UK public sector fiscal reporting: clear and contradictory

References

• ACCA. (2017). IPSAS implementation: Current status and challenges. https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/ACCA_Global/Technical/pubsect/pi-IPSAS-implementation-current-status-and-challenges.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anessi-Pessina, E., & Cantù, E. (2017). Multiple logics and accounting mutations in the Italian National Health Service. Accounting Forum, 41(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belal, A. R., Cooper, S., & Roberts, R. W. (2019). Vulnerable and exploitable: The need for organisational accountability and transparency in emerging and less developed countries. Accounting Forum, 37(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2009). Budget transparency, fiscal performance and political turnout: An international approach. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01988.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito, B., Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2007). The harmonization of government financial information systems: The role of the IPSASs. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307078424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg Johansen, C., & Waldorff, S. (2017). What are institutional logics – and where is the perspective taking us? In G. Krücken, C. Mazza, R. Meyer, & P. Walgenbach (Eds.), New themes in institutional analysis: Topics and issues from European research (pp. 51–76). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, L., & Pinheiro, R. (2016). Handling different managerial logics in the public sector: A tale from the land of the Fjords. In R. Pinheiro, F. Ramirez, K. Vrabæk, & H. Byrkjeflot (Eds.), Towards a comparative institutionalism? Forms, dynamics and logics across health and higher education fields (pp. 145–168). Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, I., Lange, J., & Märker, M. (2017). Caught in organized ambivalence: Institutional complexity and its implications in the German hospital sector. Public Management Review, 19(4), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1195437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron, D., & Giauque, D. (2006). Civil servant identity at the crossroads: New challenges for public administrations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(6), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610685989
   Google Scholar
• Carrera, N., Carmona, S., & Gutierrez, I. (2008). Human capital, age and job stability: Evidence from Spanish certified auditors (1976–1988). Accounting and Business Research, 38(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2008.9663343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruana, J., Dabbicco, G., Jorge, S., & Antónia Jesus, M. (2019). The development of EPSAS: Contributions from the literature. Accounting in Europe, 16(2), 146–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2019.1624924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruana, J., & Grima, L. (2019). IPSAS, ESA and the fiscal deficit – a question of calibration. Public Money & Management, 39(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1580897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Public Impact. (2019). New Zealand’s public financial management reforms. https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/case-study/new-zealands-public-financial-management-reforms/.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, M. (2003). Without reinventing the wheel: Business accounting applied to the public sector. Australian Accounting Review, 13(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2003.tb00396.x
   Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., Vanhee, C., Manes-Rossi, F., Aversano, N., & Cauwenberge, P. (2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: An international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 8(1), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314546580
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2006). The actual implementation of accruals accounting: Caveats from a case within the public sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 19(2), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610656123
   Google Scholar
• Constitutional Reform and Governance Act. (2010). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/25/contents.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbicco, G. (2018). A comparison of debt measures in fiscal statistics and public sector financial statements. Public Money & Management, 38(7), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1527543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasí González, R. M., Julve, V. M., & and Bargues, J. M. V. (2018). Towards convergence of government financial statistics and accounting in Europe at central and local levels. Spanish Accounting Review, 21(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). European system of accounts. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5925693/KS-02-13-269-EN.PDF/44cd9d01-bc64-40e5-bd40-d17df0c69334
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Towards implementing European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS) for EU Member States – Public consultation on future EPSAS governance principles and structures. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/about/opportunities/consultations/epsas.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Robson, K., & Stapleton, P. (2012). The logics of budgeting: Theorization and practice variation in the education field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(5), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., Ahrens, T., & Khalifa, R. (2019). Public value, institutional logics and practice variation during austerity localism at Newcastle city council. Public Management Review, 21(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1462398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2020). Hybridizing the institutional logics of performance improvement and budgetary stewardship in English and Welsh local government. Public Policy and Administration, 35(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718781433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Advisory Board. (2019). 21st report of the financial reporting advisory board report for the period April 2017 to March 2018 (HC 1844). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., Andreassen, T., & Klemsdal, L. (2015). Managing institutional complexity in public sector reform: Hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell, & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (2nd ed., pp. 232–267). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government Resources and Accounts Act. (2000). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/20/contents.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Magán Díaz, A., Xiao Li, S., & Céspedes Lorente, J. (2009). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerreiro, M. S., Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2012). Voluntary adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards by large unlisted companies in Portugal – institutional logics and strategic responses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(7), 482–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. (1998). Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector - rhetoric or reality? Financial Accountability & Management, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00047
   Google Scholar
• Hansard Society. (2010). Alignment debate in House of Commons. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Heiling, J., Schührer, S., & Chan, J. (2013). New development: Towards a grand convergence? International proposals for aligning government budgets, accounts and finance statistics. Public Money & Management, 33(4), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2013.799838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepworth, N. (2017). Is implementing the IPSASs an appropriate reform? Public Money & Management, 37(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1266174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (1994). Better accounting for the tax payers money: Resource accounting and budgeting in government (Cm 2626). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (1995). Better accounting for the tax payers money: Resource accounting and budgeting in government (Cm 2929). HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2008). Alignment (‘Clear Line of Sight’) Project: Memorandum submitted by HM Treasury. www.hm-treasury.gov.uk.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2009). Alignment (clear line of sight) project (Cm 7567). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2010). Alignment debate in House of Commons. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2012). Clear Line of Sight Alignment Project post-implementation review. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2013). Consolidated budgeting guidance from 2013-14. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2019). The government financial reporting review (CP 67). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvönen, T., Järvinen, J., Pellinen, J., & Rahko, T. (2009). Institutional logics, ICT and stability of management accounting. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 241–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802681511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. (2014). Update on the fiscal transparency code. https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2014/061614.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. (2018). Fiscal transparency handbook. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/books/069/24788-9781484331859-en/24788-9781484331859-en-book.xml.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2012). Fiscal transparency, accountability, and risk. Fiscal Affairs Department/Statistics Department.
   Google Scholar
• Inter-Secretariat Working Group on National Accounts. (2008). System of national accounts. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, J. (2016). Role of management accounting in applying new institutional logics: A comparative case study in the non-profit sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 29(5), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2012-01058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kober, R., Lee, J., & Ng, J. (2010). Mind your accruals: Perceived usefulness of financial information in the Australian public sector under different accounting systems. Financial Accountability & Management, 26(3), 267–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2010.00502.x
   Google Scholar
• Liaison Committee. (2008a). Parliament and government finance: Recreating financial scrutiny (HC 426). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Liaison Committee. (2008b). Parliament and government finance: Recreating financial scrutiny (HC 1108). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Liaison Committee. (2009). Financial scrutiny: Parliamentary control over government budgets (HC 804). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Likierman, A. (1995). Resource accounting and budgeting: Rationale and background. Public Administration, 73(4), 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00845.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likierman, A. (2000). Changes to managerial decision-taking in UK central government. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0131
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., & Boxenbaum, E. (2015). Institutional logics in action. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, part A (pp. 3–22). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB004
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Vive La Résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. Community banking. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 799–820. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, B., & Ross, L. (2010). Research methods: A practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, T. (1996). Why governments should produce balance sheets. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 55(1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1996.tb01184.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R., Egger-Peitler, I., Hollerer, M., & Hammerschmid, G. (2014). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 1000–1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2019). Constructing institutional performance: A multi-level framing perspective on performance measurement and management. Accounting and Business Research, 49(4), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1507811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, D. (2017). Rationalising government fiscal reporting. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/rationalising-government-fiscal-reporting_budget-17-5j8z25lsphq8.
   Google Scholar
• Muthumala, A. (2018). The estimates: Parliament’s role in authorising government spending plans. House of Commons Library. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/the-estimates-parliaments-role-in-authorising-government-spending-plans/.
   Google Scholar
• Nakmahachalasint, N., & Narktabtee, P. (2019). Implementation of accrual accounting in Thailand’s central government. Public Money & Management, 39(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1478516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (1995). Resource accounting and budgeting in government (HC123). HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2010). Non-departmental public bodies performance reporting to departments. https://www.nao.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2010/05/NDBP_Performance_Reporting.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2018). NAO strategy 2019-20 to 2021-22. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/NAO-Strategy-2019-20-to-2021-22.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2019). Assessing value for money. https://www.nao.org.uk/successful-commissioning/general-principles/value-for-money/assessing-value-for-money/.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/258610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, L., & Gould, G. (1999). Changing public sector accountability: Critiquing new directions. Accounting Forum, 23(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6303.00007
   Google Scholar
• Paulsson, G. (2006). Accrual accounting in the public sector: Experiences from the central government in Sweden. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00392.x
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis: New public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Procedure Committee. (2017). Authorising government expenditure: Steps to more effective scrutiny. House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Public Accounts Committee. (2011). Twenty-eighth report: Accountability for public money. House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee. (2017). Accounting for democracy: making sure Parliament, the people and ministers know how and why public money is spent (HC 95). House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee. (2018). Accounting for democracy revisited: The government response and proposed review (HC 1197). House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Rautianen, A., & Järvenpää, M. (2012). Institutional logics and responses to performance measurement systems. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(2), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00541.x
   Google Scholar
• Rautianen, A., Urquia-Grande, E., & Munoz-Colomina, C. (2017). Institutional logics in police performance indicator development: A comparative case study of Spain and Finland. European Accounting Review, 26(2), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1120412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmayne, N. B., & Laswad, F. (2015). ). IPSAS or IFRS as the framework for public sector financial reporting? New Zealand preparers’ perspectives. Australian Accounting Review, 25(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rensch, S. (2019). Europe headed for ‘road to accruals’, says EPSAS project lead. https://www.publicfinancefocus.org/news/2019/03/europe-headed-road-accruals-says-epsas-project-lead.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, F., Cohen, S., & Caperchione, E. (2016). Harmonizing public sector accounting in Europe: Thinking out of the box. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1133976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Scrutiny Unit. (2017). Financial scrutiny uncovered. https://www.parliament.uk/documents/Scrutiny-Unit/Financial-Scrutiny-Uncovered-booklet-2017-edition-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor. (2007). The governance of Britain (CM 7170). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Sjögren, E., & Fernler, K. (2019). Accounting and professional work in established NPM settings. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 32(3), 897–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, T. (2003). The epistemology of macroeconomic reality: The Keynesian revolution from an accounting point of view. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 28(5), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00061-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H. J. (2003). Performance evaluation styles in governmental organizations: How do professional managers facilitate politicians’ work? Management Accounting Research, 14(4), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2003.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Jones, C., & Kury, K. (2005). Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: Transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing. In C. Jones, & P. Thornton (Eds.), Transformation in cultural industries (research in the sociology of organizations, Vol. 23) (pp. 125–170). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(05)23004-5
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tily, G. (2009). John Maynard Keynes and the development of national accounts in Britain 1895-1941. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(2), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treasury Committee. (2008). The 2008 budget (HC 430). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Hoek, M. P. (2005). From cash to accrual budgeting and accounting in the public sector: The Dutch experience. Public Budgeting and Finance, 25(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0275-1100.2005.00353.x
   Google Scholar
• Van Peursam, K. A., & Pratt, M. J. (1998). Are private sector standards enough? An example from public sector hospitals in New Zealand. Financial Accountability & Management, 14(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00055
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Sepulveda, L., & McMullin, C. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy, 46(10), 1755–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar