An examination of comment letters concerning an increase in audit exemption thresholds. Evidence from Finland

References

• Accountancy Europe. (2018). Simplifying auditing standards for small or non-complex entities. https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/180412_Publication_Simplifying-auditing-standards-for-small-or-non-complex-entities-Exploring-possible-solutions-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Accountancy Europe. (2019). Audit exemption thresholds in Europe. https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/181114_Audit-exemption-thresholds-in-Europe_2019_survey-update-version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Adelle, C., & Weiland, S. (2012). Policy assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.663256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amara, I., Khlif, H., & El Ammar, A. (2020). Strength of auditing and reporting standards, corruption and money laundering: A cross-country investigation. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(9), 1243–1259. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-10-2018-2026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, N., Gallery, N., & Sidhu, B. K. (2000). The incentives of Australian public companies lobbying against proposed superannuation accounting standards. Abacus, 36(1), 40–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00053
   Google Scholar
• Arafat, I., Dunne, Y., & Ahmed, A. H. (2020). Splitting accountability hairs: Anomalies in the adaptation of IFRS for SMEs in the UK and Ireland. Accounting in Europe, 17(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2020.1764601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. R., Bedard, J., & Prat dit Hauret, C. (2014). The regulation of statutory auditing: An institutional theory approach. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(5), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2013-0931
   Google Scholar
• Bigus, J., & Zimmermann, R.-C. (2008). Non-audit fees, market leaders and concentration in the German audit market: A descriptive analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 12(3), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00378.x
   Google Scholar
• Clacher, I., Duboisée de Ricquebourg, A., & May, A. (2019). Who gets all the PIE? Regulation of the statutory audit for private UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(5), 1297–1324. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M. A., & Peel, M. J. (2013). The impact of voluntary audit and governance characteristics on accounting errors in private companies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis, J. (2010). Audit exemption and the demand for voluntary audit: A comparative study of the UK and Denmark. International Journal of Auditing, 14(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2010.00415.x
   Google Scholar
• Collis, J., Jarvis, R., & Skerratt, L. (2004). The demand for the audit in small companies in the UK. Accounting and Business Research, 34(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729955
   Google Scholar
• Daoust, L., & Malsch, B. (2020). When the client is a former auditor: Auditees’ expert knowledge and social capital as threats to staff auditors’ operational independence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(3), 1333–1369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedman, E., & Kausar, A. (2012). The impact of voluntary audit on credit ratings: Evidence from UK private firms. Accounting and Business Research, 42(4), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2012.653761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Hertog, J. (1999). General theories of regulation in Encyclopaedia of Law and Economics, Volume 3: The Regulation of Contracts Eds B Bouckaert, G De Geest (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).
   Google Scholar
• Downing, J., & Langli, J. C. (2019). Audit exemptions and compliance with tax and accounting regulations. Accounting and Business Research, 49(1), 28–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1442707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Green paper – Audit policy: Lessons from the crisis. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0561.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Cutting red tape in Europe: Final report. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/final-report-of-the-high-level-group_july2014_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). 2018 SBA fact sheet. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/32581/attachments/10/translations/en/renditions/native.
   Google Scholar
• Federation of European Accountants (FEE). (2016). Audit exemption thresholds in Europe. https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/1605_Audit_exemption_thresholds_update.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment. (2010). Selvitys yrityksille aiheutuvista hallinnollisista kustannuksista. https://tem.fi/documents/1410877/2395713/Selvitys-yrityksille-aiheutuvista-hallinnollisista-kustannuksista-Taloushallinnon-raportointi.pdf/aefebc2c-d110-4165-82f6-7e0c11cbb479/Selvitys-yrityksille-aiheutuvista-hallinnollisista-kustannuksista-Taloushallinnon-raportointi.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment. (2018a). Working group‘s memorandum on certain legal provisions of the Auditing Act and lightening of the administrative burden. https://api.hankeikkuna.fi/asiakirjat/8577f33f-b153-4abc-931b-f54a00de8e57/9fb6067a-fbec-452b-a279-2fb88106ebac/RAPORTTI_20180118080000.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment. (2018b). Työryhmä valmistelemaan kevyempää tarkastusta pienille yrityksille tilintarkastuksen sijaan. https://tem.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/tyoryhma-valmistelemaan-kevyempaa-tarkastusta-pienille-yrityksille-tilintarkastuksen-sijaan.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Tax Administration. (2020). Fact sheet. https://www.vero.fi/en/gray-economy-crime/prevention/taxation/.
   Google Scholar
• Giner, B., & Arce, M. (2012). Lobbying on accounting standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on share-based payments. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 655–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.701796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipper, B., Lombardi, B. J., & Skinner, D. J. (2013). The politics of accounting standard-setting: A review of empirical research. Australian Journal of Management, 38(3), 523–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896213510713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Finland. (2015). The Finnish Auditing Act (1141/2015).
   Google Scholar
• Government of Finland. (2016). The Finnish Accounting Act (1620/2016).
