Social presence reconsidered: moving beyond, going back, or killing social presence

References

• Bickhard, M. H. (1992). How does the environment affect the person? In L. T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children’s development in social context (pp. 33–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 456–480. doi:10.1162/105474603322761270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105. doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147–166. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/j/IJET
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11, 8–26. doi:10.1080/08923649709526970
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1993). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29, 89–106. doi:10.1080/01587910802004860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehrwald, B. (2010). Being online: Social presence as subjectivity in online learning. London Review of Education, 8, 39–50. doi:10.1080/14748460903557688
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (2006). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R. (2010). The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning. In T. T. Kidd (Ed.), Online education and adult learning: New frontiers for teaching practices (pp. 124–139). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/AETID
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2014). Problems measuring social presence in a Community of Inquiry. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11, 19–30. doi:10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.19
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. (1994). Using communications media in open and flexible learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• McComb, M. (1994). Benefits of computer-mediated communication in college courses. Communication Education, 43, 159–170. doi:10.1080/03634529409378973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706–718. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Öztok, M. (2013). Tacit knowledge in online learning: Community, identity, and social capital. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22, 21–36. doi:10.1080/1475939x.2012.720414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztok, M. (2016). Cultural ways of constructing knowledge: The role of identities in online group discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 157–186. doi:10.1007/s11412-016-9233-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztok, M., & Brett, C. (2011). Social presence and online learning: A review of research. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(3). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/index
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6, 21–40. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/olj_main
   Google Scholar
• Riva, G. (2002). The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: The present and future of technology-based interactions. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 581–598. doi:10.1089/109493102321018222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers, P., & Lea, M. (2005). Social presence in distributed group environments: The role of social identity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24, 151–158. doi:10.1080/01449290410001723472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14, 50–71. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/index
   Google Scholar
• Shin, N. (2010). Beyond interaction: The relational construct of ‘Transactional Presence’. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17, 121–137. doi:10.1080/02680510220146887
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9, 115–136. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/olj_main
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C.-H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 131–150. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1603_2
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar