Innovating in the real world: exploring institutional effects on tertiary teacher innovations in New Zealand

References

• Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., & Yuhnke, B. (2016). 2016 NMC technology outlook for Australian tertiary education: A horizon project regional report, Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890/1826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672–682. doi:10.1111/bjet.12439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, A., Lawler, C., & Whitworth, A. (2008). Rules, roles and tools: Activity theory and the comparative study of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 456–467. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00838.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity theory in empirical higher education research: Choices, uses and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(2), 125–152. doi:10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, R. (2016). New Zealand productivity commission research note 2016/1: History of tertiary education reforms in New Zealand. Wellington: Productivity Commission. Retrieved from https://www.productivity.govt.nz/working-paper/history-of-tertiary-education-reforms-in-new-zealand
   Google Scholar
• Dron, J. (2014). Innovation and change: Changing how we change. In O. Zawacki-Richter & T. Anderson (Eds.), Online distance education: Towards a research agenda (pp. 237–266). Edmonton: AU Press, Athabasca University.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 1–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812774
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43, 960–974. doi:10.1080/001401300409143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, A., & Weiss, T. (2010). Understanding change in teachers’ ways of being through collaborative action research: A cultural–historical activity theory analysis. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 29–55. doi:10.1080/09650790903484517
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, J. (2009). Breaking down online teaching : Innovation and resistance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, D., Meyer, L. H., & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 17–30. doi:10.1080/13600800500283734
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., & Estrada, V. (2014). 2014 NMC technology outlook for Australian tertiary education: A horizon project regional report. Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A. (2014). Teaching and learning with technology in higher education: Blended and distance education needs “joined-up thinking” rather than technological determinism. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 206–221. doi:10.1080/02680513.2015.1009884
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, B., & Lentle-Keenan, S. (2013). Teaching beliefs and practice, institutional context, and the uptake of web-based technology. Distance Education, 34(1), 5–21. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.770432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. (2011). More than just story-telling: Cultural–historical activity theory as an under-utilized methodology for educational change research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 403–424. doi:10.1080/00220272.2010.513069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisewski, B. (2004). Implementing a learning technology strategy: Top–down strategy meets bottom–up culture. Alt-J, 12(2), 175–188. doi:10.1080/0968776042000216228
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. (2014). Technological innovation of higher education in New Zealand: A wicked problem? Studies in Higher Education, 41, 1–14. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey University. (2014). Shaping the Nation, Taking the Best to the World, The Road to 2025. Palmerston North: Main Massey University Campus. Retreived from: http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/about-massey/university-management/strategic-plan/strategic-plan_home.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Mcloughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In Proceedings Ascilite Singapore (pp. 664–675). Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008). Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 442–457. Retrieved from http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/1203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, M. B., & Mcpherson, M. (2007). Why designers cannot be agnostic about pedagogy : The influence of constructivist thinking in design of e-learning for HE. In L. C. Jain, R. A. Tedman, & D. K. Tedman (Eds.), Evolution of technology and pedagogy, Studies in Computational Intelligence (SCI), Vol. 62 (pp. 7–30). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, C. R., & Reinhart, C. J. (2008). Can we talk? Course management software and the construction of knowledge. On the Horizon, 16(1), 34–43. doi:10.1108/10748120810853336
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. L., & Schneiderheinze, A. (2005). Understanding innovation in education using activity theory. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 38–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: A strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. Alt-J, 13(3), 201–218. doi:10.1080/09687760500376439
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, J. (2008). Adopting a grounded theory approach to cultural-historical research: Conflicting methodologies or complementary methods? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 1–18 http://doi.org/doi:10.1177/16094069080070010110.1177/160940690800700101
   Google Scholar
• The University of Auckland. (2013). The University of Auckland – Strategic plan 2013–2020. Auckland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Westera, W. (2012). The eventful genesis of educational media. Education and Information Technologies, 17(3), 345–360. doi:10.1007/s10639-011-9162-z
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, A. (2005). The politics of virtual learning environments: Environmental change, conflict, and e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 685–691. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00549.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Backer, E. M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 21–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar