Obstacles, facilitators, and needs in doctoral writing: A systematic review

Bibliography

• Adamek, M. 2015. “Building Scholarly Writers: Student Perspectives on Peer Review in a Doctoral Writing Seminar.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 35 (1–2): 213–225. doi:10.1080/08841233.2014.995333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitchison, C., and A. Lee. 2006. “Research Writing: Problems and Pedagogies.” Teaching in Higher Education 11(11):265-278. doi:10.1080/13562510600680574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badenhorst, C., and C. Guerin 2016. Research Literacies and Writing Pedagogies for Masters and Doctoral Writers. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. 2003. “Speech Acts, Genres, and Activity Systems: How Texts Organize Activity and People.” In What Writing Does and How It Does It An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual, edited by C. Bazerman, and P. Prior, 309–339. New Jersey: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. 2013. “Understanding the Lifelong Journey of Writing Development.” Infancia y Aprendizaje 36 (4): 421–441. doi:10.1174/021037013808200320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., and M. Scardamalia. 1992. “Dos Modelos Explicativos de los Procesos de Composición Escrita.” Infancia y Aprendizaje 15:43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C., and T. Huckin. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C., T. Huckin, and J. Ackerman. 1988. “Conventions, Conversations, and the Writer: Case Study of a Student in a Rethoric Ph.D. Program.” Research in the Teaching of English 22 (1): 9–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks-Gillies, M., E. Garcia, and S. Kim. 2020. “Introduction: Graduate Writing Across the Disciplines.” In Graduate Writing Across the Disciplines: Identifying, Teaching, and Supporting, edited by M. Brooks-Gillies, E. Garcia, S. Kim, K. Manthey, and T. Smith, 3–19. Colorado: WAC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks-Gillies, M., E. Garcia, S. Kim, K. Manthey, and T. Smith, eds. 2020. Graduate Writing Across the Disciplines: Identifying, Teaching, and Supporting. Colorado: WAC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Caffarella, R., and B. Barnett. 2000. “Teaching Doctoral Students to Become Scholarly Writers: The Importance of Giving and Receiving Critiques.” Studies in Higher Education 25 (1): 39–52. doi:10.1080/030750700116000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can, G., and A. Walker. 2011. “A Model for Doctoral Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Written Feedback for Academic Writing.” Research in Higher Education 52 (5): 508–536. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9204-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can, G., and A. Walker. 2014. “Social Science Doctoral Students’ Needs and Preferences for Written Feedback.” Higher Education 68 (2): 303–318. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9713-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelló, M. 2016. “Escribir Artículos de Investigación. Aprender a Desarrollar la voz y la Identidad del Investigador Novel.” In Enseñar a Leer y Escribir en la Educación Superior. Propuestas Educativas Basadas en la Investigación, edited by G. Bañales, M. Castelló, and N. Vega, 211–232. Libros Digitales.
   Google Scholar
• Castelló, M., D. González, and A. Iñesta. 2010. “La Regulación de la Escritura Académica en el Doctorado: El Impacto de la Revisión Colaborativa en los Textos.” Revista Española de Pedagogía 68 (247): 521–537. doi:10.2307/23766358.
   Google Scholar
• Castelló, M., A. Iñesta, and C. Monereo. 2009. “Towards Self-Regulated Academic Writing: An Exploratory Study with Graduate Students in a Situated Learning Environment.” Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology 7(3):1107–1130. doi:10.25115/ejrep.v7i19.1336
   Google Scholar
• Chakma, U., B. Li, and G. Kabuhung. 2021. “Creating Online Metacognitive Spaces: Graduate Research Writing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Issues in Educational Research 31 (1): 37–55. http://www.iier.org.au/iier31/chakma.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciampa, K., and Z. Wolfe. 2020. “From Isolation to Collaboration: Creating an Intentional Community of Practice Within the Doctoral Dissertation Proposal Writing Process.” Teaching in Higher Education, in press, doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1822313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, L. 2014. “Los Vínculos Personales en la Producción de Tesis Doctorales.” Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa 16 (2): 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium on Graduate Communication. n.d. Home. Retrieved August 10, 2021, from https://www.gradconsortium.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Coterall, S. 2011. “Doctoral Students Writing: Where's the Pedagogy?” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (4): 413–425. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.560381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, D., C. Spark, and E. Burke. 2009. “Disciplining Writing: The Case for Multi-Disciplinary Writing Groups to Support Writing for Publication by Higher Degree by Research Candidates In The Humanities, Arts And Social Sciences.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (2): 137–149. doi:10.1080/07294360902725025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didactext. 2003. “Modelo Sociocognitivo, Pragmalingüístico y Didáctico Para la Producción de Textos Escritos.” Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura 15: 077–104. doi:10.5209/DIDA.20310.
   Google Scholar
• Didactext. 2016. “Nuevo Marco Para la Producción de Textos Académicos.” Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura 27 (0): 219–254. doi:10.5209/rev_DIDA.2015.v27.50871.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, T. 2009. “The ‘Write’ Skills and More: A Thesis Writing Group for Doctoral Students.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 33 (2): 285–297. doi:10.1080/03098260902734968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., C. Brock, T. Frahm, A. Van Wig, and V. Gillis. 2020. “Reflections on Writing and Identity: Exploring the Role of Qualifying Exams in the Sociocultural Development of Doctoral Students.” Studies in Continuing Education 42 (3): 365–380. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2019.1661237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L., and J. Hayes. 1981. “A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 32 (4): 365–387.
   Google Scholar
• González, G., and M. Castelló. 2018. “Writing in Doctoral Programs: Examining Supervisors’ Perspectives.” Higher Education 76 (3): 387–401. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0214-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., and L. Crosta. 2019. “New Perspectives in Online Doctoral Supervision: A Systematic Literature Review.” Studies in Continuing Education 41 (2): 173–190. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2018.1532405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haswell, R. 2005. “NCTE/CCCC’s Recent War on Scholarship.” Written Communication 22(22):198–223. doi:10.1177/0741088305275367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haswell, R. 2008. “Teaching of Writing in Higher Education.” In Handbook of Writing Research, edited by C. Bazerman, 405–424. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, R., and B. Simpson. 2012. “Writes of Passage: Writing up Qualitative Data as a Threshold Concept in Doctoral Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (6): 735–746. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.678328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye, K., and L. McAlpine. 2017. “Developing Scholarly Identity: Variation in Agentive Responses to Supervisor Feedback.” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 14(2):35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R. 1998. Writing and Identity. The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R., and D. Camps. 2001. “I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (1–2): 3–33. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00034-0.
   Google Scholar
• Jalongo, M., W. Boyer, and M. Ebbeck. 2014. “Writing for Scholarly Publication as ‘Tacit Knowledge’: A Qualitative Focus Group Study of Doctoral Students in Education.” Early Childhood Education Journal 42(4):241–250. doi:10.1007/s10643-013-0624-3
   Google Scholar
• Kamler, B. 2008. “Rethinking Doctoral Publication Practices: Writing from and Beyond the Thesis.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 283–294. doi:10.1080/03075070802049236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozar, O., and J. Lum. 2015. “Online Doctoral Writing Groups: Do Facilitators or Communication Modes Make a Difference?” Quality in Higher Education 21 (1): 38–51. doi:10.1080/13538322.2015.1032003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, C.K.C., C.H. Hoang, R.K. Lau, B. Cahusac de Caux, Y. Chen, Q. Tan and L. Pretorius. 2019. “Experiential Learning in Doctoral Training Programmes: Fostering Personal Epistemology Through Collaboration.” Studies in Continuing Education. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2018.1482863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassig, C., L. Dillon, and C. Diezmann. 2013. “Student or Scholar? Transforming Identities Through a Research Writing Group.” Studies in Continuing Education 35 (3): 299–314. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2012.746226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., and B. V. Street. 1998. “Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23: 157–172. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., and R. Murray. 2015. “Supervising Writing: Helping Postgraduate Students Develop as Researchers.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (5): 558–570. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.866329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M. 2019. Reporting qualitative research in psychology. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. 2001. Student Writing: Access, Regulation, Desire. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T., and M. Scott. 2007. “Defining Academic Literacies Research: Issues of Epistemology, Ideology and Strategy.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 4 (1): 5–32. doi:10.1558/japl.v4i1.5
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. 2015. “What Works for Doctoral Dtudents in Completing their Thesis?” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (2): 183–196. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.974025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., J. Du, D. Zhou, and B. Huang. 2020. “Exploiting the Potential of Peer Feedback: The Combined Use of Face-to-Face Feedback and E-Feedback in Doctoral Writing Groups.” Assessing Writing, in press. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, L., and M. Boyle. 2016. “Avoiding the A.B.D. Abyss: A Grounded Theory Study of a Dissertation-Focused Course for Doctoral Students in an Educational Leadership Program.” The Qualitative Report Article 21 (9): 1574–1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonka, K., A. Chow, J. Keskinen, K. Hakkarainen, N. Sandström, and K. Pyhältö. 2014. “How to Measure PhD Students’ Conceptions of Academic Criting – and are they Related to Well-being?” Journal of Writing Research 5(3):245–269. doi:10.17239/jowr-2014.05.03.1
   Google Scholar
• Lonka, K., E. Ketonen, J. Vekkaila, M. Lara, and K. Pyhalto. 2019. “Doctoral Students’ Writing Profiles and Their Relations to Well-Being and Perceptions of the Academic Environment.” Higher Education 77 (4): 587–602. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0290-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S. 1994. Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, S. 2020. “Introduction. Valuing Lived Experiences and Community Mentorship.” In Learning from the Lived Experience of Graduate Student Writers, edited by S. Madden, M. Eodice, K. Edwards, and A. Lockett, 3–31. Colorado: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M., A. Fallucca, and H. Halasz. 2013. “Write On! Through to the Ph.D.: Using Writing Groups to Facilitate Doctoral Degree Progress.” Studies in Continuing Education 35 (2): 193–208. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2012.736381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell, D., H. Shalan, C. Stalker, and L. Caragata. 2015. “Writing for Publication: Assessment of a Course for Social Work Doctoral Students.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 35 (1–2): 197–212. doi:10.1080/08841233.2014.983662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., M. McGlynn-Stewart, and F. Ghafouri. 2014. “Constructing Our Identities Through a Writing Support Group: Bridging from Doctoral Students to Teacher Educator Researchers.” Studying Teacher Education 10 (3): 239–254. doi:10.1080/17425964.2014.949656.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L.S., J.M. Norris, D.E. White, and N.J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 160940691773384–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odena, O., and H. Burgess. 2017. “How Doctoral Students and Graduates Describe Facilitating Experiences and Strategies for Their Thesis Writing Learning Process: A Qualitative Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 572–590. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. Education at a Glance. doi:10.1787/889e8641-en
   Google Scholar
• Page-Adams, D., L. Cheng, A. Gogineni, and C. Shen. 2009. “Establishing Groups to Encourage Writing for Publication among Doctoral Students.” Journal of Social Work Education 31(3):402–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ 372 (71), doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papen, U., and V. Thériault. 2018. “Writing Retreats as a Milestone in the Development of PhD Students’ Sense of Self as Academic Writers.” Studies in Continuing Education 40 (2): 166–180. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2017.1396973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. 2009. “A Learning Community Approach to Doctoral Education in the Social Sciences.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (1): 43–54. doi:10.1080/13562510802602533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulson, L., and M. Wallace. 2004. “Learning to Read Critically in Teaching and Learning.” London: Sage, doi:10.4135/9780857024466.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P., and R. Bilbro. 2012. “Academic Enculturation: Developing Literate Practices and Disciplinary Identities.” In University Writing: Selves and Texts in Academic Societies, edited by M. Castelló and C. Donahue, 19–31. UK: Emerald. doi:10.1163/9781780523873
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. 1997. “Rethinking Genre in School and Society. An Activity Theory Analysis.” Written Communication 14 (4): 504–554. doi:10.1177/0741088397014004004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, D. 2002. Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History. 2nd ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sala-Bubaré, A., J. Peltonen, K. Pyhältö, and M. Castelló. 2018. “Doctoral Candidates’ Research Writing Perceptions: A Cross-National Study.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 13: 327–345. doi:10.28945/4103.
   Google Scholar
• Selbach, H., D. Motta-Roth, and A. Carvalho. 2018. “Academic Literacies: Appraisal and Social Sanction About Authorship and Scientific Integrity.” Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 18 (4): 703–736. doi:10.1590/1984-6398201812991.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, S. 2016. “New Frontiers in Graduate Writing Support and Program Design.” In Supporting Graduate Student Writers: Research, Curriculum, and Program Design, edited by S. Simpson, N. Caplan, M. Cox, and T. Phillips, 1–20. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starke-Meyerring, D. 2011. “The Paradox of Writing in Doctoral Education: Student Experiences.” In Doctoral Education: Research-Based Strategies for Doctoral Students, Supervisors and Administrators, edited by C. Amundsen, and L. McAlpine, 75–94. Montreal: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4
   Google Scholar
• Starke-Meyerring, D., A. Paré, K. Sun, and N. El-Bezre. 2014. “Probing Normalized Institutional Discourses About Writing: The Case of the Doctoral Thesis.” Journal of Academic Language and Learning 8 (2): A13–A27.
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., and V. Kumar. 2016. “Exploring Doctoral Students’ Perceptions of Language Use in Supervisory Written Feedback Practices–Because “Feedback is Hard to Have.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 39(2):122–138. doi:10.1075/aral.39.2.02str
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, M., G. Thomas, and E. Robinson 1992. “The Writing Experiences of Social Science Research Students.” Studies in Higher Education 17(2):155–167. doi:10.1080/03075079212331382637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacek, K., W. Donohue, A. Gates, A. Lee, and S. Simpson. 2019. “Seeking Balance Within Personal Writing Ecologies: A Collaborative Autoethnography of a Doctoral Student Writing Group.” Studies in Continuing Education. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2019.1703670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, C., É Tremblay-Wragg, C. Déri, I. Plante, and S. Chartier. 2021. “How Writing Retreats Represent an Ideal Opportunity to Enhance PhD Candidates’ Writing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation.” Teaching in Higher Education, doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1918661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M., and A. Wray. 2011. Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates. New Delhi: Sage Study Skills.
   Google Scholar
• White, W., and J. Grinnell. 2011. “The Ed.D. v2.0: Imagining a New Doctorate in Education.” In Higher Education and Human Capital: Re/Thinking the Doctorate in America, edited by D. Callejo, S. Fain, and J. Slater, 91–102. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S., and J. Cutri. 2021. “Novice Academic Roles: The Value of Collegiate, Attendee-Driven Writing Networks.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 16: 149–170. doi:10.28945/4700.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. 2004. What Does Good Education Research Looks Like? NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar