“I ‘feel’ like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment

References

• Angelino, L., & Natvig, D. (2009). A conceptual model for engagement of the online learner. The Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.thejeo.com/
   Google Scholar
• Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27, 139–153. doi:10.1080/01587910600789498
   Google Scholar
• Bexley, E., Daroesman, S., Arkoudis, S., & James, R. (2013). University student finances in 2012: A study of the financial circumstances of domestic and international students in Australia’s universities. Canberra: Universities Australia. Retrieved from http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/266786
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, S. (2005). Engaged learning: Are we all on the same page? Peer Review, 7, 4–7. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46, A39–A41. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory – A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., & Ransom, L. (2011). Dropout DNA, and the genetics of effective support. AUSSE Research Briefings, 11, 1–16. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/ausse/1
   Google Scholar
• Coffman, D. L., & Gilligan, T. D. (2002). Social support, stress, and self-efficacy: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 4, 53–66. doi:10.2190/BV7X-F87X-2MXL-2B3L
   Google Scholar
• Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2005). Collaborative learning in a contribution orientated pedagogy. In C. Howard, J. V. Boettcher, L. Justice, K. D. Schenk, & P. L. Rogers (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (pp. 277–283). Hershey, PA: Idea Group. doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-555-9.ch040
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, D. (2002). Deep in the heart of learners: Insights into the nature of online community. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/index
   Google Scholar
• Delahunty, J. (2012). ‘Who am I?’: Exploring identity in online discussion forums. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 407–420. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Dyment, J., Downing, J., & Budd, Y. (2013). Framing teacher educator engagement in an online environment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 133–149. doi:10.14221/ajte.2013v38n1.6
   Google Scholar
• Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners drop out. Workforce, 80, 53–58. Retrieved from http://www.workforce.com/
   Google Scholar
• Greenland, S. J., & Moore, C. (2014). Patterns of student enrolment and attrition in Australian open access online education: A preliminary case study. Open Praxis, 6, 45–54. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.6.1.95
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2007). Diversity, identity and belonging in e-learning communities: Some theories and paradoxes. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 709–720. doi:10.1080/13562510701596315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, R., Krause, K., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian Universities – Findings from 1994–2009. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, D., & Norton, A. (2014). Review of the demand driven funding system report. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge Books.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K. L. (2005, September). The changing of student experience: Who’s driving it and where is it going? Paper presented at the Student Experience Conference: Good Practice in Practice, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales. Retrieved from https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/39270/StudExpKeynote05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K. L., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies (Final Report). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyini, A. B. (2011). Exploring the effects of including students’ ideas and concerns on their participation in online groups. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde
   Google Scholar
• Long, M., Ferrier, F., & Heagney, M. (2006). Stay, play or give it away? Students continuing, changing or leaving university study in first year. Melbourne: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, G., & James, R. (2012). Staying relevant and current with online learning in an increasingly global and competitive environment. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 5, 26–28. doi:10.3991/ijac.v5i3.2171
   Google Scholar
• McInnis, C., James, R., & Hartley, R. (2000). Trends in the first year experience in Australian universities. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, K. (2012). Virtual classroom: Reflections of online learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29, 156–165. doi:10.1108/10650741211243175
   Google Scholar
• Middlecamp, C. H. (2005). The art of engagement. Peer Review, 7, 17–20. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Miliszewska, I., & Horwood, J. (2004). Engagement theory: A framework for supporting cultural differences in transnational education. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (pp. 223–233). Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/2004/PDF/P016-jt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B., & Geva-May, I. (2009). Attitudes affecting online learning implementation in higher education institutions. Journal of Distance Education, 23, 71–88. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde
   Google Scholar
• Moody, J. (2004). Distance education: Why are the attrition rates consistently higher than those in traditional courses? The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5, 205–210. Retrieved from http://www.infoagepub.com/quarterly-review-of-distance-education.html
   Google Scholar
• Muller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree-completion programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
   Google Scholar
• Open Universities Australia. (2013). Annual Report 2012. Melbourne: Author. Retrieved from http://www.open.edu.au/content/documents/annual-reports/OUA_Annual_Report_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, M., O’Kane, P., & Owens, M. (2009). Betwixt spaces: Student accounts of turning point experiences in the first‐year transition. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 37–54. doi:10.1080/03075070802601929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittaway, S. M. (2012). Student and staff engagement: Developing an engagement framework in a faculty of education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 37–45. doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n4.8
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. (2005). Belonging in a learning community: The re-imagined university and imagined social capital. Studies in the Education of Adults, 37, 4–17. Retrieved from http://www.niace.org.uk/publications/academic-journals/studies
   Google Scholar
• Radloff, A., & Coates, H. (2010). Doing more for learning: Enhancing engagement and outcomes. Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (Australasian Student Engagement Report). Melbourne: ACER. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/ausse/12/
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, J. R., Gallagher-Lepak, S., & Killion, C. (2012). ‘Me and my computer’: Emotional factors in online learning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33, 100–105. doi:10.5480/1536-5026-33.2.100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: A strategic framework for e‐learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. Research in Learning Technology, 13, 201–218. doi:10.1080/09687760500376439
   Google Scholar
• Saltmarsh, S., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2010). S(t)imulating learning: Pedagogy, subjectivity and teacher education in online environments. London Review of Education, 8, 15–24. doi:10.1080/14748460903557613
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (2012). Engaging students across distance and place. Journal of the Australia and New Zealand Student Services Association, 39, 49–55. Retrieved from http://anzssa.squarespace.com/complete-editions/
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C., & O’Shea, S. (2012). Transformations and self-discovery: Women returning to study. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Todhunter, B. (2013). LOL – Limitations of online learning – Are we selling the open and distance education message short? Distance Education, 34, 232–252. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.802402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler-Smith, K. (2006). Early attrition among first time eLearners: A review of factors that contribute to drop-out, withdrawal and non-completion rates of adult learners undertaking eLearning programmes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2, 73–85. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/index.html
   Google Scholar