Adult learners’ social connectedness and online participation: the importance of online interaction quality

References

• Abbasi, A., and J. Altmann. 2011. “On the Correlation Between Research Performance and Social Network Analysis Measures Applied to Research Collaboration Networks.” System sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th hawaii international conference on, IEEE, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Aragon, S. R. 2003. “Creating Social Presence in Online Environments.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2003 (100): 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., M. Cleveland-Innes, S. R. Diaz, D. R. Garrison, P. Ice, J. C. Richardson, and K. P. Swan. 2008. “Developing a Community of Inquiry Instrument: Testing a Measure of the Community of Inquiry Framework Using a Multi-Institutional Sample.” The Internet and Higher Education 11 (3): 133–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of personality and social psychology 51 (6): 1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmon, S. J. 2012. “Outcomes of Chat and Discussion Board Use in Online Learning: A Research Synthesis.” Journal of Educators Online 9 (2): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. E., L. R. Thom, J. Hayes, and C. Hay. 2008. “Ask and You Will Receive: How Question Type Influences Quantity and Quality of Online Discussions.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39 (5): 888–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J., F. J. Boster, M. Kotowski, and J. P. Day. 2015. “Evidence for the Validity of a Social Connectedness Scale: Connectors Amass Bridging Social Capital Online and Offline.” Communication Quarterly 63 (2): 119–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. H., and S. S. Chuang. 2011. “Social Capital and Individual Motivations on Knowledge Sharing: Participant Involvement as a Moderator.” Information & Management 48 (1): 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1992. “A Power Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, S. 2006. “A Study of the Relationship Between Student Communication Interaction and Sense of Community.” The Internet and Higher Education 9 (3): 153–162.
   Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., H. Van Keer, T. Schellens, and M. Valcke. 2010. “Roles as a Structuring Tool in Online Discussion Groups: The Differential Impact of Different Roles on Social Knowledge Construction.” Computers in Human Behaviour 26 (4): 516–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diep, N. A., C. Cocquyt, C. Zhu, and T. Vanwing. 2016. “Predicting Adult Learners’ Online Participation: Effects of Altruism, Performance Expectancy, and Social Capital.” Computers & Education 101: 84–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diep, N. A., C. Cocquyt, C. Zhu, T. Vanwing, and M. de Greef. 2017. “Effects of Core Self-Evaluation and Online Interaction Quality on Adults’ Learning Performance and Bonding and Bridging Social Capital.” The Internet and Higher Education 34: 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., M. Zhu, and D. Mindrila. 2009. “Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 14 (20): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A. G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G* Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behaviour Research Methods 41 (4): 1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. 2001. “Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education.” American Journal of Distance Education 15 (1): 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Grieve, R., M. Indian, K. Witteveen, G. A. Tolan, and J. Marrington. 2013. “Face-to-face or Facebook: Can Social Connectedness be Derived Online?” Computers in Human Behaviour 29 (3): 604–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieve, R., and N. Kemp. 2015. “Individual Differences Predicting Social Connectedness Derived From Facebook: Some Unexpected Findings.” Computers in Human Behaviour 51: 239–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., S. Rojas-Drummond, R. Higham, A. M. Márquez, F. Maine, R. M. Ríos, Rocío García-Carrión, et al. 2016. “Developing a Coding Scheme for Analysing Classroom Dialogue Across Educational Contexts.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 9: 16–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. 2009. “A Theory of Online Learning as Online Participation.” Computers & Education 52 (1): 78–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., and R. T. Johnson. 2005. “New Developments in Social Interdependence Theory.” Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 131 (4): 285–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F., and K. Xie. 2009. “Toward Deep Learning for Adult Students in Online Courses.” The Internet and Higher Education 12 (3): 136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbler, F., C. Riedl, C. Vetter, J. M. Leimeister, and H. Krcmar. 2010, July. “Social Connectedness on Facebook: An Explorative Study on Status Message Usage.” Proceedings of 16th Americas conference on information systems.
   Google Scholar
• Koroleva, K., Krasnova, H., & Günther, O. (2010). “‘STOP SPAMMING ME!’-Exploring Information Overload on Facebook.” Paper presented at the sixteenth Americas conference on information systems, Lima, Peru, 447.
   Google Scholar
• LaBarbera, R. 2013. “The Relationship Between Students’ Perceived Sense of Connectedness to the Instructor and Satisfaction in Online Courses.” Quarterly Review of Distance Education 14 (4): 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. 2012. Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M., B. L. Dean, and K. R. Jung. 2008. “Social Connectedness, Extraversion, and Subjective Well-Being: Testing a Mediation Model.” Personality and Individual Differences 45 (5): 414–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M., M. Draper, and S. Lee. 2001. “Social Connectedness, Dysfunctional Interpersonal Behaviours, and Psychological Distress: Testing a Mediator Model.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 48 (3): 310–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M., and S. B. Robbins. 2000. “Understanding Social Connectedness in College Women and Men.” Journal Of Counseling & Development 78 (4): 484–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S. C., W. S. Cheung, and K. F. Hew. 2011. “Critical Thinking in Asynchronous Online Discussion: An Investigation of Student Facilitation Techniques.” New Horizons in Education 59 (1): 52–65.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., and P. M. Podsakoff. 2012. “Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies.” Journal of Retailing 88 (4): 542–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrynikola, N., R. Miranda, and A. Soffer. 2018. “Social Connectedness, Stressful Life Events, and Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviours among Young Adults.” Comprehensive Psychiatry 80: 140–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., A. Littlejohn, and G. Vojt. 2011. “Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality? University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies.” Computers & Education 56 (2): 429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, E., K. K. Wiener, and A. J. Saliba. 2015. “Compulsive Internet use and Relations Between Social Connectedness, and Introversion.” Computers in Human Behaviour 48: 569–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mebane, M., R. Porcelli, A. Iannone, C. Attanasio, and D. Francescato. 2008. “Evaluation of the Efficacy of Affective Education Online Training in Promoting Academic and Professional Learning and Social Capital.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 24 (1): 68–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norberg, A., C. D. Dziuban, and P. D. Moskal. 2011. “A Time-Based Blended Learning Model.” On the Horizon 19 (3): 207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Pelz, B. 2010. “(My) Three Principles of Effective Online Pedagogy.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 14 (1): 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, C., F. Köbler, S. Goswami, and H. Krcmar. 2013. “Tweeting to Feel Connected: A Model for Social Connectedness in Online Social Networks.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29 (10): 670–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. 2002. “Building Sense of Community at a Distance.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 3 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., and H. Jordan. 2004. “Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 5 (2): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, K. N., and M. Khalifa. 2009. “Design for Social Presence in Online Communities: A Multidimensional Approach.” AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1: 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, T. J., and R. Grieve. 2017. “Facebook as a Source of Social Connectedness in Older Adults.” Computers in Human Behaviour 66: 363–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagter van Tryon, P. J., and M. J. Bishop. 2009. “Theoretical Foundations for Enhancing Social Connectedness in Online Learning Environments.” Distance Education 30 (3): 291–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. V. 2013. “Face-to-face vs. Blended Learning: Effects on Secondary Students ‘Perceptions and Performance.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 89: 79–83.
   Google Scholar
• Swaggerty, E. A., and A. D. Broemmel. 2017. “Authenticity, Relevance, and Connectedness: Graduate Students’ Learning Preferences and Experiences in an Online Reading Education Course.” The Internet and Higher Education 32: 80–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Baren, J., W. A. Jsselsteijn, P. Markopoulos, N. Romero, and B. de Ruyter. 2004. “Measuring Affective Benefits and Costs of Awareness Systems Supporting Intimate Social Networks.” CTIT workshop proceedings series, Vol. 2, 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F., M. Saghafian, and P. Padmanabhan. 2012. “Towards More Precise Design Guidance: Specifying and Testing the Functions of Assigned Student Roles in Online Discussions.” Educational Technology Research and Development 60 (1): 55–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, R., and S. Ebersole. 2003. “Using non-Subject-Matter-Specific Discussion Boards to Build Connectedness in Online Learning.” The American Journal of Distance Education 17 (2): 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. W. 2006. “Two Group Development Patterns of Virtual Learning Teams: Linear Progression and Adaptive Progression.” Quarterly Review of Distance Education 7 (3): 297–312.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, E. 2006. “Interaction and Cognitive Engagement: An Analysis of Four Asynchronous Online Discussions.” Instructional Science 34 (6): 451–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar