The conservation management implications of isolation by distance and high genetic diversity in Great Spotted Kiwi (Apteryx haastii)

References

• Allen, J. L., McKenzie, S. K., Sleith, R. S., and Alter, S. E. (2018). First genome-wide analysis of the endangered, endemic lichen Cetradonia linearis reveals isolation by distance and strong population structure. American Journal of Botany 105, 1556–1567. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allendorf, F. W. (1986). Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biology 5, 181–190. doi:10.1002/zoo.1430050212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allendorf, F. W., and Ryman, N. (2002). The role of genetics in population viability analysis. In ‘Population Viability Analysis.’ (Eds S. R. Beissinger and D. R. McCullough.) pp. 50–85. (The Chicago University Press: Chicago.)
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, S., and Ito, M. 2020. Where should wild species be sampled? New method based on isolation-by-distance objectively gives the answer. Molecular Ecology Resources n/a. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie, S. M., Ritchie, P. A., and Brunton, D. H. (2014). Population genetic connectivity of an endemic New Zealand passerine after large-scale local extirpations: A model of re-colonization potential. Ibis 156, 826–839. doi:10.1111/ibi.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A. J., Daugherty, C. H., Colbourne, R., and McLennan, J. L. (1995). Flightless brown kiwis of New Zealand possess extremely subdivided population structure and cryptic species like small mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92, 8254–8258. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.18.8254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berner, D. (2019). Allele Frequency Difference AFD – An intuitive alternative to fst for quantifying genetic population differentiation. Genes 10, 308. doi:10.3390/genes10040308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, O., Tocher, M. D., Gleeson, D. M., and Sarre, S. D. (2005). Effect of vegetation matrix on animal dispersal: Genetic evidence from a study of endangered skinks. Conservation Biology 19, 855–864. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3591075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BirdLife International (2016). Apteryx haastii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016, e.T22678132A92756666. Accepted 02 July 2020. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22678132A92756666.en
   Google Scholar
• Boessenkool, S., Taylor, S. S., Tepolt, C. K., Komdeur, J., and Jamieson, I. G. (2007). Large mainland populations of South Island robins retain greater genetic diversity than offshore island refuges. Conservation Genetics 8, 705–714. doi:10.1007/s10592-006-9219-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, B. (1998). Measures of divergence between populations and the effect of forces that reduce variability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15, 538–543. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C. N., and Sgrò, C. M. (2017). Aligning science and policy to achieve evolutionarily enlightened conservation. Conservation Biology 31, 501–512. doi:10.1111/cobi.12863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornuet, J. M., and Luikart, G. (1996). Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144, 2001–2014. Available at http://www.genetics.org/content/genetics/144/4/2001.full.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Conservation. (in prep.). Roroa (Great Spotted Kiwi, Apteryx Haastii) species plan 2019–2029. (Wellington, NZ.)
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, D. A., and Hardy, C. M. (2005). Dispersal and phylogeography of the agamid lizard Amphibolurus nobbi in fragmented and continuous habitat. Molecular Ecology 14, 1613–1629. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussex, N., Wegmann, D., and Robertson, B. C. (2014). Postglacial expansion and not human influence best explains the population structure in the endangered kea (Nestor notabilis). Molecular Ecology 23, 2193–2209. doi:10.1111/mec.12729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falush, D., Stephens, M., and Pritchard, J. K. (2003). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164, 1567–1587. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12930761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falush, D., Stephens, M., and Pritchard, J. K. (2007). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Dominant markers and null alleles. Molecular Ecology Notes 7, 574–578. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., Ralls, K., Eldridge, M., Dudash, M. R., Fenster, C. B., Lacy, R. C., et al. (2019). ‘A Practical Guide for Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations.’ (Oxford University press: Oxford, UK.)
   Google Scholar
• Germano, J., Barlow, S., Castro, I., Colbourne, R., Cox, M., Gillies, C., Hackwell, K., et al. (2018). Kiwi (Apteryx spp.) recovery plan 2018–2028. Department of Conservation Threatened Species Recovery Plan 64.
   Google Scholar
• Goudet, J. (1995). FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86, 485–486. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudet, J. (2005). HIERFSTAT, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Molecular Ecology Notes 5, 184–186. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00828.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosser, S., Abdelkrim, J., Wing, J., Robertson, B. C., and Gemmell, N. J. (2017). Strong isolation by distance argues for separate population management of endangered blue duck (Hymenolaimus malacorhynchos). Conservation Genetics 18, 327–341. doi:10.1007/s10592-016-0908-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grueber, C. E., Knafler, G. J., King, T. M., Senior, A. M., Grosser, S., Robertson, B., Weston, K. A., et al. (2015). Toll-like receptor diversity in 10 threatened bird species: Relationship with microsatellite heterozygosity. Conservation Genetics 16, 595–611. doi:10.1007/s10592-014-0685-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, O. J., and Vekemans, X. (2002). SPAGEDi: A versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2, 618–620. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedrick, P. W. (1999). Perspective: Highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53, 313–318. doi:10.2307/2640768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, J., and Daugherty, C. H. (2002). Genetic variation, systematics and management of kiwi. In ‘Some Early 1990s Studies in Kiwi (Apteryx Spp.) Genetics and Management. Science & Research Internal Report 191.’ (Ed. F. Overmars.) pp. 11–34. (Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand.)
   Google Scholar
• Hoban, S., Bruford, M., D’Urban Jackson, J., Lopes-Fernandes, M., Heuertz, M., Hohenlohe, P. A., Paz-Vinas, I., et al. (2020). Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 global biodiversity framework must be improved. Biological Conservation 248, 108654. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J., Eppink, F. V., and Robertson, H. (2015). Saving a national icon: Preliminary estimation of the additional cost of achieving kiwi population stability or 2% growth. Landcare Research contract report LC2136 prepared for Kiwi for kiwis/The Kiwi Trust, Private Bag 68908, Auckland 1145.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, P., Harper, G. A., and Gilchrist, J. (2013). Home range sharing in family units of great spotted kiwi (Apteryx haastii) at Nelson Lakes National Park. Notornis 60, 201–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, M., Edge, M. D., and Rosenberg, N. A. (2013). The relationship between FST and the frequency of the most frequent allele. Genetics 193, 515 LP–528. doi:10.1534/genetics.112.144758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, I. G., Wallis, G. P., and Briskie, J. V. (2006). Inbreeding and endangered species management: Is New Zealand out of step with the rest of the world? Conservation Biology 20, 38–47. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00282.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, L. (2008). GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Molecular Ecology 17, 4015–4026. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03887.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keye, C., Roschak, C., and Ross, J. (2011). Summer home range size and population density of great spotted kiwi (Apteryx haastii) in the North Branch of the Hurunui River, New Zealand. Notornis 58, 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Laikre, L. (2010). Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation. Conservation Genetics 11, 349–354. doi:10.1007/s10592-009-0037-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laikre, L., Hoban, S., Bruford, M. W., Segelbacher, G., Allendorf, F. W., Gajardo, G., Rodríguez, A. G., et al. (2020). Post-2020 goals overlook genetic diversity Ed J. Sills. Science 367, 1083 LP–1085. doi:10.1126/science.abb2748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, D. J., van Dorp, L., and Falush, D. (2018). A tutorial on how not to over-interpret STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE bar plots. Nature Communications 9, 3258. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05257-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, B. D. (2003). The demographic history of the New Zealand short-tailed bat Mystacina tuberculata inferred from modified control region sequences. Molecular Ecology 12, 1895–1911. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01879.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luikart, G., and Cornuet, J.-M. (1998). Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conservation Biology 12, 228–237. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matisoo-Smith, E., and Daugherty, C. (2012). Africa to Aotearoa: The longest migration. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 42, 87–92. doi:10.1080/03036758.2012.673495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, J., and McCann, T. (2002). Genetic variability, distribution and abundance of great spotted kiwi (Apteryx haastii). In ‘Some Early 1990s Studies in Kiwi (Apteryx Spp.) Genetics and Management. Science & Research Internal Report 191.’ (Ed. F. Overmars.) pp. 35–56. (Department of Conservation: Wellington.)
   Google Scholar
• Meirmans, P. G. (2012). The trouble with isolation by distance. Molecular Ecology 21, 2839–2846. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05578.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, L. S., and Allendorf, F. W. (1996). The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and management. Conservation Biology 10, 1509–1518. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10061509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ Donnell, C. F. J., Richter, S., Dool, S., Monks, J. M., and Kerth, G. (2016). Genetic diversity is maintained in the endangered New Zealand long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) despite a closed social structure and regular population crashes. Conservation Genetics 17, 91–102. doi:10.1007/s10592-015-0763-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orloci, L. (1978). ‘Multivariate Analysis in Vegetation Research.’ (W Junk Publishers: The Haugue, Netherlands.)
   Google Scholar
• Palsbøll, P. J., Bérubé, M., and Allendorf, W. F. (2007). Identification of management units using population genetic data. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, 11–16. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall, R., Ruibal, M., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation analysis offers new insights into gene flow in the Australian bush rate, Rattus fuscipes. Evolution 57, 1182–1195. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00327.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall, R., and Smouse, P. E. (2006). GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 288–295. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall, R., and Smouse, P. E. (2012). GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research - An update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537–2539. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, M. F., Franco, F. F., Bombonato, J. R., Bonatelli, I. A. S., Khan, G., Romeiro-Brito, M., Fegies, A. C., et al. (2018). Assessing population structure in the face of isolation by distance: Are we neglecting the problem? Diversity and Distributions 24, 1883–1889. doi:10.1111/ddi.12816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, J. C., Coates, D. J., Oostermeijer, J. G. B., Beissinger, S. R., Bragg, J. G., Sunnucks, P., Schumaker, N. H., et al. (2016). Genetic factors in threatened species recovery plans on three continents. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14, 433–440. doi:10.1002/fee.1323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piry, S., Luikart, G., and Cornuet, J.-M. (1999). Computer note. BOTTLENECK: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity 90, 502–503. doi:10.1093/jhered/90.4.502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., and Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959. Available at https://www.genetics.org/content/genetics/155/2/945.full.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, J. K., Wen, X., and Falush, D. (2007). ‘Documentation for Structure Software: Version 2.2.’ pp. 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Prunier, J. G., Kaufmann, B., Fenet, S., Picard, D., Pompanon, F., Joly, P., and Lena, J. P. (2013). Optimizing the trade-off between spatial and genetic sampling efforts in patchy populations: Towards a better assessment of functional connectivity using an individual-based sampling scheme. Molecular Ecology 22, 5516–5530. doi:10.1111/mec.12499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralls, K., Ballou, J. D., Dudash, M. R., Eldridge, M. D. B., Fenster, C. B., Lacy, R. C., Sunnucks, P., et al. (2018). Call for a paradigm shift in the genetic management of fragmented populations. Conservation Letters 11, e12412. doi:10.1111/conl.12412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramstad, K. M., Pfunder, M., Robertson, H. A., Colbourne, R. M., Allendorf, F. W., and Daugherty, C. H. (2010). Fourteen microsatellite loci cross-amplify in all five kiwi species (Apteryx spp) and reveal extremely low genetic variation in little spotted kiwi (A. owenii). Conservation Genetics Resources 2, 333–336. doi:10.1007/s12686-010-9233-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, M., and Rousset, F. (1995). GENEPOP (version-1.2) - Population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86, 248–249. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, B. C. (2006). The role of genetics in kakapo recovery. Notornis 53, 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, H., and Colbourne, R. (2003) . ‘Kiwi (Apteryx Spp.) Best Practice Manual.’ (New Zealand Department of Conservation: Wellington, NZ.)
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, H. A., Baird, K., Dowding, J. E., Elliott, G. P., Hitchmough, R. A., Miskelly, C. M., McArthur, N., et al. (2017). Conservation status of New Zealand birds, 2016. Department of Conservation New Zealand Threat Classification Series 19. Available at https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/science-and-technical/nztcs19entire.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCBD (2010). Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity at its tenth meeting. X/2. The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Available at https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-10/cop-10-dec-02-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCBD (2020). ‘Preparation of the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Recommendation submitted by the Co-Chairs.’ Available at https://www.cbd.int/conferences/post2020/wg2020-02/documents
   Google Scholar
• Schregel, J., Remm, J., Eiken, H. G., Swenson, J. E., Saarma, U., and Hagen, S. B. (2018). Multi-level patterns in population genetics: Variogram series detects a hidden isolation-by-distance-dominated structure of Scandinavian brown bears Ursus arctos. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9, 1324–1334. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. K., and McKelvey, K. S. (2008). Why sampling scheme matters: The effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conservation Genetics 10, 441. doi:10.1007/s10592-008-9622-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slatkin, M. (1993). Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47, 264–279. doi:10.2307/2410134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smouse, P. E., and Peakall, R. (1999). Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 82, 561–573. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6885180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. L., and Dizon, A. E. (1999). First policy then science: Why a management unit based solely on genetic criteria cannot work. Molecular Ecology 8, S11–S16. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00797.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. R., Colbourne, R. M., Robertson, H. A., Nelson, N. J., Allendorf, F. W., and Ramstad, K. M. (2017a). Cryptic inbreeding depression in a growing population of a long-lived species. Molecular Ecology 26, 799–813. doi:10.1111/mec.13977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. R., Dussex, N., and van Heezik, Y. (2017b). Bridging the conservation genetics gap by identifying barriers to implementation for conservation practitioners. Global Ecology and Conservation 10, 231–242. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toy, R., and Toy, S. (2020). Post-translocation dispersal and home range establishment of Roroa (Great Spotted Kiwi, Apteryx Haastii): Need for long-term monitoring and aflexible management strategy’. Notornis 67, 511–525.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlund, S. (1928). Zusammensetzung von populationen und korrelationrscheinungen vom standpunkt der vererbungslehre aus betrachtet. Hereditas 11, 65–106. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1928.tb02483.x
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, A. R., Thavornkanlapachai, R., Weiser, E. L., and Heinze, D. (2015). Conserving and enhancing genetic diversity in translocation programmes. In ‘Advances in Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna.’ (Eds D. P. Armstrong, M. W. Hayward, D. Moro, and P. J. Seddon.) pp. 127–139. (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, VIC, Australia.)
   Google Scholar
• Weir, B. S., and Cockerham, C. C. (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370. doi:10.2307/2408641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics 28, 114 LP–138. Available at http://www.genetics.org/content/28/2/114.abstract
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (1946). Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31, 39–59. Available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21009706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (1978). ‘Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 4: Variability within and among Natural Populations.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)
   Google Scholar