   Google Scholar
• Gros, M., & Worret, D. (2016). Lobbying and audit regulation in the EU. Accounting in Europe, 13(3), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2016.1255343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapamäki, E. (2018). Voluntary auditing: A synthesis of the literature. Accounting in Europe, 15(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2018.1430369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. B. (2011). Lobbying of the IASB: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Accounting Research, 10(2), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-10078
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S., & Zülch, H. (2014). Lobbying on accounting standard setting in the parliamentary environment of Germany. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(8), 709–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, O.-K., Langli, J. C., & Thomas, W. B. (2012). Agency conflicts and auditing in private firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(7), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, O.-K., Thomas, W. B., & Vyas, D. (2011). Financial credibility, ownership, and financing constraints in private firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(7), 935–957. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höglund, H., & Sundvik, D. (2019). Do auditors constrain intertemporal income shifting in private companies? Accounting and Business Research, 49(3), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1490166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, K. K. (2019). The role of auditing in the fight against corruption. British Accounting Review, 51(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsen, K., & Jehn, K. A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 4(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391
   Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., & Van de Poel, K. (2006). Lobbying towards a global standard setter: Do national characteristics matter? An analysis of the comment letters written to the IASB. In G. N. Gregoriou & M. Gaber (Eds.), International accounting: Standards, regulations, and financial reporting (pp. 1–39). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, J. (2011). Audit quality and cost of debt capital for private firms: Evidence from Finland. International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2010.00424.x
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, C., & Parker, D. (2008). Regulatory impact assessment: Towards better regulation? Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Koeppl, P. (2000). The acceptance, relevance and dominance of lobbying the EU Commission: A survey of the EU Commission’s civil servants. Journal of Public Affairs, 1(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.51
   Google Scholar
• Königsgruber, R. (2013). Expertise-based lobbying and accounting regulation. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(4), 1009–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9210-0
   Google Scholar
• Laffont, J.-J. (1999). Political economy, information and incentives. European Economic Review, 43(4-6), 649–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00130-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffont, J.-J., & Martimort, D. (2009). The theory of incentives: The principal–agent model. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaPorta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, F. A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. (2008). An examination of comment letters submitted to the IASC: Special purpose entities. Research in Accounting Regulation, 20, 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-0457(07)00202-0
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C., & Pittman, J. (2011). Voluntary audits versus mandatory audits. Accounting Review, 86(5), 1655–1678. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, S., & Zaman, M. (1999). Lobbying the auditing practices board: Analysis of responses to the expanded audit report. Accounting Forum, 23(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6303.00003
   Google Scholar
• Minnis, M., & Shroff, N. (2017). Why regulate private firm disclosure and auditing? Accounting and Business Research, 47(5), 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2017.1303962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, L., Kinnunen, J., Ojala, H., & Troberg, P. (2012). Drivers of voluntary audit in Finland: To be or not to be audited? Accounting and Business Research, 42(2), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2012.653742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, L., & Sundgren, S. (2012). Are modified audit opinions related to the availability of credit? Evidence from Finnish SMEs. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 767–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.671465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, M., Karjalainen, J., & Niskanen, J. (2011). Demand for audit quality in private firms: Evidence on ownership effects. International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2010.00422.x
   Google Scholar
• Norton, S. D. (2018). Suspicion of money laundering reporting obligations: Auditor compliance, or skeptical failure to engage? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 50, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala, H., Collis, J., Kinnunen, J., Niemi, L., & Troberg, P. (2016). The demand for voluntary audit in micro-companies: Evidence from Finland. International Journal of Auditing, 20(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, R. A. (1974). Theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 5(2), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003113
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, M., & Messner, M. (2015). Lobbying on the integrated reporting framework. An analysis of comment letters to the 2011 discussion paper of the IIRC. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(3), 365–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, A., Maglio, R., & Rapone, V. (2020). Lobbying during IASB and FASB convergence due processes: Evidence from the IFRS 16 project on leases. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 41, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100348
   Google Scholar
• Small and Medium Entrepreneurs of the European People’s Party (SMEs of the EPP). (2019). Position paper on primary targets for small & medium-sized enterprises. http://www.smeeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/SME-Europe-Online-version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2020). Finland in figures 2020. http://www.stat.fi/tup/julkaisut/tiedostot/julkaisuluettelo/yyti_fif_202000_2020_23214_net.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stenka, R., & Taylor, P. (2010). Setting UK standards on the concept of control: An analysis of lobbying behavior. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2010.9663387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabone, N., & Baldacchino, P. J. (2003). The statutory audit of owner-managed companies in Malta. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(5), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310476855
   Google Scholar
• Tandy, P., & Wilburn, N. (1996). The academic community’s participation in standard setting: Submission of comment letters on SFAS Nos. 1-117. Accounting Horizons, 10(3), 92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tendeloo, B., & Vanstraelen, A. (2008). Earnings management and audit quality in Europe: Evidence from the private client segment market. European Accounting Review, 17(3), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802016684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen, A., & Schelleman, C. (2017). Auditing private companies: What do we know? Accounting and Business Research, 47(5), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2017.1314104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weetman, P., Davie, E. S., & Collins, W. (1996). Lobbying on accounting issues: Preparer/user imbalance in the case of the operating and financial review. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610109978
   Google Scholar