Mud acts as a noise dampener in Australian passerine nests

References

• Asuquo, U., Obisung, E., and Faithpraise, F. (2010). Sound absorbing properties of different density local acoustic materials. International Research Journals 1, 039–041.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, J. R., Crooks, K. R., and Fristrup, K. M. (2010). The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 180–189. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayne, E. M., Habib, L., and Boutin, S. (2008). Impacts of chronic anthropogenic noise from energy-sector activity on abundance of songbirds in the boreal forest. Conservation Biology 22, 1186–1193. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00973.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardi, U., and Iannace, G. (2015). Acoustic characterization of natural fibers for sound absorption applications. Building and Environment 94, 840–852. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beruldsen, G. (2003). ‘Australian Birds Their Nests and Eggs,’ Revised edn. (G & E Beruldsen: Kenmore Hills, Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Blickley, J. L., and Patricelli, G. L. (2010). Impacts of anthropogenic noise on wildlife: Research priorities for the development of standards and mitigation. Journal of International Wildlife Law Policy 13, 274–292. doi:10.1080/13880292.2010.524564
   Google Scholar
• Blickley, J. L., Word, K. R., Krakauer, A. H., Phillips, J. L., Sells, S. N., Taff, C. C., Wingfield, J. C. et al. (2012). Experimental chronic noise is related to elevated fecal corticosteroid metabolites in lekking male Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). PLoS ONE 7, e50462. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenrath, S. H., Dabelsteen, T., and Pedersen, S. B. (2004). Being inside nest boxes: Does it complicate the receiving conditions for great tit parus major females? Bioacoustics 14, 209–223. doi:10.1080/09524622.2004.9753526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brischoux, F., Meillère, A., Dupoué, A., Lourdais, O., and Angelier, F. (2017). Traffic noise decreases nestlings’ metabolic rates in an urban exploiter. Journal of Avian Biology 48, 905–909. doi:10.1111/jav.2017.v48.i7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooker, M., and Rowley, I. (1991). Impact of wildfire on the nesting behaviour of birds in heathland. Wildlife Research 18, 249–263. doi:10.1071/WR9910249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucur, V. (2006). ‘Urban Forest Acoustics.’ (Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg.)
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, G. C. (2014). Nesting and acoustic ecology, but not phylogeny, influence passerine urban tolerance. Global Change Biology 20, 803–810. doi:10.1111/gcb.12410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. L., and Koprowski, J. L. (2015). Animal occurrence and space use change in the landscape of anthropogenic noise. Biological Conservation 192, 315–322. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crino, O. L., Johnson, E. E., Blickley, J. L., Patricelli, G. L., and Breuner, C. W. (2013). Effects of experimentally elevated traffic noise on nestling white-crowned sparrow stress physiology, immune function and life history. The Journal of Experimental Biology 216, 2055–2062. doi:10.1242/jeb.081109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, E. N., Horn, A. G., and Leonard, M. L. (2013). Nest acoustics and begging call structure in nestling tree swallows. Animal Behaviour 85, 917–923. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, C. D., Paritsis, J., Ortega, C. P., and Cruz, A. (2011). Landscape patterns of avian habitat use and nest success are affected by chronic gas well compressor noise. Landscape Ecology 26, 1269–1280. doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9609-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and Hill, J. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/hierarchical Models. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, T., and Dawkins, M. S. (1991). Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Animal Behaviour 42, 1–14. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80600-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfwerk, W., Both, C., and Slabbekoorn, H. (2016). Noise affects nest-box choice of two competing songbird species, but not their reproduction. Behavioral Ecology 27, 1592–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfwerk, W., Holleman, L. J. M., Lessells, C. M., and Slabbekoorn, H. (2011). Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 210–219. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammad, R. N. S., and Gibbs, B. M. (1983). The acoustic performance of building façades in hot climates: Part 2 – Closed balconies. Applied Acoustics 16, 441–454. doi:10.1016/0003-682X(83)90011-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, D. (1994). Experimental evidence that nestling begging behaviour incurs a cost due to nest predation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 257, 161–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huet Des Aunay, G., Grenna, M., Slabbekoorn, H., Nicolas, P., Nagle, L., Leboucher, G., Malacarne, G. et al. (2017). Negative impact of urban noise on sexual receptivity and clutch size in female domestic canaries. Ethology 123, 843–853. doi:10.1111/eth.12659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kight, C. R., and Swaddle, J. P. (2011). How and why environmental noise impacts animals: An integrative, mechanistic review. Ecology Letters 14, 1052–1061. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleist, N. J., Guralnick, R. P., Cruz, A., and Francis, C. D. (2017). Sound settlement: Noise surpasses land cover in explaining breeding habitat selection of secondary cavity-nesting birds. Ecological Applications 27, 260–273. doi:10.1002/eap.1437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korner-Nievergelt, F., Roth, T., Felten, S. V., Guelat, J., Almasi, B., and Korner-Nievergelt, P. (2015). ‘Bayesian Data Analysis in Ecology Using Linear Models with R, BUGS and Stan.’ (Elsevier: London.)
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. L., and Horn, A. G. (2005). Ambient noise and the design of begging signals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272, 651–656. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3021
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. L., and Horn, A. G. (2008). Does ambient noise affect growth and begging call structure in nestling birds? Behavioral Ecology 19, 502–507. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. L., and Horn, A. G. (2012). Ambient noise increases missed detections in nestling birds. Biology Letters 8, 530–532. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. L., Horn, A. G., Oswald, K. N., and McIntyre, E. (2015). Effect of ambient noise on parent–Offspring interactions in tree swallows. Animal Behaviour 109, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucass, C., Eens, M., and Müller, W. (2016). When ambient noise impairs parent-offspring communication. Environmental Pollution 212, 592–597. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrath, R. D., Haff, T. M., Horn, A. G., and Leonard, M. L. (2010). Chapter 6 – calling in the face of danger: Predation risk and acoustic communication by parent birds and their offspring. In ‘Advances in the Study of Behavior. Vol. 41’. (Eds H. J. Brockmann, T. J. Roper, M. Naguib, K. E. Wynne-Edwards, J. C. Mitani, and L. W. Simmons.) pp. 187–253. (Academic Press: Burlington)
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. A. (2007). ‘Bayesian Methods for Ecology.’ (University Press: Cambridge.)
   Google Scholar
• McClure, C. J., Ware, H. E., Carlisle, J., Kaltenecker, G., and Barber, J. R. (2013). An experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds: Avoiding the phantom road. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280, 20132290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, E., Leonard, M. L., and Horn, A. G. (2014). Ambient noise and parental communication of predation risk in tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor. Animal Behaviour 87, 85–89. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mealings, K. T., Buchholz, J. M., Demuth, K., and Dillon, H. (2015). Investigating the acoustics of a sample of open plan and enclosed Kindergarten classrooms in Australia. Applied Acoustics 100, 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meillère, A., Brischoux, F., Ribout, C., and Angelier, F. (2015). Traffic noise exposure affects telomere length in nestling house sparrows. Biology Letters, 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennill, D. J., and Ratcliffe, L. M. (2004). Nest cavity orientation in black-capped chickadees Poecile atricapillus: Do the acoustic properties of cavities influence sound reception in the nest and extra-pair matings? Journal of Avian Biology 35, 477–482. doi:10.1111/jav.2004.35.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz, N. E., and Blumstein, D. T. (2012). Multisensory perception in uncertain environments. Behavioral Ecology 23, 457–462. doi:10.1093/beheco/arr220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parris, K. M., and McCarthy, M. A. (2013). Predicting the effect of urban noise on the active space of avian vocal signals. American Naturalist 182, 452–464. doi:10.1086/671906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., and Team, R. C. (2018). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. In ‘R Package Version 3.1-131.1.’
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, D. A. (2017). Coping with a changing soundscape: Avoidance, adjustments and adaptations. Animal Cognition 20, 9–18. doi:10.1007/s10071-016-0999-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, D. A., Curcio, M. T., Swaddle, J. P., and MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. (2016). Experimental exposure to urban and pink noise affects brain development and song learning in zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata). PeerJ 4, e2287. doi:10.7717/peerj.2287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, D. A., and MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. (2015). Traffic noise affects embryo mortality and nestling growth rates in captive zebra finches. Journal of Experimental Zoology A 323, 722–730. doi:10.1002/jez.1965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proppe, D. S., Sturdy, C. B., and St. Clair, C. C. (2013). Anthropogenic noise decreases urban songbird diversity and may contribute to homogenization. Global Change Biology 19, 1075–1084. [In 1354–1013]. doi:10.1111/gcb.12098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reethof, G., Frank, L. D., and McDaniel, O. H. (1976). ‘Absorption of Sound by Tree Bark.’ (USDA Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture: Upper Darby, PA, USA.)
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J., Nakagawa, S., Cleasby, I. R., and Burke, T. (2012). Passerine birds breeding under chronic noise experience reduced fitness. PLoS ONE 7, e39200. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Chen, S., Blair, R. B., Jiang, P., and Ding, P. (2009). Nest composition adjustments by Chinese bulbuls pycnonotus sinensis in an urbanised landscape of Hangzhou (E China). Acta Ornithologica 44, 185–192. doi:10.3161/000164509X482768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Dai, H. M., Chan, N. H., Ma, G. C., and Sheng, P. (2010). Acoustic metamaterial panels for sound attenuation in the 50–1000 Hz regime. Applied Physics Letters 96, 041906. doi:10.1063/1.3299007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, P. J., Hauber, M. E., and Price, T. D. (2007). Alternative nesting behaviours following colonisation of a novel environment by a passerine bird. Oikos 116, 1473–1480. doi:10.1111/oik.2007.116.issue-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar