Shifting the focus from motivated learners to motivating distributed environments: a review of 40 years of published motivation research in Distance Education

References

• Abulibdeh, E., & Hassan, S. (2011). E-learning interactions, information technology self-efficacy and student achievement at the University of Sharjah, UAE. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 1014–1025. doi:10.14742/ajet.926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Belawati, T. (1998). Increasing student persistence in Indonesian post-secondary distance education. Distance Education, 19, 81–108. doi:10.1080/0158791980190107
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Brauer, A., Abrami, P. C., & Surkes, M. (2004). The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement. Distance Education, 25, 31–47. doi:10.1080/0158791042000212440
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2013). The influence of asynchronous video communication on learner social presence: A narrative analysis of four cases. Distance Education, 34, 48–63. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.770427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M. (1996). The role of internal and external factors in the discontinuation of off‐campus students. Distance Education, 17, 44–71. doi:10.1080/0158791960170105
   Google Scholar
• Cho, M. H., & Cho, Y. (2017). Self-regulation in three types of online interaction: A scale development. Distance Education, 38, 70–83. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1299563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. H., & Kim, B. J. (2013). Students’ self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 69–75. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M.-H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36, 80–99. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M.-H., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34, 290–301. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. E., & Menchaca, M. P. (2014). Investigating value creation in a community of practice with social network analysis in a hybrid online graduate education program. Distance Education, 35, 43–74. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.893813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J., & Kahl, T. N. (1983). Distance education and distance learning: Some psychological considerations. Distance Education, 4, 27–39. doi:10.1080/0158791830040102
   Google Scholar
• de la Varre, C., Irvin, M. J., Jordan, A. W., Hannum, W. H., & Farmer, T. W. (2014). Reasons for student dropout in an online course in a rural K–12 setting. Distance Education, 35, 324–344. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.955259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26, 127–148. doi:10.1080/01587910500081376
   Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–Learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28, 65–79. doi:10.1080/01587910701305319
   Google Scholar
• DeTure, M. (2004). Cognitive style and self-efficacy: Predicting student success in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 21–38. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1801_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387. doi:10.1108/09534811111132758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, D., Mankoff, C., & Carbrey, J. (2015). Coursera’s introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 46–68. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. D., Tobias, S., & Wisher, R. A. (2007). Learning anytime, anywhere: Advanced distributed learning and the changing face of education. Educational Researcher, 36(2), 96–102. doi:10.3102/0013189X07300034
   Google Scholar
• Garland, M. R. (1993). Student perceptions of the situational, institutional, dispositional and epistemological barriers to persistence. Distance Education, 14, 181–198. doi:10.1080/0158791930140203
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33. doi:10.1177/074171369704800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 187–194. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, D., & Bowman, M. (2003). Constructing knowledge at a distance: The learner in context. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 169–180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, A., & Matthiasdottir, A. (2004). Distributed learning in the Nordic Countries and Canada. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 7(2). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/
   Google Scholar
• Hanewicz, C., Platt, A., & Arendt, A. (2017). Creating a learner-centered teaching environment using student choice in assignments. Distance Education, 38, 273–287. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1369349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1–21. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, T. (1983). The social and psychological milieu of distance students. Distance Education, 4, 53–62. doi:10.1080/0158791830040104
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, A. (1988). A conceptual framework for understanding the transitions in perceptions of external students. Distance Education, 9, 5–26. doi:10.1080/0158791880090102
   Google Scholar
• Holzweiss, P. C., Joyner, S. A., Fuller, M. B., Henderson, S., & Young, R. (2014). Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences. Distance Education, 35, 311–323. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.955262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D. C. (1985). Reading and study skills and the distance learner. Distance Education, 6, 169–188. doi:10.1080/0158791850060203
   Google Scholar
• Hromalik, C. D., & Koszalka, T. A. (2018). Self-regulation of the use of digital resources in an online language learning course improves learning outcomes. Distance Education, 39, 528–547. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1520044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegede, O., Taplin, M., Fan, R. Y. K., Chan, M. S. C., & Yum, J. (1999). Differences between low and high achieving distance learners in locus of control and metacognition. Distance Education, 20, 255–273. doi:10.1080/0158791990200206
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29, 175–185. doi:10.1080/01587910802154970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. (1989). Opportunities for older learners: Older students in the open university. Distance Education, 10, 64–82. doi:10.1080/0158791890100106
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1989). An illustration, with case studies, of a linear-process model of drop‐out from distance education. Distance Education, 10, 196–211. doi:10.1080/0158791890100205
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. M. (2008). Using email to enable e3 (effective, efficient, and engaging). Learning. Distance Education, 29, 187–198. doi:10.1080/01587910802154988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingsieck, K. B., Fries, S., Horz, C., & Hofer, M. (2012). Procrastination in a distance university setting. Distance Education, 33, 295–310. doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.723165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning. New York, NY: Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuboni, O., & Martin, A. (2004). An assessment of support strategies used to facilitate distance students’ participation in a web-based learning environment in the University of the West Indies. Distance Education, 25, 7–29. doi:10.1080/0158791042000212431
   Google Scholar
• Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laaser, W. (1986). Some didactic aspects of audio-cassettes in distance education. Distance Education, 7, 143–152. doi:10.1080/0158791860070110
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. Y. (2015). Changes in self-efficacy and task value in online learning. Distance Education, 36, 59–79. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1019967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, P. (2011). Role of social presence and cognitive absorption in online learning environments. Distance Education, 32, 5–28. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.565495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. (1980). Do correspondence students need counselling? Distance Education, 1, 142–162. doi:10.1080/0158791800010202
   Google Scholar
• Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: Investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35, 217–233. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L.-F. (2006). A flow theory perspective on learner motivation and behavior in distance education. Distance Education, 27, 45–62. doi:10.1080/01587910600653215
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljoså, E. (1980). Some thoughts on the state of research in distance education. Distance Education, 1, 99–102. doi:10.1080/0158791800010107
   Google Scholar
• Maddrell, J. A., Morrison, G. R., & Watson, G. S. (2017). Presence and learning in a community of inquiry. Distance Education, 38, 245–258. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1322062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marland, P., Patching, W., Putt, I., & Putt, R. (1990). Distance learners’ interactions with text while studying. Distance Education, 11, 71–91. doi:10.1080/0158791900110106
   Google Scholar
• Marland, P., Patching, W., Putt, I., & Store, R. (1984). Learning from distance-teaching materials: A study of students’ mediating responses. Distance Education, 5, 215–236. doi:10.1080/0158791840050205
   Google Scholar
• Marland, P. W., & Store, R. E. (1982). Some instructional strategies for improved learning from distance teaching materials. Distance Education, 3, 72–106. doi:10.1080/0158791820030105
   Google Scholar
• Martens, R., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). New learning design in distance education: The impact on student perception and motivation. Distance Education, 28, 81–93. doi:10.1080/01587910701305327
   Google Scholar
• Menchaca, M. P., & Bekele, T. A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29, 231–252. doi:10.1080/01587910802395771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3, 1–7. doi:10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26, 29–48. doi:10.1080/01587910500081269
   Google Scholar
• Müller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree-completion programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–18. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.455
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., & Yum, J. C. (1998). Understanding Hong Kong distance learners. Distance Education, 19, 64–80. doi:10.1080/0158791980190106
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–53. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidu, S. (1994). Applying learning and instructional strategies in open and distance learning. Distance Education, 15, 23–41. doi:10.1080/0158791940150104
   Google Scholar
• Naidu, S. (2016). Mainstreaming open, flexible, and distance learning. In K. W. Lai, S. Stein, P. Field, & K. Pratt (Eds.), Our world in your place: 30 years of distance learning and teaching at the University of Otago (pp. 92–108). Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A. (1996). Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 7–16). London, England: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, C. (2006). The role of achievement goals in the completion of a course assignment: Examining the effects of performance-approach goals and combined goals. Open Learning, 21(1), 33–48. doi:10.1080/02680510500472189
   Google Scholar
• Ng, C. (2015). Learners’ goal profiles for learning over an academic year. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3), 86–109. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.1951
   Google Scholar
• Ng, C. (2016). Sustaining learning engagement in distance education: An achievement goal perspective. In C. Ng, B. Fox, & M. Nakano (Eds.), Reforming learning and teaching in Asia-Pacific universities: Influences of globalised processes in Japan, Hong Kong and Australia (pp. 115–134). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, C. (2017). Distance learners’ multiple goals, learning and achievement in different learning situations. Distance Education, 38, 37–58. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1298981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, C. (2018). “I learn for a job promotion!”: The role of outcome-focused career goals in motivating distance learners to learn. Distance Education, 39, 390–410. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1476839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, M. (2010). Student perceptions of support services and the influence of targeted interventions on retention in distance education. Distance Education, 31, 93–113. doi:10.1080/01587911003725048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, A. (2015). Building an online academic learning community among undergraduate students. Distance Education, 36, 115–128. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1019969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, S., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015). “I ‘feel’ like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36, 41–58. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1019970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostman, R. E., & Wagner, G. A. (1987). New Zealand management students’ perceptions of communication technologies in correspondence education. Distance Education, 8, 47–63. doi:10.1080/0158791870080104
