Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes

References

• Aragon, S. R., & Johnson, E. S. (2008). Factors influencing completion and noncompletion of community college online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 146–158. doi:10.1080/08923640802239962
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, J. G. (2014). Comprehending male and female levels of engagement in subsets of the National Survey of Student Engagement: Explicating the dynamics of gender role conflict as a mediating factor for males (Unpublished dissertation). Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, USA. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1370&context=dissertations
   Google Scholar
• Banna, J., Lin, M.-F. G., Stewart, M., & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11, 249–261. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e-learning: Using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education, 30, 5–21. doi:10.1080/01587910902845972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., … Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439. doi:10.3102/00346543074003379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987, March). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED282491).
   Google Scholar
• Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/index
   Google Scholar
• Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement (OSE) Scale. Online Learning, 19(4). Retrieved from https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/index
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
   Google Scholar
• Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2008). Beyond the theoretical impasse: Extending the applications of transactional distance theory. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.541
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R., & Shea, P. (2005). The student in the online classroom. In S. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 145–168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555–575. doi:10.1023/A:1020114231387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. D. (2008, November). Strengthening student engagement. Rexford, NY: International Center for Leadership in Education. Retrieved from http://www.cesdp.nmhu.edu/prof-learning/docs/Teaching%20and%20Learning/Student%20Engagement/Strengthen%20Student%20Engagement%20white%20paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H., & Gyorke, A. S. (2008). Rethinking distance learning activities: A comparison of transactional distance theory and activity theory. Open Learning, 23(3), 203–214. doi:10.1080/02680510802420050
   Google Scholar
• Kassandrinou, A., Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2014). Transactional distance among open university students: How does it affect the learning process? European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(1). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2009a). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20. doi:10.1002/ir.283
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2009b). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1991). Editorial: Distance education theory. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1–6. doi:10.1080/08923649109526758
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 44, 661–679. doi:10.2307/1980599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1980). Independent study. In R. D. Boyd & J. W. Apps (Eds.), Redefining the discipline of adult education (pp. 16–31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed. ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309–319. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/
   Google Scholar
• Nwankwo, V. (2013). The relationship between faculty perceptions and implementation of elements of transactional distance theory and online web-based course completion rates (Doctoral dissertation). Florida International University, Miami, USA. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/875/
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R. C., Swart, W., Zhang, A. M., & MacLeod, K. R. (2015). Revisiting Zhang’s scale of transactional distance: Refinement and validation using structural equation modeling. Distance Education, 36, 364–382. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1081741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101–109. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education, 75, 103–111. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, O. (2003). Student retention in online, open and distance learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836–1884. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00544.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar