References
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Oakland, CA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group LLC. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/
- Altbach, P. G. (2013, December 4). MOOCs as neocolonialism: Who controls knowledge? [Blog post]. WorldWise. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/moocs-as-neocolonialism-who-controls-knowledge/
- American Association of University Professors. (2009). Statement on professional ethics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/report/statement-professional-ethics
- Anderson, M. (1992). Imposters in the temple. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
- Baker, A. (2009). Small talk: Andrea Baker. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 2, 1–4. Retrieved from http://ijire.net
- Bassett, E. H., & O’Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 233–247. doi:10.1023/A:102131912520710.1023/A:1021319125207
- Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1989). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Birch, M., Elliot, D., & Trankel, M. A. (1999). Black and white and shades of gray: A Portrait of the ethical professor. Ethics & Behavior, 9, 243–261. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0903_5
- Briggs, L. (2013, September 5). Assessment tools for MOOCs. Campus Technology. Retrieved from http://campustechnology.com/Articles/2013/09/05/Assessment-Tools-for-MOOCs.aspx
- Bruhn, J. G., Zajac, G., Al-Kazemi, A. A., & Prescott, L. D. (2002). Moral positions and academic conduct: Parameters of tolerance for ethics failure. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 461–493. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.003310.1353/jhe.2002.0033
- Buchholtz, W. J. (1989). Deciphering professional codes of ethics. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32, 62–68.10.1109/47.31601
- Burman, M. E., & Kleinsasser, A. M. (2004). Ethical Guidelines for Use of Student Work: Moving from Teaching’s Invisibility to Inquiry’s Visibility in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. The Journal of General Education, 53, 59–79. Retrieved from http://www.psupress.org/journals/jnls_jge.html10.1353/jge.2004.0018
- Callahan, D. (1982). Should there be an academic code of ethics? The Journal of Higher Education, 53, 335–344. doi:10.2307/198175210.2307/1981752
- Carr, N. (2012, October 25). The ethics of MOOC research [Blog post]. Rough Type. Retrieved from http://www.roughtype.com/?p=2005
- Coughlan, S. (2013, September 24). Harvard plans to boldly go with ‘Spocs’. BBC Business News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24166247
- Daniel, J. S. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Seoul: Korean National Open University. Retrieved from http://sirjohn.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/120925MOOCspaper2.pdf
- Davis, J. E. (2014, February 7). MOOCs, trust, and the signature track [Blog post]. #FutureEd. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/future/2014/02/07/moocs-trust-and-the-signature-track/
- Dore, R. (1997). The argument of the diploma disease: A summary. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4, 23–32. doi:10.1080/096959497004010210.1080/0969594970040102
- edX. (2012, May 2). MIT and Harvard announce edX. MITNews. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/mit-harvard-edx-announcement-050212.html
- Erramilli, V. (2012). The tussle around online privacy. IEEE Internet Computing, 16, 69–71. doi:10.1109/MIC.2012.9210.1109/MIC.2012.92
- Esposito, A. (2012). Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10, 315–325. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org/
- Ess, C. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Chicago, IL: Association of Internet Researchers. Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
- European Commission. (2012, January 25). Commission proposes a comprehensive reform of data protection rules to increase users’ control of their data and to cut costs for businesses. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-46_en.htm?locale=en
- Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on Internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323, 1103–1105. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.110310.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103
- Felicio, D. M., & Pieniadz, J. (1999). Ethics in higher education: Red flags and grey areas. Feminism & Psychology, 9, 53–73. doi:10.1177/0959353599009001007
- Felzmann, H. (2013). Ethical issues in Internet research: International good practice and Irish research ethics documents. In C. Fowley, C. English, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Internet research, theory, and practice: Perspectives from Ireland (pp. 11–32). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.
- Frankel, M. S., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet: A report of a workshop. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved from https://nationalethicscenter.org/resources/187/download/ethical_legal.pdf
- Freeman, K. (2013, October 12). There is no business model for MOOCs yet [Blog post]. The Experts. Retrieved from http://blogs.wsj.com/experts/2013/10/12/there-is-no-business-model-for-moocs-yet/
- Girvan, C., & Savage, T. (2012). Ethical considerations for educational research in a virtual world. Interactive Learning Environments, 20, 239–251. doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.64167810.1080/10494820.2011.641678
- Grimes, J. M., Fleischman, K. R., & Jaeger, P. T. (2009). Virtual guinea pigs: Ethical implications of human subjects research in virtual worlds. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 2, 38–56. Retrieved from http://ijire.net
- Grossman, S. (2013, July 16). Bill Gates discusses MOOCs at Microsoft research’s faculty summit [Blog post]. Wired Campus. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/bill-gates-discusses-moocs-at-microsoft-researchs-faculty-summit
- Henn, S. (2013, May 14). Facebook users question $20 million settlement over ads [Blog post]. All Tech Considered. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/05/14/182861926/facebook-users-question-20-million-settlement-over-ads
- Hoser, B., & Nitschke, T. (2010). Questions on ethics for research in the virtually connected world. Social Networks, 32, 180–186. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.11.00310.1016/j.socnet.2009.11.003
- Jaschik, S. (2013, May 29). Inside higher ed: Harvard profs consider MOOC ethics. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/inside-higher-ed-harvard-profs-consider-mooc-ethics/2004244.article
- Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (2007). Ethical issues in qualitative e-learning research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 1–14. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index
- Kerr, C. (1994). Higher education cannot escape history: Issues for the twenty-first century. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Kolowich, S. (2012, June 11). How will MOOCs make money? Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/06/11/experts-speculate-possible-business-models-mooc-providers
- Kolowich, S. (2013, November 18). Angered by MOOC deals, San Jose State Faculty Senate considers rebuff. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Angered-by-MOOC-Deals-San/143137/
- Kuper, S. (2013, November 4). Why should colleges be doing MOOCS? Relationships. EDUCAUSE Review online. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/
- Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14, 202–227. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/index
- Marshall, S. (2013). Evaluating the strategic and leadership challenges of MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 216–227. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/index.html
- Mintz, S., Savage, A., & Carter, R. (2010). Commercialism and universities: An ethical analysis. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10805-010-9109-910.1007/s10805-010-9109-9
- Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 119–158. Retrieved from https://www.law.washington.edu/wlr/
- Open Learning Design Studio (2013). Research and ethical use of data. Retrieved from http://www.olds.ac.uk/about/olds-mooc-how-it-works/research-and-ethical-use-of-data
- Palermo, E. (2013, June 13). Forget the NSA: Your tech gadgets are spying on you. Yahoo! News. Retrieved from http://news.yahoo.com/forget-nsa-tech-gadgets-spying-170109659.html
- Paton, H. J. (Trans.). (1966). The moral law: Kant’s groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. London: Hutchinson.
- Pittenger, D. J. (2003). Internet research: An opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research. Ethics & Behavior, 13, 45–60. doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1301_08
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2013). Open letter to the President. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_edit_dec-2013.pdf
- Regalado, A. (2012, November 2). The most important education technology in 200 years. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/news/506351/the-most-important-education-technology-in-200-years/
- Rivard, R. (2013, April 25). The world is not flat. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/04/25/moocs-may-eye-world-market-does-world-want-them
- Robbins, J. (2013, March 25). The ethics of MOOCs [Blog post]. Sounding Board. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/sounding-board/ethics-moocs
- Rooke, B. (2013). Four pillars of Internet research ethics with Web 2.0. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11, 265–268. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/journal/1080510.1007/s10805-013-9191-x
- Rosenberg, Å. (2010). Virtual world research ethics and the private/public distinction. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3, 23–37. Retrieved from http://ijire.net
- Scriven, M. (1982). Professorial ethics. The Journal of Higher Education, 53, 307–317. doi:10.2307/198175010.2307/1981750
- Sharf, B. F. (1999). Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 243–256). London: Sage.10.4135/9781452231471
- Sharma, G. (2013, July 15). A MOOC delusion: Why visions to educate the world are absurd [Blog post. WorldWise. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/a-mooc-delusion-why-visions-to-educate-the-world-are-absurd/
- Smith, D. C., & Reynolds, C. H. (1990). Institutional culture and ethics. In W. W. May (Ed.), Ethics and higher education (pp. 21–31). New York, NY: American Council on Education & Macmillan.
- Spriggs, M. (2009). Consent in cyberspace: Internet-based research involving young people. Monash Bioethics Review, 28, 32.1–32.15. doi:10.2104/mber0932
- Trenholm, R. (2013, August 12). ‘Smart’ bins banned from grabbing your data as you pass by. CNET. Retrieved from http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/smart-bins-banned-from-grabbing-your-data-as-you-pass-by-50011969/
- Weeden, M. R., & Williams, G. (2012). Ethics and on-line research methodology. Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics, 9, 40–51. Retrieved from http://www.jswvearchives.com
- Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2010). Researching personal information on the public Web: Methods and ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29, 387–401. doi:10.1177/0894439310378979
- Yang, Y., Lutes, J., Li, F., Luo, B., & Liu, P. (2012). Stalking online: On user privacy in social networks. In Second ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy (pp. 37–48). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2133601.2133607
- Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 313–325. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9227-510.1007/s10676-010-9227-5