Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies

References

• Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18–32. doi:10.1037/a0022086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. C., Lampley, J. H., & Good, D. W. (2013). Learner satisfaction in online learning: An analysis of the perceived impact of learner-social media and learner-instructor interaction. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 6(21), 81–96. Retrieved from http://www.intellectbase.org/RHESL.php
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1–14. Retrieved from https://www.thejeo.com
   Google Scholar
• Ardichvili, A. (2008). Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: Motivators, barriers, and enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 541–554. doi:10.1177/1523422308319536
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), 1–30. Retrieved from https://www.thejeo.com
   Google Scholar
• Beck, V. S. (2010). Comparing online and face-to-face teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 21(3), 95–108. Retrieved from https://celt.muohio.edu/ject
   Google Scholar
• Chao, C.-Y., Hwu, S.-L., & Chang, -C.-C. (2011). Supporting interaction among participants of online learning using the knowledge sharing concept. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 311–319. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P.-S. D., Gonyea, R., & Kuh, G. (2008). Learning at a distance: Engaged or not? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(3), Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7. Retrieved from https://www.aahea.org/index.php/aahea-bulletin
   Google Scholar
• Cuthrell, K., & Lyon, A. (2007). Instructional strategies: What do online students prefer? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 357–362. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. K., & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, I. (2008). Increasing the success of online students. Inquiry:Tthe Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 13(1), 39–48. Retrieved from https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry/
   Google Scholar
• Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162. doi:10.1080/14703290252934603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner-instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301. doi:10.1111/jcal.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching online: A practical guide (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20–37. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPointe, D. K., Greysen, K. R. B., & Barrett, K. A. (2004). Speak2Me. Using Synchronous Audio for ESL Teaching in Taiwan. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5, 1. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v5i1.166
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2006). Print vs. electronic resources: A study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Information Processing and Management, 42(2), 583–592. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2004.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Parker, M. A. (2014). Use of synchronous virtual classrooms: Why, who, and how? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10, 192–210. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 228–261. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52–65. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement in online learning: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1–114. doi:10.1002/aehe.20018
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. J. (1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. John, & D. Keegan (Eds.), Distance education: New perspectives (pp. 19–24). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. Y. (2015). Student interactivity and teacher participation: An application of legitimate peripheral participation in higher education online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 389–406. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2014.935743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2007). Synchronous learning experiences: Distance and residential learners’ perspectives in a blended graduate course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6, 245–264. Retrieved from https://www.ncolr.org
   Google Scholar
• Reushle, S., & Loch, B. (2008). Conducting a trial of web conferencing software: Why, how, and perceptions from the coalface. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(3), 19x–28. Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/
   Google Scholar
• Reushle, S., & Mitchell, M. (2009). Sharing the journey of facilitator and learner: Online pedagogy in practice. Journal of Learning Design, 3(1), 11–20. Retrieved from https://www.jld.edu.au/index-3.html
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, B. C. P., & Armellini, A. (2013). Student engagement with a content-based learning design. Research in Learning Technology, 21(1), 1–10. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22106
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2007). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, A., & Cumming, K. (2007). Reflections on engagement in online learning communities. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 3(3), 35–46. doi:10.5172/ijpl.3.3.35
   Google Scholar
• Shackelford, J. L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Sense of community in graduate online education: Contribution of learner to learner interaction. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 13(4), 228–249. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavredes, T., & Herder, T. (2014). A guide to online course design: Strategies for student success. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Stepich, D. A., & Ertmer, P. A. (2003). Building community as a critical element of online course design‎. Educational Technology, 43(5), 33–43. Retrieved from http://www.bookstoread.com/etp
   Google Scholar
• Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X., & Lee, S.-H. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4, 1–19. Retrieved from https://www.ncolr.org
   Google Scholar
• Tuovinen, J. E. (2000). Multimedia distance education interactions. Educational Media International, 37(1), 16–24. doi:10.1080/095239800361473
   Google Scholar
• Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77–90. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1
   Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6, 339–362. Retrieved from https://www.aace.org/pubs/ijel
   Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22–36. doi:10.1080/08923649909527033
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. H. (2016). The correlation between types of instructor-student communication in online graduate courses and student satisfaction levels in the private university setting ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Carson-Newman University, Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, M. E., Peters, G., & Shelley, K. (2010). Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online learning experiences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3), 57–77. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, J. (2017). Learner-content interaction in distance education: The weakest link in interaction research. Distance Education, 38, 123–135. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1298982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, T. D. (2012). Exploring learner to content interaction as a success factor in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 152–165. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar