Establishing an online community of inquiry at the Distance Education Centre, Victoria

References

• Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 133–136. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). 3101.0 – Australian demographic statistics, Dec 2012. Canberra: Author. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/3101.0
   Google Scholar
• Bangert, A. W. (2009). Building a validity argument for the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 104–111. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27, 139–153. doi:10.1080/01587910600789498
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, P., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Educational presence in the community of inquiry model: The student’s viewpoint. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference on Distance Education and Learning. Retrieved fromhttp://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/05_2024.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, S. R., Swan, K., Ice, P., & Kupczynski, L. (2010). Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 22–30. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fåhræus, E. R. (2004). Distance education students moving towards collaborative learning: A field study of Australian distance education students and systems. Educational Technology & Society, 7, 129–140. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2007).Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11, 61–72. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2006). Online collaboration principles. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10, 25–34. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7–23. doi:10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 5–9. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, D. T. (2004). Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8, 61–74. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main
   Google Scholar
• Grant, L. (2009). “I DON’T CARE DO UR OWN PAGE!” A case study of using wikis for collaborative work in a UK secondary school. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 105–117. doi:10.1080/17439880902923564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1130–1161. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01484.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haavind, S. (2007). An interpretive model of key heuristics that promote collaborative dialogue among online learners. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11, 39–68. Retrieved fromhttp://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K., Cheung, W., & Ng, C. (2009). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science, 38, 571–606. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9087-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conole, G. (2008). Characterising the different blogging behaviours of students on an online distance learning course. Learning, Media and Technology, 33, 21–33. doi:10.1080/17439880701868838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 72–81). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences. doi:10.3115/1658616.1658627
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E. (2004). Recognising and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 421–431. doi:10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, R. D., & Archer, W.(1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education/Revue de l’Éducation à Distance, 14, 50–71. Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52, 543–553. doi:10.1007/s12528-009-9024-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Glazer, H. R., Engle, C. L., Harris, R. A., Johnston, S. M., … Trinko, L. A. (2007). Creating shared understanding through chats in a community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 103–115. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T. L., & Macdonald, C. J. (2006). Learners’ perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/325/744
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K. P., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. e-mentoring, 2(24), 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/eng/
   Google Scholar