Reflections on writing and identity: exploring the role of qualifying exams in the sociocultural development of doctoral students

References

• Adams, G. 2018. “A Narrative Study of the Experience of Feedback on a Professional Doctorate: ‘A Kind of Flowing Conversation’.” Studies in Continuing Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2018.1526782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitchison, C., B. Kamler, and A. Lee, eds. 2010. Publishing Pedagogies for the Doctorate and Beyond. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison, C., and A. Lee. 2006. “Research Writing: Problems and Pedagogies.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 265–278. doi:10.1080/13562510600680574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P., S. Harris-Huemmert, and L. McAlpine. 2014. “Tools for Reflection on the Academic Identities of Doctoral Students.” International Journal for Academic Development 19 (3): 162–173. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2013.817333.
   Google Scholar
• Ampaw, F. D., and A. J. Jaeger. 2012. “Completing the Three Stages of Doctoral Education: An Event History Analysis.” Research in Higher Education 53: 640–660. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9250-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E. 2002. “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career.” The Journal of Higher Education 73 (1): 94–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair, C. R., and J. G. Haworth. 2004. “Doctoral Student Attrition and Persistence: A Meta-synthesis of Research.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. XIX., edited by J. C. Smart, 481–534. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. V., R. A. Harris, and M. J. Mulvaney. 2017. “A Comparison of Best Practices for Doctoral Training in Europe and North America.” FEBS Open Bio 7: 1444–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, M., and D. Hamilton. 1998. Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beaufort, A. 2007. College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., and M. Scardmalia. 1987. The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, G., and D. Tourish. 2016. “The Critical Incident Technique Reappraised: Using Critical Incidents to Illuminate Organizational Practices and Build Theory.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management 11 (4): 276–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brew, A., D. Boud, and S. U. Namgung. 2011. “Influences on the Formation of Academics: The Role of the Doctorate and Structured Development Opportunities.” Studies in Continuing Education 33 (1): 51–66. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2010.515575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, C. H. 1997. “Exploring a Second Language Learners’ Opportunities for Literacy Learning in a Mainstream Classroom: A Collaborative Case Study.” PhD thesis, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, C. H., L. Helman, and C. B. Patchen. 2005. “Learning to Conduct Teacher Research: Exploring the Development of Mediated Understandings.” Teachers and Teaching 11 (1): 73–94.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. C., and S. Preskill. 2005. Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, R. V., and S. Pinnegar. 2001. “Guidelines for Quality in Autobiographical Forms of Self-study Research.” Educational Researcher 30 (3): 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, L. D., W. A. Borgen, N. E. Amundson, and A. T. Maglio. 2005. “Fifty Years of the Critical Incident Technique: 1954–2004 and Beyond.” Qualitative Research 5 (4): 475–497.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, A., S. R. Neugebauer, A. Ellis, D. Ensminger, A. M. Ryan, and A. Kennedy. 2016. “Teacher Educator Identity in a Culture of Iterative Teacher Education Program Design: A Collaborative Self-study.” Studying Teacher Education 12 (2): 152–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, J., E. C. Mayland, J. van der Meer, R. A. Spronken-Smith, C. Tustin, and P. Blyth. 2018. “Stressors in Early-stage Doctoral Students.” Studies in Continuing Education. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coterall, S. 2011. “Doctoral Students Writing: Where’s the Pedagogy?” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (4): 413–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Graduate Schools. 2008. Executive Summary of Ph.D. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Demographic Data from the Ph.D. Completion Project. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools. http://www.phdcompletion.org/information/executive_summary_demographics_book_ii.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, D., N. Gilbert, H. Ledford, A. Nayar, and M. Yahia. 2011. “Education: The PhD Factory.” Nature 472: 276–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, P. J. 2006. “Critical Incident Technique: A Learning Intervention for Organizational Problem Solving.” Development and Learning in Organizations 20 (2): 13–16. doi:10.1108/14777280610645877.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. A., R. McClelland, J. Davies, and L. Sudbury. 2009. “Using Critical Incident Technique (CIT) to Capture the Voice of the Student.” The TQM Journal 21 (4): 305–318.
   Google Scholar
• European University Association. 2005. Doctoral Programmes for the European Knowledge Society: Report on the EUA Doctoral Programmes Project. Brussels: European University Association. http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/Doctoral_Programmes_Project_Report.1129278878120.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European University Association. 2010. Salzburg II Recommendations: European Uni­versities’ Achievements since 2005 in Implementing the Salzburg Principles. Brussels: European University Association. https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/salzburg%20ii%20recommendations%202010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European University Association. 2016. Taking Salzburg Forward: Implementation and New Challenges. Brussels: European University Association. http://www.eua.be/Libraries/publications-homepage-list/Doctoral-Education_Taking-Salzburg-Forward.
   Google Scholar
• Flanigan, J. C. 1954. “The Critical Incident Technique.” Psychological Bulletin 51 (4): 327–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, R., A. R. Crowe, K. A. Tollafield, and C. E. Allan. 2014. “Exploring Doctoral Student Identity Using a Self-study Approach.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry 2 (1): 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. 1997. “Critical Incident Analysis: A Strategy for Developing Reflective Practice.” Teachers and Teaching 3 (2): 169–188. doi:10.1080/1354060970030201.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. 2007. “‘I Heard It through the Grapevine’: Doctoral Student Socialization in Chemistry and History.” Higher Education 54: 723–740. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 1991. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 2015. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. 5th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., and L. van Langenhove, eds. 1999. Positioning Theory. Oxford, London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ILA/NCTE (International Literacy Association/National Council of Teachers of English). 2009. “Standards for the Assessment of Reading and Writing, Revised Edition (2009).” http://www.ncte.org/standards/assessmentstandards.
   Google Scholar
• Kamler, B., and P. Thomson. 2006. Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for Supervision. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. M. 2007. “Quo Vadis Doctoral Education? New European Approaches in the Context of Global Changes.” European Journal of Education 42 (3): 307–319.
   Google Scholar
• Kemppainen, J. K. 2000. “The Critical Incident Technique and Nursing Care Quality Research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 32 (5): 1264–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., and C. Seale. 2007. “Managing Criticism in Ph.D. Supervision: A Qualitative Case Study.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (4): 511–526. doi:10.1080/03075070701476225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. 2015. “What Works for Doctoral Students in Completing Their Thesis?” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (2): 183–196. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.974025.
   Google Scholar
• Litalien, D., and F. Guay. 2015. “Dropout Intentions in Ph.D. Studies: A Comprehensive Model Based on Interpersonal Relationships and Motivational Resources.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 41: 218–231. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louie, B. Y., D. J. Drevdahl, J. M. Purdy, and R. W. Stackman. 2003. “Advancing the Scholarship of Teaching through Collaborative Self-study.” The Journal of Higher Education 74 (2): 150–171. doi:10.1080/00221546.2003.11777194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. E. 2001. Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lundell, D. B., and R. Beach. 2003. “Dissertation Writers’ Negotiations with Competing Activity Systems.” In Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives, edited by C. Bazerman and D. R. Russell, 583–514. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. 2006. “Literature Reviews of, and for, Educational Research: A Commentary on Boote and Beile’s ‘Scholars before Researchers’.” Educational Researcher 35 (9): 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. 2014. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., and C. Amundsen. 2009. “Identity and Agency: Pleasures and Collegiality among the Challenges of the Doctoral Journey.” Studies in Continuing Education 31 (2): 109–125. doi:10.1080/01580370902927378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, C. 2009. “Stories Return Personal Narrative Ways of Knowing to the Professional Development of Doctoral Supervisors.” Studies in Continuing Education 31 (2): 141–156. doi:10.1080/01580370902927485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. 2001. “The Pedagogy of Writing across the Curriculum.” In Composition Pedagogies, edited by G. Tate, A. Rupiper, and K. Schick, 149–164. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Most, D. E. 2008–2009. “Patterns of Doctoral Student Degree Completion: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Journal of College Student Retention 10 (2): 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Odena, O., and H. Burgess. 2017. “How Doctoral Students and Graduates Describe Facilitating Experiences and Strategies for Their Thesis Writing Learning Process: A Qualitative Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 572–590. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overall, N. C., K. L. Deane, and E. R. Peterson. 2011. “Promoting Doctoral Students’ Research Self-efficacy: Combining Academic Guidance with Autonomy Support.” Higher Education Research and Development 30: 791–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papen, U., and V. Thériault. 2018. “Writing Retreats as a Milestone in the Development of PhD Students’ Sense of Self as Academic Writers.” Studies in Continuing Education 40 (2): 166–180. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2017.1396973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. 2007. Redefining the Doctorate. Heslington: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, S., and H. Green, eds. 2007. The Doctorate Worldwide. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. A. 1998. Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Räsänen, K., and K. Korpiaho. 2011. “Supporting Doctoral Students in their Professional Identity Projects.” Studies in Continuing Education 33 (1): 19–31. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2010.515568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skakni, I. 2018. “Doctoral Studies as an Initiatory Trial: Expected and Taken-for-granted Practices that Impede PhD Students’ Progress.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (8): 927–944. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1449742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. C. 2007. “Reform the PhD System or Close It Down.” Nature 472: 261.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. 1993. Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. 2010. “More than a Matter of Cognition: An Exploration of Affective Writing Problems of Post-graduate Students and their Possible Solutions.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (2): 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinner, L. 2016. Professionals in Doctoral Education. Vienna: PRIDE Network.
   Google Scholar