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Yun, H. (2017). Relationships between motivational strategies and cognitive learning in distance education courses. Distance Education, 38, 302–320. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1369007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–Value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531. doi:10.1037/a0019243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruniak, G. (1983). Interactive perspectives in distance education: A case study. Distance Education, 4, 63–79. doi:10.1080/0158791830040105
   Google Scholar
• Philip, R., & Nicholls, J. (2007). Theatre Online: The design and drama of e-learning. Distance Education, 28, 261–279. doi:10.1080/01587910701611310
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 6, pp. 117–160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittenger, A., & Doering, A. (2010). Influence of motivational design on completion rates in online self-study pharmacy-content courses. Distance Education, 31, 275–293. doi:10.1080/01587919.2010.513953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72–89. doi:10.1080/08923640802039024
   Google Scholar
• Reio, T. G., & Crim, S. J. (2013). Social presence and student satisfaction as predictors of online enrollment intent. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 122–133. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.775801
   Google Scholar
• Remedios, R., & Richardson, J. T. (2013). Achievement goals in adult learners: Evidence from distance education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 664–685. doi:10.1111/bjep.12001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, B. (1987). Audio teleconferencing: Low cost technology for external studies networking. Distance Education, 8, 121–130. doi:10.1080/0158791870080110
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activities on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided appropriation and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alverez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sageder, J. (1988). Tests as means for promotion of learning from distance teaching. Distance Education, 9, 234–249. doi:10.1080/015879188009020
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1997). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samarawickrema, R. G. (2005). Determinants of student readiness for flexible learning: Some preliminary findings. Distance Education, 26, 49–66. doi:10.1080/01587910500081277
   Google Scholar
• Scales, K. (1984). A study of the relationship between telephone contact and persistence. Distance Education, 5, 268–276. doi:10.1080/0158791840050209
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Seiver, J. G., & Troja, A. (2014). Satisfaction and success in online learning as a function of the needs for affiliation, autonomy, and mastery. Distance Education, 35, 90–105. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.891427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, B. E., Hung, J.-L., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2017). Predicting student success by modeling student interaction in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 38, 59–69. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1299562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. J., & Smith, S. N. (1999). Differences between Chinese and Australian students: Some implications for distance educators. Distance Education, 20, 64–80. doi:10.1080/0158791990200106
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, R. (1986). Student dropout in distance education: An application of Tinto’s model. Distance Education, 7, 201–213. doi:10.1080/0158791860070204
   Google Scholar
• Tang, H., Xing, W., & Pei, P. (2018). Exploring the temporal dimension of forum participation in MOOCs. Distance Education, 39, 353–372. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1476841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. C. (1986). Student persistence in Distance Education: A cross-cultural multi-institutional perspective. Distance Education, 7, 68–91. doi:10.1080/0158791860070106
   Google Scholar
• Thistoll, T., & Yates, A. (2016). Improving course completions in distance education: An institutional case study. Distance Education, 37(2), 180–195. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1184398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. doi:10.3102/00346543045001089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todhunter, B. (2013). LOL—Limitations of online learning—Are we selling the open and distance education message short? Distance Education, 34, 232–252. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.802402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2008). How does motivation develop and why does it change? Reframing motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 119–131. doi:10.1080/00461520802178441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A., Graham, C. R., & Osguthorpe, R. (2013). Caring in a technology-mediated online high school context. Distance Education, 34, 97–118. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.770435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37, 208–223. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34, 302–323. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, J. (2012). Tutors’ influence on distance language students’ learning motivation: Voices from learners and tutors. Distance Education, 33, 365–380. doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.723167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K. U. I., Debacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 67–89. doi:10.2190/7BAK-EGAH-3MH1-K7C6
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Baldwin, S., & Snelson, C. (2017). Persistence factors revealed: Students’ reflections on completing a fully online program. Distance Education, 38, 23–36. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1299561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar