Do beak volume and bite force influence the song structure of sympatric species of seedeaters (Thraupidae: Sporophila)?

References

• Areta, J. I. (2008). The entre ríos seedeater (Sporophila zelichi): A species that never was. Journal of Field Ornithology 79, 352–363. doi:10.1111/jofo.2008.79.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Areta, J. I., and Repenning, M. (2011). Systematics of the Tawny-Bellied Seedeater (Sporophila hypoxantha). I. Geographic variation, ecology, and evolution of vocalizations. The Condor 113, 664–677. doi:10.1525/cond.2011.100058
   Google Scholar
• Ballentine, B. (2006). Morphological adaptation influences the evolution of a mating signal. Evolution 60, 1936–1944.
   Google Scholar
• Baptista, L. F. (1996). ‘Apuntamientos para la historia natural de lós páxaros Del Paraguai y Río de La Plata’. (Imprenta de La Viuda de Ibarra: Madrid.)
   Google Scholar
• Barker, F. K., Burns, K. J., Klicka, J., Lanyon, S. M., and Lovette, I. J. (2015). New insights into New World biogeography: An integrated view from the phylogeny of blackbirds, cardinals, sparrows, tanagers, warblers, and allies. The Auk 132, 333–348. doi:10.1642/AUK-14-110.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumm, H., and Zollinger, S. A. (2011). The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research. Behavior 148, 1173–1198. doi:10.1163/000579511X605759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, K. J., Shultz, A. J., Title, P. O., Mason, N. A., Barker, F. K., Klicka, J., Lanyon, S. M. et al. (2014). Phylogenetics and diversification of tanagers (Passeriformes: Thraupidae), the largest radiation of Neotropical songbirds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 75, 41–77. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, K. J., Unitt, P., and Mason, N. A. (2016). A genus-level classification of the family Thraupidae (Class Aves: Order Passeriformes). Zootaxa 4088(3), 329–354. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4088.3.2
   Google Scholar
• Buskirk, J. V. (1997). Independent evolution of song structure and note structure in American wood warblers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 264(1382), 755–761. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0107
   Google Scholar
• Campagna, L., Silveira, L. F., Tubaro, P. L., and Lougheed, S. C. (2013). Identifying the sister species to the rapid capuchino seedeater radiation (Passeriformes: Sporophila). The Auk 130, 645–655. doi:10.1525/auk.2013.13064
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, G. C., and Mota, P. G. (2007). Song diversification and complexity in canaries and seedeaters (Serinus spp.). Biological Journal of the Linneal Society 92, 183–194. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00837.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsoso, G. C., Hu, Y., and Mota, P. G. (2012). Birdsong, sexual selection, and the flawed taxonomy of canaries, goldfinches and allies. Animal Behavior 84, 111–119. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.015
   Google Scholar
• Catchpole, C. K., and Slater, P. J. B. (2008). ‘Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations,’ 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., Kleindorfer, S., and Robertson, J. (2006). Song is a reliable signal of bill morphology in Darwin’s small tree finch Camarhynchus parvulus, and vocal performance predicts male pairing success. Journal of Avian Biology 37, 617–624. doi:10.1111/jav.2006.37.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• Derryberry, E. P., Seddon, N., Claramunt, S., Tobias, J. A., Baker, A., Aleixo, A., and Brumfield, A. T. (2012). Correlated evolution of beak morphology and song in the Neotropical woodcreeper radiation. Evolution 69, 2784–2797. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01642.x
   Google Scholar
• Endler, J. A. (1992). Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. The American Naturalist 139, 125–153. doi:10.1086/285308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz, I., and Fontana, C. S. (2013). Breeding biology of the Tawny-Bellied Seedeater (Sporophila hypoxantha) in southern Brazilian upland grasslands. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 125, 280–292. doi:10.1676/12-059.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, P. W., and Lemen, C. A. (2008). Measuring bite force in small mammals with a piezo-resistive sensor. Journal of Mammalogy 89, 513–517. doi:10.1644/07-MAMM-A-101R.1
   Google Scholar
• García, N., and Tubaro, P. L. (2018). Dissecting the roles of body size and beak morphology in song evolution in the “blue” cardinals (Passeriformes: Cardinalidae). The Auk 135, 262–275. doi:10.1642/AUK-17-146.1
   Google Scholar
• Genbrugge, A., Herrel, A., Boone, M., Hoorebeke, L. V., Podos, J., Dirckx, J., Aerts, P. et al. (2011). The head of the finch: The anatomy of the feeding system in two species of finches (Geospiza fortis and Padda oryzivora). Journal of Anatomy 219, 676–695. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01437.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudeau, M., Nolan, P. M., Black, C. E., Earl, S. R., Hasegawa, M., and McGraw, K. J. (2014). Song characteristics track bill morphology along a gradient of urbanization in house finches (Hamorhous mexicanus). Frontiers in Zoology 11, 83. doi:10.1186/s12983-014-0083-8
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. R., and Grant, P. R. (1979). Darwin’s finches: Population variation and sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 76, 2359–2363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grenier, J. L., and Greenberg, R. (2005). A biogeographic pattern in sparrow Bill morphology: Parallel adaptation to tidal marshes. Evolution 59, 1588–1595. doi:10.1554/04-502
   Google Scholar
• Herrel, A., Podos, J., Huber, S. K., and Hendry, A. P. (2005). Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin’s finches: Implications for the evolution of beak shape. Functional Ecology 19, 43–48. doi:10.1111/fec.2005.19.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrel, A., Podos, J., Vanhooydonck, B., and Hendry, A. P. (2009). Force-velocity trade-off in Darwin’s finch jaw function: A biomechanical basis for ecological speciation? Functional Ecology 23, 119–125. doi:10.1111/fec.2009.23.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Hoese, W. J., Podos, J., Boetticher, N. C., and Nowicki, S. (2000). Vocal tract function in birdsong production: Experimental manipulations of beak movements. The Journal of Experimental Biology 203, 1845–1855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, S. K., and Podos, J. (2006). Beak morphology and song features covary in a population of Darwin’s finches (Geospiza fortis). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 88, 489–498. doi:10.1111/bij.2006.88.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lack, D. (1947). ‘Darwin’s Finches’. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
   Google Scholar
• Linskens, H. F., Martens, M. J. M., Hendrikssen, H. J. G. M., Roestenberg-Sinnige, A. M., Browers, W. A. J. M., van der Staak, A. L. H. C., and Strik-Jansen, A. M. J. (1976). The acoustic climate of plant communities. Oecologia 23, 165–177. doi:10.1007/BF00361233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler, P., Slabbekoorn, H. V., and Bowman, R. I. (2004). ‘Nature’s Music: The Science of Birdsong’. (Elsevier Academic: Boston, MA.)
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. P., Doucet, S. M., Knox, R. C., and Mennill, D. J. (2011). Body size correlates negatively with the frequency of distress calls and songs of Neotropical birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 82, 259–268. doi:10.1111/jofo.2011.82.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, N. A., and Burns, K. J. (2013). Molecular phylogenetics of the neotropical seedeaters and seed-finches (Sporophila. Oryzoborus. Dolospingus). Ornitologia Neotropical 24, 139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, N. A., and Burns, K. J. (2015). The effect of habitat and body size on the evolution of vocal displays in Thraupidae (tanagers), the largest family of songbirds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114, 538–551. doi:10.1111/bij.12455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, E. (1975). Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. The American Naturalist 109, 17–34. doi:10.1086/282971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki, S. (1987). Vocal tract resonances in oscine bird sound production: Evidence from birdsongs in a helium atmosphere. Nature 325, 53–55. doi:10.1038/325053a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podos, J. (1997). A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberezidae). Evolution 51, 537–551. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02441.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podos, J. (2001). Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin’s Finches. Nature 409, 185–188. doi:10.1038/35051570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podos, J., Huber, S., and Taft, B. (2004). Bird song: The interface of evolution and mechanisms. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35, 55–87. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podos, J., and Nowicki, S. (2004). Beaks, adaptation, and vocal evolution in Darwin’s finches. BioScience 54, 501–510. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0501:BAAVEI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. J., and Lanyon, S. M. (2002). Reconstructing the evolution of the complex bird song in the oropendolas. Evolution 56(7), 1514–1529. doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[1514:RTEOCB]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing’. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.)
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, L. M., and Grant, P. R. (1985). Species recognition in Darwin’s finches (Geospiza, Gould). III. Male responses to playback of different song types, dialects and heterospecific songs. Animal Behaviour 33, 290–307. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80143-3
   Google Scholar
• Repenning, M., and Fontana, C. (2013). A new species of gray seedeater (Emberezidae: Sporophila) from upland grasslands of southern Brazil. The Auk 130, 791–803. doi:10.1525/auk.2013.12167
   Google Scholar
• Repenning, M., Rovedder, C. E., and Fontana, C. F. (2010). Another color morph of Sporophila Seedeater from the capuchinos group (Aves. Emberezidae). Iheringia Série Zoologia 100, 369–378. doi:10.1590/S0073-47212010000400012
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D. G., and Wiley, R. H. (1980). Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: Implications for animal communication. The American Naturalist 115, 381–933. doi:10.1086/283568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, A. L. (2010). Capturando aves. In ‘Ornitologia e Conservação: Ciência Aplicada, Técnicas de Pesquisa e Levantamento’. 1st edn. (Eds S. Von Matter, F. C. Straube, V. Q. Piacentini, I. A. Accordi, and J. F. Cândido Jr.) pp. 79–104. (Technical Books Editora: Rio de Janeiro.)
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. J., and Brenowitz, E. A. (1985). The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. The American Naturalist 126, 87–100. doi:10.1086/284398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, G. B., Brown, J. H., and Enquist, B. J. (1997). A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276, 122–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westneat, M. W., Long, J. H. Jr., Hoese, W., and Nowicki, S. (1993). Kinematics of birdsong: Functional correlation of cranial movements and acoustic features in sparrows. The Journal of Experimental Biology 182, 147–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G. (1978). Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 3, 69–94. doi:10.1007/BF00300047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. R., Bitton, P. P., Podos, J., and Mennill, D. J. (2014). Uneven sampling and the analysis of vocal performance constraint. The American Naturalist 183, 214–228. doi:10.1086/674379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar