The role of dissemination in market liquidity: Evidence from firms’ use of Twitter. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumentritt, T. P. (2003). Foreign subsidiaries’ government affairs activities: The influence of managers and resources. Business & Society, 42(2), 202–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650303042002003
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2013). Critical accounting and communicative action: On the limits of consensual deliberation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(3), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Proceedings of the 6th European consortium for political research (ECPR) general conference 2011, 25–27 August.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. (2000). The dynamics of accounting change inter-play between new practices, routines, institutions, power and politics. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 566–596. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570010353710
   Google Scholar
• Burris, V. (2001). The two faces of capital: Corporations and individual capitalists as political actors. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
   Google Scholar
• CCAB. (2018). The accountancy profession in the UK and Ireland. Oxford Economics. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://www.ccab.org.uk/documents/20181122CCABEconomicreport2018Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2011). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British prime minister and the Bullygate affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210384730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. E., Bryant, A. P., & Griffin, J. J. (2015). Firm engagement and social issue salience, consensus, and contestation. Business & Society, 56(8), 1136–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315613966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (2017). “People in this country have had enough of experts”: Brexit and the paradoxes of populism. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1282376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coad, A. F., & Herbert, I. P. (2009). Back to the future: New potential for structuration theory in management accounting research? Management Accounting Research, 20(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. M. (2001). The power of accounting: A field study of local financial management in a police force. Management Accounting Research, 12(4), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2001.0157
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. G., & Fox, D. R. (2000). Resources, frequency, and methods: An analysis of small and medium-sized firms’ public policy activities. Business & Society, 39(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900107
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. J., & Sherer, M. J. (1984). The value of corporate accounting reports: Arguments for a political economy of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(3–4), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(84)90008-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortizo, J. C., Carrero, F. M., & Gómez, J. M. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: Mining social media. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(3), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415150301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debreceny, R. S. (2015). Social media, social networks, and accounting. Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-10462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. (2017). Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within critical perspectives of accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Hond, F., Rehbein, K. A., de Bakker, F. G. A., & Lankveld, H. K. (2014). Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, 51(5), 790–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting in professional accounting firms. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. L. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in host countries: A perspective from American managers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.114
   Google Scholar
• Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Wollebæk, D. (2013). Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: Transcending participatory divides? New Media & Society, 15(6), 890–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eschenbrenner, B., Nah, F. F.-H., & Telaprolu, V. R. (2015). Efficacy of social media utilization by public accounting firms: Findings and directions for future research. Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. (2017). Britain after Brexit: A nation divided. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frynas, J. G., Child, J., & Tarba, S. (2017). Non-market social and political strategies – New integrative appoaches and interdisciplinary borrowings. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. (2017). Brexit as the unlikely leading edge of the anti-expert revolution. European Management Journal, 35(5), 575–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, J., & Buchholz, R. (1987). The political pursuit of competitive advantage: What business can gain from government. In A. Marcus, A. Kaufman, & D. Beam (Eds.), Business strategy and public policy (pp. 231–252). Quorum.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, K. Y., Heng, C. S., & Lin, Z. (2013). Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society, privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadani, M., Doh, J. P., & Schneider, M. A. (2018). Corporate political activity and regulatory capture: How some companies blunt the knife of socially oriented investor activism. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2064–2093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, M. M., Brubaker, P., & Whiteside, E. (2013). Facebook: Examining the information presented and its impact on stakeholders. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281311294128
   Google Scholar
• Hart, D. M. (2010). Political theory of the firm. In D. Coen, & G. Wilson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and government (pp. 173–190). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825–842. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2012). Why do people use social media? Empirical findings and a new theoretical framework for social media goal pursuit. SSRN. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1989586
   Google Scholar
• Holm, C., & Zaman, M. (2012). Regulating audit quality: Restoring trust and legitimacy. Accounting Forum, 36(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2011.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X. B., & Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josefy, M., Kuban, S., Duane Ireland, R., & Hitt, M. A. (2015). All things great and small: Organizational size, boundaries of the firm, and a changing environment. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 715–802. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1027086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, M. J., Naughton, J. P., Tahoun, A., & Wang, C. (2015). Corporate use of social media. Working Paper. New York University, Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killian, S., & O’Regan, P. (2016). Social accounting and the co-creation of corporate legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the guilds: Professions, states and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the present. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. (2010). The perceptual bases of collective efficacy and protest participation: The case of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 392–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. F., Hutton, A. P., & Shu, S. (2015). The role of social media in the capital market: Evidence from consumer product recalls. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 367–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepoutre, J., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9183-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedong, T. A., Mellahi, K., & Rajwani, T. (2017). Reality or illusion? The efficacy of non-market strategy in institutional risk reduction. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, T., Kilroy, S., Van der Werff, L., Venkatagiri, S., & Healy, P. (2015). Towards a general framework for social media research using Big data. Procomm 2015: IEEE professional communication conference 2015, 12–15 July.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, T., Rosati, P., & Nair, B. (2020). Calculated vs. ad hoc publics in the # Brexit discourse on Twitter and the role of business actors. Information, 11(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11090435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malsch, B. (2013). Politicizing the expertise of the accounting industry in the realm of corporate social responsibility. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manetti, G., & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 985–1011. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, I., & Singh, I. (2011). Corporate political strategies. Accounting & Finance, 51(1), 252–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2020). Reflections on the 2018 decade award: The meaning and dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company. (2009, November). Tackling socio-political issues in hard times: McKinsey Global Survey Results. Retrieved April 1, 2020, from http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/leadership/tackling-sociopolitical-issuesin-hard-times-mckinsey-global-survey-results
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., & Siegel, D. (2016). A review of the non-market strategy literature: Towards a multi-theoretical integration. Journal of Management, 42(1), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practice: An introduction. In A. G. Hopwood, & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as a social and institutional practice (pp. 1–39). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nalick, M., Josefy, M., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. (2016). Corporate sociopolitical involvement: A reflection of whose preferences? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(4), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obergefell v. Hodges. (2015). Brief of 379 employers and organizations representing employers as Amici curiae in support of petitioners. Retrieved September 29, 2019, from https://www.supremecourt.gov/ObergefellHodges/AmicusBriefs/14-556_379_Employers_and_Organizations_Representing_Employers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B. (2011). The case of sustainability assurance: Constructing a new assurance service. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1230–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of National Statistics. (2016). Internet access – Households and individuals: 2016. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/householdcharacteristics/homeinternetandsocialmediausage/bulletins/internetaccesshouseholdsandindividuals/2016
   Google Scholar
• Padar, J. (2012). Innovation or stagnation? Accounting Today, 26(6), 54. https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/innovation-or-stagnation
   Google Scholar
• Pain, P., & Chen, G. M. (2019). The President is in: Public opinion and the presidential use of Twitter. Social Media+ Society, 5(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119855143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdana, A., Robb, A., & Rohde, F. (2015). XBRL diffusion in social media: Discourses and community learning. Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E. (2012). Social media in the Workplace: Issues and strategic questions. SHRM Foundation Executive Briefing. Retrieved December 15, 2018, from http://www.shrm.org/about/foundation/products/Documents/Social%20Media%20Briefing-%20FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Potter, B. N. (2005). Accounting as a social and institutional practice: Perspectives to enrich our understanding of accounting change. Abacus, 41(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00182.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). Expertise and the construction of relevance: Accountants and environmental audit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00037-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokofieva, M. (2015). Twitter-based dissemination of corporate disclosure and the intervening effects of firms’ visibility: Evidence from Australian-listed companies. Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, M., Lynn, T., Jollands, S., & Nair, B. (2016). Domestic water charges in Ireland-issues and challenges conveyed through social media. Water Resources Management, 30(10), 3577–3591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1374-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajwani, T., Lawton, T., & McGuire, S. (2013). Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. W., Dwyer, P. D., & Sweeney, J. T. (2003). Political strategies used by the US public accounting profession during auditor liability reform: The case of the private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(5), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2003.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Rosati, P., Deeney, P., Cummins, M., Van der Werff, L., & Lynn, T. (2020). Social media and stock price reaction to data breach announcements: Evidence from US listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 47, 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roshan, M., Warren, M., & Carr, R. (2016). Understanding the use of social media by organisations for crisis communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D. (2012). New media and external accounting information: A critical review. Australian Accounting Review, 22(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00176.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). Public support for referendums in Europe: A cross-national comparison in 21 countries. Electoral Studies, 38, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler, D. A., & Rehbein, K. (1997). The filtering role of the firm in corporate political involvement. Business & Society, 36(2), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600202
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, D. A., Rehbein, K., & Cramer, R. D. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciulli, D., & Halley, J. A. (2009). Professions and Burgertum: Etymological ships passing, night into day. Comparative Sociology, 8(2), 202–246. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913309X421646
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, 37, 460–484.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC). (2013). SEC says social media OK for company announcements if investors are alerted. Retrieved December 15, 2018, from https://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1365171513574
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, B. (1995). Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. Journal of Management, 21(3), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skærbæk, P., & Tryggestad, K. (2010). The role of accounting devices in performing corporate strategy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2016). Age distribution of Twitter users in Great Britain from May 2013 to July 2016. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/278320/age-distribution-of-twitter-users-in-great-britain/
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Cooper, D., & Greenwood, R. (2007). Trans-national regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4-5), 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Saxton, G. D., & Gunz, S. (2015). Twittering change: The institutional work of domain change in accounting expertise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 45, 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suiter, J., Nair, B., & Lynn, T. (2017). The role of social media in driving participation and engagement in referendums. ECIU Workshop – Menace or Blessing? The role of direct democracy in the process of political representation, 6 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sykianakis, N., & Bellas, A. (2011). Organization politics and the role of accounting. European Research Studies, XIV(3), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/330
   Google Scholar
• Tata, A., Martinez, D. L., & Brusoni, S. (2015). Looking backward and forward? Understanding the role of temporal focus on startup performance. Proceedings of the Druid conference, 21–23 January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tilt, C. A. (2009). Corporate responsibility, accounting and accountants. In S. Idowu, & W. Leal Filho (Eds.), Professionals’ perspectives of corporate social responsibility (pp. 11–32). Springer Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., & Chapman, C. (2014). Academic contributions to enhancing accounting for sustainable development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanden Bergh, R. G., & Holburn, G. L. F. (2007). Targeting corporate political strategy: Theory and evidence from the US accounting industry. Business and Politics, 9(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1202
   Google Scholar
• Walker, E. T., & Rea, C. M. (2014). The political mobilization of firms and industries. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar