Song rate and duetting in the Chirruping Wedgebill (Psophodes cristatus): frequency, form and functions

References

• ABOM (2016). Summary statistics Fowlers Gap AWS. In ‘.’ (Australian Bureau of Meteorology http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_046128.shtml)
   Google Scholar
• Ballentine, B. (2004). Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: An experimental test. Behavioral Ecology 15(1), 163–168. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, K. R. W. (1999). Design-based or prediction-based inference? Stratified random vs stratified balanced sampling. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale De Statistique 67(1), 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton, D. H., Roper, M. M., and Harmer, A. M. T. (2016). Female song rate and structure predict reproductive success in a socially monogamous bird. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 4(13). [In English]. doi:10.3389/fevo.2016.00013
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K. E., Cockburn, A., and Langmore, N. E. (2015). Female song rates in response to simulated intruder are positively related to reproductive success. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 3. doi:10.3389/fevo.2015.00119
   Google Scholar
• Catchpole, C. K., and Slater, P. J. (2008). ‘Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations.’ (Cambridge University Press.). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754791
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, M.J. (2012) ‘The R book.’ (John Wiley & Sons)
   Google Scholar
• Dalziell, A. H., and Welbergen, J. A. (2016). Elaborate mimetic vocal displays by female superb lyrebirds. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 4. [In English]. doi:10.3389/fevo.2016.00034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, D. E., Gallagher, R. V., and Griffith, S. C. (2017). Characterizing opportunistic breeding at a continental scale using all available sources of phenological data: An assessment of 337 species across the Australian continent. The Auk 134(3), 509–519. doi:10.1642/AUK-16-243.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elie, J. E., Mariette, M. M., Soula, H. A., Griffith, S. C., Mathevon, N., and Vignal, C. (2010). Vocal communication at the nest between mates in wild zebra finches: A private vocal duet? Animal Behaviour 80(4), 597–605. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farabaugh, S. M. (1982). The ecological and social significance of duetting. Acoustic Communication in Birds 2, 85–124.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, D., and Gahr, M. (2002). The honesty of bird song: Multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17(3), 133–141. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02410-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S., Vonhof, M., Stutchbury, B. J. M., Morton, E., and Quinn, J. (2005). No evidence for acoustic mate-guarding in duetting buff-breasted wrens (Thryothorus leucotis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57(6), 557–565. [In English]. doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0893-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, J., Slater, P., Dingess, K., Barker, K., and Mann, N. (2009). A comparative study of song form and duetting in neotropical Thryothorus wrens. Behaviour 146(1), 1–43. doi:10.1163/156853908X390913
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. L. (2004). A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55(5), 415–430. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0741-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. L. (2009). Chapter 3 A review of vocal duetting in birds. In ‘Advances in the Study of Behavior. Vol. 40.’ (Eds N. Marc, Z. Klaus, S. C. Nicola, and M. J. Vincent) pp. 67–121. (Academic Press.). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(09)40003-2
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. L., Rittenbach, M. R. D., and Vehrencamp, S. L. (2015). Female song and vocal interactions with males in a Neotropical wren. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 3, 12. doi:10.3389/fevo.2015.00012
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N., and Madow, W. G. (1953). ‘Sample Survey Methods and Theory.’ (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Prophietors.).
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. M. C., McNamara, J. M., and Cuthill, I. C. (1993). Song, sexual selection, starvation and strategic handicaps. Animal Behaviour 45(6), 1153–1177. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer, S., Evans, C., and Mahr, K. (2016). Female in-nest chatter song increases predation. Biology Letters 12(1), 20150513. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.0513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmore, N. E. (1998). Functions of duet and solo songs of female birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13(4), 136–140. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01241-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmore, N.E. (2002). Vocal duetting: definitions, Discoveries and Directions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17(10), 451–452.
   Google Scholar
• Logue, D. M., and Krupp, D. B. (2016) Duetting as a collective behavior. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 4, 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, R. (1987). ‘The dawn chorus in the great tit paras major is directly related to female fertility.’ Nature 330(6150), 745.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant, S., and Higgins, P. J. (2002). ‘HaHandbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds, Vol. 6: Pardalotes to Shrikethrushes.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, R. C., Buchanan, K. L., and Catchpole, C. K. (2003). Sexual selection and individual genetic diversity in a songbird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 270(Suppl 2), S248–S250. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0081
   Google Scholar
• Odom, K. J., Hall, M. L., Riebel, K., Omland, K. E., and Langmore, N. E. (2014). Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nature Communications 5. doi:10.1038/ncomms5972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podos, J. (1997). A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51, 537–551. doi:10.1111/evo.1997.51.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portelli, D.J., Barclay, H., Russell, D. J. F., Griffith, S. C., and Russell, A. F. (2009). Social organisation and foraging ecology of the cooperatively breeding chestnut-crowned babbler (pomatostomus ruficeps). Emu 109(2), 153.
   Google Scholar
• Riebel, K., Hall, M. L., and Langmore, N. E. (2005). Female songbirds still struggling to be heard. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20(8), 419–420. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. C. (2005). Male and female song structure and singing behaviour in the duetting eastern whipbird, Psophodes olivaceus. Australian Journal of Zoology 53(3), 157–166. doi:10.1071/ZO04083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. C., Langmore, N. E., and Mulder, R. A. (2007). Function of pair duets in the eastern whipbird: Cooperative defense or sexual conflict? Behavioral Ecology 18(1), 182–188. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, E. M., Yom-Tov, Y., and Geffen, E. (2004). Extended parental care and delayed dispersal: Northern, tropical, and southern passerines compared. Behavioral Ecology 15(5), 831–838. doi:10.1093/beheco/arh088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, P. J. B., and Mann, N. I. (2004). Why do the females of many bird species sing in the tropics? Journal of Avian Biology 35(4), 289–294. doi:10.1111/jav.2004.35.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenschein, E., and Reyer, H.-U. (1983). Mate-guarding and other functions of antiphonal duets in the slate-coloured boubou (Laniarius funebris). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 63(2–3), 112–140. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1983.tb00083.x
   Google Scholar
• Sorato, E., Gullett, P.R., Griffith, S.C., and Russell, A.F. (2012). Effects of predation risk on foraging behaviour and group size: adaptations in a social cooperative species. Animal Behaviour 84(4),823–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toon, A., Joseph, L., and Burbidge, A.H. (2013). Genetic analysis of the australian whipbirds and wedgebills illuminates the evolution of their plumage and vocal diversity. Emu 113(4), 359–366
   Google Scholar
• Yasukawa, K. (1981). Male quality and female choice of mate in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecology 62, 922–929. doi:10.2307/1936990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A., and Smith, G. M. (2009). GLM and GAM for count data. In 'Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R.' pp. 209–243. (Springer)
   Google Scholar